ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • Geology & Atmospheric Science

Gravity is Magnetism

Updated on June 12, 2017

Gravity is Magnetism Newton was Wrong

This Hubpage has been read by over 62,900 readers. It is accredited with a 8 yr award.

  This theory seems to be gaining much more traction and acceptance over 
the seven + years it has been published here. You will find comments from 
Scientists all over the world as well as regular everyday people. Please
respect each other's opinions and debate in a professional manner. Any
Nasty,rude,vulgar etc... comments will be deleted. Heated discussions are 
allowed, just remember there is a line!    



Please go through it, experiment with it, and comment with only factual
 comments. I present to you the facts.....Magnetism IS Gravity!

The following theory is copyright protected 2008.

Welcome to the missing link in the Grand Unified Theory!

The Big Bang occurs, like many Scientists have theorized matters of different substances are ejected throughout space. An iron mass of great proportions is ejected as well. This iron mass is extremely hot. It begins to cause atomic fusion. Tremendous quantities of energy begin to be released. With energy comes rotational specific heat. This is also accompanied by molecular spin. The atoms now become ions caused by electrical current from the production of heat caused by the molecular spin and contributed by rotational specific heat. “Every ion contains electrons and all electrons contain a natural magnetic movement” (Bohr) . {additional information on this theory by Bohr}: Two types of experimental evidence which arose in the 1920s suggested an additional property of the electron. One was the closely spaced splitting of the hydrogen spectral lines, called fine structure. The other was the Stern-Gerlach experiment which showed in 1922 that a beam of silver atoms directed through an inhomogeneous magnetic field would be forced into two beams. Both of these experimental situations were consistent with the possession of an intrinsic angular momentum and a magnetic moment by individual electrons. Classically this could occur if the electron were a spinning ball of charge, and this property was called electron spin. ( mind you we are dealing with a spinning “ball of charge” at this point in the theory)

Quantization of angular momentum had already arisen for orbital angular momentum, and if this electron spin behaved the same way, an angular momentum quantum number s = 1/2 was required to give just two states.

Because of the massive amount of ions present in this iron ball/mass, a magnetic current is created. A magnetic current with great power and strength. The magnetic current now magnetizes the very core of the iron ball/mass. At this point the magnetized ball/mass continues to display a magnetic movement (rotation) freely throughout the Universe. As we are all aware of this universe of ours is a freezing environment with temperatures of about MINUS 455 degrees Fahrenheit . In this dark and freezing environment each layer of this ball/mass is cooling and causing what is now known to us as ROCK to form all over this iron mass. As the Keeker Theory continues you will be able to determine where all three types of rocks come into play.

Igneous Rocks

Igneous rock is formed when magma cools and makes crystals. Magma is a hot liquid made of melted minerals. The minerals can form crystals when they cool. Igneous rock can form underground, where the magma cools slowly or igneous rock can form above ground, where the magma cools quickly.

Sedimentary Rocks

Sedimentary rocks form at or near the earth's surface at relatively low temperatures and pressures primarily by: deposition by water, wind or ice precipitation from solution (may be biologically mediated) growth in position by organic processes (e.g., carbonate reefs ) Sediment can either be: Material, originally suspended in a liquid, that settles at the bottom of the liquid when it is left standing for a long time Material eroded from preexisting rocks that is transported by water, wind, or ice and deposited elsewhere

Metamorphic Rock

Metamorphic Rock is formed when rocky material experiences intense heat and pressure in the crust of the earth. Through the metamorphic process, both igneous rocks and sedimentary rocks can change into metamorphic rocks, and a metamorphic rock can change into another type of metamorphic rock. Heat and pressure do not change the chemical makeup of the parent rocks but they do change the mineral structure and physical properties of those rocks. Metamorphic rocks trapped underground are still subject to enormous heat from rising magma, or heated water, and pressure. Sometimes the heat can get so intense the rocks actually melt. Pressure comes from the incredible weight of material surrounding the rock on all sides. The pressure pushes new minerals into the rock and drives other minerals out; the result, of course, is that the rock is chemically changed. Magnetic spin and magnetic moment continue through constant natural cyclotron. This combination of thins all occurring simultaneously causes magnetic resonance within the iron mass/ball.

Now what many people do not know. Is that Rocks contain oxygen naturally as well as minerals.

( A recent study done by M.I.T. verifies this part of my theory as they had similar testing and findings when dealing with Lunar rock. )

“When Fe2+ was present, the melt composition most closely resembled that found on

the lunar surface. Two competing anode reactions then occurred: the desired oxidation of

oxides to form oxygen and the undesired oxidation of Fe2+ to produce Fe3+ ":

2O2- Æ O2 + 4e- [1]

Fe2+ Æ Fe3+ + e- Note :In process of math verification. (update: Harvard verified thismath to be accurate)

This oxygen from these rocks forming on the cooling iron mass is being freely emitted into the Earths surroundings. Now we have two processes occurring at this point. 1) As the element Hydrogen which is extremely notable in the Universe is coming into contact with the Oxygen that is being released from this iron mass/ball. These two elements begin to bond. Thus creating H20 (water) to fill in these rocks and cracks. This is how Oceans and Lakes where formed on the Iron mass (Which I will now begin to call the Earth). And 2. Because of the freezing temperatures of space , Liquid oxygen is also forming around the Earth sealing it in. Liquid Oxygen is highly paramagnetic! The wonderful thing about this happening is when the liquid oxygen surrounds and seals the Earth it is now able to create in conjunction with the earths core, a magnetic planet.( However take note for further incite into this theory that this liquid oxygen sealing does come away from the solid form of the Earth as it becomes in contact with the Sun's magnetic field. The hotter it becomes in the Sun's magnetic field the further away from the Solid mass of the Earth it moves due to the heat. Thus giving it's position in the atmosphere now. This allows further oxygen that is still being released to become trapped and stabilized within the atmosphere, which is the oxygen we breathe now) Our magnetic planet newly formed now has both a magnetic North and magnetic South. At this point something dramatic occurs. Suddenly while on it’s travel throughout the Universe the earth comes into contact with the Sun’s magnetic field. Now, because at this point we are dealing with planets whose core is primarily Nickel and Iron both highly magnetic, I am sure you can just imagine what happens now. We have a small Earth in comparison to the size of the Sun. The Earth is then rapidly pulled towards the Sun. The closer the Earth gets to the Sun the hotter the Earth gets. This causes immense and rapid evaporations to occur of the water on the Earth. This evaporation causes the oxygen from this water to be re-released from the Earth as it gets closer and hotter. Now because the Earth has a Magnetic North and South the Sun will pull the Earth close to it, but the opposite attraction of Earth’s magnetic North will stop the earth from crashing into the Sun. Take note there are several evidences that it is the Earths magnetic North that causes this. 1. Our magnetic North area on Earth is the coldest part of the Earth, in the Southern areas of the Earth that are more attracted to the Sun it is warmer/hotter year round. And 2. The moon is stationary in its position. Meaning it does not spin. It always has 1 side that is dark, the same side. Hence "the dark side of the moon". Yet, it still rotates around the Earth. We know the Earth spins around the sun. We also know that the earths magnetic field repels the suns magnetic field. So if the Earth is pushing away on its exterior, how is it that it does not just push the moon away? To fully understand the magnetic field that actually comes off of the earth we must understand just how HUGE it really is. We have seen many pictures on google that show a field that kind of just goes side to side pole to pole and trails slightly behind the Earth. This cannot be further from the truth. That field goes as far as the Earth to the Sun , all around the earth. And here is why I say this. 1. It repels the Sun at this point... and also lets again look at the moon. 2. If the Earth is repelling that certain magnetic pull from the sun then the moon must have the exact opposite polarity. It must be able to attract to this magnetic field. However do to it's size (Earth's magnetic field and strength) it cannot get close enough to the Earth to hit it. The Earths magnetic field is powerful enough to stop it, and just like 2 magnets being placed together N and S. They stick together in a stationary position. So the moon is stuck quite literally to the Earths magnetic field and cannot spin on its own, it just follows the spin of the Earth as the Earth spins around the Sun. Also, unlike the Earths field where we deflect the Suns harmful waves etc... the moon actually attracts them. Such as Helium 3. The moon is abundant in Helium 3. The moon was on a mission to crash with the Sun, at a crucial and critical moment it had to have come into contact with the Earth saving it from its impending doom. Had the Earth not been there for the Moon to be attracted to and become stuck, it most certainly would have crashed into the Sun. Again…. this is why we have the dark side of the moon.

The magnetic field of the Earth has it’s own “push” within the atmosphere, going from the magnetosphere to the core. Which is what we describe as “gravity”. And we also have our Magnetic North reflecting the Sun to protect us.

And lastly we must discuss the orbits of the Earth around the Sun. This is due to two things, spin magnetic moment, and the constant pull of the sun on the Earths South Pole.

Here is where we discuss absolute proof that everything within the earth’s atmosphere is magnetized. Unfortunately at this time in Science we do not currently have instruments that can show that we ourselves are magnetic. But here is a solid evidence. When we consider MRI’s (Magnet Resonance Imaging) We must understand how these machines work medically. They pull he cells of the human body to the surface of the body in able to take pictures of what is going on inside of the body. If human cells were not magnetic they would not respond to MRI’s and these pictures would not be possible through MRI. Then we must consider necessary elements to survive. ALL LIVING MATTER on this planet has to have certain elements to survive. We would die without them, including plants and food sources. Things elements are magnetic. They include things like iron, nickel, potassium, manganese, calcium, etc…. So what keeps our bodies in a mineral state of homeostasis? The minerals in our body that are nonmagnetic such as zinc, copper, etc… this is why when we get sick or feel ill when our bodies are lacking any of these elements. They need each other to maintain that homeostasis.

What about nonliving materials? Again… I reiterate that we do not have the necessary instruments to pick up magnetic measurements of this quantity, and here’s the reason why which correlates to these nonmagnetic materials… Electromagnetic Induction. Discovered By Faraday in 1831. It was successfully observed that ALL objects become magnetized when they are within a magnetic field. A great example is the frog. Here’s a link, by all means a frog like a human should not display ANY reactions to a magnet, (according to previously known physics) However, check it out in this setting where it is surrounded by a 10 tesla magnetic coil : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E . So here where we have a small nonmagnetic living being that we can clearly see amazing responses and results from strong magnets. So even though we may not have the technology yet to measure these magnetic fields that we are in because we are an actual part of them, hopefully one day we will. And lastly but definitely NOT least. We have no proof of the existence of a graviton. We have a Hadron Collider that smashes atoms at the speed of light , (by using magnets btw) , but have yet to be able to see or show actual proof of a Graviton. Now that is just amazing to me. Boson/God Particle we can find, a simple atom of gravity.... can't find...hmmmm

In Conclusion:

I make the claim that Newton was wrong by calling “gravity” gravity. He did in fact observe an effect, apple and tree… But he was WRONG for naming it. It was not correctly identified and this has since caused serious problems within the Physics community. Even Einstein knew that Newton was not accurate somewhere in this discovery and was unable to establish his Unified Theory. This I contend is the missing link to the Unified Theory! That which binds all of creation together. Once we can as a scientific community start thinking with the right information then and only then can we truly advance in Physics.


References:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/spin.html

http://web.mit.edu/dsadoway/www/133.pdf

Rock Formation: https://wikis.engrade.com/es03

Oxygen naturally contained within rock:

http://www.icr.org/article/ancient-oxygen-rich-rocks-confound/

http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Paramagnetism.html

Lunar rock testing:

A.H.C. Sirka, D.R. Sadowaya, L. Sibilleb

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of

Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

ASRC Aerospace Corp. NASA Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899, USA

Hydrogen in space:

https://public.nrao.edu/news/pressreleases/gbt-sees-river-of-hydrogen

Theodore Kaczynski - confirmation of math.


Copyright 2008

Comments...Keep it clean!

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 months ago from Indiana

      Stars / our Sun - are Electric Transformers. They are NOT driven by nuclear fusion.

      Below is a link to a video I made comparing Solar Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections to Electric Arcs.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDeMv8sZHPE

      The Good Vibrations

      (C)

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 4 months ago from Indiana

      IE - Induced Magnetic Fields are actually a display of a balance between the linear acceleration of Gravity above the Law of Conservation of Energy for the Mass - and the natural surrounding Gravitational Influx Field supporting the Strong Force from the Aether.

      An Electric Current for example -

      The "accelerated Gravity" (energy / electric current) is trying to "escape" the confines of the Mass (conductor / wire as it is conducted) - and as it begins to "escape" around the outer circumference of the "wire" - the surrounding natural Gravitational Field forces it to only "escape" until there is a balance between the amount of accelerating energy escaping - and the "siphoning" this "act" creates on the surrounding Gravitational Field that forces the accelerated gravity (energy / electric current) to be confined to the Mass of the wire.

      The "atmosphere" is not atomically dense enough to conduct the current - so the current is confined to the denser mass of the wire.

      However - if the acceleration is great enough (high enough frequency) it will escape and "disperse" in the less dense atmosphere = Tesla Coil / or Plasma displays.

      This is WHY electric currents "rotate" as they conduct - they are trying to escape - and the rotation of the electric current causes the "Magnetic Field" to also "rotate".

      Everything of Mass displays natural and constant rotation / vortexes - from the initial act of the Electron Function (Strong Force) all the way through to the display of Energy (Linear Acceleration of Gravity).

      (C)

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 8 months ago from Indiana

      Edgar-

      Gravity is the capacitance of static charge throughout the Aether of the Universe supporting / supplying the Strong Force to Atoms of Mass via the Electron Functions. Normally the delivery of "Gravity" (static charge) to any NON Magnetized Mass - is from the outer spherical circumference inward to the Core where the relay (Law of Conservation of Energy) "Terminates". (C)

      Natural Magnetism is merely the display of Gravity being "accelerated" linearly through the Mass at the speed to maintain the Law of Conservation of Energy for the Magnetized Mass. (The South Pole (hemisphere) is the "INPUT" of the static charge for the entire Mass - including the North Pole (hemisphere) where the relay terminates - and the static charge around the North hemisphere is forced to be "DIVERTED" around the Mass toward the Input South hemisphere.) (C)

      Energy is the display of Gravity being "accelerated" linearly ABOVE the speed to maintain the Law of Conservation for the Mass. (C)

      Induced Magnetic Fields are displayed when the static charge (Gravity) is accelerating through a Mass above the Law of Conservation of Energy for that Mass (Energy - electric current for example) and the surrounding - normal speed Gravity is forced to be "siphoned" into the acceleration of the "Energy". (C)

    • profile image

      Edgar Cortés 8 months ago

      I was just thinking, water is made of h2o, and an apple is made of water and other components. Earths core is like a gigantic magnet. Isnt there a form of magnetic pull going on there, between the earth's core and the apple? Hydrogen is diamagnetic and oxygen is paramagnetic. Humans are made of water and iron and other components. Magnetism is caused by electricity; negative and positive currents causing the magnetic pull, and the sun's light are a form of electricity... Main question being aren't gravity and magnetism are two sides of one coin?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 9 months ago from Indiana

      Here is a phenomena which gives even more credibility to my Good Vibrations theory.

      Atmospheric "Sprites".

      These are electrical charges / discharges which occur above the troposphere, approximately 39 to 50 miles high in the atmosphere.

      Most of the time sprites occur above thunderstorms and usually at the exact time which lightning is occurring in the cloud mass.

      However, sprites can occur without any cloud cover at all, but they are most frequent during thunderstorms with lightning.

      As my theory defines, Gravity is the (grounding / acceleration) static charge of the vibrating NON GNR subatomic particles comprising the Aether of the universe supporting the atomic strong force to accumulated GNR particles comprising atoms of Mass.

      The Mass of the Earth “constantly consumes” a constant flow of static charge from the surrounding Aether to support the strong force for all of the Atoms of Mass comprising the Earth itself.

      (This is why “Gravity” pulls Masses toward each other – IE – this is “why” your body is pulled toward the surface of the earth – your body is “intercepting as is also consumes” the larger flow of static charge supplying the larger Mass of the Earth.)

      However - when the “flow” of static charge into the Earth is disturbed / blocked / altered at a significant amount – in the atmosphere before it can reach the surface – a “surge” of static charge from the Aether occurs to “supply” (make up for loss) to the Mass of the solid Mass of the Earth.

      The water vapor (ice / etc.) in storm clouds are almost always moving horizontally in perspective to the surface of the Earths surface because of the “wind” (movement of the “air” in the atmosphere = jet stream / temperature differences / etc.)

      As the air “flows” horizontally – it drags the water vapor molecules with it – and this horizontal motion causes the static charge (GRAVITY) to also be relayed horizontally – instead of vertically – as it usually / normally does.

