Questions about religion often require more detailed answers than what is provided in Q&A's 250 word limit. Also, we also now have a handful of New Atheist's who are now deleting every single comment that is answered by "religionists," especially Christian believers. Would not a more even back and forth exchange be more suitable than a one-sided argument? Additionally, too many questions are meant to provoke, such as those which suggest that Atheist are more intelligent than Christians. Long story short, an intelligent exchange requires more serious thought and two (reasonable) sides.
sort by best latest
Annsalo, They may want to answer in order to counter a false supposition/question with facts. Secondly, the questioner can still delete the useful information and still maintain a 1-sided argument. The forums do not allow for this knee jerk reaction.
OK, however, you have asked questions about religion. Are you going to write hubs instead? In any event, all those who have asked have written hubs about religion. It hasn't resolved the Q&A thing.