ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Neal Adams versus Barry Windsor-Smith--who was the superior comic book artist?

Updated on December 4, 2010

Gritty realism and ornate elegance--which do you prefer?

The Adams Barbarian
The Adams Barbarian
The Windsor-Smith Barbarian
The Windsor-Smith Barbarian

Neal or Barry--who was best?

 

Barry Windsor-Smith and Neal Adams were two young men who reached the heights of their fame as comic book artists in the early ‘70s.  Both changed the way comics looked as perhaps no one before them ever had; Windsor-Smith with his stunning, elegant work on Marvel’s Conan the Barbarian, and Adams through the ultra-realistic Green Lantern/Green Arrow comic for DC.  These two artists transcended the medium with their stylized depictions of characters we were accustomed to viewing in the more traditional styles of Jack Kirby, John Buscema, and Gil Kane, and comic book fans quickly took notice.

These two artists were much alike, with magnificently rendered heroes and visually compelling worlds that looked real.  Green Lantern, Conan and the rest were drawn with an anatomical precision that artists had never before attempted in a comic.  They gave us far more than Superman flying in through the office window to greet Lois and Jimmy for the thousandth time.  They gave us something new and unique, with Adams’ Triton rising from the water on the first page of Avengers #95, arms and legs straining as the aquatic Inhuman pulls himself onto the pier.  On the first page of Conan the Barbarian #19, Windsor-Smith offered us a sullen Conan sitting alone on the deck of a great ship, watching soldiers tending to a wooden idol that represented their god.  Conan’s long hair flowed in the sea breeze, and his arms were muscular and tensed, even in repose.  Who was the better comic book artist?  These guys were both so good there is no wrong answer to this question, but let’s compare and contrast their styles and come to a conclusion.

Neal Adams.  Neal Adams did many of the covers for DC comics in the late ‘60s and early ‘70s, presumably in an effort to give DC a look that would draw in new fans.  His style was influenced by graphic illustration, and he worked with a fluidity and charm that no one equaled.  He created a quirky hero in a really cool red costume called Deadman, who roamed the earth as a ghost, looking for his killer.  Adams was the very best at making his heroes look real.  He was once quoted as saying something to the effect of, “if superheroes were real, they would look the way I draw them”.  No one disputed his claim.  His work for DC on Green Lantern/Green Arrow and Batman were of such high quality, his vision of these heroes became the standard for decades.  Deadman was a departure from the standard superhero format, as the main character usually inhabited other bodies to fulfill his purpose.  This character was so linked to Adams that for years, no other DC artist was allowed to draw Deadman. 

Neal Adams frequently tested the limits of comic book conventions, leaving blank areas for dialogue, drawing figures holding the comic cover’s logo, or looking for new ways to illustrate the human figure in action.  Although his efforts sometimes looked rushed, his experiments were usually successful.  His backgrounds were dark and gritty, suggesting a New York (or Gotham City) that might not be safe at night.  His action sequences were usually tight and powerful, and he did some wonderful work with Green Arrow and his bow.  He took Carmine Infantino’s Batman and pushed the envelope a step further with bold, powerful fight scenes—the Dark Knight never looked better.

Neal Adams was not perfect as a comic book artist, however.  Adams was sometimes inconsistent, as though he took too much time drawing the first half of a story and had to rush through the last ten pages.  (It was rumored he frequently missed deadlines.)  He wasn’t my favorite at designing the tights traditionally worn by comic book heroes and villains (Deadman and the X-Men’s Havok being notable exceptions).  It was hard to define what I didn’t like about his costumes, but I preferred the simpler designs.  The more complex his costumes were, the less I appreciated them.  Neal Adams suffered from the malady comic artists were frequently stricken with—his women didn’t look as good as his men.  I got used to the way he drew women, but the faces always looked the same, and I didn’t find them attractive.  As time passed he made his women prettier, and it became less of a problem.

In my opinion, his comic book work saw its peak in a one-shot large format comic teaming Superman with (of all people) Muhammad Ali.  In this comic, Adams combined the realism of Green Lantern/Green Arrow with a masterful rendition of Ali.  Thrown in for good measure was some of his best work ever on Superman.  The result was a joy to behold.

Barry Windsor-Smith.  Barry Windsor-Smith began working at Marvel as a Jack Kirby imitator, and you had to look hard at his earliest work on X-Men and Daredevil to see the promise this young artist held.  He was given a crack at Conan the Barbarian because Marvel couldn’t afford John Buscema, and the rest was comic book history.  He started slowly, but improved with each issue and by Conan the Barbarian #3, one could see that Windsor-Smith had talent.  He posed Conan in dramatic new ways, and his backgrounds were becoming increasing ornate and elegant.

Each successive issue of Conan displayed less of the Marvel “house style” and more of Barry’s considerable talents.  Windsor-Smith drew from classical art styles, and “art nouveau”, “art deco”, and “Pre-Raphaelite” were all terms used to describe his style.  Other artists relied on illustration techniques to craft comics, but Windsor-Smith preferred incorporating the methods of the Old Masters.  His work was so unique; it was sometimes difficult to find the right inker to complement his style.  Sal Buscema and Dan Adkins were considered good matches for him, but even they had their critics.  Windsor-Smith eventually solved this problem by inking and even coloring his own work, but this reduced his output even more.

