The Big Foot Legend
Pike's Peak Big Foot Crossing Sign
Does the Sasquatch truly exist? Are the numerous photos that supposedly show a large ape-like creature real? Regardless if you believe, there are reports all across the United States of sightings of this monstrous creature. It is believed to live in the Pacific Northwest region of North America among other very wooded sometimes mountainous terrains. The Sasquatch is often described as being humanoid, yet apelike. He walks upright, yet his arms hang down low like an ape. He's hairy and climbs trees like an ape, but shows great intelligence and stealth.
Most scientists dismiss the idea of a Sasquatch, because they believe that it is either a hoax, folklore, or misidentifying of a real thing. Then there is a belief it is a combination of some of these. Animal Planet even specializes in trying to identify this, in their series Finding Bigfoot. They have a skeptic that travels with the "Squatchers. " She identifies many of the falsehoods of these sightings or the possible errors. Amazingly, as the season has continued even she seems to become almost convinced.
What Does Bigfoot Look Like
One of the things that makes the Sasquatch reports so convincing is the similarities between many people's reports. The two best descriptions that most often pop-up when describing this elusive creature is ape-like and humanoid. It is believed to walk upright on two feet just like a human and stand somewhere between six and ten feet tall. It is covered in hair which is the big difference between the Sasquatch and humans. Their hair is usually dark brown or reddish brown much like an ape. Although there has been very few sitings of a white ape, that is believed to be an aged Sasquatch, or possibly an albino Squatch.
In someways, descriptions of the face seem reminiscent of Frankenstein with it's prominent brow, large eyes, and a large low set forehead.
Footprints that are claimed to have been made by the Sasquatch are two feet long and eight inches wide. The large majority of the prints found by the Sasquatch have five toes like most apes, although some have had as many as six and as few as two. So the prints have not been consistent, except in size. Some of the casts have had claws, which makes many people believe that the prints are truly made from bears not that of a Bigfoot!
It has a very strong odor, according to those who claim to have encountered it. It is also believed to be omnivorous and nocturnal.
Do You Believe Big Foot Is Real
History of the Legend
Before 1958, there are numerous stories, all describing similar features and habits. This giant creature has been given many names. One name early on was skoocooms, which was believed to be a cannibalistic madman. It was believed to have supernatural powers.
J. W. Burns was the first man to coin the phrase Sasquatch, which he wrote in a series for a local Canadian newspaper. Throughout the year of 1958, this new name and description became popular in Canada and soon the United States. The legend spread as one common legend shared by many, unlike the sporadic short stories spread earlier on.
Regardless of what the legends have said, or the possible sightings, even the strongest believers of Bigfoot will admit that around 80 percent of the so called sightings are merely fictional! Either people have misidentified a known species as a Bigfoot, or less likely they chose to fabricate a story for attention.
A Big Foot Print
The footprints have been found as early as 1951, and again in 1958 when the name Sasquatch became popular. It was originally believed to be a Yeti print, which is possibly a myth of the same unknown creature as the Sasquatch.
Over the years there have been over one thousand unidentified footprints that have been placed under evaluation as possibly from Bigfoot. They were either photographed and some were even made casts of for further examination. The prints have not always been consistent with varying amount of toes and claw marks. But there are some things that seem to remain consistent. They all seem to be flat footed. In a vast majority of the casts, the toes are longer proportionately than that of humans.
There is one notable inconsistency that actually makes the plausibility more likely. That is that the toe positioning is never consistent. For instance in some cases the toes are all next to each other, whereas other casts will show the toes splayed out. The reason this seems like it may be more plausible is because the animal is believed to live in the mountain areas. If the animal does have ranges of splaying or having it's toes close together this shows that the animal is well adapted for mountain walking. The toes allow the animal to have a nice grasp on the rocky terrain, and can better change it's steps for walking on flat land as well as rocky land.
Is it Just a Bear?
No matter how much common evidence we find, that matches the believed description, there are still going to be people who are critiques. Many people believe that the sightings have just been a bear standing on it's hind legs. A few problems with this line of thinking is the proportions are not correct. The legs of the pictures that have been taken show a creature with much longer legs and arms in proportion to it's body than that of a bear.
But even if it's not a bear, one must keep in mind that nearly 80 percent of the sightings are completely made up. There has never been any non-refutable evidence that has been discovered. How come more people have not seen it? Even if the animal had been able to elude human observation, it seems as if there would be some possible skeletal structure found in all of the many fossils that have been found in the North Western portion of North America. Though, if you think of how often you have walked through woods, how often have you seen skeletal remains of any creature? Even if you do find skeletal remains, how many are complete and easily identifiable.
© 2010 Angela Michelle Schultz