      When the amount of static charge from the Aether – into a heavy cloud Mass – is forced to relay more horizontally than vertically – the atoms comprising the solid Mass of the Earth - directly below the cloud Mass become “starved” of static charge (Gravity) and this causes a “surge” of static charge in the Aether to build up to supply this increasing demand. Once the build up of static charge above the cloud Mass reaches a critical amount – a sudden discharge occurs = LIGHTNING – to balance / redistribute the static charge (Think of the spark gap on a Tesla Coil / or the spark gap on a Lord Kelvin’s Thunderstorm).

      The “sprites” are the super accelerated and “focused” Aether static charge which energizes the lightning. (Plasma)

      When this occurs it usually shows the acceleration of the sprite to be moving from the Aether – down into the lightning occurrence in the cloud Mass.

      Occasionally however – if the lightning discharge occurs - just as the sprite forms – the sudden acceleration and deceleration causes the build up to be “aborted” and the sprite decelerates – and looks to be moving from the lightning – up into the Aether.

      Furthermore - a cloud to surface lightning strike is the extreme situation of re-balancing of the static charge supply to the starved Mass of the Earth.

      Lightning which remains only within the cloud Mass, without a cloud to surface strike is because the discharge to re-supply the solid mass of the Earth occurs before the build up and discharge become great enough to demand a “full contact” cloud to surface strike.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 10 months ago from Indiana

      Space and time are absolute. Distance is distance. Time is time - "Time travel" is impossible. However, the relative position / location of the observer for displayed comparisons between "Masses / situations / energy / etc. will reveal variables in the "when / where and how" each different observer - at different locations - and moving at different speeds - observes / detects / describes the same "situation / act / display".

      As for my description of the difference between Gravity and Inertia-

      Gravity is the force displayed by the delivery of the strong force to Atoms of Mass via the Electron Functions from the static charge capacitance of the aether.

      Inertia is displayed by a secondary Mass that is in motion / (is moving) through the aether of static charge - at a different speed / trajectory than the primary Mass - which the primary Mass is the "control" (stable constant) for "comparison" - for calculating the location / state / position of the secondary Mass.

    • profile image

      S. O 11 months ago

      and also want to know your opinion if time and space can be absolute as Newton insisted?

    • profile image

      S.O 11 months ago

      Hi N R!

      What you think of inertia, is it the same as gravity? I want to know your as others opinion on this.

    • profile image

      Newton's Rival 16 months ago

      No (me) down below.... the math seems like music to my ears.......You see numbers, I see Mozart! Fantastic!

    • profile image

      Newton's Rival 16 months ago

      Don't I know it Sharpencil..... it's disgusting! But like you stated in your email conversations with me.... it's no different than what we have already been dealing with. Just a few more morons to add to the list of ignorance!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 17 months ago from Indiana

      NR-

      I have personally become intricately aware that the Media, Scientific, Economic, Education and Political "arenas" are NOT interested in the "truth" - because there is no $$$$ in it for them and only embarrassment and retraction.

      Which results in saturation of denial accompanied with obvious public misdirection.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 17 months ago from U.S.A

      Uggg it cut off the first half of my message ..... I was stating my aggravation at the CNN news today about Physicists confirming that gravitational waves exist, that they proved it. Now these fools are in line for a nobel... are you kidding me. But they used a magnetic device to detect these waves.ummmmm..................duuuuh! FFS!

    • profile image

      Newton's Rival 17 months ago

      "Scientists have what they call a "five-sigma" standard of proof, and LIGO's researchers say the gravitational wave discovery exceeds that.

      "It took six months of convincing ourselves that it was correct," says Shoemaker. "It goes beyond that five-sigma to proving that nothing was happening with the equipment that couldn't be understood."

      She's thrilled with the possibilities.

      "Imagine having never been able to hear before and all you can do is see," she says. "Now we can listen to the universe where we were deaf before. It's a different spectrum (from the electromagnetic spectrum). It's unlike anything we've ever detected before.".........Now.... Here's my aggravation ......First off she stated in her statement it's a different spectrum (from the electromagnetic spectrum). However how were the waves detected? So I did some research at their page. Turns out they built a Interferometer. So I said to myself, what is that? I do see the word fero in that word, so I looked it up. Guess what it is? It is a device built to pick up waves and take specific measurements. But how is it built? OHHHHH magnetically!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The damn device to detect waves is built using magnetic properties.....huh? And they did not see a problem with this? Now there is talk of these Scientists getting a nobel peace prize, are you kidding me? They did not just help science, they deterred it EVEN FURTHER. And every idiot that learned the wrong thing in Physics is really going to think this is the THEORY OF EVERYTHING??? I am just in utter shock! And the media??? you think they would do real research to understand everything about a story they are going to run to make sure it is flawless. Nope! They just roll with the punches!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 18 months ago from Indiana

      Here is the youtube streaming version of my theory "The Good Vibrations".

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o365rOB1YCk

    • profile image

      me 18 months ago

      One retired professor offers big prize for anyone finding a fault in his theory which integrates the two.

      As I am not a physicist, I am not able to judge.. Math seems fine though.

      [1]: http://jovandjuric.tripod.com/Magnetism22pdf.pdf "MAGNETISM AS MANIFESTATION OF GRAVITATION"

      [2]: http://jovandjuric.tripod.com/TO_THE_PEOPLE_OF_THE... "3 million prize"

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 18 months ago from Indiana

      Here is the Video Presentation of my Quantum Mechanics / Astrophysics Theory - "The Good Vibrations".

      Its 2 hours long - and you will completely disagree with my depiction through the first half - which sets up the second half.

      The first half is describing how the Atomic Strong Force and Gravity came about - and how they work.

      However - once you get to Magnetism - and beyond - in the second half - it will all make perfect sense.

      www.customaudioproductions.com/THE_GOOD_VIBRATIONS_MP4.mp4

      Sharpencil

    • profile image

      mouna 21 months ago

      I'm an algerianwoman physicist, when I knew for the first time that our moon have had a magnetic field, It came to my mind that it is attracted to the earth by magnetism, and that gravity is magnetism. this idea was renforced when I studied magnetism in the univers.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 22 months ago from Indiana

      Justin-

      The "Ferrite Core" of a Star is not nearly as "hot" as are the NON Magnetic Elements (gases) surrounding it. Because the gases are "caught in" - the "Magnetic Field" (linearly accelerated gravity) created by the the Ferrite Core.

      Since the Magnetized Ferrite Core is the "source" of the Magnetic Field - which creates the "conflict" in the surrounding gases = the "heat" (thermodynamics - resistance in the linear acceleration of gravity) is "increasingly resisted" outward as each "thinner layer" of gas tries to "conduct / relay" the ""acceleration"" - but can not - because each thinner layer outward - has fewer and fewer "Protons" per Atom for the - "relay / conduction" (which creates more and more resistance in relay of the linear acceleration of gravity") - and the "heat" increases proportionately "OUTWARD HERE" within the gases.

      The Ferrite Core "deals" with the "resistance" created by the gases in the acceleration of "gravity" (Magnetic Field) - by merely making the "Magnetic Field" SWELL / LARGER - than it would be - if there were NOT ANY NON Magnetic Elements (gases) present around the Ferrite Core .... - instead of the Ferrite Core displaying "thermodynamics / heat".

      IE-

      The planet Mercury is mostly Ferrite and is "Magnetized" (displays a substantial Magnetic Field).

      However-

      Since there are NOT any NON Magnetic elements (gases) surrounding the Planet Mercury - the Magnetic Field (linearly accelerated gravity) is NOT "resisted" - and there is no "stable rotation" - or stable "internal thermodynamics".

      (Our "Moon" displays a slightly different situation than Mercury. The Moon has NO Ferrite Core = No substantial "Magnetic Field" and = subsequently NO rotation in the elements surrounding its NON Magnetic Core = No stable rotation / and subsequently No internal thermodynamics.)

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 22 months ago from Indiana

      Hydrogen (single Proton Atoms) had to form first - they then incurred gravitational fusion into the denser elements - up to Ferrite (26 Protons per Atom) and once a Core of Ferrite "Magnetized" - a Star is born.

      The eventual "death" of Stars (Supernova's) create the elements denser than Ferrite.

    • profile image

      Justin 22 months ago

      So how exactly did a very hot iron mass form before the first hydrogen atoms?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 22 months ago from Indiana

      DC Batteries are merely causing linear acceleration in gravity.

      The Positive (+) cells of a battery are comprised of "more dense" elemental components. (Particular number of Atomic / Proton and EF Shell structures)

      The Negative (-) cells of a battery are comprised of "less dense" elemental components. (Particular number of Atomic / Proton and EF Shell structures)

      The more dense elemental "cells" (Positive +) force gravity to accelerate "through" the less dense elemental "cells" (Negative -) - and into the more dense (Positive +) "cells".

      The "elemental components" separating the Positive (+) and Negative (-) components within the battery - will only "allow" conduction (the acceleration of gravity) to occur - through this semi-conductive "elemental barrier" itself - in a "one way direction" through the entire batteries "engineered structure" from the Negative (-) cells and - into the Positive (+) cells ---

      BUT - ONLY when the terminals are connected.

      The "Electric Current" in the "wire" - is merely the "CONSTRICTED PATH" at which the "accelerated gravity" is forced to "follow" = which IS ------ "CONDUCTION".

      Copyrighted.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 22 months ago from Indiana

      Thanks S.O.

      Tesla also knew, and famously stated, that the secretes of the Universe function through related states of energy, frequency and vibration.

      I believe my theory reveals a plausible "linear connection" between all of the "states of Mass" and the associated energy displays - detected / observed throughout the Universe.

      I believe if Einstein would have "considered" that the fundamental source for the formation and various maintained "situations" of Mass - "originated" from a basic "static electric source" - he would have been able to culminate his elusive quest to define gravity - and would have proposed an earlier and numerically proper constructed version of my theory - several decades before I was even born.

    • profile image

      S.O 22 months ago

      Sharpencil ! Here what N. Tesla described about his induction motor invention: '' One summer evening I watched with my friend sunset. Thousands of fire was turning around in thousands of flaming colors... then, as in a fog, I saw spinning magnetic field, and induction motor. I saw them in the sun!''.

      I hope this will help you in your constructive ideas.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 22 months ago from Indiana

      IE-

      An "electric current" is merely the display of the "linear acceleration" of gravity through a Mass above the Law of Conservation of Energy..

      reference-

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 22 months ago from Indiana

      Effilnuc-

      I contend that the capacitance of friction generated static electric charge throughout the vibrating "entities" of the Aether of the Universe is the "control" (initial measurement) for the energy which supply's the Strong Force for the formation and maintained "state" of "Mass".

      This "delivery" (flow - "grounding") of the static charge toward a single Proton of Mass (or toward and into accumulated Protons = Planet / etc.) is the display of "Gravity".

      (Gravity is the "initial" display of ""acceleration"" of the static charge of the Aether as it supplies (penetration / relays) the Strong Force energy to Protons of Mass - from the Masses outer spherical circumference - inward to where the "relay" terminates at its core.)

      When a Mass (Ferrite) becomes "naturally magnetized" - it merely FORCES "gravity" to enter (penetrate) the Mass at the South Hemisphere - then be "relayed" through the core - to then be terminated at the inner circumference of its North Hemisphere.

      ("Magnetic distance" (S - to - N) of Strong Force energy "relay / penetration" is TWICE (double) that of normal spherically/radial penetration - which MUST occur in the same set amount of time.)

      Which means that natural magnetic (S - to - N) "penetration" is a display of TWICE (double) the ""acceleration"" of the Aether static charge - when compared to normal spherically/radial "penetration".

      (reference)

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      Furthermore-

      The Aether static charge is forced to be (twice) doubly accelerated toward a magnetized Mass spherically/radial around its entire circumference.

      HOWEVER-

      The "magnetic field" is displayed because the "doubly accelerated" Aether static charge around the North Hemisphere is not allowed to "penetrate" at the North Hemisphere - because the input penetration at the South Hemisphere is "supplying" the entire Mass (including the North Hemisphere) from the "internal" relay of the static charge.

      This FORCES the accelerated Aether static charge "trying to penetrate" at the North Hemisphere to be DIVERTED around the Mass - to be "mixed in" with the accelerated Aether static charge at the South Hemisphere.

      Furthermore-

      The accelerated Aether static charge around the South Hemisphere is FORCED to be pushed back by the equally powerful DIVERTED Aether static charge accelerating around the outer parameter of the North Hemisphere to "find" a place for penetration -

      Which is ultimately displayed with a "MIX" of "uniform / balanced" accelerated penetration with the South Hemisphere.

      The "balance" of the "conflict" between these two (equally powerful / accelerated) "opposing" directions of Aether static charge "meet" at the equatorial plane directly between the two Hemispheres - and the result - is - the display of the "Magnetic Field".

      A natural magnetic field (magnetized Ferrite Mass) ONLY forces the Aether static charge to "accelerate" at the speed to maintain the minimal Strong Force demands of the Protons comprising the magnetized Ferrite Mass itself.

      (I=GaM@Law of Conservation of Energy)

      Anytime "gravity" is linearly accelerated through Mass ABOVE the speed to supply the minimal Strong Force demands of the Protons comprising the Mass - the display is "ENERGY".

      (E=GaM^Law of Conservation of Energy)

      Copyrighted

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 23 months ago

      The Octave Field Theory

      The electric field provides the scale,

      the magnetic field provides the orientation,

      the gravitational field provides the center point,

      the light field provides the motion,

      the heat field provides the environment,

      the sound field provides the record of events...

      This creates a 7th transitory field of time and space based around a center point of mass (gravity).

      The time and space field provides for the experience and hopefully awareness.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 23 months ago

      Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but

      magnetic force and the magnetic field has a single direction, it passes thru an axis of mass...always.

      The force of gravity and the gravitational field point in all directions, away from the centre of mass...always.

      Based on this observation, they have to be unique fields, even if they are interrelated. Each field stores energy in its own unique way.

      I think it may be wiser to seek the answers to how the two fields interact, (transfer energy parcels) rather than trying to see them as one and the same.

    • profile image

      NR 23 months ago

      Been talking with Sharpencil.... Very impressive....! I must say....

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 23 months ago from U.S.A

      I was not offended or mad, just a busy bee! :)

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 23 months ago from U.S.A

      Forgive me Sharppencil, I have emailed you.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 23 months ago from U.S.A

      So I have spent so much time lately connecting the dots and realized that this theory really is The Theory of Everything. When I first researched Einstein and his "missing" theory I have to admit that I did not grasp it "ALL". But it's true there really is a theory of everything. And it all does originate from Magnetism. There is so much to cover and explain I need a bit of time to add them together in a rough course/draft so I can post them. But like me I can't help but to think you will be scratching your head in wonderment. Trying to answer the same questions I had to seek answers too and maybe more. Today more than ever I STAND in confidence that magnetism is the answer to the Theory of everything. To start off before I write what I have found and researched, I would like you to all start with this one question. How does the heart beat? What is the SA Node, and why does it create energy enough to sustain life with no "battery". How are we living?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      NR-

      I have attempted, but failed, to find a way to contact you directly.

      However, I would like to ask if you might be receptive to private correspondence with me via E-Mail, concerning what I believe to be direct "links" between our theories which explain the evolution / function of the Universe ?

      If this is acceptable - I would merely like to present my thoughts to you (and receive your responses) on what I believe is an extremely plausible theoretical correlation.

      Our theories differ in several major aspects - however, I can present a theses - which by using my theory as a "main progression basis" - I can show where several aspects of your theory correlate - into / with mine - to define a plausible explanation of the origin and function of the Celestial Bodies (gravity / magnetism / energy) observed throughout the Universe.

      If you accept my invitation, (or if you decide to decline) please send me a note.

      customaudioproduct@centurylink.net

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      NR-

      I apologize if I have overstepped the boundaries for acceptable posting in your hub.

      Ever since was a child of 8 years old - (I am currently 52) I have been trying to explain (at least a plausible theory to myself) for how simple magnets display the effects and properties they do.

      When I found your hub over a year ago - it re-ignited my interest in finishing my life long "quest" to initially explain how simple magnets display their properties.

      Once I wrapped my mind around my "Aether Fuel Tank" (The Good Vibrations) "Theory" - to "potentially" explain how a natural Ferrite magnet works - it was not difficult for my "Aether Fuel Tank" theory to be used to connect how Celestial Bodies and "energy" "could" be explained by using the basis of my theory.

      I'm sure my theory may seem quite "crazy" to you (and to anyone reading my posts in your hub).

      And again, I apologize if I have offended you in ANY way - Newtons Rival.

      I have the utmost respect for your supreme intellect and hard work throughout this hub. I further respect and applaud you for your absolutely POSITIVE scientific attitude - and positive social attitude throughout all comments and post's within this hub.

      Sincerely-

      Sharpencil :)

    • profile image

      Newton's Rival 2 years ago

      It's kind of weird... I am noticing all kinds of new hubpages that are now based on this original theory. It all started last year when that female Doctor copied my theory exactly and started her own page with it. Now, I am seeing similar pages everywhere, including here. I'm finding it weird but also good. People are starting to wake up and they are putting science and common sense together. What betters science as a whole is the best outcome.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Here is a more explanatory definition for the function of Magnetic Fields and the subsequent rotation of Celestial Bodies that display Magnetic Fields.

