I had two book review hubs go unfeatured for lack of traffic about two weeks ago. I wasn't angry. It's a fact. They don't get traffic. I let them sit there because I didn't have time to think about what to do with them.
Without me editing or touching them, they are now "featured."
Is anyone else seeing hubs that were unfeatured due to low traffic featured again? I'm back to 100 percent featured hubs.
I had two of mine that were unfeatured for a couple weeks. I was too lazy to do anything about them then I realized they are now featured and even getting a few views.
Yes. One unfeatured hub mysteriously became featured again. Others have mentioned this occasionally.
Very interesting. I wonder if they are reviving some unfeatured hubs for a second chance.
Congratulations on that! Yes, I too realized this happens. Actually that keeps happening. Quality depends on what we do, and traffic we can't handle. You can try to make those hubs more social through social media, forums, etc. making sure that they will last that way...
I agree. Social media has done well for me so far. Although I have a long way to go. Just a newbie here.
I have a very large social media presence, but it's for my niche - which is dog agility - not book reviews. I won't post my book review articles on social media, other than Pinterest, because my "fans" have liked my FB fan page for agility information - not book reviews.
You are right though. Social media is the best place to get traffic. For these hubs, I just don't care whether they are featured or not. I only wanted to know if others are seeing their hubs that were unfeatured for traffic refeatured too.
Thanks though!!! If I were looking for traffic for those hubs, this would be a great tip.
Yes, few of my hubs too have been unfeatured for the same reason.
I think agilitymach is more interested in the fact that they when from unfeatured to featured all of the sudden without any edits. Seems a little strange. But maybe it will help some hubs pushed by the wayside.
Only thing I can imagine is the traffic. If agilitymach can analyze the analytic report, it may provide us some useful information behind this secret featuring event....
One problem is I cannot remember which two of my five book reviews was unfeatured for traffic. I know the "Elfstones of Shannara" was. This shows only a very slight increase in traffic of 2 hits in the last 24 hours and 3 hits in the last week. One of these hits was me checking out the stats to attempt to see why it had been refeatured. One of the other hits was a Google hit. A drop in the virtual bucket.
I cannot remember which of my other book reviews was unfeatured due to lack of traffic, but I think it was "Mistborn: The Well of Ascension." This shows one hit today and two hits this week. The stats do now show where the hits came from.
I'm not at all sure a hit or two could cause a hub to get refeatured. I'm not sure what the reason is...
What if there were NO HIT prior and so even one hit counts? How was the page rank for those hubs? With the related keywords? If you had high serps and even one hit can make a change I guess. Cause if the keywords have a smaller search capacity, making even one organic hit count, that can make a difference right? by the way, how was the traffic before? Before they got unfeatured? was it all Nil? This has made me curious....
The traffic was nil before going unfeatured for traffic. I have no idea what the page rank was on these hubs, however the hit came when they were not featured, I believe. Therefore, their being re-featured would have nothing to do with a "Google" hit. They were, after all, unfeatured. I'm a bit tired, so I hope that makes sense.
Let's just hope things would work out the same for all always. If we get organic hits after getting unfeatured - there are few hubs of mine I would like to see getting unfeatured too.. LOL. Anyways, keep an eye on those hubs agilitymach. If the same happens someday, it will make you understand what caused it. If you do that, let us all know of the secret behind. Now let's let the mystery reveal itself....
I wonder if these are cases of:
The filter taketh away...
And a moderator giveth back.
Yeah. The more I think about it you hit the nail on the head. I bet that's what probably happened.
The only thing that really makes me wonder about that is that these two hubs are two of my worst hubs. I mean, I can see why they are unfeatured. I could see them unfeatured for quality - not just lack of traffic, so why would a moderator refeature them? I'm glad - but just wondering.
I see your point. It would make sense if they were just mediocre hubs. But if they are some of your worst...? Get in there and edit those baby up so they don't fall back off!
by Faith Reaper 9 years ago
I am just curious, all 92 hubs of mine are featured. In your opinion, should one delete (although Featured) any hubs where the score on a particular hub has eventually dropped way down from when it was initially high at one point? Or would it be better to just unpublish and later...
by Sondra Rochelle 6 years ago
Awhile back the team started unfeaturing articles due to lack of traffic. Many here think this is a bad idea, and I agree. Doing this upsets many writers and has nothing to do with quality or how Google views our work...except for the fact that leaving low or no traffic articles online...
by Nathan Bernardo 8 years ago
On a different account, somewhat "experimental" account, one of my Hubs is unfeatured. Generally my inclination was to unpublish it and move it or just delete it. But I kept it and put it in a Hub group. Meaning, if the Hubs before and after it get traffic, possibly the unfeatured one...
by qeyler 5 years ago
I've been writing here for quite a few years, I go back to the ancient era before the 'featured' 'not featured' declension.I have found that 'fixing' a Hub which is not featured is a total waste of time, as in a day or so, after a fix, it is back to unfeatured. I did an experiment and I can...
by Sondra Rochelle 6 years ago
I have been in touch with the team concerning a hub of mine that was unfeatured due to the fact that I had only HP traffic and no Google traffic and felt this was not fair because my article had been online for years and had more than 1400 total views.This morning I received the following email...
by David Livermore 9 years ago
Let me preface this by stating I am not trying to be mean or a troll. In fact, I avoid the forums because I don't want to get involved. But with so many posts about the topics I'm about to discuss, I wanted to put in my two cents and to offer a reality check to old and new hubbers...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|