ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • History & Archaeology»
  • History of Asia

Alexander's invasion of India

Updated on August 13, 2014
Alexander the Great
Alexander the Great

Alexander the Great

In the fourth century B.C. the Greeks and the Iranians fought for the supremacy of the world. Under the leadership of Alexander of Macedonia the Greeks finally destroyed the Iranian empire. Alexander conquered not only Asia Minor and Iraq but also Iran. From Iran he marched to India, obviously attracted by its great wealth. Herodotus, who is called father of history, and other Greek writers had painted India as a fabulous land, which tempted Alexander to invade this country. Alexander also possessed a strong passion for geographical inquiry and natural history. He had heard that on the eastern side of India was the continuation of the Caspian Sea. He was also inspired by the mythical exploits of past conquerors whom he wanted to emulate and surpass.

The political condition of north-west India suited his plans. The area was parcelled out into many independent monarchies and tribal republics which were strongly wedded to the soil and had a fierce love of the principality over which they ruled. Alexander found it easy to conquer these principalities one by one. Among the rulers of these territories, two were well known Ambhi, the prince of Taxila, and Porus whose kingdom lay between the Jhelum and the Chenab. Together they might have effectively resisted the advance of Alexander. But they could not put up a joint front; the Khyber pass remained unguarded.

After the conquest of Iran Alexander moved on to Kabul, from where he marched to India through the Khyber pass and reached the Indus. Ambhi, the ruler of Taxila, readily submitted to the invader, augmented his army and replenished his treasure. When he reached the Jhelum, Alexander met from Porus the first and the strongest resistance. Although Alexander defeated Porus he was impressed by the bravery and courage of the Indian prince. So he restored his kingdom to him and made him his ally. Then he advanced as far as the Beas river. He wanted to move still further eastward but his army refused to accompany him. The Greek soldiers had grown war weary and disease stricken. The hot climate of India and ten years of continuous campaigning had made them terribly home-sick. They had also experienced a taste of Indian fighting qualities on the banks of the Indus, which made them desist from further progress.

In the art of war the Indians were far superior to the other nations inhabiting the area at that time. Especially the Greek soldiers were told of a formidable power on the Ganga. Obviously it was the kingdom of Magadha ruled by the Nandas who maintained an army far outnumbering that of Alexander. So, despite the repeated appeals of Alexander to advance, the Greek soldiers did not budge an inch. The king who had never known defeat at the hands of his enemies had to accept defeat from his own men. He was forced to retreat, and his dream of an eastern empire remained unfulfilled. On his return march Alexander vanquished many small republics till he reached the end of the Indian frontier. He remained in India for 19 months (326-325 B.C.), which were full of fighting. He. had barely any time to organize his conquests. Still he made some arrangements. Most conquered states were restored to their rulers who submitted to his authority. But his own territorial possessions were divided into three parts, which were placed under three Greek governors. He also founded a number of cities to maintain his power in this area.

Alexander's invasion
Alexander's invasion

Alexander's invasion provided the first occasion when ancient Europe came into close contact with ancient India. It produced certain important results. The Indian campaign of Alexander was a triumphant success. He added to his empire an Indian province which was much larger than that conquered by Iran, though the Greek possessions in India were soon lost lo the then Maurya rulers.

The most important outcome of this invasion was the establishment of direct contact between India and Greece in different fields. Alexander's campaign opened up four distinct routes by land and sea. It paved the way for Greek merchants and craftsmen, and increased the existing facilities for trade.

Although some Greeks living on the north-west India even before the invasion of Alexander, the invasion led to the establishment of more Greek settlements in these areas. The most important of them were the city of Alexandria in the Kabul region, Boukephala on the Jhelum, and Alexandria in Sindh. Although the areas were conquered by the Mauryas the settlements were not wiped out, and some of the Greeks continued to live in this area, under both Chandragupta Maurya and Asoka. Alexander was deeply interested in the geography of the mysterious ocean which he saw for the first time at the mouth of the Indus. Therefore he dispatched his new fleet under his friend Nearchus to explore the coast and search for harbours from the mouth of the Indus to that of the Euphrates. So Alexander's historians have left valuable geographical accounts. They also have left clearly dated records of Alexander's campaign, which enable us to build Indian chronology for subsequent events on a definite basis. Alexander's historians also recorded important information about social and economic conditions in India. They gave the records about the sati system, the sale of girls in market places by poor parents, and the fine breed of oxen in north-west India. Alexander sent from there 200,000 oxen to Macedonia for use in Greece. The art of carpentry was the most flourishing craft in India, and carpenters built chariots, boats and ships.

