Functions of Effective Leadership
What is a leader?
For the purpose of clarity, the word “group” shall be used in this article to represent any collection of individuals gathered for a shared purpose.
From an early age in human development, people have realized it is easier for groups to achieve their objectives than persons acting alone. The results of group activities can be seen everywhere—in fact, it is virtually impossible to ignore the effects group efforts have had on society. Every house built, every car on the road, and even the roads themselves are all examples of group efforts. Individuals gather in cooperative organizations for the purpose of accomplishing common goals in all walks of life. Families, businesses, churches, athletic teams and even social clubs all meet to realize a shared purpose. All groups function differently—some might casually gather for a single meeting and others become powerful, highly structured organizations. Despite the widely diverse reasons to gather and organize, most groups have one thing in common: leadership.
Men and women from all walks of life study and train to become leaders. From corporate executives to clergy, leadership courses are designed to offer practical training in becoming a leader. While many courses are practical and worthwhile, too often coaching leadership is tied to a particular field or discipline--coaching situational leadership and coaching leadership are not interchangeable.
What is a leader?
A leader goes first and leads by example. They have a goal—a “vision” that guides their actions and motivates them to fulfill their purpose. Skillful leaders are adept at articulating their vision and convincing others to support it. When this happens, groups are formed.
Anyone who accepts responsibility for leading a group must adopt a different point of view from those of its members. Members tend to see a group solely from the perspective of their role in it. Leaders must inherently view a group from a different perspective. They must look at the group as a whole.
Leadership is necessary. People have had so many bad experiences with leadership that many believe it an unnecessary burden that restricts rather than encourages progress. Leaders have been equated with authority, arrogance, dishonesty and self-righteousness to the extent that trust is sometimes lost simply by assuming a leadership role. It is often difficult to separate leadership from those who abuse authority, but the assumption that groups are able to successfully function without a leader is flawed. Even in groups where no one is recognized as being in charge, there are still signs of leadership. Leaders might be modest and quiet, but someone is still guiding the group and directing its efforts. If at least two people convene for the purpose of accomplishing something, someone must act in a leadership capacity. It can certainly be acceptable for more than one person to fulfill a leadership role, but one person must assume responsibility for thinking about the group as a whole.
Leadership is important and necessary
The functions of leadership
The responsibilities of leadership may vary in detail and emphasis from one group to another, but certain functions can be seen as important in any group, regardless of its size or purpose. These responsibilities will never be listed as essential functions on a job description, but they are vital components of success.
1. To offer a vision and direction. Why is a group’s founder so often its leader, as well? The reason lies in an individual’s ability to articulate a vision. Good leaders draw clarity from confusion and render the complex simple. This ability to see through a morass frequently suggests both a goal and a path toward its fulfillment. The capacity to verbalize this goal rallies others who share their beliefs to join them. (The leader will sometimes become the face and voice of a group and their cause through his/her ability to communicate.)
2. To make decisions in the absence of consensus. No leader can do all the thinking for a group. A wise leader solicits the thinking of as many people as is practical and listens to suggestions (consensus), but someone must take responsibility for problem-solving and reaching decisions. There must be someone authorized to say “the buck stops here. I will decide how we shall proceed.” To properly facilitate this, leadership should be clearly designated. Without designated leaders, difficult decisions will either not be made or they will not be supported.
3. To think about their group on several levels.
1.) They must consider the group as a whole. A group is a different entity than the individuals comprising it, and groups function with different rules than a single person. Leading a group includes the ability to manage a meeting, direct discussions and solicit the participation of all members. It also consists of keeping the “big picture” in view while simultaneously disassembling it into smaller, more manageable goals.
2.) They must consider the strengths and needs of the individuals that comprise their group. This allows leaders to delegate with wisdom (recognizing and fully utilizing a person’s strengths). The skilled leader can motivate the individual and evaluate their progress in achieving team goals. Clear thinking about individuals creates an environment conducive to success.
