ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

2014's Biggest stories, #1: NASCAR's fight for legitimacy

Updated on February 17, 2014
To some, this was a fantastic sight on Sunday. To others, it was yet another sign of NASCAR's fading credibility
To some, this was a fantastic sight on Sunday. To others, it was yet another sign of NASCAR's fading credibility | Source
Chicago's "Shoeless" Joe Jackson became the face of a sports scandal in 1919 with the Chicago "Black" Sox
Chicago's "Shoeless" Joe Jackson became the face of a sports scandal in 1919 with the Chicago "Black" Sox | Source

The single biggest story in 2014 will be NASCAR's fight for its very legitimacy as a professional sport. Long time fans have often accused the sport of the occasional phantom debris caution or mechanical rules change to make racing more interesting. Yet few accused the sport of being truly “fixed” in the WWE sense that every race was predetermined and endings done strictly for purposes of creating drama. But with the events of last fall still fresh in everyone's mind added in with the changes to NASCAR's Chase, the legitimacy of the sport has been called into question like never before.

No true sport can long survive fans questioning whether all involved are doing their very best to win and an example nearly 100 years old shows why. Baseball still cringes about the Black Sox scandal of 1919. Upset with the low pay and poor treatment they received from management, players on the favored Chicago White Sox conspired with gamblers to throw the World Series. Eight players alleged to be involved in the conspiracy were banned for life by Major League Baseball. The reason why? If fans began to believe that the product on the field was fixed, it could potentially destroy the league. After all, who would buy tickets to watch a fake sport?

Fly your own checkered flag, from

Tony Stewart has been less than impressed with NASCAR's officiating in the past, once comparing them with the WWE
Tony Stewart has been less than impressed with NASCAR's officiating in the past, once comparing them with the WWE | Source

In some ways, questions about NASCAR's integrity are nothing new. Commentators and drivers alike joked about caution flags thrown for “debris” late in a race where the field is spread out. Three time series champion Tony Stewart compared these late-race cautions with professional wrestling, essentially calling NASCAR a rigged sport. While television cameras generally do a good job of finding the caution-causing debris, they cannot catch every single one (nor do they catch the number of times early in a race where similar debris goes uncalled).

NASCAR also has a long history of making changes during the season in an effort to make a competitive product. Prior to the Car of Tomorrow, NASCAR's manufacturers would regularly complain to the office about perceived mechanical slights, hoping to have a change made in their favor. The goal was always to make the driver (instead of the car) the determining factor in who wins a race- but naturally those on the losing end of such changes didn't view it that way.

Neither of these issues, however, truly cut to the core of NASCAR's legitimacy. Complaining about one car's edge over another was nothing more than an extension of trying to put the fastest car possible on the track. Late race yellow flags might have bunched up the field but by and large there was physical evidence to support the caution. Besides, the race didn't end with those yellow flags; the leader might have seen his lead erased but if his car was the fastest he had the chance to build a new one.

The questions raised over the past six months somehow feel different. And the consequences to NASCAR could be far worse.

NASCAR officials had tough questions to answer after Richmond last year
NASCAR officials had tough questions to answer after Richmond last year | Source
Busch might've been joking but he was far from alone in expecting Austin Dillon to win the pole
Busch might've been joking but he was far from alone in expecting Austin Dillon to win the pole | Source

The problems started with the chaos that resulted from last year's regular season-ending race at Richmond. Instead of cheating aimed at making one car faster, Michael Waltrip Racing slowed two of its three entries in an attempt to get the third car in NASCAR's playoffs. Radio traffic elsewhere on the scanner showed that they weren't alone in the effort to tank their way to victory. NASCAR eventually responded by booting Martin Truex Jr. from the playoffs (even though he was the only guy still trying to win apparently), and adding Ryan Newman. Inexplicably, they then added fan-favorite Jeff Gordon as car #13 to the 12 car playoff just days before the Chicago kickoff race was to start.

