ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Andres Serrano’s “Piss Christ” – Should Art be Censored on the Grounds of Religious Blasphemy?

Updated on June 12, 2018
JenniferWilber profile image

Jennifer Wilber works as an ESL instructor, substitute teacher, and freelance writer. She holds a B.A. in Creative Writing and English.

Piss Christ by Andres Serrano
Piss Christ by Andres Serrano | Source

Background of Andres Serrano’s “Piss Christ”

“Piss Christ” is a photograph by the American artist and photographer Andres Serrano. It was created in 1987. This work depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank of a yellow liquid that is presumed to be the artist's urine. This photograph won the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art's "Awards in the Visual Arts" competition. This competition was sponsored by the National Endowment for the Arts, a United States Government agency that offers support and funding for artistic projects and is backed by public funding.

While initially well received, this piece caused great amounts of controversy in 1989 when the media brought attention to the fact that Serrano received public funding for this work. The artist received hate mail and death threats for this piss and lost his grant following the scandal that his artwork created. Many opponents of this piece of artwork claimed that the government funding of “Piss Christ” violated the separation of church and state.

Piss Christ by Andres Serrano
Piss Christ by Andres Serrano | Source

What is the Controversy?

Many people consider Andres Serrano’s photograph “Piss Christ” to be offensive and blasphemous because it can be interpreted as a blatant attack on Christianity. Even more, the fact that tax payers’ money was used to fund the project made this project even more controversial and may may have made people even more upset about this so-called work of art, as it was their tax dollars that funded a project that insults their religion.

My Initial Take on this Piece

When I first saw this piece, I assumed that it was just a wannabe artist trying to be offensive for the sake of being offensive and riling people up, but upon further reflection, I feel that there might be some kind of artistic statement behind it after all. If the government is willing to fund artwork, the artwork produced should not be censored.

Photo artist Andres Serrano, portrayed by foto di matti at the c/o Gallery during Serrano's exhibition in 2005.
Photo artist Andres Serrano, portrayed by foto di matti at the c/o Gallery during Serrano's exhibition in 2005. | Source

Does Piss Christ Have Any Artistic Meaning, or is it Simply Meant to Offend?

This image of Christ differs from more traditional religious images because it is submerged in a tank of urine, which shows the artist’s disrespect for Christ, the Christian church, and the beliefs of many Americans. While most images of Jesus show respect and reverence, this one shows complete disrespect. The artist’s intent at first seems to be to simply anger the religious community and see how far he could go to insult people in the name of art, rather than to make any kind of artistic statement, but that may not be the case.

There could be a deeper artistic statement behind it. It may be a statement about how Americans, as a whole, treat religion. Rather than actually living by what Jesus taught, we use his name as justification to fight wars, hate people who have different beliefs or lifestyles, etc, and expect to be forgiven just for claiming to believe in him. The artist could be making a statement about how, if we treat Jesus like that, we might as well just “piss” on him. It is possibly a statement of how hypocritical many religious people are. What is more blasphemous, Andres Serrano’s work, or using the name of Christ to justify such disgusting behaviors such as intolerance and violence?

My Take Away

It is up to the individual to decide what they consider to be obscene or blasphemous. As Americans, we have freedom of speech and freedom of thought. For religious people, God also gave humans free will. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and are able to make their own judgments about what is offensive to them. There should not be any kind of public agency or anything that regulates what is acceptable, because no one should be allowed to tell people what they can or cannot think.

Artists should not be forced to sign a pledge that would regulate the content of their art to receive federal funding. They should be able to make ethical choices about what they want to do with the federal funding that they receive. Everything could be considered offensive to someone, and artists shouldn’t be expected to censor their work just because it may be considered offensive by someone.

© 2018 Jennifer Wilber


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)