ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Capsim Simulation: Ferris Attacks The High End Sensor Market

Updated on March 25, 2013

This will be a review for the first three rounds of the Capsim Simulation where Ferris, the computer generated company, attacks the High End Sensor Segment to take control of that market space.

In the Capstone (Capsim simulation) Course at Georgian Court University, Lakewood, NJ summer session 2012, there are six companies: Andrews, Baldwin, Chester, Digby, Erie and Ferris (Computer). The industry simulation is the sensor industry. The teams play six rounds in the game. At the beginning of the third round the modules are: Research and Development; Marketing, Production, Finance and Human Resources.

In Round 0 of the simulation the High End Segment contains the following companies and products: Andrews-Adams; Baldwin-Bid; Chester-Cid; Digby-Dixie; Erie-Echo; Ferris-Fist. The High End Statistics for all companies are set in Round 0 which ends December 31, 2012: On page 4 of the Capstone Courier we find the Production Analysis for all segments. The following are the statistics for the High End Segment.
Units’ Sold-366; Inventory-40;
Product Age Revision Date-4/19/2011; Product Age at 12/31/2012 is 1.7 years old;
Mean Time Before Failure (MTBF)-23000; Performance Coordinate-8.0
Size Coordinate-12.0; Price-$38.00;
Material Cost-$15.98; Labor Cost-$8.57; Contribution Margin-33%;
2nd Shift & Overtime-0%; Automation Next Round-3.0;
Capacity Next Round-900 and Plant Utilization 45%.

Next we go to page 7 of the Capstone Courier and review the High End Segment Analysis for Round 0.

The total industry unit demand and actual unit sales for the High End Products is 2,554. This means that 2,554,000 units of high end sensor products are sold during the year that ends December 31, 2012. High End Sensors compose 11.2% percent of the entire sensor industry sales. All companies have an equal market share of 14% for the High End Segment.

For Round 0 the Promotional Budget for all companies in the segment is $800 with Customer Awareness of 49%. The Sales Budget for all companies is $800 with Customer Accessibility of 48% and the December Customer Survey of 21.

We are still on page 7 of the Capstone Courier, High End Segment Analysis, for the end of Round 0. We now review Ideal Position Expectations. Performance is 8.9 and Size is 11.1. Performance and Size are the most important buying criteria at 43.0%. Ideal Age = 0.0 is 29% in importance. This means consumers want the newest product possible in the high end segment. Reliability is 19% in importance with MTBF between 20,000 and 25,000 hours. A company should never increase MTBF over the maximum number, in this case 25,000 because the money spent is just wasted. The price of the High End Product is between $30.00 and $40.00. Price is the least important criteria in the high end segment at only 9%.

We shall explain what Ferris does to gain an advantage in the High End Customer Buying Criteria. We download the Capstone Courier for Round 1 which ends December 31, 2013. We go to page 4 Production Analysis.

In Round 1, Ferris improves its high end product Fist. In the Research and Development Module, Ferris increases the Performance Coordinate to 9.1 and decreases the Size Coordinate to 10.9. The Revision Date for Fist is 12/22/2013. Round 1 ends December 31, 2013, so these improvements take almost one year. Ferris increases MTBF to 24,000, an increase of 1,000 hours. The cost of R&D is $988,000 which is found on Ferris’ Income Statement in the Annual Report.

In the Marketing Module Ferris increases the price of Fist from $38.00 to $39.50. The Promotional Budget is increased to $1,000,000 and the Sales Budget is increased to $1,175,000. Note that all these changes do not take effect until 12/22/2013. Therefore when we check page 4 of the Courier, Top Products in the High End Segment, Fist has sold 368,000 units and has only a 12% market share. However, Ferris has set Fist to begin Round 2 as the top product in the High End Segment. The age of Fist at 12/31/2013 is 1.36 years.

Teams make a comparison check among the High End Segment Products in the Production Analysis section. Ferris does not increase Automation for Fist and Plant Utilization remains the same. Ferris Income Statement at the end of Round 1 for the year ended December 31, 2013 shows that the high end product Fist has a net margin of $1,479,000.

The results of Ferris’ improvements for Fist show up in Round 2. Download the Capstone Courier for Round 2. Check the bottom of page 7 for Top Products in the High End Segment. Fist is number one, controls 24% market share and sells 834,000 units. Ferris improves Fist again with an increase in Performance to 10.2 and a decrease in Size to 9.8. MTBF is maximized to 25,000 hours. These revisions take place 12/22/2014. Fist will decrease in price $0.50 to $39.00. Ferris Income Statement at the end of Round 2 for the year ended December 31, 2014 shows Fist has a net margin of $6,107,000.

Now companies review Production Analysis for Round 2 to see what the competition is planning. Production Analysis displays new products. Note that Ferris invents a new product Fox. The Primary Segment is left blank. Fox has a Performance Coordinate of 11.0, Size Coordinate of 9.0, and MTBF of 25,000 hours. The revision date for Fox is 12/12/2014 and age is 0 at that date. Price is $39.00. Plant automation for the next round is 5.5. When analyzing customer buying criteria for the High End Market Segment, Fox is a high end product. This new high end product Fox and the original high end product Fist will produce increased sales in the High End Segment for Ferris in Round 3 that ends December 31, 2015.

When we download the Capstone Courier for Round 3 and check the High End Statistics we have the new product Fox with 25% market share and Fist with 24% market share. Thus Ferris has almost 50% of the High End Product Segment. Ferris’ Income Statement at the end of Round 3 for the year ended December 31, 2015, shows Fist with a net margin of $4,680,000 and Fox with a net margin of $8,435,000.

Teams in the competition will have to develop strategies to counterattack Ferris. A company may want to withdraw from the High End Market and focus on the Traditional or Low End market. Another company that is competitive in the High End Market may want to improve its product and take market share from Ferris.

Companies must check Production Analysis each round to analyze what the competition is doing.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)