      Any celestial body that displays constant / stable rotation of its atmosphere or its solid mass - has a Magnetized Ferrite Core.

      Gravity is the detected/observed "constant" display of the Aether static charge supplying the demand for "fuel" by Protons of Mass to - use the static charge to "exist" in a state of "Mass" - by means of electrostatic bonds - via "Electron Functions".

      This "relay" from atom - to - atom - into the Mass - initially occurs spherically/radial "equally" - from the outer spherical circumference - inward to the "core".

      As described above - natural "Magnetism" is the "altered flow of Gravity into a Mass of "Ferrite" at the South Hemisphere - through the core - to the North Hemisphere.

      Since the North Hemisphere is "receiving" its "fuel" (Aether static charge supplying the Strong Force) FROM the South Hemisphere - the "relay" into - and through the Mass is a "farther distance" - when compared to normal - spherically/radial - "Gravitational" "fuel" delivery - and forces the "flow" of the Aether static charge to be ""accelerated"" as it is "drawn" toward - and through - the Mass to supply the demand in the same set amount of time.

      This "forces" the incoming Aether static charge - from the Aether - around the outer parameter of the North Hemisphere to be DIVERTED around the North hemisphere - and "mixed in" with the INPUT at the South Hemisphere. This "balances" at the equatorial plane directly between the two Hemispheres.

      This "opposition" in directions of - the North Diverted flow - moving Southward - and the South Input flow - pushing back Northward - as it "mixes with the North Diverted Flow - is what "establishes the symmetrically "balanced" "Magnetic Field".

      If there are NO other NON Magnetic elements "present" around the Magnetized Ferrite Mass - the "Magnetic Field" becomes "established" with a "vertically opposing" - but "horizontally stationary" - Pole - to - Pole static charge "flow" situation.

      However-

      If there are particular / proportionate NON Magnetic elements surrounding the Magnetized Ferrite "Core" - the NON Magnetic elements become "conflicted" in the vertical Pole - to - Pole - but "horizontally stationary" OPPOSING flows.

      IE - the NON Magnetic elements surrounding the the North Hemisphere of the Ferrite Core are "relaying" (caught in) the Magnetic Field's SOUTHWARD "flow".

      And - the NON Magnetic elements surrounding the the South Hemisphere of the Ferrite Core are "relaying" (caught in) the Magnetic Field's NORTHWARD "flow".

      These two "opposing flows" MEET at the "Equatorial Plane" - directly between the North and South Hemispheres.

      The OVERALL flow of the surrounding "INCOMING" Aether static charge (phantom gravitational fuel flow from the fuel tank) - forces the NON Magnetic elements to REMAIN gravitationally positioned near the Ferrite Core.

      The only resolve to the conflict / contradiction - for the NON Magnetic elements - is to force the "field" into a 90 degree turn - (most predominantly at the Equatorial plane) in a ROTATING motion - around the Ferrite Core to relieve the "conflict" which is the only "OPTION AVAILABLE".

      NOTE-

      As the Magnetic Field "rotates" - it "drags" the NON Magnetic elements with it - and the movement of the NON Magnetic elements across/against the surface of the Ferrite Core - causes physical friction / resistance - which causes the Ferrite Core to also "rotate".

      The "balance" between the size of the Ferrite Core (and subsequent size/power of its Magnetic Field) and the particular elemental "composition" - and "amount" - of NON Magnetic elements surrounding the Ferrite Core - determines the "state /classification/displays" of the "Celestial Body" as the NON Magnetic elements "relay" the Magnetic Field.

      A common Star (like our Sun = comprised of a Huge Ferrite Core and proportionately (substantially) less Mass of gaseous layers surrounding it) displays rotation / induction / thermodynamics / Eddy Currents / Electric Currents / Plasma and Photons - as the NON Magnetic elements relay/conduct the various incurred / compounded "fields".

      However-

      A Planet (Rocky celestial body = Earth for example) with a substantial Magnetic Field - contains a proportionate Magnetized Ferrite Core - which will display proportionate "rotation" in any NON Magnetic Elements directly surrounding the Ferrite Core.

      Depending on the particular elemental composition of the NON Magnetic elements surrounding the Ferrite Core - the "rotation" will create some degree of induction (lava) and cause rotation of the Molten Lava - which will cause friction / physical resistance rotation of the Ferrite Core itself - and in proportionate amounts of "time" - eventual - stable rotation - of the entire "Mass" of ALL of the elements comprising the Mass = the Planet itself.

      The gas giant Planets (Jupiter / Saturn / Uranus / Neptune) have Magnetized Ferrite Cores generating their proportionate /substantial Magnetic fields - even though they may NOT have "rocky" (solid mass) - below the gaseous atmospheric elements - but regardless - it is the NON Magnetic elements "caught" in the opposing South / North Magnetic Flows near the Ferrite Core - which cause "stable rotation".

      (The gases themselves may "assist" with the generating of the Magnetic Field - but the "stable rotation" is attributed to the proportionate Magnetized Ferrite Core.)

      If there are NOT any "rocky/solid" elemental components surrounding the Ferrite Cores any of the gas giants - the proportion of NON Magnetic gases surrounding the Ferrite Core - are substantial enough to "relay" the rotating magnetic field without enough induction to create substantial enough Eddy / Electric Currents to produce observable/detectable Photons and Plasma - nearly as substantial as a "Star".

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Living organisms on Earth (or any "planet") develop/evolve in the particular "gravitational" properties of their host planet environment. The "cells" (bio-mechanics) of the more complex organisms have been "established" to "function" in the particular "amount of Aether static charge" (gravity) "flowing" through the organism itself - and onward into the "planet".

      The "flow" of the Aether static charge through ANY "object/Mass" on the surface of any "planet" - is the observed/detected "display" of "local gravity" "dragging" the object/Mass with it as the larger "flow" supplies the Mass of the planet.

      When this "constant" is "altered" with enough + or - "change" - the bio-mechanics of the cells of more complex organisms become "disrupted" from "operating" within their normal "gravitational conditions" - and failure/mutations/etc. occur.

      The mechanics of "cells" is simply a quantum form of "forced magnetism" = chemical reactions.

      As I described above with "chemistry" - the Atoms of the cells of living organisms "exist" by constantly "changing" the Atomic structures of atoms through "forced magnetism" -

      IE - particular denser atoms/molecules/cellular structures (oxygen / etc.) force the Aether static charge to be "accelerated" through less dense atomic structures (food /carbon /etc.) - which causes the Electron Functions of the Protons of the LESS dense atomic structures to "fail" - which results with new structure formation - which this IS the quantum mechanics / bio-mechanics of "cell generation - and cell re-generation".

      Life = cellular bio-mechanical "forced magnetism" = with by products of thermodynamics (humans = 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit.)

      Particular intensities of Magnetic Fields can have profound (+ or -) effects on the cellular bio-mechanical (naturally evolved forced magnetism) "functioning" of organisms - while in their natural gravitational environment - and when NOT in their natural gravitational environment.

    • profile image

      cliff lewis 2 years ago

      choicez@tds.net

    • profile image

      cliff lewis 2 years ago

      To touch lightly on the human body being magnetic. When we are in outer space for long periods of time out muscular skeletal system goes through degradation from the lack of gravity or as you refer, magnetism.

      An interesting reference from Chemical & Engineering News from 10/2/2014.

      Environmental conditions, such as heat, acidity, and mechanical forces can affect the behavior of cells. Some biologists have even shown that magnetic fields can influence them. Now for the first time an international team reports that low-strength magnetic fields may foster the reprogramming of cellular development, aiding in the transformation of adult cells into pluripotent stem cells. If confirmed, the phenomenon could lead to new tools for bioengineers to control cell fates and help researchers understand the potential health effects of changing magnetic fields on astronauts.

      The electro magnetic system that helps run our bodily systems is very connected to this earth and the evolution of our bodies adaptive process!

      We are more connected to this earth than many realize and we have more than magnetic personalities. My sincere respect to all our Scientists!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Elementary example.

      A copper / aluminum conductive wire.

      When an electric current (Forced Magnetism) is applied to a conductive "wire" - the Atoms/Protons of the wire "substitute" their Strong Force energy "source" to be originating from the electric current itself instead of the "source" being the Aether static charge.

      This causes the surrounding Aether static charge to NOT be needed - and a "Magnetic Field" is displayed around the "wire".

      The "amount" of electric current detected/observed at the far end of the "wire" - is proportionately "less" than the "amount" introduced to the "wire" at the point of where it is "energized" - because of "The Law of Conservation of Energy".

      IE - the Atoms/Protons of the energized "wire" AUTOMATICALLY "steal" (parasitically consume) their Strong Force energy "source" - from the "electric current" itself - and the surrounding Aether of static charge is NOT needed - and a "Magnetic Field" is displayed around the energized wire.

      However - when the electric current is removed from the "wire" - the Magnetic Field automatically and instantaneously "disappears" - because the Aether static charge automatically and instantaneously "resumes" being the "source" for the Strong Force energy for the Atoms/Protons of the wire.

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      The "paradox".

      The reason we can NOT detect the capacitated static charge of the Aether is because of the Law of Conservation of Energy.

      Everything of Mass uses the static charge of the Aether to exist in the form of Electron Functions delivering the Strong Force static charge to supply the electrostatic bond between the subatomic particles comprising Protons - and electrostatic bonded / compiled Protons comprising Atoms - and electrostatic bonded / compiled Atoms comprising Molecules - and electrostatic bonded / compiled Molecules comprising Mass.

      Our eyes, our detection devices - everything comprised of Protons/Mass "uses" the Aether static charge to "exist" in a "state" of "Mass".

      When a Photon of light (Forced Magnetism) strikes a Proton/Atom/Molecule of Mass - the Protons of the Atoms of the Mass "steal" (parasitically use) a proportionate amount of the Photons "energy" at the moment of "contact" as proportionate Electron Function "pulses". (The Law of Conservation of Energy)

      When we "look" at an Atom/Proton with quantum amounts of "light" or Electron Microscopes - (continuous bombardment) the Atom/Proton "steals" (parasitically uses) a proportionate amount of the energy to "substitute" the static charge of the Aether.

      IE - the "subject/Atom/Proton" substitutes the "energy" we "bombard" it with - as "Electron Functions" - and there is NO "reflection/detection".

      (As an Atom/Proton is "bombarded" (Electron Microscope) there is a proportionate quantum sized Magnetic Field "around" it - because as long as the Atom/Proton is using the "energy/light" (Forced Magnetism) as a "substitute" for the surrounding normal/natural static charge of the Aether - the surrounding normal/natural static charge of the Aether is NOT needed - and a quantum Magnetic Field is displayed.

      We can only initially detect / observe the "effects" of the static charge of the Aether on Protons/Atoms/Molecules/Mass by the display of Gravity.

      However - when Gravity displays linear acceleration through Mass at the speed to maintain the Law of Conservation of Energy we detect / observe Magnetism.

      And when Gravity has linear acceleration through Mass above the speed to breach the Law of Conservation of Energy we detect / observe Energy.

      Gravity = the static charge of the Aether supplying the Strong Force to Protons of Mass / via the Electron Functions.

      Magnetism = linear acceleration of Gravity through Mass at the speed to maintain the Law of Conservation of Energy.

      I=GaM@Law of Conservation of Energy.

      Energy = linear acceleration of Gravity through Mass above the speed to breach the Law of Conservation of Energy.

      E=GaM^Law of Conservation of Energy.

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Magnetism = linear acceleration of Gravity through Mass at the speed to maintain the Law of Conservation of Energy.

      Energy = linear acceleration of Gravity through Mass above the speed to breach the Law of Conservation of Energy.

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      I propose that E=MC2 is fundamentally incorrect.

      IE - E=MC2 is when an explosion (trajectory force / speed) forces atoms to be accelerated at / or beyond the speed of light - resulting with the "FAILURE" of the Electron Functions of the Atoms - because the Protons comprising the Atoms accelerate through the Aether (atmosphere/etc.) - faster than which the static charge of the Aether (the Strong Force) can "occur". Which results with the Protons "separating" (especially with "unstable/radioactive" Atoms) because of the "loss" of the Strong Force (Electron Functions) - which results with extreme "backlashes/shock-waves" in the surrounding Aether static charge as the Electron Function "Shells" - FAIL - and subsequently/immediately become - RE-INSTATED.

      However - this "display" is merely one "form" of "Energy" - that can be caused/displayed/achieved by accelerating Atoms of Mass to the speed of light - to cause Electron Function "Failure" and subsequent "Reinstatement".

      All forms of "Energy" are displayed results of the Electron Functions of Atoms of Mass "Failing" - and then becoming "Re-Instated".

      However - "Most" Energy displays (Electric Currents / Combustion / Chemical Reactions / etc.) are displayed results of the "acceleration" of the Aether static charge - (Forced Magnetism) NOT the "Atoms" themselves" - potentially causing Electron Function "Failure" - and subsequent "Reinstatement".

      (IE - when an Electron Function Shell "Fails" - this causes the influx of the static charge of the Aether to "compress" back into itself around the Protons (Atoms) involved in the "disturbance". Then the influx of the static charge of the Aether - instantly - "De-compresses" (""accelerates"") to "reinstate" the Eletron Function Shell.

      Electric Currents are displays of the acceleration of the Aether static charge (Forced Magnetism) through NON Magnetic / but electrically conductive elements "below" the threshold of Electron Function Failure - but - "above" the Law of Conservation of Energy.

      Photons (light = intense thermodynamics = acceleration in the "reinstatement" of the Electron Function Shell ) are the "by-products" of Electron Function "Failures" and subsequent "Reinstatements" created by Forced Magnetism "through" Atoms of Mass - OR - by Atoms of Mass being accelerated to the speed of light.

      IE - an "Atomic" explosion creates by-product "Photons" from the "source" of Atoms of Mass accelerating to the speed of light - resulting with Electron Function "Failure - and subsequent - "Reinstatement".

      However-

      Flashlight filaments create by-product "Photons" from an electric current (accelerated Forced Magnetism) breaching (above) the Law of Conservation of Energy - just at the threshold of Electron Function "Failure" - and subsequent "Reinstatement" of the Atoms (Protons) of the filament. (The "Atoms" are NOT "accelerating")

      (IE - if "too" much electric current (speed in the acceleration of the Forced Magnetism) is "applied" to the flashlight filament - the Electron Function "Failure" is "too intense" causing "too many" of the Atoms to incur Electron Function "Failures" "simultaneously" and a "meltdown" in the stable "overall Atomic/Molecular structure" occurs - and the "circuit" (relay of trajectory /path of the Forced Magnetism) is "broken".

      Energy = acceleration (Forced Magnetism) in the static charge of the Aether (Gravity) "Reinstating" the Electron Funtion Shell (the Strong Force) to Atoms of Mass which have incurred "temporary" Electron Function Shell "Failure".

      E=GaM

      Copyrighted

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      @ Sharpencil, you have a lot of posts here, I will have to go through them all and read em. @ Effilnuc, So because someone sees an end they couldn't possibly "see" it's true? hmmmmm... That is not scientific fact. And what we deal with when it comes to science is fact. If your going to reference a FACT as a fact thats fine. Until then it is nothing more than a hypothesis. This may very well be a fact, but can you show me 1 person that can prove it? Nope. Impossible bc the math doesn't show US. None of us will live to see it. And if it cannot be proven it will ALWAYS just be a hypothesis.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Chemistry is merely a display of "Forced Magnetism -

      IE - when molecules comprised of Atoms of a particular "atomic weight" - are in close enough proximity of other molecules comprised of Atoms of a particular "atomic weight" - the (denser - higher atomic weight) Atoms "draw" the aether static charge ("fuel") THROUGH the less dense Atoms - which creates a situation of "Forced Magnetism".

      This is because denser Atoms display more numerous Electron Functions occurring in the same set amount of "time" as do less dense Atoms.

      This "difference" in the number of Electron Functions occurring in the same set amount of time - corresponds to the denser Atoms "burning" more "fuel" in the same set amount of time.

      This "forces" the Aether static charge to be "accelerated" (aligned = Forced Magnetism) THROUGH the Electron Functions of the less dense Atoms - into the denser Atoms.

      And if the "speed" of the "acceleration" (particular difference in the number of - and Electron Function "Gear" "timing" between the two molecules (Atoms) is "great" enough - the Electron Functions of the less dense Atoms of the less dense molecule FAIL to occur - (the Protons are "dragged" toward the denser Atoms = (resistance) - and the individual Protons are forced to re-shape with the denser molecule Atoms - into a NEW "combined" atomic structure - with by-products of thermodynamics / Photons / etc.

      Combustion works on the same "principal" - BUT - "combustion" requires a "catalyst" to "instigate" the "Forced Magnetism" = "Energy Display".

