ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Code of Carl Munck - True or False?

Updated on March 23, 2017
Buildreps profile image

Mario Buildreps is a graduate engineer. Become aware of topics in a way you have never heard before.

Is The Code of Carl Munck a real code incripted in ancient monuments around the world?
Is The Code of Carl Munck a real code incripted in ancient monuments around the world? | Source

What Do You Think

Is Carl Munck Right?

See results

Magic or Trick?

Just a few days ago, something new arrived at my desk: The Code of Carl Munck.

I watched the first 15 minutes of the video and analysed the claims Munck makes. It's clear that Munck is a cunning fraudster.

The tactic Carl Munck uses is similar as that of a magician: psychology and deception. People are craving to learn secret codes, no matter what. The "tricks" he shows are even open to anyone, and still, many believe him. What does that say about Humanity?

Not only the calculations are based on false assumptions, the outcomes are incorrect as well. Why do so less people verify anything? We all should be worried about that...yes, you too.

Tragedy

Millions of "seekers" seem to be fascinated by Munck's theory.

The mainstream sciences are discredited by the conspiracist community for numerous of reasons, and they are maybe rightly so. Conspiracists don’t trust science as part of an alleged global mind control system, while the group of spiritual awakening people, who sit close to the conspiracist groups, reject mainstream science because they reject the Soul. Part of that is even true.

After all, the Soul is untestable for the atheist empiricists, and therefore rejected as real. But because of that are these groups sensitive to all kind of swindlers like Carl Munck. In fact any theory that tears down the mainstream ideas is welcomed, but therefore not automatically true. Beware of the false prophets.

What Munck in fact does is guiding a large group of awakening people into a new, false paradigm.

The Video of Carl Munck: "The Code"

The first grandiose assumption is made by moving the prime meridian of Greenwich to the pyramid of Khufu. Most people will swallow this first step easily.
The first grandiose assumption is made by moving the prime meridian of Greenwich to the pyramid of Khufu. Most people will swallow this first step easily.

Pyramids of Giza

Munck goes to the pyramid of Khufu, the magical, mystical pyramid. It is a fact that these pyramids are a mystery to everyone, and therefore easy to use for any purpose.

He then moves the prime meridian to the center of Khufu without a single logic, but many people swallow that step without giving it a single thought. Munck calls it: “we must make an adjustment in our thinking, once made, we achieve a fine-tuning necessary for the decoding process”.

Many people will be afraid to fall behind on that part, and will “adjust” their thinking. After all, we are all programmed. They have given away their critical mind and will swallow everything which comes after.

Most people are too lazy or maybe even incompetent to check, recalculate, and verify the claims Munck is making. The mathematics of Munck is false in every step and he manipulates his numbers constantly. I will show you where he makes false jumps.

Munck sweeps all structures around the world onto the same pile, suggesting that this lost civilization was connected to each other all around the world. That sounds great for anyone in the New Age movement. But there is not a single real connection between the claims he makes.

Keep thou not silent when evil is spoken for Truth

— Thoth
Stonehenge consists, according to Munck, of 75 stones, while in fact it are 93 stones. Why he leaves out some stones is clear of course.
Stonehenge consists, according to Munck, of 75 stones, while in fact it are 93 stones. Why he leaves out some stones is clear of course.

#1 – Stonehenge

Carl Munck says about Stonehenge that it comprises of 60 stones at the outer circle and 15 stones in the center. There are today 93 stones, not counting the missing ones. He neglects the other stones or doesn’t even show them in his own made drawing.

He continues by stating that the 60 stones are arranged in a circle, which is true, and then asks if they might knew about 360 degrees. We don’t know that, it could be so, it could not be so. But he then makes a huge jump by making the equation of 360 × 60 = 21,600 without any further knowledge. It is the second grandiose assumption in Munck's theory, but most people might not even recognize it as unrelated assumptions, because they are mathematically ignorant.

Munck then picks the rough latitude of Stonehenge 51°10', which is only correct within one nautical mile.

He makes the division 21,600 ÷ 51 ÷ 10 = 42.35. This division is completely unrelated, but that is masked behind the empty phrase that the ancients spoke a mathematical language, and hints to the idea that we are ignorant. Of course.

