DNA Cloning of Mammals: Not Always Perfect Twins
What Is Cloning?
Cloning is the developing of two identical organisms. It has occurred in humans as long as identical twins have been born. Only in the past century have scientists begun to discover ways to artificially create cloned organisms. This of course has arisen a lot of great debate on whether cloning should be legal.
The first kind of cloning that scientists used on mammals was that of artificial embryo twinning. It is a very low tech procedure to create twins that has been around for decades. This technology soon caused scientists to begin researching other ways to create clones, and soon came across somatic cell nuclear transfer, where they began to make clones of adult organisms. They did this the case of Dolly the sheep. In 1997, Dolly was the first organism to be cloned through somatic cell nuclear transfer. This means that Dolly is genetically identical to her 'donor mother.'
Artificial Embryo Twinning
Before Dolly, there was artificial embryo twinning. In order to understand how artificial twinning occurs, it is best to understand how identical twins develop. Identical twins differ from fraternal twins, because they come from one sperm and one egg; therefore, identical twins have exactly the same DNA, making them genetically identical. This occurs soon after an egg and a sperm meet, when the original is still a zygote. The zygote will then begin to replicate. In a single child birth, the cells replicated will stay attached and grow until a full grown fetus is born. In the case of identical twins, when the zygote forms a duplicate cell, they split into two. Then each cell will duplicate and build on each other just as a single child birth cell would, except in this case, there are two genetically identical embryos. The identical twins are essentially clones of one another.
Artificial embryo twinning happens very similarly, except instead of splitting while the cell is in the mother's womb, the zygote is split inside a petri dish by a scientist. The newly split zygotes will then be implanted into a surrogate mother who will give birth to two babies.
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
The biggest difference between somatic cell nuclear transfer and artificial embryo twinning is where they get their DNA. A clone developed from artificial embryo twinning takes its chromosomes from a mother and a father. A clone from the somatic cell nuclear transfer gets all its chromosomes from one organism, making it an exact replica of its 'donor parent.' Somatic cell nuclear transfer is also referred to as reproductive cloning. Reproductive cloning is accomplished by a scientist taking a somatic cell from an adult. A somatic cell is basically any cell that is not an egg or sperm. The reason for this is because an egg or sperm only have half the amount of chromosomes as a somatic cell, which is only half the amount of chromosomes any given species needs to develop.
Scientists will then take the nucleus out of somatic cell and place it into an egg that has had its nucleus removed. The reason they do this is because the nucleus is much like the brain of the cell. It contains all chromosomes that are needed in DNA. The DNA tells the cell how to form, what the person will look like, how they will develop and all other pertinent information. By taking the nucleus out of an egg cell, and replacing it with a nucleus that has all the chromosomes, the egg acts like a fertilized egg and becomes a zygote. It will then develop with the exact information as the 'donor parent.' This causes the new cell to become the clone of the 'donor parent' making them genetically identical.
This new cell will then be implanted into a surrogate mother who will carry the baby until delivery. Unfortunately, less than 10 percent of all implanted somatic cell transfers survive. Some species are also more resistant to being cloned than others, as scientists have had more success with certain animals.
Photo of Cloned Mice
The Cloning of Animals
The first thing to understand about cloning animals is that there is a lot more that makes up a creature than just genetic make-up. If you have ever met identical twins, then you know that two people with identical DNA can be very different from one another. They can have different interests, different personalities, different dreams, etc. They are not the same person. Let's say your sweet cat is getting old and you are thrilled when you discover that you can have him cloned for a fee. Just because they will be genetically the same, they may not end up with the same temperament, since genes only take us so far.
As you may have heard of the nature versus nurture theory, nature would be the genetic makeup of the new cat, but nurture would be all the other factors from what its surrogate mother ate to how it was treated as a young kitten. There are so many outside factors that could change the personality of your newly cloned cat that may cause it to have a very different personality than the cat you loved before. This is why many people are opposed to cloning.
Let's take this idea a step further. A couple is traumatized by the death of their son, Timmy. They learn that there is a doctor who will clone children. They choose to have Timmy cloned. She carries this new child to term. What if she ate different foods, or carried this child during a different season. How will these changes affect the growing fetus? Then the child is born. He looks just like Timmy, but he doesn't like baseball or sports, he prefers more artistic pursuits. Will the parents try to mold the new Timmy to be like the old one. How will this affect the new Timmy's perception of himself? Humans are emotional beings. There are so many factors involved in cloning humans that could be detrimental to the emotional health of the clone.
Another thing to note, aside from just nature versus nurture is that the nucleus is only a portion of the cell. There is also the cytoplasm which contains mitochondria. It is believed that mitochondria may play a role in how we age, although to what extent it plays on the rest of our growing is unknown. The rate of failure for cloning is quite high due to premature death, deformity, among other things. This shows that the clones are not actually as identical to their 'donor parents' as previously thought.
CC the First Cloned Cat
CC and Rainbow
Being not as identical as previously thought is very much the case when it came to two cats, Rainbow and CC. By just looking at them, you would have no idea that CC, which stands for carbon copy, is the clone of Rainbow. Rainbow is a calico cat, whereas CC is a gray tabby with no orange color.
CC was born December 22 ,2001, and was the very first cloned cat. After CC was born Dr. Leslie Lyons wanted to test their DNA to prove they were in fact clones, despite their difference in appearance. Therefore, Lyons took a DNA sample from both cats and sent it to a lab for a blind test, where the testers had no idea that the DNA samples came from two separate cats. The test results came back that the DNA was exactly the same.
So why the difference? Shortly put--environmental factors. Cats have a gene in their skin that either activates orange coloring or does not activate orange coloring. Rainbow's genes in her skin had randomly activated genes for this coloring, whereas not a single gene in CC's skin was activated for this coloring. Also, white spotting is very random in cats. This means, despite their exact DNA, the white spotting is different.
Also, the two cats acted very differently. This was most likely due to the fact that early on CC was handled a lot as a kitten. Rainbow is more reserved, while CC, as you would expect, is more curious and friendly than Rainbow.
On a side note, CC did become a mother, which they allowed to happen to see if a cloned cat could reproduce. This proved that they can. CC was considered to be a very good mother.
Cloning Extinct Animals Quiz
Should scientists clone extinct animals?
Cloning Extinct Animals
Though many people will agree that cloning humans is not a good idea, they view cloning of extinct animals as a way to learn a lot about our planet's history. We can reestablish creatures that died off many years ago, as long as we have DNA and a surrogate mother to develop the creature in. Theoretically this is an amazing step in technology and biology. We can replenish endangered animals. We can discover why dinosaurs became extinct. We can discover what the saber tooth cat really looked like.
Although we need to stop and ask is this a good idea? There are reasons certain animals became extinct. By reintroducing creatures that have become extinct into the wild could severely disrupt our ecosystem. What if the saber tooth cat eats other wild cats, and ends up killing off the last of the lions? Or what if the dinosaur that is created chases humans killing off entire communities with a Jurassic Park-like epidemic? There are way too many unknowns about reintroducing extinct animals into our world.
Although there is a lot of good that cloning can result in, there is a lot of things that need to be considered before scientists begin cloning things just because they can. We need to consider the emotional impact cloning may have on the clone itself, as well as the people around them. We also need to keep in mind the impact that cloning extinct or even endangered animals may have on our ecosystem. Although cloning can be used in healthy profitable ways, anytime cloning is considered, the ramifications of bringing the clone into earth needs to be weighed before proceeding.
Human Cloning Video
© 2012 Angela Michelle Schultz