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      IE -

      The "act" of "Gravity" (accumulated Protons (Atoms) is the display of the "relay" of the Aether static charge Strong Force energy from one Atom to the next - equally - inward from the outer spherical circumference of the Mass - to its core.

      The "act" of this "relay" is the FUNDAMENTAL BASIS for the Law of Conservation of Energy - because each individual Atom must "relay" enough static charge to "FIRST" satisfy it own Strong Force demands - then it relays the amount "demanded" by the proportionate Atoms closer and closer to the core - all the way to the core. The "amount" of "static charge" "relayed" - for the "distance" (number of Protons involved in the "linear" relay - from the outer parameter - to the core) - in the "time frame" that is "Necessary" to "satisfy" the Strong Force NEEDS of ALL of the Atoms of the Mass - is what "ESTABLISHES" the "Gravitational" property of the Mass.

      (IE - the TOTAL number of Protons (size and elemental composition) of the Mass - determines the "distance" at which the static charge must "travel" (be relayed) - in the gravitational "format" (natural) energy delivery "time frame" - to "satisfy" the TOTAL Strong Force demands of ALL of the Protons comprising the Mass.

      HOWEVER -

      A "Natural Magnet" (Ferrite) "aligns" the Aether static charge Strong Force energy to ENTER the SOUTH HEMISPHERE - then "travel" (be relayed) THROUGH the core - to the NORTH HEMISPHERE. The "DISTANCE" for the "travel" (number of Protons involved in the relay) - in the same "time frame" is proportionately GREATER - when compared to "normal / Natural - "GRAVITATIONAL" Strong Force energy delivery.

      This is "proportionate" because of the "looped/angled" flux lines of the "delivery" of the Strong Force static charge.

      (IE - the Strong Force static charge input at the South side of equatorial plane - only "travels" the short distance to the "equal" (balanced/opposite) distance to the North side of the equatorial plane.

      HOWEVER - the "closer" to the "center" of the South Pole - the GREATER the "distance" the static charge must "travel" (be relayed) - in the same "time frame" - to reach the parameter of the "equally" "RADIALLY (opposite) LOCATED" North Pole.

      (IE - the center of the South Pole - "relays" the static charge the FARTHEST distance - to the center of the North Pole. And - the "closer" to the "equatorial plane" = the "shorter the "distance" (relay - in the same time frame).

      The "difference" between gravitational - and - magnetic - "distance" (number of Protons "involved" in the relay) is "resistance" - which is displayed by the "Magnetic Field".

      This is the "INITIAL" - "detectable" display of "Energy".

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      A natural "Magnet" alters/directs the normal spherically/radial "flow" of gravity into its "Mass" (Magnet) by forcing it to enter only the South Pole Hemisphere to supply ALL of the Protons/Atoms of the entire Mass/Magnet.

      Since the "flow" is entering the South Pole hemisphere ONLY - to supply the Strong Force energy demands of ALL of the Protons/Atoms of the ENTIRE Mass - this means that the "flow" is FORCED to be "ACCELERATED" - because there are only HALF of the Protons/Atoms at the South INPUT half of the "Mass" supplying (relaying) the Strong Force static charge to ALL of the Protons/Atoms comprising the Mass -

      When compared to how much Strong Force static charge the South Hemisphere of an IDENTICAL - NON Magnetized Mass is "relaying" (delivering / supplying) (IE - an identical NON Magnetized Mass has double/twice the Protons/Atoms (NORTH Hemisphere) ALSO supplying/relaying the "INPUT" to the entire Mass from the entire outer circumference into the center/core.

      IN THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME!

      The forced "acceleration" that occurs to "maintain" the delivery of the Strong Force demands of ALL of the Protons/Atoms comprising the entire Magnetized Mass - through only HALF of the "normal spherically/radial gravitational" amount of Protons/Atoms around the entire circumference - is the FUNDAMENTAL BASICS - for the creation of "ENERGY" itself - and the FUNDAMENTAL BASICS for how and why the Law of Conservation of Energy applies to the “transfer/conduction/relay” of “energy” between/through Protons/Atoms of Mass.

      Energy is merely the various displays of FORCED MAGNETISM.

      E=MC2 - is WRONG!

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Once the static electric premises for the Strong Force Energy source and delivery function of my theory is comprehended -

      Here are a few reference pages to give visuals to the text for how Gravity / Magnetism / Eddy & Electric Currents function-

      Gravity-

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      Magnetism-

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      Eddy Currents & Electric Currents-

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      If you want to understand how our Sun (Common Stars) work-

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Uni...

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      So - are there any brave entrepreneurs out there looking for an interesting - if not worthy- way to invest in a tax deductible adventure to fill in the holes of Relativity?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      By the way - I can "prove" that my theory is not only "plausible" - but "probable" - by means of executing and documenting particular experiments.

      However - I do not possess the funds or assets to obtain the necessary components to conduct or document these experiments in an "acceptable" and "accredited" format to present the findings / results to any "entity" interested.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Energy is merely the various displayed results (from particular / various amounts) of EXCESSIVE amounts of FORCED Magnetism (electric currents / chemical reactions / combustion /etc.) above the Strong Force energy NEEDS on various elements (Protons/Atoms) of Mass.

      Think of Protons of Mass as "parasites" - as they "burn" fuel for their Strong Force NEEDS.

      The "aether fuel tank" is ALWAYS present - ready / willing and able - to supply the MINIMAL Strong Force energy demands of Protons of Mass.

      However - when FORCED Magnetism (Energy - electric current / chemistry / etc.) is "applied" to Protons/Atoms of Mass - The Law of Conservation of Energy is invoked - because this is the amount of the "forced" Magnetism (energy) which is SUBSTITUTED for the surrounding aether static charge fuel tank supply - normally obtained from the aether fuel tank.

      The amount of forced magnetism (energy) LOST by invoking the Law of Conservation of Energy - as the EXCESS is relayed/conducted - is the amount SUBSTITUTED for the NORMAL aether fuel tank Strong Force demand.

      IE - The Protons/Atoms "substitute" the "supply" for their Strong Force Energy demands as they "relay/conduct" the (forced magnetism) energy - but they only "relay" the EXCESS - AFTER they "steal" / "substitute" their necessary Strong Force NEEDS (amount) for the normal fuel tank of the aether).

      When forced Magnetism is applied to Protons/Atoms of Mass - the Law of Conservation of Energy is invoked - and a "Magnetic Field" is automatically induced - because the "surrounding" static charge of the aether fuel tank is NOT NEEDED - for as long as the energy source (forced magnetism) is SUBSTITUTING the Strong Force demands of the Protons/Atoms involved.

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Visualize "Magnetism" like this.

      There are two identical Ferrite spheres.

      One is Magnetized and the other is not.

      The sphere which is NOT Magnetized is receiving its static charge Strong Force "fuel" supply spherically/radial - equally - around its circumference. Which means that the "fuel" is being delivered (relayed) "equally" through ALL of the outer parameter spherical Protons/Atoms (Electron Functions) - inward - to the Core - supplying fuel to ALL of the spheres Protons/Atoms equally FROM the outer circumference inward. This is Normal / Natural - "Gravity".

      However - the other sphere IS "Magnetized" - and is receiving its static charge Strong Force "fuel" in an "aligned/directed" flow - into the South Pole Hemisphere ONLY - through the Protons/Atoms (Electron Functions) - all the way through the Core - to the North Pole Hemisphere parameter.

      This means that the Magnetized sphere is "supplying" the ENTIRE / TOTAL sphere's fuel supply INPUT & DEMAND - through ONLY HALF of the Protons/Atoms - as compared to the NON Magnetized sphere - in the SAME SET AMOUNT OF TIME.

      Furthermore - since the Protons/Atoms in the North Pole Hemisphere are ALREADY receiving their "fuel" supply (within/through) FROM the South Pole Hemisphere -

      This FORCES the incoming static charge (fuel supply) around the outer parameter of the North Pole Hemisphere - to be DIVERTED around the outer parameter of the North Pole Hemisphere - to be "filtered" in with the input at the South Pole Hemisphere.

      This is why - and what - CREATES a (fuel flow back-up) Magnetic Field around a Naturally Magnetized Mass.

      This "situation" "balances" at the Equatorial Plane of the Magnetized sphere - directly between the North & South Poles.

      Example - "A" = South Magnetic Orientation-

      When the South Pole of a Magnet is placed near a refrigerator - the proportionate "portion" of the gravitational "fuel" is "pulled" out of the refrigerator - directly into the South Pole of the Magnet.

      Example -"B" = North Magnetic Orientation-

      When the North Pole of a Magnet is placed near a refrigerator - a proportionate "portion" of the gravitational "fuel" is "pulled" out of the refrigerator - - then DIVERTED around the outer parameter of the Magnets North Pole Hemisphere - and into the South Pole Hemisphere of the Magnet.

      This is WHY BOTH Poles are ATTRACTED with "EQUAL" strength to the Magnetic (Ferrite) refrigerator.

      This is also why the OPPOSITE Poles (North to South) of two separate - individually "Magnetized" Masses ATTRACT - because the fuel flow becomes oriented in a "ONE WAY" direction for BOTH Masses.

      This is also why the "same" Poles of two separate - individually "Magnetized Masses (North to North - and South to South) REPEL - because of the CONTRADICTION in direction of "fuel" flow delivery.

      Copyrighted

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Galaxies display this same "linear" "fuel flow" situation.

      I will compare a galactic display to our solar system.

      If the center of a galaxy - is in fact a Black Hole - (like our Sun is the center of our solar system) and the Black Hole is a HUGE / magnetized celestial body.

      (By the way - my theory contends that a Black Hole is merely an enormous celestial body of mostly Ferrite with proportionate amounts of NON magnetic elements directly surrounding it. The "fuel flow" (magnetic field) is so intense that NOT even Photons are able to "resist" being "dragged" along with the "movement/flow" of the rotational (fuel flow) magnetic field.) (Quasar displays are in essence "less intense" / similar to Black Holes.)

      Furthermore - the Black Hole is "burning" more static electric "fuel" in the same set amount of time than are ALL of the celestial bodies "orbiting" it. The Black Hole is creating the same exact "fuel flow" situation as our Sun - but on a much / much / much larger scale.

      All of the celestial bodies of a Galaxy are "caught" if the fuel flow into the Black Hole - and are being "dragged" along as they "intercept" their individual - but interconnected - "fuel" supply.

      The "aether" (fuel tank) surrounding each Galaxy displays this same "swirling/rotating" flow because of the enormous "rotating" magnetic field. The galactic plane - is - in essence - merely the equatorial plane of the Black Hole

      The "galactic plane" is quite similar to the "equatorial plane" situation which our Sun displays with the planets.

      Galaxies function quite similarly to how our solar system functions - only MUCH more intensely and with particular different displays.

      The combined celestial bodies surrounding the central Black Hole of a galaxy - act as a "coil" toward the central Black Hole - intensifying its "magnetic field".

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      NOTE

      (The “fuel flow” (magnetic field) will not begin rotating around the magnetized Ferrite Primary Mass – UNLESS there are proportionate amounts of the appropriate NON magnetic elemental atoms directly/completely surrounding the Ferrite Primary Mass to “resist/inhibit” the “establishment” of the vertical axis (pole to pole) “stationary” situation of the “fuel flow delivery limbo” (magnetic field).

      If there are the appropriate proportions of NON magnetic elements present surrounding the Primary magnetized Mass – and they are subjected to the appropriate “overall” gravitational “pressure” (IE – the particular NON magnetic elements are forced to “remain” tightly located against the “surface” of the Primary Mass which is creating the magnetic field – completely surrounding the circumference of the magnetized Primary Mass) – the NON magnetic elements “RESIST” (IE - the “directions of fuel flow feed for the Electron Functions of the NON magnetic Secondary Mass “quickly” switch back and forth between the “aligned/limbo” – and normal gravitational “fuel” delivery direction.

      This “resistance” forces the Electron Functions of the NON magnetic elements to “relay” the “aligned” fuel flow (normally “stationary” vertical axis magnetic field orientation) “around” the equatorial plane between the North and South hemispheric Poles where there is the least resistance – because this is where the Primary Mass has established the Maximum volume of fuel input – and this is what causes ROTATION of not only the magnetic field (fuel flow delivery) but also causes “proportionate” resistance propelled rotation of the solid Mass of the Primary magnetized Mass itself.

      Furthermore – any Primary Mass (the Sun for example) which has a magnetized Ferrite core - with NON magnetic elements surrounding it – displays rotation in the fuel flow / magnetic field.

      This causes the incoming flow (static charge) of fuel from the fuel tank (aether) to also “rotate” or “swirl” as it flows toward the equatorial plane magnetized Primary Mass.

      Furthermore - the incoming fuel flow is strongest at the equatorial plane (heliosphere) of the Sun. (proportionately at distance).

      These two factors are why Planets orbit Stars at their equatorial Plane – and why they orbit in the same direction at which the magnetic field rotates around the Star.

      (Copyrighted)

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Think of it like this. The aether of static charge is the “fuel tank”. Protons of Mass are the “Motors”. Electron Functions are the fuel pumps / fuel delivery lines.

      According to my theory-

      The “entities” of the aether are constantly vibrating – which instills a “constantly” “capacitated” static electric charge throughout the “affected” area of the aether..

      (If there were NO Mass in the universe – this static charge would be spread EQUALLY throughout every square inch of the affected universal aether.)

      However – since the golden number ratio vibrating “entities” “use” this static charge for “fuel” to “electromagnetically” bond (burning fuel = Electron Functions) into forming and maintaining Protons (Mass) (this IS the Strong Force) – this creates a “supply and demand” situation.

      As Protons form – and cluster - the static charge of the aether (fuel tank) is “drawn” toward any (all) Protons (Masses) (from all sides equally) all the way to the center / core of each Mass to SUPPLY the DEMAND. (The larger (or denser the elemental Protons of the Mass) – the farther “outward” the fuel must be drawn in from the fuel tank to supply the demand.)

      This is the observed “display” of gravity – and is INITALLY – supplied “spherically/radial” into any “Mass” - equally around its circumference.

      (I’ll get to magnetism and its effects farther below.)

      Any Primary Mass – in proportionate distance to any Secondary Mass – creates a proportionate CONTRADICTION in the “flow” of the “fuel” into BOTH Masses.

      A large Mass (the Sun for example) is “burning” more fuel in the same set amount of time as are ANY (all) of the Planets.

      This means that – as the “fuel” flows toward the Sun – the Planets “INTERCEPT” their “fuel supply” from the larger “flow” of fuel - flowing into the Sun – which causes the planets to be “dragged” along with the larger flow of fuel “moving” toward the larger Mass of the Sun.

      ALL Mass “burns” this static electric “fuel” (the Strong Force) - and the observed / detected display of the DELIVERY of the Strong Force “fuel” is “gravity”.

      However - the motional trajectory of the planets and the CONTRADICTION in the direction of “fuel flow” delivery – directly between each planet and the Sun – are the two factors which create “stable orbits”. (This is the same situation occurring between any masses in proportionate distance from each other = Planets and Moons / etc.)

      Magnetism-

      When a Mass contains the appropriate amounts of - and configurations of Ferrite – it magnetizes – which is merely the display of the “fuel” (static charge supplying the Strong Force) being “forced” to be delivered by entering the South Pole hemisphere of the Mass – because the Electron Functions of the element Ferrite “relay” the Strong Force static charge (fuel) from one Proton – to the next Proton – to the next Proton – through the Protons/Atoms of the Mass in a “linear” / swirling “Fibonacci” display – instead of the “fuel” being delivered spherically/radial “equally” around its circumference into / toward its core = “gravitational”.

      Natural magnetism is merely the directed/altered “flow” normal spherically/radial gravity - once the Electron Functions “align” with this linear / Fibonacci – internal - fuel delivery display.

      (There is NO “fuel” (static charge) actually “exiting” (exhaust…) out the North Pole – because there is only the NEESSARY amount of fuel “entering” the South Pole to SUPPLY the necessary Strong Force DEMANDS of the magnetized Masses Electron Functions in an “aligned/relayed” delivery.

      The area around the circumference of a magnetized mass (magnetic field) is merely where the flow of the fuel coming in (still being drawn in - equally spherically/radial around its circumference = normal gravitational) is NOT being “immediately” “accepted/used” by the Mass and is in a state of “limbo” as it is “filtered/mixed” toward the South Pole hemisphere. (The linear / Fibonacci swirl of the “fuel flow” within the Electron Functions of the Mass finds “equilibrium” to this situation by actually “balancing” the “display of the magnetic field in the middle – at the “equatorial plane” between the Poles.)

      HOWEVER - if there is a Secondary Mass in proportionate distance to the magnetic field of the magnetized Primary Mass– the Protons/Atoms of the Secondary mass will AUTOMATICALLY (align/relay) to the proportionate amount of “limbo” in the fuel flow created by the Primary magnetized Mass = “Magnetic Field”.