By destroying the power of petty states in north-west India Alexander's invasion paved the way for the expansion of the Maurya empire in that area. According to tradition Chandragupta Maurya, who founded the Maurya empire, had seen something of the working of the military machine of Alexander and had acquired some knowledge which helped him in destroying the power of the Nandas.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      vinay 5 years ago

      sikandar is not great bcz hi lost in india

    • alocsin profile image

      alocsin 6 years ago from Orange County, CA

      I had no idea that Alexander got that far. Nicely written and I learned something new. Voting this Up and Useful.

    • profile image

      Syed Faizal Karim  6 years ago

      One day before his (Sikandar) death. He (Sikandar/Alexandar) told that "After my death, when you people keep my body into the grave, remember that do not let my hand straight towards to my leg, keep my both hands in opposite direction & open (South & North), so that let the world know that Alexandar is not carrying anything with himself. He came in this world with empty hands and going back with empty hands..........

    • profile image

      lozzoms 7 years ago

      Very nice writing, definatly going to get some good feed back from me. And im sure you have already seen it, but the film Alexander is a good watch, accurate in most cases, and good i think, despite what the critics say. Also portrays nicely the battle of the Hydaspes.

    • profile image

      Radhakrishnan, P 7 years ago

      many historians that Aryans passed through Persia before coming to India. Why Aleander's troupe did not see Aryan settlements in Persia? Why they did not see Aryan priests or Aryan settlements on the bank of the Beas? After Alexander's departure a vigorous overland trade sprang up between Europe and Asia. Why those traders did not report about Aryan settlements? But the concrete proof of the existence of Buddhism at the time of the arrival of Alexnader is the Gandhara Art - a blending of Greek and Indian artistic style."

    • profile image

      A.Yeshuratnam 7 years ago

      Alexander introduced western ideas and civilized the western part of India. It is to be noted that no Brahmin priest was found in Porus' empire. There were no Aryan settlements. There were Buddhists and the Gandhara art- a blending of Greek and India artistic style- produced many statues of the Buddha. Prof. A. Yeshuratnam's thesis is that Aryans came to India after the Buddha.

    • theindiaphile profile image

      theindiaphile 7 years ago from London

      Lovely writing and intelligent hub. I've rated you up!

    • profile image

      Syed Faizal Karim 7 years ago

      I love the man called Alexender the Great, his original name is Sikandar,the best part which i like in the history of Alexender when there was a rope on his way to cross a particular boarder of the continent, that rope was nod in such a manner that no buddy opened up, when Alexender was told this complicated hurdle (Rope Nod), Alexender said what the big deal, come i will tell you how open up. Alexender did not even try to open the Nod of the Rope, he simply cut the Rope a moved ahead,,,,,That was passion & creativity in him to rule the whole world,,,,,


      Syed Faizal Karim,


    • cascoly profile image

      cascoly 7 years ago from seattle

      In the Graveyard of Empires: America's War in Afghanistan. By Seth G. Jones. presents the war in its historical context, beginning with Alexander the Great and the proven ability ofAfghans to bring down strong empires

    • dilipchandra12 profile image

      Dilip Chandra 7 years ago from India

      Alexander's invasion is a memorable event in the history of India. Apart from the records of Indians, Alexander's historians records too are giving valuable information about social and economic conditions. And yes it is obviously useful to historians and archaeologists today in their research works. Thanks for the comment Denny Lyon.

    • Denny Lyon profile image

      Denny Lyon 7 years ago from Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

      Ancient history is always of interest to gauge the present. What I like about your writing perspective is it reminds me of when researching genealogy. Sometimes, you can't take the direct route but must research side families to find out more about the main family. Alexander's history recorded a lot of India's history - that might have been lost to the mists of time - but because of Alexander it was written down and that is now useful to historians and archaeologists today. Great hub!