ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Scientific Theory of Evolution or merely the Religion of Humanism

Updated on November 13, 2012

Fossils kept in the shadows tell the true story!

The truth of the fossil record keeps rising to the surface.
The truth of the fossil record keeps rising to the surface. | Source

Evolution polls show little has changed!

According to a recent Gallup Poll done this year, 46% of Americans polled believe in Creationism compared to just 15% that believe in evolution alone, while 32% believe in "theistic evolution;" that God played a role in man's evolution.

This is troubling news for evolutionists after more than fifty years of strictly evolutionist teaching in education. Although 29% of those with postgraduate degrees believed in evolution just ahead of the 25% of this same group believing in Creationism.

This proves that if you teach the same lie long enough the majority of people will believe it.

Incas Rocks from Peru

Evolution evidence fraud and misinterpretated

One thing that has always bothered me about the fossil dating method used to allow enough time for evolution to happen is based on circular reasoning. Geologists will tell you that they know a certain fossil is 100 million years old, because it was found in a certain layer of rock. They know that layer of rock is 100 million years old , because they found that particular fossil in it. Even the fossils from the Cambrian explosion stand as evidence against evolution according to Darwin himself.

The staggering amounts of time stated by evolutionists for fossils, stalactites, rocks, and coal to be formed doesn't line up with the evidence. Many manmade objects have been found inside of rocks and coal. Or consider the human footprints found in rock supposedly 25-40 million years old. Or other human footprints found inside of and next to dinosaur prints. So what do all these discoveries mean? Most are quietly pushed aside, as they evidence the many problems with the dating method and demolish the millions of years needed for evolution to be a viable theory.

It's quite obvious from all the evidence that men lived alongside the dinosaurs when you view the many clay figures, drawings, and carvings from humans that lived just thousands of years ago all around the world. Although Darwin stated that further fossil evidence would be uncovered to establish his theory of evolution, most of the evidence discredits evolution.

Consider the massive fossil boneyards found all over the world, these would seem to indicate the historical truth of a world wide flood, such as the Noah's flood of the Bible. These massive extinctions of dinosaurs clearly point to a cataclysmic flood according to many scientists.

Anyone who has been to Estes Park or Pike's Peak can attest to the abundant sea shell fossils virtually everywhere near the top of these mountains.

Lloyd Pye does a great lecture showing the frauds perpetrated in the name of proving evolution, as well as, the discrimination done to any scientists that disagree with the theory of evolution. Do our supposed humanoid ancestors still exist as the bigfoot species that are found all around the world?

Why are scientists biased towards proving evolution, unless it's just to explain our existence without an intelligent designer? Starting with the discovery of "Piltdown man" by Charles Darwin, we've been shown one hoax after another according to researchers at http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php. The Piltdown man's skull was only 500 years old, and the jawbone found was of a more recently deceased orangutan. This is quite typical for the fossil evidence used to prove evolution, but certainly can't be considered anything close to science.

Inspite of all the artists drawings of the missing links that we've seen in the textbooks, most of these have all been shown to be frauds from the start. Starting with bones from animals other than humans, including both Lucy and Nebraska man. Lucy was discovered and later shown to have been the leg bone of a chimpanzee. So much for the missing link.

Nebraska man was developed from a single tooth of a wild pig, but was shown in the textbooks drawings with his whole family. They could show what a whole family looked like, from the tooth of a pig. Is this theory, myth, or religion? Yet, evolutionists attack creatonists as those who believe in myths unsubstantiated by any evidence.They should look into the mirror of their own evidence, to see what if any remains.

Don't the similarities of all living creatures point to the same intelligent designer, rather than us having animals as ancestors?

While I don't hold Mr. Pye's views of aliens creating us for a slave race, there's probably better evidence of that than evolution. It is quite interesting that primates have 48 chromosomes, while humans evolved upward from primates after losing 2 chromosomes.

The last five minutes of this video are quite revealing, as an anonymous geneticist points out problems that most scientists in the field realize, but won't admit. These scientific terms are quite complicated for myself to understand, but the essence of it is that there is a discontinuity between human and primate genes that they can't account for. That there are also repeated Y chromosomes in male humans that apes don't have. The geneticist refers to himself as the DNA deepthroat.