The moves only served to pour gas onto the fire surrounding NASCAR's credibility. Gordon fans initially went ballistic when their driver wasn't added as a part of the initial penalty. In turn, Truex fans lost their minds once Gordon was added; if anyone was to be removed from the playoffs, why was their man kicked out when he and his race team did nothing wrong? And if there was room for a thirteenth car in the field, why not a fourteenth?

The questions on credibility continued this spring. Richard Childress Racing had the fastest cars in preseason testing. They had the fastest cars in practice. So it was little surprise than an RCR car would sit on the pole for the Daytona 500. Yet even as qualifying began, speculation filled the garage that not just any RCR car would receive that honor. Fox had Kyle Busch on the air live during qualifying and Busch essentially stated that everyone knew the front row would be Austin Dillon's #3 and Dale Earnhardt Jr's #88. While Junior didn't quite make the front row, Austin Dillon's time held up and the rookie will start the Daytona 500 from the pole. Before Fox even went off the air Twitter was filled with jokes about the (insert sarcasm here) “unexpected” showing of the #3 car.

Austin Dillon puts the #3 on the Daytona 500 pole

NASCAR isn't oblivious to these questions. This past off-season, they finally took the long-overdue step of making their enforcement procedures standard. Instead of relying on the “We can do it if we want to” defense, NASCAR is giving teams and drivers a realistic expectation in terms of what offenses will draw which penalties. Just as important, meaningless infractions that have no bearing on who wins a race will no longer draw a points penalty that could decide a championship. It's a huge step forward in terms of legitimacy.

Yet even this change has its own fair amount of accompanying questions. NASCAR stuck with the same system of punishment for decades. Doing what was “in the best interests of stock car racing” was good enough for the last 50+ years. So why change now? Could it be that NASCAR, after losing several high-profile penalty appeals in the last two years, is tired of being embarrassed off the track? Former chief appellate officer John Middlebrook is gone, replaced by Bryan Moss- a 73 year old airplane company executive whose connection to stock car racing is less obvious. Will he be more amenable to upholding NASCAR's rulings than Middlebrook was, particularly with a less arbitrary system in place?

And then there's the little matter of NASCAR's Chase changes. To be sure, expanding the field to 16 teams and virtually guaranteeing entry for race winners will make the events of Richmond less likely. Realistically speaking, the win provision will lock down spots for eight to twelve teams annually. That will leave only four to eight slots open for drivers to qualify based on points (four being far more likely than eight). In the Chase era, there's generally been a few drivers who pile up the points without a win; Dale Earnhardt Jr and Clint Bowyer were excellent examples of this last season. The reality is that only a couple of drivers will be on the points bubble at Richmond. And after the example made of MWR last season (and the amount of scrutiny on those few teams facing the bubble), it's highly unlikely anyone would be dumb enough to try that again.

Despite six championships in eight seasons, Johnson receives far less credit than he's earned in part due to the existence of the Chase
Despite six championships in eight seasons, Johnson receives far less credit than he's earned in part due to the existence of the Chase | Source

But tanking isn't the only issue.

NASCAR was long a sport where athletes of the past could be compared with athletes of the present. The cars might've been different, the length of the season might have been different, but the method of determining a champion remained the same. Some title races were thrilling, others amounted to a coronation ride at the season finale. But when a champion was crowned it was because he was the best driver over the course of the season. The Chase took that connection to the past away and infuriated many diehard fans in the process.

Offending the diehards in and of itself isn't a sin. Sometimes change has to be made for the sport to grow; baseball is a perfect example of this. And the number of dull title races that occurred in the years prior to the Chase made a strong case for change in stock car racing. But now, with the Chase a decade old, NASCAR has once again taken a step away from rewarding season-long consistency. It has again cut the cord to what has mattered most in the past in an effort to inject more drama into the championship chase. Without question, the new Chase format will be exciting. Fans will have plenty to talk about throughout the ten race playoff, particularly as the elimination races approach.

But that drama will come with a price. To this day, many fans question the legitimacy and the weight of Jimmie Johnson's six Sprint Cup championships thanks to the Chase. Websites annually calculate how the points would have shaken out had the champion been crowned under the old points format. The treatment of this year's champion will be even worse, especially if a driver eliminated due to poor luck early on happens to do well in the seven remaining races. What if a driver with only one or two wins manages to work the system well while another with seven or eight wins blows a tire and gets eliminated? In an era where the sport's legitimacy is under fire like never before, was this really the right time to overhaul the point system in such a radical way?

