ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

NASCAR Doesn't Need Reluctant Television Partners Right Now

Updated on August 27, 2013
NBC is ready to start its NASCAR coverage early; can NASCAR work a deal to make it happen?
NBC is ready to start its NASCAR coverage early; can NASCAR work a deal to make it happen?

A story in the Sports Business Daily reports that ESPN and TNT are looking to end their NASCAR coverage in 2013 instead of next year as previously agreed. With ten year contracts already signed with both Fox and NBC, the sanctioning body should do everything it can to accommodate their current broadcast partners and move on to their future ones. Neither the networks nor the sport benefit from having the races broadcast by a network not fully committed to the future of NASCAR.

TNT is ready to drop the ax on its summer series a year earlier than planned
TNT is ready to drop the ax on its summer series a year earlier than planned

Publicly, all is well with both ESPN and TNT. While they weren't willing to pay the steep rights fee increases NBC agreed to, ESPN and TNT both spoke to their commitment to maintain their current NASCAR coverage through the end of the 2014 season. Which makes sense; the contracts in place have the networks paying NASCAR hundreds of millions of dollars from now until then and publicly bashing the sport will make recouping those costs even more difficult. They're already facing difficulties in lining up advertising for next season's schedule in large part due to the lame duck status. Undercutting those negotiations by announcing their desire to trash the contract will make those sales virtually impossible.


Privately, however, the two departing networks seem more than ready to move on from NASCAR. TNT only has six races on its schedule and saw awful ratings during their summer series this year. Fans detested the oversized commercial bar TNT utilized during its coverage and the heavy commercial rotation; the network had the highest average commercial rate of any NASCAR partner over the past two years at 25.9%. By contrast, in 2012 ESPN averaged 23.6% (and 18% when looking at side-by-side coverage) and Fox sat at 23.3%. The numbers for 2013 similarly show that no network cut to commercial as often as TNT and the fans responded by clicking their remotes.

TNT's coverage included more adds and less actual race coverage than any other NASCAR broadcaster
TNT's coverage included more adds and less actual race coverage than any other NASCAR broadcaster

Check out other races from Daytona on DVD

Covering NASCAR is a complex business that requires high technology and high expenses
Covering NASCAR is a complex business that requires high technology and high expenses

ESPN has its own issues in terms of NASCAR coverage. The network currently carries the entire Nationwide schedule in addition to the final 17 races of the Sprint Cup schedule. With stiff competition coming from the new Fox Sports 1 network, ESPN cannot afford to provide a substandard broadcast product. Moreover, this isn't the first time that ESPN and NASCAR have parted ways; it's entirely possible that the two will do business again somewhere down the line. Between broadcast reputation and future business possibilities, ESPN isn't going to put out a single camera broadcast with a skeleton crew on a weekly basis.


Yet the temptation to cut costs, especially those races where ESPN's trucks show up to cover just a single Nationwide event, will loom large. Ratings for a Nationwide race in March from Las Vegas do not justify the costs to broadcast the event. This is particularly true given the fact that every dollar ESPN spends to build up NASCAR now will go towards another network's bottom line come the following season. That next contract is also better structured to help NASCAR's television partners defray the costs of broadcasting as both Nationwide and Sprint Cup schedules will be split between Fox and NBC. This split ensures that production costs will likewise be split between two races most weekends.


If NASCAR plays hardball with ESPN and TNT the consequences for next season could be brutal. ESPN is billed as the “World Wide Leader in Sports” and their overall ratings justify that claim. They have a sports megaphone that is able to drive viewers towards your product- or away from it. Think that ESPN doesn't provide enough NASCAR coverage now? Imagine what would happen should they try to stiff ESPN on this deal. And the network could easily fill that motorsports void by placing greater emphasis on other forms of racing. After all, the company still will have the rights to several IndyCar events per year including the crown jewel Indianapolis 500. Why not promote a series that's working with them over the one working against them?

For a network leaving the sport, these trucks represent an investment in someone else's future
For a network leaving the sport, these trucks represent an investment in someone else's future
More cameras let networks catch every moment of the action
More cameras let networks catch every moment of the action

Auto racing is a difficult sport to cover under any circumstances and a lame duck status makes it nearly an impossible one. Action can take place at any point on the racing surface and sometimes off of it. You need a wide range of camera to capture the action, multiple reporters on pit road to get critical information, and skilled people in the production trucks to beam out a coherent product. All of those items cost money. Should the networks look to cut racing costs those are the areas they will do it. Three pit road reporters? Cut it to one. Someone monitoring the race scanners for good material? Cut that, just take a live snippet here and there instead. Cut the number of cameras (and camera crews) in half; most of the race comes from a handful of shots anyway. Who cares if a major incident is missed? It's not like they're coming back next year.


NASCAR cannot afford to have disinterested broadcast partners with little invested in the future. The sport is only now beginning to recover from the economic meltdown and recession several years ago; overall attendance is inching up at most tracks and TV ratings (for the most part) have stabilized after a multi-year free fall. An engaged broadcast partner doing everything possible to put out a quality TV race product is critical to that recovery. Fans at home have high expectations of a race broadcast; missing a wreck or re-start is considered an inexcusable error no matter how common it was just a decade ago.