      IE – if the Primary Masses magnetic field (fuel flow limbo area) is larger/stronger than what the Secondary Mass NEEDS for NECESSARY NORMAL gravitational Strong Force consumption – the Secondary Mass “passes/relays” the proportionate directed/aligned “limbo” of “fuel flow” through its own Electron Functions beyond its own consumption needs.

      (IE – The “size/strength of the “magnetic field” created by the Primary Mass - and the size and elemental composition of the Secondary Mass – is what determines how much of – and how strongly - the Secondary Mass is “affected” by the magnetic field (fuel flow limbo) created by the Primary Mass.

      In essence – A Secondary Mass at proportionate distance to the South Pole of a magnetized Primary Mass is being forced to “align/deliver” the “fuel flow” from the aether - through itself and into the Primary Mass.

      Furthermore - A Secondary Mass at proportionate distance to the North Pole of a magnetized Primary Mass is being forced to “align/receive/accept” the “fuel flow” FROM the Primary Mass.

      Furthermore - any Secondary Mass which is located at the equatorial plane of a “Magnetized” Primary Mass – the North hemisphere of the Secondary Mass is basically “accepting” “fuel” from the magnetized Primary Mass – and the South hemisphere of the Secondary Mass is “delivering” fuel to the magnetized Primary Mass.

      (If the Secondary Mass is Ferrite – the proportionate Electron Functions “willingly” respond/accept the internal Fibonacci linear fuel delivery created by the magnetized Primary Mass (magnetic field – South OR North) and an ATTRACTION is displayed.

      However – if the Secondary Mass is NON magnetic – it merely “relays/passes” the magnetic field through the proportionate Electron Functions – and there is no attraction.)

      (If the Secondary Mass IS ALSO individually/separately magnetized – the South Pole of one can only “accept” the North Pole of the other – which displays ATTRACTION. And visa versa.

      However - the “same” poles (North to North or South to South) display a CONTRADITION to each other in the direction of fuel flow delivery – and they “resist” or “REPEL”.

      (Copyrighted)

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      A large portion of of the "stable" orbits of planets around Stars - and Stars around galaxies - is the "overall" spiraling (helical) momentum that is displayed.

      Below is a link to a couple of very well done videos that show how solar systems (and most likely all celestial bodies) "orbit" the center of a galaxy in a "spiraling" (helical /vortex) type of "orbital precession".

      We do not orbit the center of the Milky-way in a heliocentric motion - it is more of a "helical /vortex motion"

      (In these videos the artist depicts the Sun moving in a straight line - I theorize the Sun to be displaying a "spiral" motion - as the Planets follow.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jHsq36_NTU

      The below video by the same artist is an even better / updated depiction.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4V-ooITrws

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Effilnuc-

      The Sun and Planets are not necessarily "falling" away from anything.

      It is just possibly a long term cycle. Stars have births - lives and deaths - so, why not galaxies? Or even all of the galaxies?

      The tides here on Earth are more than just a perspective. The Moon orbits the Earth because it is caught in the larger flow of the static aether (gravitational) strong force delivery to the Earth. However, the Moon is simultaneously intercepting a portion of this flow for itself - which along with the Moons trajectory - helps stabilize its orbit.

      Furthermore - the side effect consequences of this situation on the Earth is detected / observed as the movement of the oceanic tides.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Sharpencil,

      We know that every observable action has an equal and opposite reaction, so, if the earth is falling towards the sun, and the moon is falling towards the earth and the sun is falling towards the middle of the galaxy, what exactly are they falling away from, respectively?

      I think the back and forth rolling to which you refer is simply a change in perspective. If you are before any point, it seems to be rolling forward, if you are after the point, it seems to be rolling backwards, but at all times and at all points it rolls both forwards and backwards simultaneously. There is complete stillness at every point, (+ve and -ve), however there is complete motion between all points, this motion is always positive. Motion is what is observed, motion is all that is observed. The relativity of that motion to our our subjective point of perspective dictates whether it appears to roll forwards or backwards.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      NR, the universe has a beginning according to

      http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-univer...

      The universe has a middle, just look around.

      The universe has an observable end, it is as far as we can see

      http://www.fromquarkstoquasars.com/what-lies-beyon...

      If the universe has a beginning and a middle and an end, so does everything within it. The beginning of the universe is also the end of the universe and the end of the universe is another beginning.

      The universe is a mathematical construct with each integer representing a point in the universe. Every integer is both a positive and a negative.

      The difference between two points or two integers is always positive.

      http://www.themathleague.com/index.php/about-the-m...

      I hope this helps.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      The above description also explains HOW the Moon causes the oceanic tides here on Earth.

      (By the way - the lack of rotation and lack of magnetic field of the Moon - has practically no direct influence on this interaction of HOW and WHY the oceanic "tides" work as they do.)

      As the Moon orbits the Earth - the Earth incurs a "slight" DECREASE in static aether influx (gravity) - at the "moving orbital location" where the Moon is "intercepting" a portion of the Earths proportionately "larger" aether static "flow" (gravity).

      In this "traversing area" - the Earth displays an ever so slight "decrease" in its "gravitational grip" on the WATER as a "whole" in the area in question.

      Furthermore - as the Moon traverses (orbits) - the area of the Earth BEHIND / AFTER the progression of this "traversing decrease" - THEN displays a REINSTATEMENT of the NORMAL aether influx (gravity) after the Moon has "passed by / moved on".

      It is this "back and forth" "ROLLING" '"fluctuation" in the "steady aether static influx as the Moon "passes by" - which causes the water to "MOVE" as a whole / entity - and display "tides"..

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Effilnuc-

      According to my theory (The Good Vibrations) -

      Gravity is the by-product effect / display of the static charge of the Aether - being delivered to Protons (Mass = the Strong Force).

      The "flow" of this charge (spherically/radial) INTO any larger Mass is what "pulls / drags" any smaller Mass toward the larger Mass-

      However - the smaller Mass is "intercepting" a portion of this "flow" toward the larger Mass for its own Strong Force NEEDS.

      (The initial "trajectory" of the smaller Mass is also a determining factor for the result (stable orbit / collision / near miss / etc.)

      It is this "CONTRADICTION" in direction of "flow"of the static charge in the immediate area of the smaller Mass - in the direction - directly "between" the two Masses - which instills a "stable orbit" - along with the momentum of the "trajectory" of the smaller Mass.

      (It is "SIMILAR" to how Einstein explained it -

      The Planets are "falling" toward the Sun - but NOT because "gravity" "warps" space/time - but rather - because gravity is the displayed side effect the planets adhere to because they are "caught" in the LARGER static electric "flow" moving toward the larger Mass of the Sun - and the Planets initial motion of trajectory ASSISTS with the "contradiction" in direction of static electric "flow" in the immediate area (phantom gravitational static flow) INTO each Planet - which these two constant factors are what establish stable orbits.

      It helps to fully read - and comprehend - the entirety of my theory to understand how it "plausibly" unifies the detected / observed displays of physics.

      (Any body of Mass with a proportionate magnetic field displays a South input of the aether static charge - and a North output of the aether static charge. Any NON magnetic elements surrounding the magnetized Ferrite core of a Mass - will force the magnetic field to "rotate" - directly / most prominently - at the equatorial plane - of the Ferrite core - where there is the LEAST resistance.

      This forces the influx "flow" of the aether static charge - into any body of Mass with a substantial magnetic field - to be STRONGEST at the equatorial plane of the Mass.

      (IE - the heliosphere of the Sun - or the Earth - has the strongest "influx" of static flow at the equatorial plane - because of the "resistance" in the "establishment" of the magnetic field itself.

      Furthermore - the above "situation" forces the static aether "influx" to display a rotating / swirling "movement" into any Mass with a proportionate magnetic field

      This is WHY all of the Planets "orbit" the Sun at its equatorial plane - and why they all orbit in the SAME direction which the Sun "rotates".

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Effilnuc, here I am struggling with your words again and I just began, You said the universe has 3 components, the start, the middle ,and the end... Says who? Have you ever seen or experienced the end to claim this? Also you stated " Whilst the middle is always a positive time period or space distance, the start and end are both negative and positive.

      Every starting point in time or space is positive and negative.

      Every end point in time or space is positive and negative.

      Every middle point in time or space in our material universe is positive.

      Every middle point in time or space in the antimaterial universe is negative."

      Please link some verified references to this information.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Sharppencil, I hear what your saying and I have to say I would like to research some videos in regards to the possibility of magnetism being created through electrical forces. Also.... I do ask this question... In your hypothesis what you state about the moon and mercury would make complete since to me except for one thing, perhaps you can attempt to explain..... If this is true why then does the moon not just crash into the Earth or Sun whose magnetic field is stronger, obviously... because they do display rotation? The same with Mercury and the Sun?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Here is an analogy to give a mental visualization (and a defining “linear” connection between all “components” of the universe) in accordance to the quantum mechanics of my theory - "The Good Vibrations".

      My theory states that the Aether of the Universe is completely jam packed full of vibrating “entities” (particles / standing waves = “entities”).

      The vibration of these entities instills the entire “affected” Aether to be constantly capacitated with static electric charge.

      Particular “entities” vibrate at a particular frequency which allows them to use this surrounding charge to electromagnetically bond to form Protons of Mass.

      The “pulses” of static charge supporting the electromagnetic “bond” between these particular entities are what I term “Electron Functions” and occur at the speed of light.

      (An “individual” Proton (Hydrogen) displays a particular geometrically choreographed “pattern” of these systematic / symmetrical static charge pulses = Electron Functions - = the Electron Function Shell.)

      Now - visualize this influx of sequential / systematic / symmetrical “static pulses” as a spherical “gear” with a particular spherical size – and a particular number of teeth (= each individual Electron Function pulse represents a single tooth of the gear). (like a gear in a machine).

      Each single Proton (Hydrogen Atom) displays this same spherical – static electrical “gear” shape / Electron Function – and is identical.

      However – when two (2) Protons are interconnected inside the same Electron Function “Shell” (Helium) – this “different” (larger) geometrical shape of two (2) Protons causes the static electric pulses (Electron Functions) supporting the electromagnetic “bond” of each individual Proton – to “double” the number of static pulses (Electron Functions) occurring to the Atomic structure (Electron Function Shell) in the same set amount of time.

      (This change (doubles) the number of “teeth” that this larger gear displays – in the same set amount of “time”.)

      Each elemental atomic structure throughout the periodic scale displays different (proportionate) numbers of “teeth” (Electron Functions) occurring in the same set amount of time.

      This is the basis for chemistry / fission / fusion / etc. (and displays of energy).

      It’s all in the mathematical “harmonics” of the number of “teeth” (Electron Functions) which correlate in “unison” at enough “intervals” in a particular set amount of “time” for particular “teeth” of each individual “gear” (differing elemental atoms Electron Function geometrically choreographed “patterns”) to “mesh” in “enough” “pulses” to coexist by ALTERNATING - or harmoniously sharing / in sequential Electron Function “Pulse” “turn” to establish a “bond”. (Molecules / etc.)

      Particular elements display particular geometrically choreographed “gears” (Electron Functions) in a set amount of time - which results with ONLY particular differing elements being able “mesh” with other particular elements - which display completely different numbers of overall “teeth” (Electron Functions) – but are “mathematically harmonic” in the “timing” of the “alignment” of the necessary number of “teeth” when “compared” to each other – and a “fusion” or “bond” of various strengths will result – depending on the circumstances (pressure / thermodynamics / etc.).

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Effilnuc -

      I must disagree.

      I contend that the universe is completely and absolutely - "linear" in all aspects / respects.

      The actions / states - of observed and detected "displays" of mass, energy and time - can be explained with directly connected "linear" progressions.

      The "consequences" derived from the interactions between particular types of mass - result with displays of subsequent particular intensities of energy - which establishes the basis for the measurement of time.

      The "measurement" of "Time" is determined by comparing the various results / stages - of the "relay" of energy between forms of mass.

      (IE - a "static" universe with no mass or movement - has no "measurable" time.

      However - the birth of a single Star instigates the measurement of the speed of relayed Photons (speed of light) - which is a "basis" for the measurement of time.

      Working backwards from (or deeper into) the manifestation and propagation of "light" gives us a "basis" to compare the observed / detected "displays" of various exchanges (movement) of "energy" between "masses" - to establish a "related / comparison" between the "particular circumstances" displayed / resulting from - the various "relays/ exchanges" of energy created by any interaction.)

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi NR and Sharpencil,

      When considering our universe there are always, and only 3 components.

      Start

      middle

      end

      Everything in the universe; matter, time, force and space is constructed of these 3 components, nothing more, nothing less.

      The start always attracts the middle, which attracts the end which attracts or becomes the start.

      The start repels itself to create the middle, the middle repels itself to create the end and the end attracts a new beginning.

      The time or space between the start and the middle, and the middle and the end is linear, it is 2 dimensional. But the time or space between the end and start is zero dimensional or of infinite dimensions, as it is a zero point.

      Natural Law, ie. the laws determining our universal construct, operate such that there is a constant time (or space) period used between the start, middle and end of everything. This is what allows for stable matter to form, it is the constant speed of light, the speed of electromagnetic transmission between any two zero POINTS in space/time.

      Whilst the middle is always a positive time period or space distance, the start and end are both negative and positive.

      Every starting point in time or space is positive and negative.

      Every end point in time or space is positive and negative.

      Every middle point in time or space in our material universe is positive.

      Every middle point in time or space in the antimaterial universe is negative.

      The start and end points are/is the zero point between the material and the antimaterial universe...between matter and antimatter.

      Start points are separated from end points in our material universe by the middle, the time or space between the points.

      Start points ARE end points in the antimaterial universe and there is NO time or space between the singularity, the point.

      Force manifests in two forms subject to perspective.

      The force is either condensing a point, or expanding a point.

      When a single point expands, such as the big bang, it instantly becomes and infinite number of start and end points relative to one another, but also each point is an end point relative to the center and start point away from the centre.

      In essence, the moment after the big bang, a multitude of universes was created, each being a start point for itself and an end point for its sister universes and also, each became an end point for the omniverse.

      Every point in the universe, every point in time, every point in space is the center of its own universe, the beginning of itself. Every point in the universe, every point in time and space is also an end point for another universe. The space or time between all of these points is the material universe we sense and observe.

      In order to observe our material universe, we reflect it such that the space and time between all points of the antimaterial universe become observable points in space/time. We are observing the wave fluctuations, the vibrations, the changes in the space/time between all singular points, all start/end points at a fixed frequency.

      We observe these fluctuations at a fixed time/space constant, called the speed of light.

      This constant allows our observable universe to exist, or makes or universe stable.

      We observe changes through space/time at the rate of the speed of light. If we observed the changes at a non constant rate, we would see only chaos. If we observed the changes at a different constant rate than the speed of light, we would observe a different, yet parallel universe existing within the same space/time.

      The changes we observe can only be observed within the constant space/time period defined by the speed of light.

      Therefore the source of all force, of all observable change is TIME (rate of awareness).

      Our material universe is observed as RED, GREEN and BLUE. These are relative rates of awareness of 'middle' periods between start/end points.

      The frequency, (the number of observable times, per unit of time - the rate of awareness) that we observe something, is the defining factor of our observable material universe.

      The speed of light gives us the time unit, as a constant, which unifies everything within our observable material universe.

      In summary, there are an infinite number of time periods that can and do exist. Any time period chosen by man is arbitrary although it may be a reflection of our observations. The time period defined by the speed of light is not arbitrary...it is the frequency of OUR material universe, it defines our rate of awareness.

      Many other material universes exist at OTHER constant time periods, frequencies, rates of awareness that differ to our speed of light.

      These parallel universes exist within the same space/time as our own, yet they are observed using an alternative constant time/space unit, (rate of awareness). The speed of light is our constant rate of awareness. Parallel universes operate on a different speed of light to ours, a different rate of awareness such that observable change is different.

      The space/time ratio, or rate of awareness defined by our speed of light is C. This is our constant time unit from which we become aware of all forces, from which we become aware of change.

      A parallel universe has a different space/time ratio, it has its own speed of light which provides a constant time unit for all observable change to occur within that universe.

      Everything we observe is moving at our rate of awareness relative to the centre of the omniverse. Within that same space/time there is everything we do not observe moving at speeds other than our rate of awareness, relative to the centre of the omniverse.

      My material body is vibrating between the zero point and the end point. My brain is wired relative to the constant speed of light such that I become aware of what is around me at the same end/start point in space/time each and every vibration. This gives me a sense that I am stationary, at the end point, which is also a start point. My rate of awareness is the present.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      NR -

      Addressing the "dark side of the Moon" (or rather "why" the Moon does NOT rotate.)

      According to my theory - "gravity" is the by-product displayed /effect of the static electric charge which is "capacitated" throughout the vibrating subatomic "entities" of the aether - as it is CONSTANTLY being delivered - equally / spherically/radial - to Protons of Mass = (the Strong Force)

      The Strong Force is a subatomic "electromagnetic" attraction (bond) between "quarks" - which are merely the particular subatomic entities of the aether - that "vibrate" at a "golden number ratio" frequency - which allows them to "use" the static charge of the aether to "bond".