As Windsor-Smith’s style developed, he showed how much he could do with the comic book medium.  Toward the end of his comics run, his action sequences were filled with perfectly proportioned men and women brawling in flawlessly choreographed fight scenes.  His backgrounds were among the most intricate in the history of comics, with shining towers rising toward the heavens; temples decorated with stained glass windows; icy mountains that sparkled from the cold; and, storm clouds forming overhead as Conan rode off on his horse.  His attention to detail wasn’t limited to backgrounds, either—ornate swords decorated with images of animals or demonic figures gleamed in the sunlight, fur boots looked like real fur, and no one drew fabric with as much detail as Mr. Windsor-Smith.

Barry had his flaws, though.  His faces, both male and female, needed work—noses in particularly were often poorly drawn.  His women were unattractive in both face and figure (a flaw he subsequently overcame when he left comics), and the men sometimes looked odd, as well.  Like Adams his work occasionally appeared rushed, as if he spent twice as long on the first half of a comic as he did the second half.  As a comic book artist he contributed very little to the Marvel cast of characters—in fact, I can’t think of a single superhero or villain he helped create.  Smith also seemed to lack versatility; while he did outstanding work on Conan and Dr. Strange, his efforts on mainstream superheroes were more uneven.       

His crowning achievement as a Marvel artist in my opinion was a story called “Red Nails” (adapted for the black and white magazine “Savage Tales” by Windsor-Smith and Roy Thomas from a Robert E. Howard story).  The first ten pages in particular were as beautiful as anything I had ever seen in comics, and Windsor-Smith added a grace and subtlety to his barbarian that was never equaled.

Who was the better comic book artist?  I have to give the edge to Neal Adams, who took mainstream heroes in new directions while offering his unique vision of the genre.  Windsor-Smith gave us a gorgeous Conan but little else. Who did I prefer of these two outstanding comic book artists?  Ask tomorrow and I might offer another answer, but I am going to say Barry Windsor-Smith.  The sheer beauty of his artwork enchanted me in a way the grit of Neal Adams’ art couldn’t.  To make a most direct comparison, they both drew Conan the Barbarian, and I preferred Barry’s version to Neal’s.  Both of them are among the greatest comic artists of all time and it almost feels wrong to pick one over the other, but my vote is for Barry Windsor-Smith.

Who's the best?

Who was the superior comic book artist?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Mike Lickteig profile imageAUTHOR

      Mike Lickteig 

      7 years ago from Lawrence KS USA

      Karl, thanks for your insightful comments. I am in total agreement the whole way--I think I liked Smith better, but Adams was the ultimate comic book artist. I also recently went back through Red Nails, and I am still impressed. It is simply magnificent.

      Mike

    • Mike Lickteig profile imageAUTHOR

      Mike Lickteig 

      7 years ago from Lawrence KS USA

      Thanks, Dave. It is indeed very difficult to decide between the two. I might choose Smith today, and Adams tomorrow. They were both unique and brilliant.

      Mike

    • profile image

      Karl Waller 

      7 years ago

      I appreciate your nuanced critiques of each artist. I was going through Red Nails just yesterday and while I was marvelling at the work, there are some points where barry still "didn't quite have it nailed down". The eyes in particular really stood out. He also occasionally pulls some very odd anatomy on the figures. Don't get me wrong, Barry Smith is the reason I draw. To this day I can't attempt a Conan drawing without it turning into a Smith impersonation. It seeme to me that that Barry's talent is more based on intellect whereas Neal's is just plain scary raw ability. Adams storytelling is as bulletproof as it gets and his ability to lay down those loose lines and still have his stuff look "tight" is almost supernatural. It's a tough call and although I worship at the Alter of 'Smith I have to hand the "better comic book artist" crown to Adams .

    • profile image

      Dave Morris 

      7 years ago

      I wouldn't know how to choose. Both artists were favorites of mine from way, way back. Both brilliant in different ways. Okay, if I can only have one, I'll go with BWS... But oh, what a hard choice to make!

    • Mike Lickteig profile imageAUTHOR

      Mike Lickteig 

      8 years ago from Lawrence KS USA

      Smith was fantastic but I like 'em both, Steve. Thanks for reading.

    • profile image

      steve 

      8 years ago

      Adams was more influential but Barry Smith was definitely the superior artist.

    • Mike Lickteig profile imageAUTHOR

      Mike Lickteig 

      8 years ago from Lawrence KS USA

      Hey, Waynet, thanks for your comments. It was tough for me to choose one over the other, also.

    • waynet profile image

      Wayne Tully 

      8 years ago from Hull City United Kingdom

      Now then, that is a hard one to figure out as they both are superior artists in the different comics that they have drawn, but mainly I've read more of comics with barry windsor smiths artwork in, so that's why I voted for him and I liked his Conan work.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)