ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Environmental Science, Policy, and Management

Updated on March 23, 2017

Why risk assessment is flawed beyond the point of acceptability and how we fix it

In the wake of America’s election, the scientific community and its allies have expressed grave concern over the new administration’s disregard for the environment. Less sensationalized, but perhaps more relevant, are the science-policy interface’s fatal methodological flaws, which have been reinforced and reproduced for decades. While research extends legitimacy to proposals and provides insight about issues and solutions, it can also instill in policymakers a dangerous comfort with risk and unknowns. When research leaves questions unanswered—as it often does—policymakers are reliant upon scientists’ and economists’ calculations of the incalculable; estimates regarding acceptable levels of risk are taken at face value and weighed against the benefits of the policy at hand (classic risk analysis within cost-benefit analysis). I will argue that this approach to incorporating research results into regulatory policymaking is not only malicious, but also perpetuates a short-sighted environmental ethical framework. An alternative approach to environmental regulatory policymaking must be taken using an ecofeminist framework.

First, using risk analysis to justify risking environmental health is malicious. Risk analysis, praised as objective and truthful, never explicitly characterizes the risk-taker, when in reality those subject to the most health risk factors are those with the least financial—and, consequently, political—capital. Risk analysis—a process which excludes the voices of poor communities—posits certain landscapes and populations as disposable, all in the name of technically or financially progressing others. Cost-benefit analysis conducted as a precursor to the creation of devices which will end up as e-waste, for example, characterizes the “cost” or negative externality of toxic waste processing as distant and worth the environmental risk. This logic is exemplified in a 1991 memo from the former Chief Economist at the World Bank, Lawrence Summers. He states:

“The measurements of the costs of health impairing pollution depend [] on the foregone earnings from increased morbidity and mortality. From this point of view a given amount of health impairing pollution should be done in the country with the lowest cost, which will be the country with the lowest wages. The economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable… The demand for a clean environment for aesthetic and health reasons is likely to have very high income elasticity.”

By rationalizing selectively compromising certain populations’ health, governments and researchers are mutually responsible for explicitly discriminating against populations with the least resources—poor populations which oftentimes intersect populations of color. Brazil’s former Secretary of Environment echoed critique in response to Summers’ memo, saying “[such] reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane”, and that it demonstrated “the arrogant ignorance of many conventional 'economists'”. For many parts of the global south, this insanity is a reality, wherein industrial production and waste processing are concentrated, and negative health impacts are experienced firsthand at a disproportionately high rate.

Next, monetizing the potential losses we face by vandalizing nature during risk analysis is a facet of a short-sighted environmental ethical framework. Valuing nature and its conservation only to the extent that it is useful to humankind risks disrupting relationships in nature that we are yet to even understand. By isolating certain natural entities to conserve based on cost-benefit analysis, we fail to acknowledge nature’s interconnectedness and interdependence (see Commoner’s “four laws of ecology”). Ecofeminist environmental ethics offer an alternative, prioritizing the preservation of natural entities on the basis off not only their intrinsic value, but also their functional value within a larger system of relationships which comprise an organismal Earth. Under this frame of ethics, risking certain portions of the environmental for the sake of others becomes a non-option, and the systemic functionality of the Earth is prioritized, even if it is not yet widely understood. Ecofeminist environmental ethics align well with classic conceptions of the precautionary principle, which dictate that any risk of harm, rather than proof of harm, should act as the stimulus for action. The only way to uphold the precautionary principle as well as ecofeminist environmental ethics is to strive to understand how each portion of the Earth impacts others before taking actions which may compromise the integrity of the system—something that will require an immense campaign towards regulatory policymaking reform.

As a reflection of our values and priorities, the ethical framework we employ to make policy decisions needs to be re-evaluated and replaced with one that is holistic, preserves accountability, and ensures precautionary approaches to co-development with the environment. Only then can regulation become truly solvent, rather than yet another perpetuator of destruction, classism, and racism in the Trump era.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)