3.) They must consider both individuals and the group as a whole regarding where they began and where they are, relative to where they wish to be. It is not sufficient to think about a group in a static way. A visionary leader thinks six months, a year or five years into the future.
4. To develop new leaders. It is practical to see everyone as a potential leader and encourage their own ability to lead others. Leadership development is paramount to any group’s success. Coaching, counseling and delegation are all tools that both serve the group and support the development of the individual.
An enjoyment of leadership
The role and function of leadership in our society is often debated. Political parties are at odds about the extent to which leaders should be able to shape our lives. We frequently witness acts of oppression and a betrayal of trust from men and women placed in positions of authority. We sadly view past and current leaders with suspicion and hostility.
The functions of leadership mentioned in this article are not the sole responsibilities of a leader. They are only the broadest of brush strokes used in painting a picture of what genuine leadership can be. They are discussed because they represent a rational and evolving model of supportive guidance in a group structure—which is what true leadership is meant to be.
Regardless of whether one is labeled a president, manager, supervisor, coordinator, director, or “boss,” a leader must master the four qualities listed here. Pay, job description, the size of the group and its purpose are irrelevant to the overriding functions of a strong and purposeful leader. If everyone embraces leadership and strives to become a leader, the acts and functions of directing a group toward a common goal doesn’t need to be a stressful, burdensome task borne in hostility and isolation. It can be supportive, rewarding and even enjoyable.
This shift in focus is absolutely necessary to foster effective leadership in the 21st century. It cannot be about power and influence and perks. Leadership cannot embrace a “to have” mentality. Leaders must separate themselves and win the support of their allies through realizing that perks are irrelevant. They must eventually understand that to prioritize “to be” ahead of “to have” is what makes them lead successfully. It’s about the head of a neighborhood association wanting to realize change on a larger scale. It also includes elected officials seeking to make government work for everyone on a national and international level. It means wanting to make the world better and enjoying the process.
It’s about constant change—for the better.
Read more articles about personal effectiveness by this author
- Time Management Tools: A Convenience or Trap?
There are numerous books and articles devoted to time management, but we still seem to have very little free time. We make lists and group tasks. We organize, categorize, prioritize and analyze. We... - Using the Job Interview to Hire the Right Person
Its stating the obvious to tell you a company loses money when it is forced to replace employees. Some costs from personnel attrition are apparent, such as paying accrued vacation time and... - How to Project Self-Confidence
Some people just have it made. They are voted most likely to succeed in school. They receive job offers in their field right after graduation from college and climb the corporate ladder with... - Time Management Skills: Don't Waste Time for Others
Everyone knows people who always show up fifteen minutes latefor everything. When they arrive, they wave their arms with a flourish and either quickly apologize or make a joke of their lack of... - Twelve Strategies to Rediscover Your Joy for Learning
Children love to learn. They see the world as a magical place, filled with countless wonders to investigate with their full focus and attention. They want to understand everything. When they... - How to Quickly Get People to Like You
Many people are naturally engaging and friendly. They are first to introduce themselves in a crowded room and are eager to turn acquaintances into friends. Their friendliness is usually reciprocated,...
Learn more about leadership with materials from Amazon.com
Related
Effective Leadership Skills - Situational Leadership
Effective Leadership Skills - What makes a Leader?
Leadership Based on Biblical Principles - 7 Leadership Lessons from King Solomon
Servant Leadership: Seven Characteristics of Follower-Centered Leaders
10 Reasons People Think Taeyeon is a Weak Leader
Comments
- AUTHOR
Conradofontanilla, thanks for your insights. Leadership does indeed involve the use of power in one classification or another. It is important that this power be coupled with wisdom in order to become an effective leader. The exertion of power without a shared vision is oppression.
Thanks again for offering your perspective on the subject, it is greatly appreciated.