The outcome of this division is 42.35". With that he constructs the center latitude of Stonehenge to be 51°10'42.35", which is false. It is 51°10'44". So, he is lying. It’s in fact 51 meters wrong. Munck's "magical" formula is wrong. Already in the first few minutes of the video.

If you refuse to see through these kinds of tricks, you are selling your Soul. Do you want to belong to the ignorant hordes? If you have turned your back to science, because you don't trust them anymore, and turned your face to irrationality instead towards divine reason, you're lost. Do you also believe the Earth is flat? If that is so, you have set your consciousness back some 500 years.

The claim that a and b intersect at c appears true to our senses, but the claim is made on an assumption.
The claim that a and b intersect at c appears true to our senses, but the claim is made on an assumption. | Source
The claim appeared to be false when we look from another perspective. We had too little information and made therefore an assumption to get to our so coveted goal.
The claim appeared to be false when we look from another perspective. We had too little information and made therefore an assumption to get to our so coveted goal. | Source

An Example of Number Tricking

The World Trade Center had 21,800 windows. It’s just a number that comes in handy, similar as the amount of stones at the outer circle of Stonehenge times 360 degrees. You need a large number to find your way to your goal, which is a fake goal. The WTC was not round, it was square. We give that the number: 4. The WTC’s center location was at 40°42'41.57" N, 74°00'47.78" W.

We now do the same as Munck does: the division trick. 21,800 × 4 ÷ 40° ÷ 42' = 51.905”. I then say this is the dead center of the WTC, which is a lie, but since no one checks it I get away with it. The public is mellow of all the data poured over them.

Is this about the truth? Of course not! It’s bullshit, far from any truth.

#2 – Earthwork at Newark

The next ancient monument Munck guides us to is the Newark Earthwork. He says the ancients knew a decimal system. Again an assumption which he will "prove" by his number manipulations.

He comes there by claiming the ancients used a decimal system based on Stonehenge's number 21,600. He shows the numbers 2,160 and 216,000. These two new numbers are, according to Munck, magically related to this Earthwork at Newark.

Munck says the Earthwork at Newark is at 40°02’27.000", which is wrong. But he needed that false latitude to calculate to the magical number 2,160 by doing his magicians' trick: 40×2×27=2,160. "Awww!", says the public.

But the center is at 40°02’27.7", closer to 40°02’28" than to 40°02’27.000". 40×2×27.7=2,216 but that truth wouldn't fit Munck's ruthless goal.

Munck implies with his 27.000" to be capable of finding the center of this Earthwork with an accuracy of about one inch. The diameter is also presented wrong. We have here three false statements in one slide.

Munck then states that: "there are those who want to write this off as mere coincidence". This was an empty phrase, since his data was corrupt. But his followers believe that coincidence doesn't exist, so he now surely must be right.

Then he says the following: "the distance from Giza to Newark is 113°34'56.2207"". That is wrong, it is 113°33'54". Again, his start is slightly off, but that is necessary to make the next fit. The digits after the dot (.2207) imply that Munck is able to "calculate" the distance between Giza and Newark up to one tenth of an inch (!). Nonsense of course, he uses these last digits to manipulate his outcomes, which is now 216,000. The correct calculation would be: 113×33×54=201,366. That number has nothing to do with 216,000.

Why does he now suddenly jumps to 216,000? Because 113×34=3,842 which is larger than 2,160. So he needs a higher number, and hides it behind the statement that the ancients used a decimal system. But because the final equation is also larger than 21,600, he needs an even higher number. That's why he now goes to the next "magical" number 216,000, and to get there he needs the additional, false numbers: 56.2207.

Again, the work of a false prophet.

Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance

— George Bernard Shaw

#3 – Goloring in Germany

Munck jumps from Newark to Germany. But the latitude of the Goloring in Germany is not at 50°20'27.000" like he claims. That's the latitude of the highway situated to the North. The latitude of the center of the Goloring is at 50°20'23". Remember that Munck derived this wrong number, 27.000”, by dividing the self made number 216,000 by the 8 openings in the octagon of Newark.

This number of the 8 openings came in handy to make the next division. Again, 27.000" is a bullshit number. He implies an accuracy of one inch while he’s more than 400 feet off. So, the start was false and the end is false.

I'm now intrigued whether this guy, who's a former defense contractor (why do conspiracists even trust him because of his past, maybe he's hired to create a false paradigm, a false trap for awakening people, paid by the government), is completely ignorant of what he is doing or has only evil intentions.

