ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Presenting: The 2011 Chrysler Fiat Cars - Part IV

Updated on June 10, 2009

A lot of hype has surrounded the supercute Fiat and soon to be Chrysler 500. Hey, it really is supercute in a 1960s Roman Holiday sort of retro motorized skateboard way. However, the biggest problem with the car is exactly the same as its biggest appeal. It's tiny. No, not just small, but incredibly microscopic!

Anyone who has ever been in a new Fiat 500 will confirm that there is absolutely no doubt that at least 30% of the North American population would not ever be able to squeeze themselves behind the steering wheel unless they removed the driver's seat and sat in the back! And even if you're able to do that, then you'll have to drive around with your window down 12 months of the year, otherwise your left arm will have to be held up over your head! And if you're not obese but six feet or over, your knees will be up around your ears!

Believe it or not, there is more usable, comfortable, ergonomic space in the driver's seat of a Smart Car than in a Fiat 500!

Sergio is soon going to find out that you can't support North America's third major automaker on novelty cars, nor are they likely to line up anytime soon for Alfa Romeo Breras or 159s that loaded out the door set the buyer back over fifty grand.

"Dang gum it, for that sorta money you'd figger you could git yerself a real car, not a scrawny lil Euro-toy! I can git me three Dodge Ram 1500 pickemup trucks for that same stack o' cash!"

Therefore, what are the prospects for Chrysler - Fiat? Sergio, my ol' bud, I am of the opinion that you didn't really think this one all the way through. (Or maybe you did, as you suckered your way into owning 20% of Chrysler without putting out one single Euro cent.)

Fact #1: Chrysler - Fiats cannot be sold before 2011. That's six long quarters away, a full year and a half. Exactly what do you expect your dealers to be selling in the meantime? Dodge Calibers that are literally being given away right now across North America and buyers still don't want them? How is what is left of Chrysler's dealer network going to keep paying the electric bill if they have no product to speak of, and Jeep and Dodge Ram simply isn't enough to stay open?

Fact #2: Sergio, you have worked wonders for most aspects of the economic bottom line of Fiat's widespread group since you took over from the deadbeat Agnellis, but you're still not in what anyone could call a strong financial position. Homologation is going to be expensive and you're facing working without any cashflow from your North American operations for just a bit under two years. Where is the cash coming from?

Fact #3: You've stated that Fiats in North America won't just be homologated and rebadged, but fully re-engineered to be truly North American models. Same question as #2: Where is the cash coming from? That sort of re-engineering is a mega-billion dollar task.

Fact #4: There is no doubt in the mind of any astute automotive industry observer that unless by 2011 gasoline is $10 a gallon, North Americans are not going to be desperate enough to dive into microcitycars with 1 litre engines... and if they were so totally panicked, there are many world cars bearing the Ford, Toyota, Honda and other renowned quality nameplates which could be imported to satisfy this demand. Let's face it: Fiat is a fairly crappy brand with a truly bad (and in many cases well deserved) quality reputation. And just wait for the backlash of American Fiat drivers when they start trying to do Chicago to Spokane on those big, wide, windy prairie Interstates and find themselves blown off the road by every passing 18-wheeler. Aint nuthin' like that in Europe!

So, Sergio, what's going to happen now?

No, I can't blame you for grabbing one fifth of an automaker for free... that was the Marxist-inspired giveaway of the century. The new US President was too busy rubbing his little Commie hands in glee in the prospect of turning over majority ownership to his beloved unions that he would have given 20% of Chrysler away to Spencer and Heidi Pratt, but the added advantage of your widely lauded "technology transfer valued at over $10 billion" (which likely means you're just going to email over a CAD file attachment of some engine tooling... $10 billion my big fat Italian butt...) really sealed the deal: Especiallly if the North American auto industry has to live up to Obama's pie in the sky MPG goals which can likely only be met by putting half of the American motorists on a bus.