Mike
Leadership involves power which is the ability to attain objectives. It is a quantitative concept. Bertrand Russell classifies power into naked power (use of force); persuasive power(one being used by author of this Hub);executive power (accruing to a position like president of a corporation); priestly power (uses magic and faith) and economic power.
- AUTHOR
What is Leadership, thanks for stopping by and voicing your agreement. I appreciate your comments.
Mike
Mike,
Thanks for the excellent Hub. I agree 100 percent with point number 4.
Thanks again
- AUTHOR
Thank you, Bilalnr. I appreciate your kind words.
Mike
very nice hub Mike Lickteig!!!!
- AUTHOR
Ben, glad to hear from you. Of course, I knew you and everyone else would be totally captivated by an engaging title such as "Functions of Effective Leadership." I knew you couldn't resist the dramatic possibilities.
In the end, I always appreciate your stopping by and offering a comment or two. Thanks again, and I hope your little guy is doing well these days. He will definitely add new luster to the holiday season. Take care.
Mike
Wow Mike let's hear it for awesome! I have to admit, I was first drawn in by the unique name of this hub blog article: Functions Of Effective Leadership.
I once read a similar Martian diatribe by the moniker called: Modes Of Transparent Fraternization
I kid of course, your words hear are of pure value for those looking at the world of fraternization from the outside in, well done bud.
Ben
- AUTHOR
Leadership Quality, thanks for stopping by. I am not completely certain what you were explaining in your comment, but I understand and agree that a leader must realize their own potential through hard work to succeed. Thank you for your comments. Take care.
Mike
As the world's leaders as they deal with would not want it. Fully their potential and willingness to work in your life are real and are among the most important qualities of leadership
- AUTHOR
LeanMan, thanks for reading. A lack of leadership is a huge problem in business, often because those in charge assume that someone capable of performing tasks is capable of leading others. You're correct, most leaders in business primarily serve to ensure their staff "toes the company line," and they are not actually qualified to do anything more. If business worked to develop true leaders, they would be far better off.
Thanks for reading and leaving a comment.
Mike
-
-
I just wish that the people that ran some of the business that I have worked within were leaders, this is what is missing in so many business, the people in charge are purely there to enforce processes, corporate views and so on, but do not actually give leadership! A truly successful company needs a leader, without a good leader the company goes no where!
- AUTHOR
Vicki, thanks for reading. Your question is a profound one, and not easily answered. Leadership is indeed important in relationships, and I believe a marriage or partnership will erode of one partner or the other places themselves in a passive or subservient role.
I believe we all have leadership potential, and we can all be encouraged to become leaders. If someone is completely unmotivated to display leadership, perhaps it can be encouraged slowly. As I suggested earlier, relationships are typically based upon the idea of an equal partnership, but these are suggestions that might encourage a more equal relationship: Place small decisions in the partner's hands and support the results. Encourage and discuss the big decisions in life, and give credit to the partner for helping to make decisions. Even if the dominant personality is making decisions, ask the partner if the course of action is acceptable. These are small things, but they might help a passive partner assume more of an equal role in a relationship.
Thanks again for reading and for your most thought-provoking question.
Mike
I really enjoy your hubs. Thanks for sharing your wisdom. Leadership is important in a marriage too, but how do you get one who is not motivated to take the lead, to do so? Otherwise, you have one person controlling the relationship?
- AUTHOR
Hypnodude, thanks for your comments. History is not my strongest suit, but I agree that Caesar was a good example of a good leader and well liked and supported by his soldiers. A leader accepted and admired by the soldiers that fight for him is a testament to his leadership qualities and, as you say, probably quite rare in contemporary society. You make a good point in observing that leaders now gain their approval from other leaders as much or more than from their own people--an observation that should be a cause for concern if not an indictment of leaders in general.
Thanks for your comments and, as always, I appreciate your willingness to rate and stumble. Take care, my friend.
Mike
- AUTHOR
Business school, thanks for reading. It is nice to know that there is validation for the points I have made, especially in an international community. I appreciate your comments.
