ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why the American Car Industry Doesn't Get It

Updated on November 5, 2010

Why Ford USA dont get it and why the answer is under their faces

Est. Reading Time 10mins.
Note: All MPG given are converted to US MPG 

For some perspective, I am English and a huge car lover. Specifically I have always loved American cars. For all their well documented faults over the years I have always been a fan. Although like most people this love purely is for the muscle car / high end sports car end of the market. Everyone should appreciate a thumping V8 muscle car, pure and simple fun. Having a huge interest in cars, I like reading US online magazines about their perspectives on our cars (UK), as well as reading about US market only vehicles. From this I was excited to see Ford USA finally deciding to release a small car in their home market, the Ford Europe designed Fiesta. A sign of changing times?

Those who know will realise that despite good early sales Ford USA have made a few shocking choices, which can be seen to sum up the problems these once great American car manufacturers are continuing to make. While Ford USA and GM have been losing money for years in the US and known for poor build quality compared to foreign cars, Ford Europe however have been known for the complete opposite for over a decade now. Since the release of the original Focus, virtually every Ford since in the UK has been well made, critically claimed and a sales success. Below I will go into why Ford USA need to just look over the pond for how to fix their issues and radically change their domestic lineup.

First off Ford USA

Imagine if tomorrow you walked into a Ford dealership and they offered a small family hatchback that looked nice, had every electronic gadget you could want like parking assist, mp3, bluetooth etc, and did 61MPG at the price of a decent speced normal model.

Or imagine you have kids, and require a 7 seater that has bags of room, luxuries etc to keep the kids and yourself comfortable and still does 40MPG?

You would be pretty impressed especially if those cars were stylish, modern and were actually well known for being class leaders to drive? Well you can, just catch a plane to England tomorrow.

The cars are the Ford Focus TDCI and the Ford S-Max.

Ford Focus UK Version and Ford S-Max
Ford Focus UK Version and Ford S-Max

And what do Americans get offered?

The Ford Flex and a 10 year old "new" Ford Focus
The Ford Flex and a 10 year old "new" Ford Focus

You have to ask why you would be patriotic and buy American if Ford treat you like this.
You do not need to know anything about cars to know that selling a brand new item based off something over 10 year old is going to fair badly against its rivals. Well the US market Ford Focus is based on the original car from 1998. Shockingly out of touch in terms of dynamics, and it is only available in a saloon shape or randomly a coupe? Looks are opinion, but in mine that Focus saloon has a face only a mother could love and the rear is even worse. Tacky chrome from the 1980s create a  "bold"  front end, which makes the once stylish Focus look cheap. I know the US market prefers saloons to hatches traditionally (is this still the case, despite what Ford USA want you to believe), but I think people would rather have the better car. A hatchback design is also much more practical especially for families, which is what the Focus is aimed at, due to easier access to the rear of the car. Only one engine is available in the US too and it is an old hat 2.0 petrol which does up to 35MPG. The funny thing is Ford USA boast that it does "up to 35MPG" like its a good thing. The worse engine in the UK line up for MPG is the high performance Focus RS which does 33MPG but has over 300BHP and is an out and out hot hatch which just happens to seat five.

For those who need seven seats it gets even worse. All you can buy is a ridiculously huge car, the Ford Flex. Whilst the Flex does look kinda cool, in an in your face mixed with Range Rover kind of way, no one in the world who would buy that car actually needs a car that size. It is simply far bigger than you would ever need. It is actually seven inches longer than a Range Rover! And you would never buy a car like that for performance so why would the most efficient engine available be a 3.5 litre v6 which struggles to do 25MPG? A diesel offering 35MPG would be much more appropriate and faster in the real world due to its mid range pull.

Ford have even managed to ruin their own hero of the MPG for America the Fiesta. Instead of releasing the smart looking 3 Door alongside the 5 Door, they spend unnecessary money developing a horrible looking saloon that isnt small in the slightest defeating the object. Basically for price reasons but why not not spend millions developing this car and release a cheaper version of the 3 door? The Fiesta is hailed in the US as being fuel efficient, yet Ford USA only released it in the US with the largest engine you can get from the European line up. Sure 40MPG is ok for any car, but imagine how much praise they would of got if they released the 64MPG Duratorq we get in the UK? Want petrol, why not the 53MPG 1.25? It makes no sense to decide you need a car that's small and fuel efficient, so take the car from Europe that's a proven sales success, and make it bigger and only release the least efficient engine. Why settle for class average when they would be class leaders? Again looks are opinion but what would you prefer to own? I understand a lot of people need 5 doors, but given the choice of a 3 door it would be more appealing to younger buyers and those without the need for rear doors.