The accountants at ESPN's headquarters have done the math on dropping NASCAR
The accountants at ESPN's headquarters have done the math on dropping NASCAR

NBC and Fox literally have billions of dollars invested in the future of NASCAR. It's in their financial bottom line for NASCAR to grow and prosper in the American sports landscape. More fans equal higher ratings and better advertising revenue. Live sports programming offers one of the few products that people tend to watch as it happens instead of on DVR. That means sponsors will pay more for the time. NASCAR also traditionally offers an advertiser-friendly demographic despite recent setbacks. NBC also desperately needs eyeballs on its struggling NBC Sports Network. Bicycle races and hockey games simply do not draw the same size of audience that NASCAR does. The contract can't start soon enough for them.


While the original article seems to indicate the complex negotiations between the four parties (Fox, TNT, ESPN, NBC) will be difficult this would seem to be a fairly simple deal to make. Fox is getting more races starting in 2015; the launch of Fox Sports 1 would seem to provide an easy landing spot particularly given the time of year those races fall (the only other sport in season would be baseball). NBC's interest is obvious. And while ESPN and TNT will make noise about wanting to be financially compensated for leaving, the fact is that their financial benefit will come in ending the contract. The bean counters in Bristol, CT can add that up as easily as anyone else. Their only leverage here comes in how the network covers NASCAR should they be held up for something now.

ESPN's NASCAR coverage (like NASCAR Now) post-2014 may depend on reaching an agreement with the sport now
ESPN's NASCAR coverage (like NASCAR Now) post-2014 may depend on reaching an agreement with the sport now

The ending here is much like that of a married couple's divorce. Both sides entered with the best of intentions and efforts but it just isn't going to work out- mainly because both think they'd be happier elsewhere. Naturally there is some bad blood on both sides about the relationship ending and it will be hard to keep those ill feelings private forever. Why delay the inevitable? Why have both sides continuing to live in the same house when the papers are filed and the court date set?


No, this is a situation where the right thing to do ethically is also the right thing to do financially. No one benefits from keeping NASCAR where it isn't wanted- particularly when those races are wanted elsewhere. The sport loses momentum and interest thanks to lesser coverage. The networks lose by putting a product on air they don't believe in. And as always, the people caught in the middle are the ones who have no ability to change the end result; the fans. The time has come to set aside pride and reach a deal that makes sense for everyone involved.

Need more NASCAR news and opinion?

Read more Another Left Turn columns on here on hubpages at http://anotherleftturn.hubpages.com
Contact me via email at anotherleftturn@yahoo.com
Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/astheleftturns

Now it's your turn!

Should NASCAR make a deal to let ESPN/TNT out of their TV contracts a year early?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Tony Geinzer 4 years ago

      It gets emotional when it is a Fall to Go versus a Full Year, but, in return, I demand ESPN and ABC get better and not dumb,dumber and Erin Andrews when it gets to any racing they got, in the event Fox Sports defaults on the bill. The broadcasts are more godawful than most Houston Astros Games.

    • toptenluxury profile image

      Adrian Cloute 4 years ago from Cedartown, GA

      Nascar is the best thing ever. Once you go to a race you will never want to go see anything but Nascar!

    • profile image

      Earner 4 years ago

      NascarJeff...That is SOOO correct...The obvious bias has been BRUTAL for the last 3 years ...Waltrip & Dougherty & Rusty for sure

    • profile image

      NascarJeff 4 years ago

      When the switch to NBC along with FOX occurs a house cleaning is in order. We need to get away from analysts who have a dog in the race or who are affiliated with a manufacturer or sponsor.

      Meaning: Michael and Darrell Waltrip have to go from FOX, they have strong ties to Toyota. Michael is a minority owner in MWR with three cars in the field and consistently hawks his sponsors, DW (who is out of touch) does commercials along with Larry MacReynolds for Quicken Loan. Plus "Boogity, Boogity, Boogity" has got to go.

      Over on ESPN Brad Daugherty is an owner in JTG-Daugherty Racing and Ray Evernham is a Hendrick Motorsports Employee. Ever hear Ray talk bad about a Hendrick car or driver? You wont because he can't.

      We need to go back to impartial commentary on the broadcast, why do you think candidates who are running for office have to leave they're TV gigs on news programs. Having this big conflict of interest week after week is getting old.

    • profile image

      Russ 4 years ago

      you overlooked two points that were mentioned in the SBJ article. One that traditionally networks serve out the terms of the contract. Several examples, covering most of the networks, were cited for this practice.

      Also both ESPN and TNN were having difficulty selling advertising for the Nascar events, this was expected to be more difficult without the ability to sell a long term package.

      Overall this seems to be just another indication that the sport, while still profitable, for a dwindling number of people, no longer is growing in popularity, but rather is sinking back into the noise of all the other sports.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)