Mike
As usual a great hub Mike. This sentence in my opinion summarizes everything "A leader goes first and leads by example." That's why we don't have anymore good leaders around, except maybe one or two. Probably it's a little out of contest but Julius Caesar was one of those leaders, that's why they killed him while he was alone without his soldiers. He lived with them and between them and they wouldn't have allowed him to be killed. Because for his soldiers he was a good leader.
Nowadays how many leaders can say my "soldiers" think I'm a good leader? Not Generals of fellow leaders, but soldiers?
Or how many citizen can say I have a good, not great, leader/government? Or employees on employers?
Rated and stumbled. :)
Excellent post Hub & comments skills being taught by international business schools include some of the points you've mentioned
-
-
- AUTHOR
Maita, thanks for your comments. You're correct, Plato blew it. Leaders don't have to be the brightest and most intelligent, but they do have to be passionate and know how to listen.
Thank you, Maita--your comments are gracious and wonderful!
Mike
Hi Mike,
Making the world a better place -- I like that. And not like Plato who said that leaders whould be the brightest in fact good leaders follow from their followers -- and of course a leader that cares.
Organizations become specialized and of course there is division of labor, and good leaders should have the qualities you just enumerated. I rated this up,
I think you can become a good leader Mike with all the things you have enumerated. I am your first follower, hehe, Maita
- AUTHOR
kimh, thanks for reading. I agree that a designated leader is essential--a dominant personality isn't the same thing, but frequently the one who is biggest or has the loudest voice or is most opinionated becomes leader for all the wrong reasons. I also believe leadership must encourage participation in order to effective represent the group.
Thanks again for your comments, they are greatly appreciated.
Mike
Thanks Mike. Nice hub on leadership. I like shared leadership and participative management; which still require a leader who shares leadership and a leader who encourages participation. I get most annoyed when there is no appointed leader, and the most obnoxious and dominating group member with poor leadership skills appoints himself the leader.
- AUTHOR
Chandra, thanks so much for reading. I greatly appreciate your gracious comments. Thanks again.
Mike
The Hub on leadership is very informative and knowledgable. I immensely enjoyed the whole hub.The categorization of leaders was something very interisting to go through. Thanks a lot for sharing such a wonderful peace of text. I await your future text with great curiosity.
- AUTHOR
Ghosty! Welcome back! It's nice to see ya again! You are so correct about good leadership--there can be good leaders and unskilled leaders, but there are also BAD leaders. As you suggest, the bully in the schoolyard that rallies others to pick on weaker kids. On a larger and more frightening level, Jim Jones and his People's Temple or David Koresh and the Branch Davidians are examples of leaders articulating a false or dangerous vision while still inspiring others to follow them. These folks knew how to recruit others to their cause, but their cause was deadly. Folks like Jones and Koresh may be leaders in some twisted sense of the word, but madmen should obviously never be followed.
Ghosty, I'm thrilled to find you here "leaving a footprint," as you say. I haven't seen you here among us very often. I have assumed you've been working a lot--I've been trying to get things sorted out and have been here a little less frequently, as well. It's always wonderful to hear from ya!
Hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo in return!
Mike
I accidentally overposted--so Ghosty is going to quickly type a hello in for you since I havn't seen or heard from you in awhile.
Hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Leadership is so important--but only if it is GOOD leadership. If you follow the school yard 'bully' as your leader-- eventually you will see the leader get his lights punched out...and it is usually by the skinny-weak looking kid that has taken enough abuse and comes out fighting....hmmmmm reminds me of something similar...lol
- AUTHOR
Paradise, thanks for reading. I always appreciate seeing that you have stopped by. Take care.
Mike
- AUTHOR
drbj, thanks for your insights. I have also seen examples of the "locker room" leader. He or she may not have the title, but everyone knows who is really in charge. Those are unfortunate examples of a group dynamic, especially when someone is forced to take charge because the leader doesn't have the skills to direct a group.