      Magnetism is the "directed" flow of this static charge (gravity) - through any Mass - in a South - to - North "flow".

      (Magnetism is the altered / directed flow of gravity.)

      The "Magnetic Field" is merely where the NORMAL (equally - spherically/radial) penetration of this charge to any "Magnetized" Mass - is "backed-up" / or not needed along the circumference / length (between the Poles). This is because the Protons of the Mass are ALREADY receiving their Strong Force "energy" in an "aligned" orientation of "feed / flow" (South to North) through the Mass.

      Any "body of Mass which displays a "magnetic field" - contains some form of "Ferrite" component - that is "magnetized". (Naturally or "Forced Magnetism" in NON Magnetic elements)

      ALL "Masses" (even those without Ferrite components) are subjected to "gravitational" displays.

      However - any Mass without a (proportionate) Ferrite "component" (or lacks "Forced Magnetism) (IE - low / or insufficient magnetic field) - will not display "rotation".

      It is any NON Magnetic element "surrounding" the magnetized Ferrite core - which creates "resistance" in the "flow" of the Magnetic Field of the Ferrite core itself.

      (The "size / strength" of magnetic field - in proportion to the "mass" (and particular elemental type) of the NON magnetic elements surrounding the Ferrite core - is the determining factor for the "amount / speed / presence" of rotation.

      IE - any NON magnetic elements present around the Ferrite core - will inhibit / "resist" the "natural / static" "situation" (flow) of the Magnetic field.

      (IE - the NON magnetic elements "restrict" the field - (and actually cause the OVERALL size of the magnetic field of the mass itself to be even larger) and FORCE the "field" to rotate around the "equatorial plane" of the Ferrite core - between the South input and North output poles.

      Since the Moon (and any celestial body which) has an insufficient magnetic field (insufficient magnetized Ferrite core) has NO reason to incur resistance in the "surrounding" rock / element components of the Moon (celestial body) - and this is why it (they) do NOT display rotation.

      (However - the planet Mercury - which is "mostly" Ferrite - but has insufficient NON Magnetic elements "surrounding" the magnetized Ferrite "core" - also has MINIMAL rotational displays because of the low (almost NON existent) RESISTANCE to the magnetic field.

      The "lava" at the Earths core is a direct result of the rock (any non magnetic elements surrounding the core) creating resistance in the magnetic field as it is FORCED to rotate around the equatorial plane of the Core itself by the resistance of the PRESENCE of any proportionate amount of NON magnetic elements. The resistance creates thermodynamics (heat) in the surrounding elements because they can only be TEMPORARILY magnetized.

      (Like how electricity is made by "quickly" (on and off) temporarily "magnetizing" (NON magnetic) Copper Coils.)

      It is ALL the same principal.

      Stars work the same exact way - but since their "huge" Ferrite Cores are surrounded by the proportionately "correct" (balanced) amount of NON magnetic elements (gases) - they display Heat / Photons / Electric Currents and Plasma - INSTEAD of LAVA.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      I just don't feel like you are grasping that the Unified Theory is missing a FORCE that binds all, and Time is not a FORCE. It is a measurement. Please I ask you again and plea with you to find the logic in Force=Measurement. Because to me, this is not logical.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Effilnuc, You had me until you got to here...."A definite period of time is required for a mono-magnet or pattern of mono-magnets to change its (their) relative alignment(s) such that the radiating face is sympathetically aligned to the condensing face...

      The observable action and reaction that results when collective patterns change their alignment is gravity.

      ...Or you could simply say "Gravity is Magnetism", or maybe even "Gravity is Time is Magnetism".............I still go back to my original argument that time is a measurement, measurement=math. Time is a man made word to understand a point A to a point B and the amount of duration between the two points. For some reason I feel like you are really missing the mark on this.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Effilnuc -

      I can understand and appreciate your Magnetism explanation - however - what is your the relation to the "source" - and "working function" of the Quantum Strong Force by using your monopole magnetism situation?

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      @ Sharpencil, I just had a thought and when I came here, I found that you had the same thinking 9 days ago...here is my verbation - that there is no such thing as a south magnetic pole and a north magnetic pole...there is only one type of magnetic pole.

      Every magnetic pole has half of its surface through which the magnetic field is pointing away (radiating) and half of its magnetic surface that is pointing in (condensing).

      When two of these poles are close enough relative to their respective magnetic flux density, they align themselves such that the condensing side of one is sympathetic to the radiating side of the other, and in turn the two magnetic poles together align their collective condensing and radiating sides with the strongest local magnetic field.

      When this alignment is relatively stable, the collective of mono-magnets now have a north and south face relative to the magnetic field in which they reside.

      In saying this, the earth has a radiating magnetic half (the southern hemisphere) and a condensing magnetic half (the northern hemisphere).

      The action that occurs between mono-magnets in order to align their radiating and condensing halves with other radiating and condensing halves manifests as various forces depending on the collective state of the mono-magnets.

      These mono-magnets are the smallest physical particle in the universe.

      A definite period of time is required for a mono-magnet or pattern of mono-magnets to change its (their) relative alignment(s) such that the radiating face is sympathetically aligned to the condensing face...

      The observable action and reaction that results when collective patterns change their alignment is gravity.

      ...Or you could simply say "Gravity is Magnetism", or maybe even "Gravity is Time is Magnetism"

      A mono-magnet is a 3 dimensional sphere that has a radiating hemisphere and a condensing hemisphere. When a group of mono-magnets is aligned such that all of the radiating faces face in 1 hemispherical direction and the condensing faces in the opposing hemispherical direction, we call it a magnet; with North and South defining the opposing faces of radiation and condensation.

      Every thing is made up of mono-magnets.

      Photons are small groups of 3 or 4?? mono-magnets, when they are sympathetically aligned they radiate in waves from one face (external surface) of their source (the internal face condenses inwards to the zero point.

      When the waves of mono-magnets in motion interact with other mono-magnets in a stable motionless pattern that forms mass, an observable change occurs that we classify as a type of force depending on the category of observable changes witnessed.

      This is how a photon is

    • profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago

      Gravity is the "side effect" display of the "delivery" of the spherically / radial - equally distributed - static electric "charge" from the Aether of Dark Matter to atoms (protons) of Mass - which constitutes the quantum / atomic "Strong Force".

      Magnetism is merely the "altered" "flow" of "Gravity" in a South - to - North "direction" through a Mass.

      "Energy" is the resulting display of "Magnetism" above the Law of Conservation of Energy for the "situation" of the Mass.

    • Ryan Allen profile image

      Ryan Allen 2 years ago

      I ran out of characters so it got a bit cluttered, sorry!

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      k, I'm going to be honest I have not read your entire post thoroughly, I skimmed it. When I have a bit more time I will. However, I want to say that I do believe in a possibility of multiple universes. Possibly more than 1 other. Who is to say there are not 30? (example). I believe that heat in itself can cause rotational spin. (or molecular spin for that matter as well). I included this in my theory. I'd like to look deeper into your post and questions and I will get back to you. If anyone else would like to answer some of your concerns they are welcome to do so as well.

    • Ryan Allen profile image

      Ryan Allen 2 years ago

      I read over this whole thread mostly from start to finish. I have not reviewed any of the video references. I have a 35 year olds grasp of high school physics which is to say at the nicest wrong

      I was berated for expressing that "I find gravity and magnetism more or less the same and we could lump them together" in a fictional story arch we were collaborating on. My collaborator and I had a near friendship ending argument for this comment.

      I was asked to just "Google it, a basic fundamental concept. I cant explain things if you don't understand fundamentals." to credit my collaborator has a BS in physics. So as a rational person, I took my lumps and did.

      to update my understanding of these forces I read all the following Q& A as a reference to classic physics.

      http://van.physics.illinois.edu/QA/listing.php?id=...

      I also decided it would be naive of me to not attempt to support my concept, hence how I found here.

      I have things that I don’t understand that were listed as known and stated either on the Q&A or here.

      1) Its been stated a photon at rest has no mass. this confuses me if energy and matter cannot be destroyed a particle at rest is always matter and a particle at the speed of light is always energy is that it is a functional curve of the state of matter, so the photon at rest statement seems to be a rules exception and rule exceptions should not exist in true laws of science they either apply or they don't. If a exception is found then it would be a reasonable conclusion that not enough information is known. Yes no?

      2) In the Q&A I read. (Paraphrased) "It is known an electron can be 2 places at the same time" this is in the #20 section of the Q&A - can anyone point me to an explanation for this I'm not expecting any of you to explain all this to me I am capable of understanding it, but I need pointed in the right direction.

      Based on not understanding these I would like to set them aside for the moment. I know I Shouldn’t but I don’t get it at this time and a massless at rest photon doesn’t affect any of my concepts at this time.

      Newton's Rival I like your theory, and potentially extrapolate on with conceptual ideas I have based on things as I understand them and possible augments to things other commenters have contributed. Please correct me along the way as I draw incorrect conclusions.

      Expanding on the events leading to the big bang or/singularity event that brought the current universe into existence. I have a concept for this gathered from what I have learned till now and using some of what I have read here to conceptualize it.

      Prior to this current universal instance of the big bang all of elemental matter was a gaseous cloud up to the element of Iron existed at least possibly molecularly greater but we know they don’t have to exist yet. Force as known to be Gravity (nonmagnetized particles drift toward the greatest mass) – created by a finite but near infinite number of gravitons compresses these together as if making the first star, however enough material is present to create a universe instead of a star. At the point of singularity the bang happens gravitons have transferred all the possible force they can on the central matter/mass. Neutrinos created from the first photons escape the singularity just ahead of the photons, since light from a singularity event would be a perfect spherical emanation there would be a finite but nearly infinite number photons that could be generated each with a neutrino on the same tangent line of escape. We know that neutrinos go as fast as light but move ahead of it based on their ability to escape generated force of the parent object (Neil de Grasses’ the cosmos series discussion of neutrinos). These first finite number of neutrinos each now reacting with an equal force as applied to them by the catalyst gravitons go in the opposite direction as applied to them and collide with the opposing aligned graviton particle and began to push it outward, the movement of this finite graviton along this tangent, and each possible tangent at this point creates the smallest measurable point of time limited by the exit speed of the neutrino pushing every graviton particle to the edge of the universe we use speed of light for this constant, this mechanical expansion allows gravitons to be time as Effilnuc suggested; just a disconnect in that a finite amount of them are present. This supports theories that the universe is both finite and infinite in size at the same time since a graviton has not gotten to an point time does not exist there which does not allow the other 3 physical dimensions known(XYZ axis) to be there either which also prevents detection. The universe from here develops as best as we can tell as NR expresses in theory.

      Adding in conservation of energy entropy etc., I also theorize during the singularity so much force is generated that a blackholelike byproduct, for lack of a better term is also created at the center creating entry to an alternate universe. These 2 universes “slide”against each other, one above the other, creating the initial spin of the universe but cannot collide because a toroid shape of gravitons(newly created) separate them allowing them to spin un unified. Now Matter is cast outward, the spin of the initial mass begins to generate the first magnetic force the alternate universe void begins to draw our universe toward it through the gap in the center. the bang energy is still too great to overcome entropy will eventually cause all the initial energy to stop expansion at that point magnetism will finally catch edge bound gravitons, this means expansion stops, gravitons will finally magnetize and begin to attempt to polarize and begin to collapse back in on its self. Gravitons will be re-energized by the initial created magnetic field from the bang that has finally reached them and they will begin to crush everything back in pushing all matter into the threshold attempting to fill the alternate universe to the point that the last remaining gravitons cause a catalyst 2nd singularity now in the alternate universe and back and forth forever like 2 cylinders of ignition with a graviton field on each side being the walls of the cylinders and the unused gravitons on either side of the joining threshold as an exchange/valve?. The energy byproduct that passes through the blackholelike instance at singularity would need to exchange into matter would need to be near equal equivalent mass as universe 1.

      What I don’t like about my ideas are

      The alternate universe concept. I add it because something has to start the initial object to begin to rotate, we know that objects in classic gravity of equal mass will cause a counter spin as each field presses on the other. Just like pressing to marbles together if one rotates one way sphere 2 will rotate the other like cogs or gears would. That is why I added something that creates initial object spin.

      If a 2nd universe does/is created I don’t know if some other material would make up the toroid shape instead of gravitons, I express it as graviton since everything remains inside the confines of graviton expansion rate, so when everything compresses back together, could enough energy be reproduced into a repeat ignition of a singularity – does conservation of energy/entropy allow this w/o a 2nd dimension?

      OR could only a single universe be created some energy lost to undiscernible(again stating something as an exception or unknown pains me) and now in a repeat singularity would the rate of the constant “speed of light” aka the velocity at which a neutrino pushes a graviton outward be less than the last occurrence of singularity did causing the 2nd singularity to have different physical/energetic constant values based on less energy used to cause catalyst repeating again and again until gravitons and magnetism fail to cause an ignition great enough to spark a universe. I honestly find this more plausible but I am unsure of what could happen to the energy that is lost since I am under the impression it can’t be, or is this instead perpetual since it cannot be lost expansion and contraction again and again infinitely.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Ronald , idk ...but you don't have to sign in to comment or be a part of the conversations here! Just post a comment!

    • profile image

      Ronald Tripp 2 years ago

      Fascinating but I am unable to sign in on this site for some reason

      Love to hear more on this topic

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Donald Polmateer was a great person, had a wonderful mind. And died from cancer. He was young and ambitious. Someone I will never forget. And even though I appreciate your thoughts and opinions, I am content just like I have been for many years doing exactly what I am doing. I believe in what I am doing and have great love and passion for it.

    • profile image

      Iknownothing 2 years ago

      Look, you have a really great mind and I do love this theory, but where is the video of the fish tank experiment Donald Plomateer mentioned three years ago? You might have something here (I don't know what) but a nearly complete rewrite of physics is probably not it. I think you would be better off trying to work with gravity not ignore it. Good luck!

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Oh yeah @ Iknows, I forgot to finish my thought on the rest of what you stated. You said: "you missed my entire point of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle that no matter how powerful the magnets or microscope you will never be able to measure an atoms speed and position at the same time because you lose one when you capture the other and vise versa" Wait one sec, You said this in response to my comment of the LHC being able to smash atoms at the near speed of light. It was also correlation with my point of the fact that we have yet to see a Graviton. (the smallest atom of gravity) ... Heisenberg's uncertainty principle has NO relevance here. His principle says that we cannot measure an atoms speed and position at the same time. However... when I stated that the LHC was smashing them at the near speed of light, it was to prove only one point. That technological science has advanced so extremely to this point that we can accomplish this, but we still cannot LOCATE/SEE the atom of a Graviton. (it was sarcasm)! I'm not looking at measuring an atoms speed and position at the same time. Like Heisenberg's Principle states. I was looking at some evidence it ACTUALLY exists. And we have YET to prove that! I have watched exactly what the Cern scientists have watched on screen. I have seen those atoms rip in and smash together expelling energy. They show all this in forms of different colors on a screen. But what atoms are they smashing? I am quite sure that they know, correct? Why can't they smash a Gravity atom? Because they have never seen one, that's why! And here's another small loophole in the LHC That people do not seem to grasp. What kind of gravitational conditions are we smashing atoms in? How do we know that these gravitational conditions are the same when the universe began? How are they measuring that Gravitational pull/and or push? I would think it's slightly difficult to measure or control conditions of something we have no proof of, something we cannot see. So this is what they do.... They use the most powerful magnets in the world to be the basis of controlling that environment and cause it to be ANTIgravitational. They have it sealed airtight so the only force they can be using is magnetism. Using magnets to eliminate gravity? Come on man.... Common sense is not that hard to utilize in all of this. Again we are at the duck philosophy... If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.........

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      You know I do not mean to sound so aggressive about Effilnuc and his theory, I just simply disagree. I listened to what he said, I logically did my best to connect the dots. But... the dots do not connect. There are too many questions that have no answer to them. A theory cannot truly be a theory until those dots can be connected and those questions can be answered , until then it is nothing more than an IDEA. If he truly feels he is correct he can start his own hubpage with this theory and get collaboration to help him fill in his dots and have help with those answers that need to be answered. There is no harm in doing that. Personally, I liked when he was discussing the vibrations of the universe and truly feel as if he was onto something big there, but for some reason he abandoned that. I am not so sure he should have done that. I believe there is a MUCH bigger picture there waiting to be discovered.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Iknows: you said "To Effilnuc's points, time is gravity is magnetism follows the same thesis line. If there is an ultimate starting point, a point of derivation that the whole universe is constantly and repeatedly birthed from, then it would have an continuous link to every other force in the multiverse. You cannot tear the power that creates reality frm" NO.... this is not Effilnuc's point. His point is that Time is gravity and is also the unifying theory. I disagree. Whether or not they all link together and how is another entirely different story. For that matter.... EVERYTHING LINKS TOGETHER SOMEHOW... AND ... if we look at it from that point of view Einstein's work would have been complete, and every other physicist on this planet would not be still looking for the unifying theory. BUT WE ARE!