Do You Still Think

Carl Munck is Right?

See results

#4 – Back to Stonehenge

Like a magician asks Munck his listeners: “Before Stonehenge fell into ruins, when a visitor approached Stonehenge, what is the first number to come in mind?”

Of course, everyone would say something different, but Munck says: “yes, 2. Lintels and supporting rocks.” I would say 3, one lintel and two supporting rocks, but that number wouldn’t fit his goal of course. Or I would maybe say 20 or 24 when I would see the large amount of stones.

Once, inside, he says we find the numbers 60, 15, and 2. He then constructs a number, 1800, which he divides by the self invented number 5, and finds 360. "Awwww", says the large majority "amazing". But that, of course, comes because he worked to his goal like a grand manipulator does. It was never about the truth, it is only about money.

He then asks: “did they leave us something at 360?”, and shows the image of the pyramids of Giza. The number 360 was completely self constructed, it were not the stones which were speaking.

Truth Counter After 15 Minutes

Nr.
Claim
True or False?
#1
Calculated latitude of Stonehenge
False
#2a
Calculated latitude of Newark Earthwork
False
#2b
Calculated distance Newark Earthwork-Giza
False
#3
Calculated latitude of Goloring
False
#4
Calculated relation between Stonehenge and Giza
False

Conclusion

After 15 minutes of watching are all 5 from the 5 major claims false. That's a score of 100% falsity.

You need to feel a deep love for truth to find it. Do you love the truth? Carl Munck doesn't love the truth, no, he only seems to care about selling his ideas.

We're after 15 minutes sitting on a massive database of false numbers, and we still have some 2.5 hours of watching to go. What a mess, and what a waste of your time, my time, and Munck's time.

If the calculations Munck shows seem true to you, it's because you're mathematical illiterate. That might sound harsh but it's the naked truth. Munck manipulates non-stop numbers which has nothing to do with any truth. The easy path of lazy watching to bullshit leads via-via from the one level of ignorance to the other level of ignorance.

Most people are completely ignorant as to what mathematics actually is and how it's able to lure the human psyche into one of its countless traps. This is just one of them: deception.

If you really deeply believe Munck is right, you're lost. You have been lured into a false paradigm, from the one into the next. But don't worry, you will have a second chance in a next life.

Only if you feel a deep love for the truth, you will find it. The sooner, the better.


© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • jgshorebird profile image

      jgshorebird 4 weeks ago from Southeastern U.S.

      Interesting information. Is this akin to numerology of structures then, when Archaeocryptography is not utilized correctly?

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 4 weeks ago from Europe

      Thanks, jgshorebird. I think that most archaeocryptographs don't use the mathematics as it should be, that is to say, they degrade it to something that's subjective to their whims.

    • billybuc profile image

      Bill Holland 4 weeks ago from Olympia, WA

      We've seen people like this throughout history, and amazingly they always garner a huge following. I'm afraid there are millions of people out there, looking for answers to life, and willing to follow anyone who can dazzle them with false premises. Very interesting article, my friend.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 4 weeks ago from Europe

      That true, my friend. A growing number of people is looking for answers to many questions. Magicians are of all times. Just for the entertainment, not for the truth. Thanks for your comment, Bill.

    • AliciaC profile image

      Linda Crampton 4 weeks ago from British Columbia, Canada

      This is interesting and very thought provoking, as always, Buildreps. I appreciate your emphasis on the search for truth, which I think is very important.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 4 weeks ago from Europe

      Thank you for your kind comment, Alicia. I think truth, if that even exists in the way we hope, is already obscured enough.

    • Jodah profile image

      John Hansen 4 weeks ago from Queensland Australia

      Buildreps, I think you have exposed Munck for the true fraud he is. Thank you for sharing this and enlightening us all. people can be very gullible and easily led to follow alternative theories like this.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 4 weeks ago from Europe

      Thank you, john. I wish it was otherwise and we could learn something magnificent but that isn't the case, unfortunately.

    • Larry Rankin profile image

      Larry Rankin 4 weeks ago from Oklahoma

      Always interesting, friend.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 4 weeks ago from Europe

      Thank you very much, Larry my friend. Hope you're doing well.

    Click to Rate This Article