Sometimes a person with a vision doesn't know how to lead. These folks are sometimes those that look at a product in a store and say, "I thought of that years ago!" They had the vision but couldn't articulate it. Leaders without vision are managers, an outstanding distinction well-made by coffeesnob in a comment above. The point boils down to the fact that leaders are necessary, and if we don't have them, someone will assume the role.
Thanks again, I appreciate your perspective.
Mike
- AUTHOR
Elena, thanks for stopping by. Your views of fulfilling a leadership role are shared by many men and women--for some it is indeed a burden, and the responsibilities of leading others actually interferes with their productivity. I believe we are all natural leaders and can support leadership even if we don't assume the responsibilities of a leader. I would venture a guess that you do this in an outstanding way.
Thanks again for reading, Elena, I always appreciate your comments.
Mike
- AUTHOR
coffeesnob, thanks for reading. Your point on the difference between a leader and a manager is outstanding. The difference is pronounced, and often shows itself when a natural leader moves away from the group and on to other matters. Steve Jobs and Apple is a great example. There were many qualified managers that assumed the title of President of the Board and CEO of Apple, but they floundered without their natural leader and resident visionary. When Jobs returned to Apple, they resumed their successful ways. John Sculley and the others were certainly outstanding CEOs, but they weren't the right leaders for Apple--only Steve Jobs was and is.
Thanks again for reading, I appreciate your comments greatly.
Mike
- AUTHOR
Catherine, thanks for reading. I appreciate your interest and your comments.
Mike
Great hub. I agree.
In one of your comments, you mentioned your belief that if a group or a team had no effective leader, a leader would "rise up and try to take control."
You are absolutely right. In my coaching work, now and then, I come across a situation exactly like that. A supervisor or manager has a promising team but he or she is a very ineffective or completely "laissez faire" person. Very often when the team members want to get the job done under those circumstances, a "locker-room" leader arises and without the title, leads the group.
Very interesting Hub. This is one area I have problems in because I don't like to assume a position of leader as I feel it's a burden and you can't please everyone - Bad Mindset. My attitude has always been: I can't be bothered with the hassle.
I have learnt new things from this Hub though and hope to put them to use in Future. Thanks.
Best Wishes.
Mike
This is excellent. I especially like how you expounded on the functions of leadership. I think an area where most leaders fall short is in your third point on thinking about the group on several levels. Often times leaders amy start out leading, i.e. casting a vision; but they end up managing. I believe the difference between leading and managing is that the leader has learned how to pay attention to the group on several levels and then meets them where they are with the intent (vision) of taking them further..
Thanks again..great thoughts and very solid teaching
CS
Great article, really goes into the finer points of leadership.
- AUTHOR
FCEtier, thanks for reading. I have watched "Undercover Boss" off and on--it is a rare reality-type show that I find interesting. I like your definition of leadership, it suggests the type of humane qualities I advocate.
Thanks again.
Mike
Good reading!
Are you a fan of the TV show, "Undercover Boss"? I've long been an advocate of that concept.
Here's the definition of leadership I've always applied to individuals: The ability to change other peoples' attitudes without giving offense or arousing resentment.
- AUTHOR
KelciC, thanks for reading. I know what you're saying--even campus groups and clubs are in need of learning some leadership skills. In fact, those environments are most in need in lots of ways. One would think folks would see a campus organization as a place to learn some leadership skills, but many believe they already have them and it becomes about ego... and it is a shame. If it was so bad your group disbanded, it sounds like there was some major difficulties!
Well, thanks again for reading, I appreciate your comments a great deal.
Mike
- AUTHOR
Janny! Nice to see ya! I agree, leadership is in many ways on trial, especially in the United States. It isn't about Obama--its all parties and all levels, in business and in government. There doesn't seem a way to accomplish anything any more, and it is a tragedy. As I said in response to Mekenzie, I hope that someday things will be better.