Good for you, paisano! You pulled a fast one on the Yankees. I'll buy you a cappuccino at Caffe Diplomatico on College St. next time you're out this way.

But... now you have to make something out of your Obama present...

... and that's going to be the hard part.

To paraphrase Top Gun, "your mouth is writing checks your factories can't cash."

Buona fortuna, amico. You're gonna need it!

Back To Start


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      8 years ago from Toronto

      The Chrysler that built that 82 Charger is a completely different company than today's Fiat-run POS.

    • profile image

      Dudley DoWrong 

      8 years ago

      My last Chrysler made car was a 1982 Dodge Charger with a 2.2 engine. It was my first front will drive car. Coming from driving mostly V8 cars I was sort of skeptical about this vehicle from the time I drove it off the lot but I bought it because it was fun to drive with its 4spd manual trans. Not really fast but zippy and peppy and it held the road quite well at high speeds. I was also concerned that the front wheel drive mechanisms would not take a beating no wear near like the standard front ends. Well let me tell you this...that car was a POS??? Hell no! That car was great!! It was dependable, fun, and kept it all the way up to about 175k miles. The body was rust free yet the floor boards were beginning to rust. The interior was great though I did get the drivers seat reuphostered. Do I have a problem with way. This was my third and they all served me well. My first had the the slant six engine, the second had the 383 magnum V8...those engines seldom if ever break. I now drive a GM with currently 152k on the clock and to be honest this one is the best car I have ever owned. Have not even had my 2nd tuneup yet...should be do at about 200k miles.

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      8 years ago from Toronto

      Mike, Fiat did import some total crap to N. America when they were present and got a reputation for instant rust-through. Modern Fiat cars, however, are of equivalent quality to almost any other brand in their class.

      autotruckservicei, why go to the drive in movies any more, just get in the back seat of the truck and put in a DVD! :)

    • profile image


      9 years ago

      The comment from joet is also shortsighted, if I must add. If you had a bad experience with one Toyota car, would you deem Toyota cars of inferior quality? Figure that Toyota has an excellent name today.

      Fiat cars, to my knowledge, are wonderfully built and engineered vehicles. They are ubiquitous in the European countries and their absence in the USA (yet presence in South America) suggests that Americans are not welcoming to the idea of a smaller, compact car. It's truly a disgrace in my opinion. No one needs a huge car. When I see Hummers and such on the road, I think to myself, what's next? Tanks?

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      9 years ago from Toronto

      What Fiat did you own, bozo? A 1971 128? I've driven around half of Europe in a 2008 Panda and it was one of best small cars I've ever been in. As for Obama and the bailouts, I've already exposed him as a COMMIE in other Hubs, so I have nothing to add to that.

    • profile image


      9 years ago

      This is probably one of the stupidest articles i have read on automobiles. EVER. The guy sounds like a jerk. I owned a Fiat long ago and it was truly, well, crap. It wouldn't start in the cold, was of inferior quality and rusted through the hood within two years The whole Fiat Chrysler marriage was a farce, initiated by Obama which will also explain why it will fail. He knows nothing about cars and should have stayed out of the whole mess. If Chrysler failed, well, that is the American way, but Fiat got 20% for free, with my and your dollars. Fiat was smart as they are trying to save their ass, but it was a bum deal for Chrysler. Poor management brought them down, their reputation has been lost and they just about got rid of their dealer network. Chrysler-Fiat-The Obama solution to save the Auto Industry, and the Unions..what a bunch of losers.

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      9 years ago from Toronto

      But you gotta hand it to my ol' buddy Sergio. He sure knows how to get the silly Yanks to hand him a whole whack of assets for nuthin'! Ah, the brilliance of the Obama Administration is blinding! :)

    • Gypsy Willow profile image

      Gypsy Willow 

      9 years ago from Lake Tahoe Nevada USA , Wales UK and Taupo New Zealand

      Too funny, too true, too sad!


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)