ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

False Confessions

Updated on March 21, 2020


The Innocence Project is a nonprofit organization which works to free or exonerate convicted individuals based on DNA evidence. The Innocence Project provides services at no cost to its clients, takes on some of the hardest cases, and provides support to clients after their release. The Innocence Project has already freed dozens of inmates and continues to work to free hundreds more. Below, we will examine three cases.


Case 1

Patrick Brown served 8 years of a 22 to 70 year sentence for armed burglary, armed robbery, illegal possession of a firearm, and criminal conspiracy. He was convicted despite DNA evidence that excluded him as a culprit (Patrick Brown).

Two intruders had broken into a Pennsylvania home; they wore bandanas on their faces and were carrying guns. One struck the homeowner in the face with his gun, causing him to cover his face with his hands. The intruders then left through a back door (Patrick Brown).

The two robbers left behind a blue bandana and a hammer when they ran away. There were latent fingerprints and a footprint left, as well. The former evidence was not considered. Also, an officer stated he was familiar with and investigating Patrick Brown. Later, Brown was identified by the victim in a photo lineup. Brown’s charges were later dismissed due to a DNA match in CODIS, but he remains incarcerated for other charges (Patrick Brown).


The fact that the victim identified Patrick Brown in the photo lineup is truly not reassuring when one knows details about eyewitness accounts. For one, the victim was distracted by a weapon; he was also attacked and had limited visibility while trying to protect himself. All of these affect the reliability of his witness, because he was not fully focused on the details (Jonas &Herr, 2020).

Case 2

The second case involves Mr. Jonathan Barr who served 14 years of an 85-year sentence for rape and murder. In November of 1991, 14-year old Canteresa Matthews went missing and in December, her body was found on a running path; she was identified as the victim of a sexual assault (Our Client).

There were no arrests or leads in the case for 10 months, until the police arrested Mr. Barr on October 20, 1992 after a witness stated that Jonathon Barr told him he saw Matthews getting into a car with Robert Lee Veal and Robert Taylor. Veal was brought in for questioning and implicated Barr, along with four other teenagers, in a hand-written statement (Our Client).

Before the trial, the Illinois state crime lab identified a sperm sample from the victim. The sample did not match any of the five defendants, but the source of the semen was never sought (Our Client).

Veal and Sharp plead guilty; the rest were convicted during a two-year period. Barr sentence was 85 years. His requests for appeals were denied, including a request for DNA testing. Luckily, DNA testing was sought again in August of 2009; the test revealed a complete CODIS match. On November 3, 2011, charges against Barr were dismissed (Our Client).


There are a couple of issues within the Barr case, the lack of DNA evidence aside. For one, ten months had passed since the crime had occurred, before there were any witnesses. The lapse between the time a crime occurs, and the identification of a perpetrator can affect the reliability of a perpetrator (Jonas &Herr, 2020).

Also, the perpetrators were all very young; they were 14 years old. It is known that the younger the suspect, the more likely that he or she is to give a false testimony. Although the teenagers all signed hand-written statements, their age makes their statements questionable (Jonas &Herr, 2020).

Case 3

The final case involves Antonio Beaver. Antonio Beaver spent 10 years of an 18-year sentence in prison for armed robbery and carjacking. Thankfully, latent fingerprints and blood stains inside the automobile were collected and later analyzed. When the DNA evidence was considered, it did not match Antonio Beaver and he was released from prison.


There were several issues with the Beaver case. For one, the victim was a 26-year old white woman who was attacked by an African-American in a ball cap; the issues with this witness are two-fold. For one, the woman is identifying someone outside of her own race. It is known that reliability declines when someone is trying to identify another who is not of their race (Jonas &Herr, 2020).

Additionally, the perpetrator was wearing a ball-cap, which lessens her visibility of her attacker. When the visibility is lower, the reliability of the witness is lower (Jonas &Herr, 2020).

Lastly, there was the presence of a weapon; the victim was attacked with a screwdriver. When a weapon is present during a crime, it can distract the witness, in this case our victim. The victim becomes focused on the weapon, and less on other details, like the identity of her attacker (Jonas &Herr, 2020).

False Confessions

We have examined three cases in which there was, or nearly was, a false confession. We have revealed that over a quarter of convictions involve false confessions that occur for a variety of reasons. Chief among these are naivety of the accused, poor understanding of one’s rights, and a lower intelligence (Stambor, 2006).

A police interrogation can take hours to complete. Throughout the interrogation, police may lie about the evidence, promise lighter sentences if one confesses, or even offer suggestions about what might have led the suspect to commit the crime. Many suspects, tired and stressed from the hours of questioning are more likely to give in to one of these ploys to get out of the interrogation room (Stambor, 2006).

Not all false confessions are an attempt to get free from the interrogation room, however. Many innocents simply believe that the evidence will exonerate them; they sign Miranda waivers feeling like they have nothing to hide. Still, others begin to doubt their own memories, thinking they may have blacked out the crime (Stambor, 2006).

Certain populations are particularly vulnerable to false evidence that police may offer up, including children and those with disabilities. It is important that police alter their interrogation tactics for vulnerable populations (Stambor, 2006).



Overall, false confessions stem from naivety. Youth, the disabled, and even competent adults wrongfully think that they must give in to the interrogators bribes or believe the evidence, despite feeling to the contrary. Individuals place too much confidence in the system and end up closing the case with a false confession; they are never exonerated by the evidence and spend years in prison as result.

Thankfully, there is help like the Innocence Project that can help to free the innocent through the introduction of DNA or other forensic evidence. Such organizations can help the convicted free of charge, even in the toughest of cases and despite false confessions


Antonio Beaver. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Jonas, J., & Herr, D. (2020, January). The Trouble with Eyewitness Testimony: Toward a Model on Jujry Instruction on Witness Testimony. Retrieved March 4, 2020, from

Our Client Jonathan Barr Celebrates his Birthday Today. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Patrick Brown. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Stambor, Z. (2006, September). Can Psychology Prevent False Confessions? Retrieved March 4, 2020, from

© 2020 Stasha Corene Hall


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)