Chairman Brian France is the public face of NASCAR's Chase and his legacy will rise or fall based upon its success
Chairman Brian France is the public face of NASCAR's Chase and his legacy will rise or fall based upon its success | Source

NASCAR's very credibility will be the number one story this upcoming season. Those asking the questions are no longer just the tinfoil hat, black helicopter brigade. The casual fans that NASCAR so desperately seeks are now among those who wonder. The aftershocks of Richmond 2013 continue to be felt throughout the garage and they're jolts that no competitive enterprise can endure forever. For NASCAR to survive as a sport, fans need to know that what they're seeing is on the up and up- and NASCAR knows it. How they respond will be interesting, to say the very least.

Need more NASCAR news and opinion?

Another Left Turn columns on hubpages at
Contact me via email at
Follow me on Twitter at

Now it's your turn

Does NASCAR have an issue in terms of credibility?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Ken Osborne 

      6 years ago

      The bobblehead buffoons on Fox telegraphed that the #3 was going to get the pole all week. I guess NASCAR thinks that NASCAR fans are fools. I think the attendance and viewing will tank by midseason. How many fairy tale endings does NASCAR think we will endure since Sr's death?

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      The issues at Richmond aren't new. Anyone car to remember the suspicious circumstances around RCR at Richmond before. Just MWR was not clever enough to avoid putting it out to be noticed. The teams have learned better now.

      Does Nascar really have any legitimacy left? People still go to WWE matches and watch on TV. Perhaps its the same with Nascar.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      When you change things to suit only a few people for the tainted dollar bill you punish the faithful mass. I like a lot of other long time followers have great memories of Nascar of the past.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      The people who pay attention have been asking these questions for a long time. Do you think with all the hype LAST YEAR BEFORE DANICA GOT THE POLE, that she wasn't going to get it? Too much pre pole bologna for her NOT to get it, Nascar would have had egg on their faces if their promo dream qualified dead last. Richmond was not the sin of MWR, it was the sin of Nascar changing the rules because Brian said "he can". Middlebrook may be gone, but this new guy is a crony of Brians. The fix was in when Sam Hornish was robbed due to an excessive caution and a winless Dillon gets the championship. PawPaw, Helton and the father were all but telling you who was going to get the pole at Daytona, look again to the hype. The head of Fox Sports works very closely with Brian, don't you think Brian tells him what to broadcast and why? Dillon "fastest" at testing, Speedweeks and the pole. They tried last year with the "first female" garbage, now they are going for the sentiment of the number 3. Who can not see that? And the new rules for still comes down to their final say so..So nothing is changed. Nascar insults its fans and the journalists who defend this madness are just as bad. So many obvious examples, so little space. No tin foil hat here, just a working brain. Big money, all about the money..not racing anymore. The circus is back in town.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      I LOVE NASCAR, the sights and sounds mean so much to me. Nascar cannot manipulate everything BUT they can control the motors and restrictive plates. Danica on the pole last years 500. Dillon this time? Come on. There is extra horsepower it's obvious. And Gordon added as a 13th car was the real embarrassment.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      The fact that Na$Crap allowed driver Clint Bowyer, who spun out on purpose in collusion with the Idiots that run MWR racing to manipulate the finish at Richmond, to even compete for the Shampionship last year was a JOKE. Any real sport would have Banned everyone at MWR for at least a year. The GIMMICK chase was Exposed on national TV and in the media last year for all to see. Brainfart France and Na$Crap didn't have the Knads to kick them out totally. Since the Gimmick chase has been exposed, now we get this BS elimination championship format that has rendered the Championship absolutely Meaningless.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      I sure would hate to drive 12 hours and spend 1000.00 dollars to watch a rigged race, but that's what is happening, They think everything revolves around Jr, Danica, and the 3. Nascar has wore this out and it's time to move on.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)