    • profile image

      Iknows 2 years ago

      Haven't been on in awhile due to life. Newtons Rival, when you made the rebuttal (I know it was a while back) that the LHC can "see particles at the speed of light" you missed my entire point of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle that no matter how powerful the magnets or microscope you will never be able to measure an atoms speed and position at the same time because you lose one when you capture the other and vis versa. As for the debate on whether gravity is magnetism or the opposite, this is really an issue of semantics. We are essentially arguing the same theory, if one is true then the inverse is also true. Inverse operations are a basic symmetrical fact of the geometric universe we live in. You cannot parse he force from on another because they are so similar. The only thing we can say for sure is that magnetism is basically artificial gravity or magnetic-gravitation on a macro scale. On the nano scale, this is a very different story. To Effilnuc's points, time is gravity is magnetism follows the same thesis line. If there is an ultimate starting point, a point of derivation that the whole universe is constantly and repeatedly birthed from, then it would have an continuous link to every other force in the multiverse. You cannot tear the power that creates reality frm

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      JNN...........http://newtonsrival.hubpages.com/hub/How-lightning... and I wrote mine a month before he uploaded his!!!!!

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      JNN I will look at your links, I am a big fan of Nikola Tesla and his work. I'll get back to you on my thoughts. I'm curious about Leedskalnin, I know someone posted about him before but I never got a chance to look into his works.

    • profile image

      JNN 2 years ago

      Also, I just your post on thunder, these videos that someone put together s based on Ed Leedskalnin seem to agree with your theories:

      http://m.youtube.com/channel/UCtbTnJGWSW_g9cy0fBmG...

      Specifically

      http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jmtzVITUWgk

    • profile image

      JNN 2 years ago

      You may have looked at this already, but here is some stuff I started looking at too and it may help your theories.

      Ed Leedskalnin had some theories on this, have you looked at his writings on magnetic current and his PMH?

      Also I think Tesla may have known about this too, but may have not seen the relationship with magnets. But I think his theories on free energy and wireless energy were heading in this path, until JD Powers stopped funding him.

      Is the magnetic field of the earth different at the equator? Do you have any thoughts on the idea of the vile vortices and there magnetic relations?

      Do you consider magnetism and a relation to Terminal Velocity? Is it possible to change Terminal Velocity while considering the theory of magnetism vs gravity?

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      You just changed the entire definition to fit your own needs. The definition is: ANY INTERACTION that changes the motion of an object.

      You changed it to include things like: "Gravity can only manifest betweeen 2 points in time. Magnetism can only manifest beetween 2 points in time. All FORCE manifests between points in time."

      If you are going to ask for a definition stick to FACTS, do not write facts and then mumbo jumbo that YOU feel like "sounds good" with the facts.

      You kind of made my point for me , force is observable by means of an interaction. Time is not observable in any interactions.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      According to THE definition ;-), a force is an INTERACTION.

      An INTERACTION is a particular way in which we observe matter, fields, and atomic and subatomic particles affecting one another, e.g. through gravitation or electromagnetism.

      The terms 'gravitation' and 'electromagnetism' simply refer to the 'particular way' of the observed effects of an interaction on seperate bodies.

      EG.

      If the 'particular' observations are of an inverse square nature, they are termed gravitational effects.

      If the 'particular' observations are of an inverse cube nature, they are termed electromagnetic.

      The notion of a single body of mass, such as the earth, having a gravitational or magnetic force independent of other bodies is ludicrous according to the definition of FORCE, as force is simply a 'particular way' of change and can only manifest through INTERACTION between TWO or more bodies.

      Gravity manifests BETWEEN bodies of mass, it is not found within bodies of mass.

      Magnetism manifests between bodies of mass, it is not found within bodies of mass.

      Physics claims that earth has a gravitiational force due to its mass. This is nonsense, the gravitational force manifests as a 'particular' observable change resulting from the interaction of the earth AND any other body.

      Gravity can only exist if there are two or more bodies, magenetism can only exist if there are two or more bodies. This is a fact and is undisputable.

      It is only via the matrix of time that our minds can observe change, time is the unifying field through which all change is observed.

      If the time matrix is not present, observable changes cease to exist; force can no longer manifest through interaction as there are no longer any points in time between which the force can manifest!

      Gravity can only manifest betweeen 2 points in time. Magnetism can only manifest beetween 2 points in time.

      All FORCE manifests between points in time.

      The SPACE between all points in time is the SAME.

      The DISTANCE between all points in time is RELATIVE.

      It is the perspective of the observer that gives rise to the illusion of seperate forces. If the observation is linear between points; it is labelled gravity. If the observation is through a 3D volume; it is labelled magnetism.

      Gravity and Magnetism are different observed interactions caused by one force.

      One force exists between all points in time, (it is the substance/matrix of time) and through the RELATIVE interaction of seperate bodies, the force manifests as observable change.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      This is a pretty good definiton, and I don't think I have to tell you how it correlates to magnetism, it's quite obvious, just in case I capitalized that part for you.... So I will await the correlation and definition you place. .......FORCE:In physics, a force is any interaction which tends to change the motion of an object. In other words, a force can cause an object with mass to change its velocity (which includes to begin moving from a state of rest), i.e., to accelerate. Force can also be described by intuitive concepts such as a PUSH or a PULL.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      I will place THE definition of Force here, and how it correlates to magnetism... After you tell me THE definition, then you can tell me how it correlates directly with time.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Hi NR, what is your definition of FORCE please?

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Ok Effilnuc, Here are my thoughts, and I want you to know that I did not simply dismiss anything you had to say.. I took everything into deep consideration. In my opinion you have to let this go. Time is NOT the unified theory and I'll tell you why. Time is a measurement. What you are looking for is a FORCE that ties everything together. To say that time is the unifying theory is no different than saying Math is the unifying theory. Yes both are infinite, but neither is a force. Time=measurement, measurement=math. Unless you can show that math is a force this theory is "beat"! And I just cannot logically see that happening. I'm sorry.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Sorry Effilnuc, have just had a seriously busy last 2 days, but I will get to you as soon as I can....

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      Check this out...

      www.customaudioproductions.com/Electric_Universe

      (BTW - When the singularity occurred (according to my theory) and instigated the "event" which set the Universal Aether of subatomic particles to begin vibrating - this was the awakening of the consciousness of the "creator".

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Ahhhh S.O..... You have touched upon a very great topic. You know Tesla and Bohr both claimed that the atom was just a perfect example of the Universe. And I do believe that it is. Right down to the magnetic momentum within that allows for the atom to function. Bohr says that all matter has a magnetic element to it. And I couldn't agree more. I actually referenced this in my original theory as part of my substantiation of my theory. Very brilliant thinking S.O. It was through my medical background and passion for physics that helped me to begin to put these pieces together. There are many other signs to show this exact behavior. I did not look at your link yet, but I can tell you I am already on the same track and have been on a long time..... Effilnuc... I am surprised to see you back so quickly, and with a vengeance:) .... I will read through what you are saying sometime today and get back to you. If not today definitely tomorrow!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Hi S.O., the funny thing is that Time can be a duration or a moment or a cycle.

      Time can have no dimension - eternal.

      One dimension - point, moment

      Two dimensions - period, duration

      3 dimensions - cycle

    • profile image

      S.O. 2 years ago

      We can give another name for Time such as - Duration. Time is a secondary attribute. It is unseparateable of a movement/ interaction/ rotation... any process. In example as a shadow is unseparatable of any thing but we cant say that shadow is the primary thing. As Reality is in unstopable movement thus

      time also exist; that is- the Duration of that process .

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Gravity requires observable change to manifest, or the result of gravity is observable change.

      A falling object is observable change and therefore gravity is manifest.

      An object sitting on the surface of the table is not changing and therefore the force of gravity is not identified as no change is identified, so the force of gravity is not manifest.

      Therefore, the force of gravity is not present on an object sitting on the table. The force of gravity only begins to manifest at the moment the ball begins to fall...but hang on, what made the ball begin to fall so that the force of gravity could begin to manifest?

      Let's try someone holding an object that they then release by reducing the pressure of their grip.

      What tells the object to begin to fall? Gravity you say...but gravity only manifests at the moment the object begins to fall. So, it must be something else that occurs in that MOMENT the object begins to fall, that is the true force behind the change. Gravity effects the rate of change but the change itself comes from the MOMENT.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      In saying that, I do believe that the unifying field manifests first as the observable influence of MAGNETISM which, THEN manifests as observable interactions called GRAVITY.

      I think NR is correct showing that observable magnetic changes lead to observable gravitational changes, not the other way around.

      As such, it is understandable why we try to say that Gravity is Magnetism... it is really like saying the ocean is water.

      Gravity has Magnetism all through it, just as the oceans have water all through them. However, for certain benefits of communication, we can seperate oceans and water as two seperate concepts, just as we can seperate gravity and magnetism as two seperate concepts. And, just like there is no ocean without water, there is no gravity without magnetism.

      We call it water if it is observed in a glass but we call it ocean if it is observed between continents.

      We call it magnetism if it is observed between relatively (to us) small objects, and we call it gravity if it is observed (with us as one of the objects) between relatively dissimilar sized objects.

      This is simply the way English works.

      I hope this helps? It makes it clearer for me.

      The unifying field that controls all interactions,be it observed as gravitational or magnetic, is one and the same and it is neither magnetic nor gravitational.

      The unifying field from which no interaction can escape, the unifying field in which all interactions occur is the field of time...everything happens according to a time sequence, every gravitational, magnetic, strong and weak interaction happens based on the same time signature and I think this signature is TAU.

      TAU is the physics label for 'proper time'

      TAU is 2PI but...it has seperate qualities to PI.

      http://www.tauday.com/tau-manifesto

      http://www.tauday.com/assets/figures/tauism_rotate...

      Note that TAU (τ) has a Feynman point (i.e., a string of consecutive 9s) one digit longer than the one for π. It begins at the 761st decimal point, rather than the 762 decimal point.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Based on the definitions above and the operation of the English language, there is no permissable way one can concisely say that 'Gravity is Magnetism'. The terms are not used to define seperate forces, the terms are used to classify different observable changes between objects resulting from their interactions due to one single force.

      E.G.

      "Walking is Running, Mum was wrong!"

      The mechanical influence behind both walking and running are the same, however, the terms 'walk' and 'run' are terms used to classify the different observed changes due to the application of the same mechanical influence; muscular contractions.

      Can you see how English does not allow us to say that Gravity is Magnetism without it striking a nerve deep within the framework of the english language. Gravity and magnetism are seperate classifications based on observable, repeatable change...nothing more, nothing less. Gravity and Magnetism are not forces in the sense of a 'driving force', they are merely labels for grouped observations.

      I believe NR, that what you are trying to say is that the unifying field that regulates observable changes classified as gravitational influence, is the same unifying field that regulates observable changes classified as magnetic influence.

      As such, gravitational and magnetic influences are subset observations of one ultimate influence that determines and meters all observable changes, in fact it permits observation in the first place!

      What shall we call this single ultimate influence that is the matrix upon which all observable change occurs? It is more than magnetic or gravitational, strong or weak, it is the ultimate driving influence found within and beyond each of these seperated observationable influences or changes....

      ...all in good time, I suppose.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      One Step at a TIME!

      "A force is a push or pull upon an object resulting from the object's interaction with another object. Whenever there is an interaction between two objects, there is a force upon each of the objects. When the interaction ceases, the two objects no longer experience the force. Forces only exist as a result of an interaction."

      http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/Les...

      So, a force is something that changes an object and is the result of an interaction.

      Let's look at "interaction".

      "2. Physics Any of four fundamental ways in which elementary particles and bodies can influence each other, classified as strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational."

      http://www.thefreedictionary.com/interaction

      A force is therefore an 'influence" that is classified into four categories based on the observed changes resulting from the interaction or "influence".

      According to these definitions or classifications, gravity and magnetism are subset classifications of an influence that causes observable change.

      Now, let's look at "push or pull". According to definition, the terms push and pull are vectors, "push" is away from the subject, "pull" is towards the subject.

      So, a force can only manifest between a subject and an object, and 'force' is the label used to describe the change that occurs when a subject and object influence one another.

      The key term here is 'CHANGE'. And any scientist will confirm that any change must be an OBSERVABLE CHANGE. In order for any change to occur, whether that change be classified as gravitational, electromagnetic, strong or weak, the basis of the change is TIME.

      Time and space are not linear, they are curved.

      The distance of 1 meter can occur between two seperate points on a straight line, AND the distance of 1 meter can also occur at the same point on a circle or elipse with a circumference of 1m or an area of 1m^2!

      Time can be measured linearly, as the distance between past and future, or it can be measured as a single point on a circle or elipse, or it can be measured as the area of said elipse.

      The interaction between an electrical field and a magnetic field is determined by this cycle of time. The manifestion of the magnetic field as a result of the RATE OF CHANGE of the electric field is directional but cyclical...it moves in 1 direction but keeps coming back to the same point!

      I think it is important to highlight that English is a language based on classification and labels. This leads to segregation rather than unification. Becausee of our thinking patterns are largely determined by the language(s) we speak, English speakers tend to see things as seperate objects rather than as parts of a whole.

      As such, we like to think that TIME is virtual, however TIME is the only real thing there is, everything else that we think is real, is only a partial reflection of eternal time.

      S.O.'s comments about the universe being one big organism is a more inclusive and unified way of thinking than english scientists are used to. Cheers S.O.! Nothing can be isolated/seperated or segregated from anything else in this universe...except time! And it is time which is used to seperate, isolate and segrate the universal whole!

      Therefore, TIME is the real force that creates SEPERATION in order to have SUBJECT and OBJECT. TIME is the real force that allows for OBSERVABLE CHANGE and allows the OBJECT and SUBJECT to interact.

      It is only through TIME that any INFLUENCE, INTERACTION or OBSERVABLE CHANGE can occur and therefore it is through TIME that the classifications of gravity, magnetism, strong and weak can be OBSERVED and categorised.

      Time is the only unfying field or framework that controls ALL INTERACTIONS.

      According to the defintion, "forces only exist as a result of an interaction." So, without TIME to control the rate of change of all interactions, there would be no interaction and the RESULT of NO INTERACTION? - no OBSERVABLE CHANGE.

      This means that gravity, magnetism, strong and weak forces are the result of interactions controlled by the unifying field of TIME.

      TIME binds everything in the universe together and at the same time, TIME seperates everything in the universe so that it may be OBSERVED.

      In NO way does this contradict the observation that the universe is one giant organism!

      Is this making more sense?

    • profile image

      S.O 2 years ago

    • profile image

      S.O 2 years ago

      I even think that sun/atom is a unipole magnet.

    • profile image

      S.O 2 years ago

      Hi NR. Time after time I follow the ideas that appear in this hubpage as I also consider that magnetism is the base of all and have to say that you are a real thinker. As to effilnuc's searching ideas about time I think it is not realistic to consider time as primary force or anything , as time is nothing more than a name of any process or movement, interaction... It is just a virtual name and no more. NR! why dont you draw your attention to the fact(as it is fact for me) that our universe is very look like an alive organism. There are many evidences , similarities between an organism and universe only we cant perceive it by just watching it, we can grasp it by analogical logic. Try to make your imagination by thinking that so called gravity is the same as what take place say inside our brain. I mean that every star is an atom, galaxies are cells, nebulas are cellular ingredients... etc; and it come obvious that so called gravity between stars are the same force as the force between atoms or atomic combinations-molecules inside our brain( as i consider our visible universe represents a brain part inside an yet unknown organism; probably a creature or human in hiper-dimention.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      "Time is not a continuum, this is my point, time is a cycle or period that repeats...physics has a limited understanding of TIME and often do not apply it correctly.

      Time existed before magnetism! Time existed before the big bang!

      Without the time signature of magnetism, electromagnetism cannot function." .......pretty big statements... I look forward to your future posts.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      BTW, thanks NR for taking the time to query and rebutt my statements. I appreciate it. I will get back to you with hopefully some more succinct replies.

      Cheers

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Forces are not oberservable, magnetism is not observable...the effects of magnetism are observable. This is scientific fact taught in grade school.

      Time is NOT observable, just like magnetism, its effects are observable.

      Time is not a continuum, this is my point, time is a cycle or period that repeats...physics has a limited understanding of TIME and often do not apply it correctly.

      Time existed before magnetism! Time existed before the big bang!

