ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Is PETA a Good Thing for Animal Rights

Updated on October 22, 2014

Does the end justify the means?

Keeping animals safe is one of the primary responsibilities of the organization.
Keeping animals safe is one of the primary responsibilities of the organization. | Source

Every group of people with something to say want to make sure they are heard

Being loud does not always guarantee you will be heard.

There are definitely times when being loud is necessary, but not always. Sometimes talking softly or silence is heard too.

Lots of people believe animal protection is necessary at any cost

Animals have been validated as part of our history as far back as paintings created on the walls of caves millions of years ago. They have evolved side by side with humans over the eras. In fact, they have gone from ruling over man to man ruling over them. At this time in our history organizations have been founded to protect them from harm for a brighter future. One such establishment launched is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals or better known as PETA.

This is a group notorious for some of their bad behavior. The company slogan recognizes animals need our protection, but does the end justify the means?

A brief history of the group

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are an organization established in American over two decades ago. With over 3 million followers they have become an internationally recognized body of members devoted to animal protection.Documented founders are Ingrid Newkirk and Alex Pacheco.

Countless people recall their most renowned acts from the news such as throwing paint on fur coats and releasing caged animals used for scientific purposes. These are certainly true cases of actions performed by some members of the association, but not all. Catching the attention of the public in these brutal actions drew attention to the cause. In fact, the release of monkeys in cages being used for science experiments at a research facility put them on the map. This particular act of defiance tied up a court case for 10 years.

The argument was custody of the monkeys. Accusations of animal cruelty were documented and the researcher was charged with the offense and convicted. In the end it came down on the side of PETA with an amendment made to the Animal Welfare Act.

With annual revenue over 40 million and a staff of 300 they are an establishment with the money and resources to accomplish their goals. Headquartered in Virginia they have reached around the world to recruit followers and take action when they see the need.

What they stand for

The society has a primary focus to assure the safety and defense of all animals in farming, furriers, scientific testing and entertainment. Fishing and hunting is a definitely a no-no along with using them illegally in gambling, like dog fighting. Even animals killed for pest control are a working project for PETA.

Although crafted during the 1980s they are actually a spin off of a giant movement the United States made toward Veganism and Vegetarianism. Both lifestyles emerged in the 1970s and drew attention to the interaction of humans and animals in a way not seen before.

Disreputable behavior in the news

Animal rights activist have become infamous for negative public exploits created to attract attention in the press for their cause. The name PETA is certainly recognizable in the news spotlight. Information spread by television along with social networking capabilities of our time possible via the web allows millions to see and hear about them. This brings lots of discussion to the table about groups like PETA and how they are represented in the news.

Whenever anyone mentions this particular business the images coming to mind are always sensationalizing acts to save animals or embarrass humans hurting them. The techniques used are the type to bring scrutiny from law enforcement and strong personal opinions from people in all walks of life on the right or wrong way to get things done.

Actions bring results

Do the ends justify the means? Individuals running in the animal rights circles even disparage the group. Not necessarily for the results, but the methods used to make them happen. Getting an intended result is great, but what cost is too great?

They are certainly working toward protecting animals in all sorts of environments from harm. A few of the methods used are non-violent or passive, but they are admired by countless folks that love animals for the hard hitting ones acquired. Confrontations organized by the group make the headlines.

Some people claiming to be members condemn any mistreatment of animals by humans and feel change at any cost is all right. Even violence against people resulting in physical harm is acceptable if the action comes with necessary changes to increase animal protection. This has never been publically approved by the group. Though, there are a few cases of fringe members of a group or non-members tie themselves to a cause simply to commit violent acts.

Allegations of unlawful activity

One of the people criticizing acts made by the company includes US Senator Jim Inhofe. Claims of financial assistance in the form of grants for activists groups like the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) were made as far back as 2005. At the time the FBI had the ALF on their list of domestic terrorists. Any involvement with these kinds of groups has been repeatedly denied by PETA. Ties to business entities accused of atrocities like terrorism is not something any company seeks. No legal action has been taken by the FBI against PETA based on this unconfirmed report.

Animal research facilities have worked with the Department of Agriculture to stop what they have termed terrorist like activities at their business locations by groups like PETA, ALF and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF). The Department of Agriculture went as far in 2009 as submitted questionnaire forms to these facilities about clashes with any of these groups since 2004. Unfortunately this type of bad publicity overshadows lots of the excellent achievements made by PETA.

Changes need to happen

The organization was created for a cause countless people identify with. Mistreatment of any animal is not acceptable. Great things have been accomplished by PETA to help reduce atrocities and illegal activity which has festered for years. Yet, in order to continue to do great things regarding the protection of animals, bad things need to be eliminated from the agenda. History has shown us nonviolent actions are also used to achieve great change.

When the scuttlebutt about the organization is all about unlawful, violent or criminal activity the wrong type of members are attracted. Sometimes followers come forth simply to do harm without any regard for the cause behind an organization. Even criminals will affiliate in order to further their own illegal activity agenda with the belief its okay to do so.

Additionally, a negative reputation is never good when an entity is attempting to raise funds, change laws or recruit followers powerful enough to make significant changes to how things are currently being done.

More positive press is definitely a step in the right direction. In fact, having the same viral coverage for constructive exploits making things better for animals is what needs to take place.

Increasing membership to include people who are ready and willing to stay within the law to build better lives for injured animals is another avenue to take.

In conclusion

On the whole people are interested in what PETA says they stand for and encourage them to continue upholding the rights of animals and protecting them from harm. Though, methods which are negative involving illegal means or violence are not tolerated as a rule for these same folks.

Continuing down a negative road is never a good thing and groups following this lead die a horrible death. Historically this has happened again and again. It would be detrimental for lots of animals if all of the good things possible were cut short because the means doesn’t justify the end in the case of PETA’s actions.

Where do you stand on how animal rights groups like PETA operate?

Do you feel some of PETA's practices go too far?

See results

Want to know more about the group? Find out with this tidbit from Amazon

© 2014 smcopywrite


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • smcopywrite profile imageAUTHOR


      3 years ago from all over the web

      Lots of people do agree with that assessment. Unfortunately, this type of method only gets you so far. Other tactics should be used more often. Of course they wont make the news as much, but get more done for a good cause.

    • breakfastpop profile image


      3 years ago

      In my view PETA goes too far in trying to get their point across. They come across as fanatical lunatics.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)