"At that moment, when the DNA/RNA system became understood, the debate between Evolutionists and Creationists should have come to a screeching halt"....... I.L. Cohen, Researcher and Mathematician; Member NY Academy of Sciences; Officer of the Archaeological Inst. of America; "Darwin Was Wrong - A Study in Probabilities"; New Research Publications, 1984, p. 4 ( Copyright 2004 s8int.com and C. James)

Another fine example of evolutionary researchers going amuck is when an African pygmy named Ota Benga was captured in the Conga and brought to America to be displayed in chains and cages as a live missing link. They seemed to forget that when captured, Benga was taken from his wife and children against his will, merely so he could be displayed at zoos and fairs as evidence of evolution.

This merely proves that there are living human beings whose skeletons they would use to prove their grand hoax of evolution, but whose very existence disproves evolution's survival of the fittest. Will the fraud of evolution and the persecution of scientists who disagree ever stop?

I agree with their right to worship themselves, if they so choose. Please let's just call it what it truly is, their chosen religion and not pretend this is science anymore. It would appear that the establishment of their religion by the education system and government violates the Constitution. For any evolutionists that are open-minded enough to do more research into the supposed facts of evolution, see this link.

At least, many of the original proponents of evolution admitted the truth in their later lives, that they merely explained away the creation of God through their theories of evolution, so that they might live their lives in any way they saw fit.




False evidence for evolution!

The Case For A Creator!

The book by Lee Strobel, The Case For a Creator is a great read. Lee describes his journey from an atheistic reporter who later becomes a Christian investigating the origins of the universe. Lee Strobel interviews various experts from physics, astronomy, DNA research and other fields of science that gives compelling testimony for an intelligent designer.

Many scientists, inspite of years of indoctrination with the "supposed facts" of evolution, become convinced of intelligent design as they research their chosen fields of expertise. The vast complexity of DNA alone has convinced many scientists that a natural chance start for life is utterly impossible. Searching out the truth takes time and effort for those who really want to know. Others would rather remain ignorant, let them.

Atheist professor gains new understanding in near death experience!

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • slcockerham profile image
      Author

      slcockerham 4 years ago from Tallahassee, Florida

      Hey vibesites, Glad that you loved my hub. Thanks for your comments!

    • slcockerham profile image
      Author

      slcockerham 4 years ago from Tallahassee, Florida

      Hey Mhatter99, Thanks for your comments. We've all been deceived to varying degrees, there are facts related by bones, but it depends on who's doing the interpretation.

    • slcockerham profile image
      Author

      slcockerham 4 years ago from Tallahassee, Florida

      Man from Modesto, Thanks for your encouraging comments. You are exactly right about the missing transition fossils of evolution. Every once in awhile we just have to start shoveling away some of the mountain of bs that we're being covered with.

    • slcockerham profile image
      Author

      slcockerham 4 years ago from Tallahassee, Florida

      Hey Scott, Thanks for your comments about these myths of evolution that have been debunked. I know, it's difficult when you find you have been lied to for so long.

    • vibesites profile image

      vibesites 4 years ago from United States

      wow - very cool - love it!

    • Mhatter99 profile image

      Martin Kloess 4 years ago from San Francisco

      Thank you for this well written report. My son is a professional "bone head". To him evolution is a theory. The bones are facts.

    • Man from Modesto profile image

      Man from Modesto 4 years ago from Kiev, Ukraine (formerly Modesto, California)

      Very well written. You are sure to activate some brain washing demon anger with this one.

      People might like to know that "unicorn" in the Bible was formerly translated "monocerous" until a few decades ago. Who made the change? Who worked up an anti-Bible campaign about a fake horse with one horn? A: Satanist disinformationists. The real one-horned animal is very likely the Rhinoceros.

      If anyone cared, they would quickly learn that every last "proof" fossil evidence is based on lies. Even if the dozen or so claimed half-apes were legitimate, there should be a smooth transition of varying forms over the "millions and billions" of years that never happened (another lie invented by Charles Lyell, who wrote in his private journal he made up stratigraphy to debunk the Bible because he hated Christians).

    • scottcgruber profile image

      scottcgruber 4 years ago from USA

      This is an excellent pile of Creationist drivel, thoroughly-debunked myths, and anti-science talking points. Thank you for putting these all in one convenient place so I can easily refer people to the many lies of Creationists.

    Click to Rate This Article