US Top Spec (SEL Sedan 38MPG) vs UK Top Spec (Zetec-S 53MPG)

Interesting note: 2 door Fiesta Coupe was dropped for a 4 door sedan after one model year. 4 door looks better but why not stick with the small concept and release the 3 door instead of yet more developing costs?
Interesting note: 2 door Fiesta Coupe was dropped for a 4 door sedan after one model year. 4 door looks better but why not stick with the small concept and release the 3 door instead of yet more developing costs?

Another way Ford have missed the beat is the release of the recent Fiesta based Transit Connect. Why would a van driver want a vehicle that will do high annual mileage running between jobs with a petrol engine? It's all about keeping costs low, and the 2.0 Ford USA offer doing 26MPG is shockingly bad. In Europe it only comes in diesel, the logical choice for torque and MPG (does 45MPG). For carrying loads you need torque, Ford USA have big pickups wit diesle engines for this reason, why not their smaller vans and trucks? Imagine the savings for a small one man business on their own in just one year over 15,000 miles?

The Ford World Car Program

As much as we like V8s etc, the fact is very few people need one in a family car, and many would be happy for punchy engine with good torque that is fun. 0-60 times, bhp and "sportiness" are largely irrelevant in everyday driving, where torque (e.g. pulling power in gear) is king and unless you are a car fan you probably dont care anyway. You just want a fuel efficient, good looking car.

The Fiesta was supposed to be the first hint towards a world car for Ford. The idea being save money on development by making one car for every market. The first truely world car will be the next Focus which is out soon. Makes sense, but if the Fiesta is anything to go by Ford USA will change everything and only offer the least efficient engines. Keep it simple Ford and it will sell, as it does in huge numbers in Europe to much praise.

Ford's current MPV for the European market the C-Max is due out in US midway through next year and does show some promise. Although no diesel is offered its rumoured to feature the latest 1.6 ecoboost engine, however also a underpowered 2.5 4 cylinder. Here is hoping that Ford realise that families generally want cheaper running costs, not thirsty engines in their MPVs.

The American Diesel Issue

Why aren't Americans taking up diesels, but love hybrids? This could be a hub on its own, however there a number of reasons why. Firstly there have been very few diesels on sale since the 80s. Back then diesels were loud, dirty, gutless and generally poor. Oldsmobile in the 80s modified a petrol engine to a diesel. It was given much advertising from GM but was a hopeless flop. Woefully unreliable, and all the poor traits mentioned previously, it alone effectively sealed the fate of diesels in the US for a generation. Fast forward the late 1990s and high fuel prices (3x that of the US, even now) meant that diesels became a ideal option for European buyers.

From BMW and Mercedes to VW and Ford, diesels started to become the primary sales for car manufacturers, especially in the luxury sector. In 2001 diesels became even more important as EU laws made co2 emissions directly relate to road tax in the UK and many countries in Europe. This meant European manufacturers put huge efforts into improving their diesel engines for efficiency, which in turn makes them more powerful and drivable. And if you want to sell they need to be quieter, cleaner etc. which they now are and have been for a long time. From small hatchbacks with 1.3 and smaller diesel engines to V8 Audi's all are turbo charged much more economical compared to their petrol counterparts, and in the real world faster than their equivalent petrols.

VW have released their impressive TDI Jetta in the US in small numbers, as have BMW with the 335d, however Ford and GM have failed to capitalise on the diesel movement in the US. Whilst the US media loves hybrids, in Europe they pale in the real world MPG compared to diesels. This depends on your type of driving, but if you do most of your driving not in towns then diesels will be more efficient than the comparative sized hybrid. Food for thought and certainly not the smelly smoky underpowered engines they used to be. 

Some GM cars in Europe that would sell in USA

Vauxhall Insignia: This car is rebadged as a Buick Regal. But Buick has the entry level engine is a 2.4l (180BHP, 30MPG), while Vauxhall has 1.6l Turbo (180BHP, 40MPG) and a 2.0 CDTI (160BHP, 58MPG)
Vauxhall Insignia: This car is rebadged as a Buick Regal. But Buick has the entry level engine is a 2.4l (180BHP, 30MPG), while Vauxhall has 1.6l Turbo (180BHP, 40MPG) and a 2.0 CDTI (160BHP, 58MPG)
Vauxhall Corsa: Rival to Fiesta, up to 70MPG
Vauxhall Corsa: Rival to Fiesta, up to 70MPG

What do you think on the state of the US car industry?

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Doug Mason 

      7 years ago


    • profile image


      8 years ago

      it good site

    • jtrader profile image


      8 years ago

      Maybe Ford needs to take some of these suggestions.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)