ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Forensic Photography

Updated on August 25, 2010

The purposes for which photographs are produced in evidence in legal proceedings are broadly:

To provide a record of something that it would otherwise be difficult or impossible for the Court to see, e.g: scenes of serious crime as they appear before anything has been disturbed; vehicles which have been involved in collisions, photographed before any repair or salvage has been done; roads, buildings and other distant places which may be many miles from the Court; injuries which will have healed and be no longer visible by the time of litigation; copies of documents, the originals of which cannot be made available.

To present the results of an experiment or test (in many cases made in a laboratory) that it is not practicable to demonstrate in Court, e.g:, photomicrographs; photographs taken by ultra-violet fluorescence; photographs illustrating some test or measurement; comparison photographs demonstrating the simi larities between finger-prints, footprints, tool marks, fired bullets or cartridge cases, etc. To show something that only photo graphy can reveal (infra-red photographs and photographs taken with unusual filters).

This article is not concerned with how such photographs are taken; it deals only with their use as evidence in the Courts.

Photo by Julie Elliott-Abshire
Photo by Julie Elliott-Abshire


There must be no handwork on either negatives or prints to be used in evidence. Simple shading control during printing is permissible, and often indeed essential. But there must be no spotting, even where the filling up of a pinhole or two could not possibly lead to any misrepresentation. It is a legal axiom that not only must justice be done, but that it shall be manifest to all present that justice is being done. In the same way photographs should not only be free from faking; it must be clear that there could be no possibility of faking.

First and foremost, this calls for clean working in the darkroom. But if in spite of it the negative or print shows a flaw, the flaw must remain, and must be disregarded or explained in Court as need arises.

There should be no reconstruction of the scene for photography. No attempt should be made to replace anything inadvertently displaced. The photographer should simply record what is in front of his camera and explain, if necessary, any discrepancy between what the photograph shows and what witnesses describe.

There is no room for ingenious technical tricks in this field; the mere fact that photographs are being used to illustrate points of evidence implies a belief that the camera cannot lie, so all work should be as straightforward as possible. (Photographs produced under laboratory conditions of subjects normally invisible to the human eye are, of course, excepted). And the photographer should always assume that, while the members of the Court may know everything about the law, they know little or nothing about the technicalities of photography.

The following example illustrates this point: in a legal dispute over a road accident, one side produced photographs showing the view which the defendant would have had round a bend if he had been driving on his correct side of the road. The pictures were taken with a lens of normal focal length (i.e., 45-50 degree angle of view). The other side objected that there were only thirteen white-line dashes visible in the pictures, although it was agreed that there were in fact seventeen dashes between the camera position and the turn of the road. It required considerable explanation to establish that the photographs were a fair and accurate representation of what the defendant should have seen, and that no photograph could ever show all the foreground in front of the camera position unless the lens had an angle of view of 180 degrees.

Similar difficulties can also arise from the use of photographs of scenes artificially lit, e.g: streets at night, A lay court will expect the photographs to show neither more nor less-than an eye-witness could have seen. They will not usually be able to appreciate the effect of the cumulative sensitivity of the photographic emulsion, by which the amount of detail recorded in a photograph of a dimly lit scene depends entirely on the exposure time.

Court Procedure

The usual procedure for taking the evidence of a photographer witness runs something like this. First he takes the oath (unless he has conscientious objections to doing so, when a form of declaration may be substituted) and gives his name and profession or official status. He then states where, when and of what he took the photographs, that he made prints, which he produces, and that the negatives are in his possession. (He should take the negatives with him for inspection if requested, but they are rarely asked for.) He will then describe what the photograph, or each photograph of a series, shows. Finally, he may be cross-examined to bring out any point that the other side feels will be to their advantage. (The "other side" simply means the side that did not call him as a witness).

There is no recognized standard type of print for use in evidence. Single prints may be mounted on thin card with a brief descriptive caption. A series of photographs may be printed with a wide margin on the left-hand side, and then numbered and bound together bookwise in a light cover with a page of descriptive captions at the beginning.

The size of prints which should be produced depends on two things: perspective considerations, and the fact that they will be examined in the hand. The perspective should be as far as possible correct when the picture is held at the normal viewing distance. Prints should also be of a size convenient to hold. The size meeting both requirements best is generally something between 5 x 4 ins. and 12 x 10 ins.

The number of copies produced depends on the type of Court hearing the case. Where there is no jury, e.g:, in a Magistrates' Court, County Court or before a Coroner sitting without a jury- four copies should suffice: one copy for each side in the case, one for the Bench and one for the witness himself to refer to. In trials by jury twelve copies are needed.


Captions must be rigidly factual and descriptive; there must be nothing to imply the conclusion which one side or the other is seeking to establish. In a road accident case it would be proper to caption a picture:

"View along the Weston-Eastwich road, taken from point A looking in the direction of B." A caption which added, "... showing that B is clearly visible from the correct side of the road at A," would be objected to by the Court, and the photograph might be declared inadmissible as evidence.

With photographs of a more technical type, such as are used to illustrate comparisons of finger-prints, tool marks, etc., it is permissible and indeed often necessary to indicate the important points by means of, for example, ruled lines or arrows. But if any of the indicating lines unavoidably obscure any detail, even unessential detail, there should always be a plain unmarked copy of the photograph for reference.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)