Thanks, Janny. I always appreciate seeing you've dropped by.
Mike
- AUTHOR
Mekenzie, thanks for reading. Undercover Boss has some good moments, and when the light bulb goes on for some of these CEOs, it is interesting to watch.
I have worked for some very good people, but I have also had some absolutely horrible bosses. There was a situation that was so awful, everyone there hated to see the owner walk in the door. This fellow was so arrogant, the process became more important than the result. I know "my way or the highway" is standard practice for a lot of businessmen, but it got so unbelievably bad this man actually preferred to lose money than admit someone else had a sound idea.
My article was written in hopes that someday things will be better.
Thanks so much for your comments.
Mike
- AUTHOR
pmccray, thanks for reading. You've hit the nail on the head on some key points. Too many managers are handed their positions, based on "potential," luck, networking, inheriting the family business, or whatever. There are fewer instances than ever of managers earning their stripes and learning to become a leader. And, we all are worse off for it.
I am not a fan of reality shows either, but I kinda like "Undercover Boss" as well. It seems that there is a much-needed reality check for CEOs that comes with getting back on the front ines, and it is fun to watch.
Hopefully the day will come when "boss" and "leader" are a little more synonymous. Thanks again for your comments, they are much appreciated.
Mike
- AUTHOR
jayjay, thanks for reading. I wish management and business leaders would learn some true leadership skills, as well. I've worked for some good people, but I've also labored for some of the most arrogant, insufferable bosses ever. When you have a truly humane leader, the difference is crystal clear.
Thanks again for your comments.
Mike
- AUTHOR
Teddletonmr, thanks for your comments. We certainly can use some effective leadership in these trying times. Hopefully things will change for the better for all of us. Take care.
Mike
- AUTHOR
HC, thanks for reading. I am always amazed by folks that believe leaders are unnecessary. I am also convinced that even if we (society, business, whatever...) actually had no leaders, someone would rise up and try and take control. Maybe that would be a good thing, but it could also be everyone's worst nightmare. I also share your opinion that society would break down without leadership. Either way, leadership is clearly called for in any group endeavor.
Thanks again for stopping by, HC. I saw you wrote something new also--I will come by soon to read.
Mike
As a former member of the Comics Club on my campus, I can say this much: the leaders of that organization really needed to read this. Maybe then the club wouldn't have disbanded and we would have kept more people in our group.
This is something that I think is an underlying concern of late in this world so great hub! This makes you think and I like that.
Great points about effective leadership Mike. I agree with pmc about how ego often takes the place of true leadership and common sense. I've had both types of 'people in charge' out in the workplace. I will bend over backwards for a leader with integrity.
I too love the show "Undercover Boss" as it connects those that lead to the worker in the trenches.
Great Job Mike!
Blessings
Mekenzie
Mike L; This hub is much needed and has been for a long time. In my years as an "employee" working for large and small entities too many times ego takes place of leadership and common sense. I can count on one hand managers or bosses that I would follow to the end.
I'm not a fan of reality shows, but get a kick out of watching "Undercover Boss". Most CEOs seem to have lost touch with those working under them and have come to some tearful truths while during their stint undercover.
I think most need to get into the trenches and remind themselves of what it's like. I think we'd see better leadership if we went back to starting from the bottom up rather than walking into executive positions from college or family.
Excellent hub, shared and rated up.
I wish more managers would take on these principles and run things properly. Great advice, well written
Mike, I agree with H.C. Porter, your Hub is insightful and to the point. Effective Leadership is what we need now. Thanks to the information, two thumbs up...
Nice Hub. I agree with everything you have expressed, every group, every organization, every effort that takes more than one-must have someone in a leadership role. I often laugh when people say they wish for anarchy-if they new what true anarchy meant, they would realize that lack of leadership and unorganized agenda's is a recipe for a break down of society, safety and productivity on an enormous scale. You wrote this very well. Rated Up!
53