      WIthout the time signature of magnetism, electromagnetism cannot function.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      BTW... I would suggest while you are in your creative/exploration zone that you carry around a notebook/lab-book. I use them all the time. It really helps when you have ah ha moments, and also with weaving out the illogical after you have realized some. And adding to the logical/factual...It is just a better way of getting your ducks in a row b4 you post. And it is also your own personal verifiable proof.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Now I would like to also point out this and I feel it is of the utmost importance. If you claim that Physics is wrong. And you claim that time is the unifying theory. I do not object to your enthusiasm of this idea. I myself feel Physics is wrong in the aspect of the term gravity. However..... You must come back here with some real answers. Not speculations, and ideas.You need a solid foundation to make such a claim. Your rebuttals must fit within the confines of what your dealing with. (I have a feeling I will be returning to some pretty long posts...lol..) However, stick to the facts, present a solid case. Show some proof. My theory is backed with proof. This hubpage and what is written in it as an experiment at very top is proof, my pieces do fit, my claims are observable. So you need to think along these lines, and show me what you got. Remember this hubpage is a safe forum. Anything you say is documented evidence of your claim. As the owner of this page, I pledge to never delete your posts or "documentation". I want everyone with interest to see, to weigh in, and participate. That is the entire point of this page. Science working with Science.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      I actually felt it was important to break down the exact definition of time according to Physics. Lets do that. Time: a measured or measurable period, a continuum that lacks spatial dimensions. Now a step further... Spatial: relating to, occupying, or having the character of space. One more step... Continuum: a continuous series or whole, no part of which is perceptibly different from the adjacent parts . Now......So according to Physics definition of time it is a measurable period, that has NO part of which that is perceptibly different from its own adjacent parts, that occupies space with NO DIMENSIONS . This is the cold hard fact. All these definitions came from Merriam Webster. So.... therefore I rebuttal 2 things. 1. Time does not have different branches/manifestations/dimensions, it cannot split or break off into different effects or forces. 2. Also it is a measurable unit. Which you have already stated a few times. So, if we were at square 1 searching for an infinite "structure" that holds it "all" together (a unifying theory), by definition Time does not fit. The definition of continuum alone shows this. But the rest of the definition of time seals the deal even more.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Ok here are my rebuttals again and a new one, in your post you define a FORCE as : Force is an interaction that is observed between two observable and seperate bodies. Force cannot be seen; the effects of a force are what we OBSERVE...agreed?, .... Yet.... you call time a force. We cannot see time. You then claim the force of time is only one "dimension" or Manifestation (I think might be the better word) of time. Time has many dimensions/manifestations. However you offer NO explanation as to how time splits to do all of these magical things. For that matter I claim it is magnetism that is the unifying force, and I can see that (the force of magnetism). Not only can I see it, I know undoubtedly it does have different manifestations. It has been proved already that magnetism takes on different forms. How do you know that time is not a manifestation of magnetism? We'll start here... But I'm not done.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Ok, ignore the last bit about water, that's not making much sense at all!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      A bit more speculation...

      By this definition, Time is the Zero dimension...it has no dimension because it is unbound.

      As such the observable interaction of the zero dimension of TIME is 'nothing'...

      If time is divided into inside/outside or before/after, the first observable interaction of time comes in the form of gravity. The observable interaction of the force of time as gravity is 2 dimensional and scalar. The ratio of in/out or before/after is relative to the observed force of gravity.

      The second observable interaction of time comes in the form of electromagnetism. The observable interaction of time as the force of electromagnetism is 3 dimensional and not scalar. The ratio of in/out or before/after is no longer relative, it is the ratio of in/right/out or before/present/after that determines the observable interaction.

      When the scale of the force of time becomes large enough, it may be OBSERVED as space and matter, two apparently differnt things, yet really just the opposite sides of one undefined, unbound thing called TIME.

      Space is the property of time without matter and matter is the property of time without space. Together, space and matter are the observable properties of TIME. All space contains matter and all matter contains space. Together, matter and space are the opposing sides of time. Energy is the product of the interaction of these opposing sides of time. Therefore energy is contained equally in both space and matter; as matter becomes space and space becomes matter.

      E=mc^2; Energy = kilogram metres per second per second.

      E=Vc^2 ; Energy = volume x speed of light, or

      Energy of 1kg of water at sea level = 3 million meters^4 per second^2.

      IE there are 3 million meters^4 per second^2 of potential observable interactions contained in 1L of water.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      TIME that the basis of Einstein's theory of relativity.

      E=MC^2 may be inside a 3D sphere of time.

      Time should not be measured as moving forwards or backwards along a 1 dimensional line.

      Time may be measured as moving in towards or out from the centre of a 3D sphere...Mayan Calendar?

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Ok, here goes...

      Force is an interaction that is observed between two observable and seperate bodies. Force cannot be seen; the effects of a force are what we OBSERVE...agreed?

      The forces that we OBSERVE to act at a distance, we call 'gravity' and 'electomagnetic'. They have different names becausee the OBSERVED interactions between bodies are noticeably different and can be grouped...agreed?

      The forces that we OBSERVE to act through contact also have different names like friction or spring forces, however we know that these forces stem from gravitational and/or electromagnetic forces that we have so label through OBSERVATION...agreed?

      All OBSERVATIONS are based on the electromagnetic spectrum...ie, it is the fluctuations or differences in electromagnetic frequencies that gives rise to all OBSERVABLE outcomes...agreed?

      Energy is a property called work that is an abritrary unit of measurement of the OBSERVED effects of gravitational or electromagnetic forces over space/distance/time...agreed?

      Energy cannot be created, it is a property of the interaction of forces measured over time.

      Matter is a property that is a unit of measurement (kg) of the OBSERVED effects of gravitational and electromagnetic forces.

      Matter cannot be created, it is a property of the interaction of forces measured over space.

      In order to say that Gravity is Magnetism or, Gravity is Electro-magnetism, we have to agree that there is only ONE original force that is the force behind all OBSERVABLE changes in our universe. This one UNIFYING force, or field is that which gives rise to all INTERACTIONS between different bodies...whether these interactions are described as gravitational, electro-magnetic, frictional or pressured.

      I am proposing that the UNIFYING force or field that leads to all observable interactions between bodies or force fields, including that which we call 'gravitational' and 'electro-magnetic' observations, is TIME. Time is the UNIFYING field or force by which all observed interactions are measured and defined/labelled.

      TIME however is not a linear dimension as we currently mathematically presume.

      Here comes some speculation...

      TIME is a circular dimension based on PI or TAU.

      The mathematical derivative of TIME is NOT a point on a 1 D LINE as is currently expressed.

      The mathematical derivivative of TIME is a 3D point inside a sphere.

      Energy is the 'property' of TIME without Matter. And Matter is the property of TIME without ENERGY. Both Energy and Matter are the Yin and Yang 'properties' of TIME.

      Our universe is made of the interbalance/interaction between these two opposing 'properties' of the UNIFYING force field of TIME.

      By refining this definition, we may unify the observed forces; gravity and electro-magnetic and control the properties of said forces to manipulate energy and matter (light/dark, yin/yang, male/female etc).

      I hope this is a clearer explanation? It makes more sense to me!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      NR, you state that "Gravity is Magnetism",

      I wish to extend it to "Time is Gravity is Magnetism."

      Unfortunately, "time" and "magnetism" are very broad meaning terms.

      This makes literary explanations difficult without a mathematical explanation as well.

    • profile image

      Effiilnuc 2 years ago

      Hi NR, I am sorry if I seemed rude, I have been a bit rushed lately, I didn't mean to offend.

      I am in agreement that the Earth is a Magnet, however, I believe that magnetic force and gravitational force are multidimensional manifestations of the Zero dimension of TIME...how time evolves into force and matter is based on mathematical ratios similar to musical ratios.

      I will review your rebuttals and see if I can't explain myself more clearly. I am sorry if there are a few contradictions in my words, I have been writing as I have been thinking, so it has been a rather organic process...

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      Here are some links that actually tell you about how the Earth is in fact a magnet. They didn't have these links or information 20 years ago when I wrote my theory, but when I googled it, I was surprised to see a few others have figured this out as well, so it shows we are at least moving forward. So in response to your objection of Earth being a magnet, I give you PRIMARY SOURCE links: http://www.spaceweathercenter.org/swop/Science_Bri... , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv7zT953290 , What we have to understand here is that the Earth is encompassed by Liquid Oxygen. Which is highly magnetic. How did that liquid oxygen get there? From high amounts of pressure and heat. How did that happen? It happened when we had a huge rock in space that was covered with water came into contact with the Suns magnetic field. When the Sun began to draw that rock in towards it that water on the rock began to evaporate from the Suns heat and a huge pressure was created between the rock and the Sun. When that rock was hot enough with oxygen free flowing all over it from this water evaporation and enough pressure was built, that liquid oxygen formed around that rock. That liquid oxygen stopped the Earth from being pulled into the Sun, and not a moment to soon either. It REPELLED the SUN, and the other side of this "magnet" (magnetosphere) ATTRACTED which was what I was explaining in my first post to you about our core and everything being pulled towards the center of the Earth. How we doing so far? Any rebuttals or questions?

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      It would appear you are getting offended and this makes no sense to me, I listened to what you had to say, the pieces were not there for a complete puzzle. Even you admitted this to an extent. I gave you ample opportunity to answer my rebuttals adequately, not with assumptions and speculations. You could not do that! Now you should listen to what I am saying. I was open minded , and deserve the same respect. If we can't agree upon even that much we might have a problem here.

    • profile image

      NR 2 years ago

      I explained your first post questions in my post, apparently you did not read the entire response! It does repel and attract! No I don't need to forget the concept of particles and objects being created , you do. You are the one that said electromagnetic energy ^2 creates matter! Not me! And now you are offering a completely different definition to matter than which you did a few posts ago.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Matter is information, energy is information. Information is stored in time. Magnets are used to store information and that information is extracted using time. All of the information is on the magnetic disc, hower, it requires time to release the information and to give the information any sense or structure.

      Information is organised time, potential is unorganised time.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      NR, Matter cannot be created or destroyed. Energy cannot be created or destroyed.

      If the earth were a magnet, it would repel some things and attract other things...would it not? Why is everything in the earth's atmosphere attracted by the earth yet at the orbit distance, it is balanced and at other times, objects are pushed away by our atmosphere.

      You need to forget about the concept of particles and objects being created!...Based on time, everything is either infite potential or defined by its relativity, frequency.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      I want to point out the monopole thought with the sun is just that... a thought, if you remember manna and I were discussing this a while back. If it is not a accurate thought, it still seems feasable in the aspect that this may explain the Earths periodic magnetic pole reversals.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      I tried to scan quickly to find the original, I couldn't there are sooo many comments, on a different note as I was scanning them it's great to see how far we have come on this hub since it first began 6 years ago. But I want you to keep this in mind. Lets use the "if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck"... common sense mentality here. Sometimes we wander to far out and forget the basics, so I will repaint the basic facts. Earth has a Magnetic North Pole and a Magnetic South Pole. Right? ok! What other things besides magnets have this? Nothing! Then lets look at our core's composition, it is created up of all highly magnetic materials , correct? ok... So ... In the atmosphere of the earth everything is pulled towards he center of the earth because the magnet that is the earth is attracted to these materials in the core. This is what we call "gravity". The force which pushes upon us. Once we break the barrier f this force, and enter into space we are dealing with a much lighter magnetic force, although there is still magnetic force at play here ,the suns. It is just not as strong as it is directly on Earth. It is much lighter, hence we float. Also the magnetic field of the earth which must have a push and a pull because it does have both N and S poles pushes when we are outside of the earths atmosphere. Inside it pulls towards the center of the Earth, outside it pushes . All magnets do this. So when we consider the Sun and it's magnetic pull, this can be the only reason that we are not pulled right into the sun. Our push force prevents it. So when we have the Earth pushing away from the Sun, and the Sun attempting to pull the Earth we have a force generated. This force causes rotation. Hence our orbit. Other planets within our solar system do this as well, the only difference is they do not have (that we know of) ability to hold life. If we consider that the Sun is a monopole this would explain it quite well. It lacks a N or a S (whichever) and our planet Earth does not, enabling it to "fight" the pull, hence the spin, hence the orbiting.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Btw.. if you would like to know about how "gravity" acts within the earths atmosphere/outside the atmosphere (in relation to planetary orbit) and on the earth perhaps you should go back and read my very first original theory from 20 years ago. I believe I did post it here at one point in the comments, and if not I will gladly explain again. The earth is the main reason we can explain this so well. It all has to do with the composition of our core.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Ok, I read your many responses. I am still just not accepting it at all. Here's why. You never stated HOW these dimensions or dimension of time force actually splits into other dimensions to become completely different things. This is very crucial in a theory like this one. We cannot state gravity/time in this dimension, and gravity/time in that dimension , etc.... with no explanation as to how this time force/ gravity is changing dimensions or as you call it splitting. Then a statement you made stood out to me , you said "Gravity, electromagnetism and space are that which forms matter.

      When the forces of gravity, electromagnetism and space (pressure) are relatively balanced for periods of time, matter forms." ......What evidence do we have to support such a statement. You can have all the forces you want, but how do you get a "matter" out of a force. A matter must be created this I can agree upon but out of a force/forces? Not buying it! I believe these forces may be a driving "force" to move these objects in a relative way, but form them , I need more proof, way more, than just a speculation. If you really believe such a thing you need to put these forces together under high pressure conditions and magically pop out some matter, then you must show how you are splitting time/force. I am sorry Effilnuc, I would say thus far, as is, you are waaay to far out on a limb. Perhaps a whole new fresh rethinking is in order, there are some big pieces to this puzzle missing. It's easy to take a idea and build from it, we all do it, but either you have to let it go and accept this is just not feasable within the laws of physics, or... go back to the drawing board and put these pieces together the right way.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      A graviton is the number 1 and 1^2 is also the distance 1 which is a unit measurement of distance. Distance is a 2 dimensional measurement of time.

      Area which is 1^3 is therefore 1^1 x 1^2 units of distance.

      Area is a 3 dimensional measurement of time.

      Volume is 1^4 = 1^1 x 1^3 units of area.

      Volume is a 4 dimensional measurement of time.

      Force is a 5 dimensional measurement of time.

      Mass is a 6 dimensional measurement of time.

      Angle is a Zero dimensional measurement of time.

      Angle is the measurement of the zero point that exists between each dimension of time. I think this is also Radians.

      Angle and radians are required to understand and manipulate forces over distances, areas, volumes and periods.

      Angles and radians allow us to convert a force exerted by a 4 dimensional volume to a force exerted over a period of time or vice versa.

      Angles and radians allow us to manipulate the force of gravity/time such that it is positive like on a stationary object at the earths surface, or balanced like an object in motion on an eliptical orbit.

      Angles and radians are ratios relative to the whole.

      Change the ratio, change the relativity to the whole.

      The entire universe is a construct of relatives, groups and sums of vectors of time.

      I have no idea how to calculate or mathematically express or test this!

      Good chance it is all a mad speculation! I must say it has been enjoyable to write and speculate about. I hope it encourages you to speculate beyond that which is indocrinated.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      I believe it is simply a matter of reviewing many mathematical and scientific formulae, then replacing the definition of a 1 dimensional unit of mass with a 6 dimensional unit relative to time.

      Eg

      Mass is a 6th dimensional unit of time, the 5 dimensional force comes from the centre of gravity of the 6 dimensional mass.

      Force is a 5 dimensional unit of time; pressure excerted over a volume, area or distance, and time.

      Volume is a 4th dimensional unit of time.

      area is 3rd dimensional time

      distance is 2nd dimensional time

      a period is the 1st dimension of time with a beginning and end.

      Balance is the Zero Point or Zero Dimension of time.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      The EM spectrum currently defines our understanding of the universe. It is a 2 dimensional field that uses units of time compared to units of space.

      I am suggesting that a unit of time is 1 dimensional and a unit of space is 3 dimensional and that the EM spectrum is actually a 4 dimensional construct of time.

      If another dimension, gravity is added, we have 5 dimensions. If these 5 dimensions are relatively balanced for period of time, we now introduce a pseudo 6th dimension of time and voila we have a 6 dimensional particle of matter. If this matter accumulates to form compounds.

      The unit measurements of all 6 dimensions is the graviton!

      So perhaps, a graviton ^4 is electromagnetism and a graviton ^ 6 is matter.

      A graviton ^ 1 is a graviton.

      A graviton ^0 is infinity.

      A graviton is a part of infinite time that was separated from infinite time.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      The EM spectrum currently defines our understanding of the universe. It is a 2 dimensional field that uses units of time compared to units of space.

      I am suggesting that a unit of time is 1 dimensional and a unit of space is 3 dimensional and that the EM spectrum is actually a 4 dimensional construct of time.

      If another dimension, gravity is added, we have 5 dimensions. If these 5 dimensions are relatively balanced for period of time, we now introduce a pseudo 6th dimension of time and voila we have a 6 dimensional particle of matter. If this matter accumulates to form compounds.

      The unit measurements of all 6 dimensions is the graviton!

      So perhaps, a graviton ^4 is electromagnetism and a graviton ^ 6 is matter.

      A graviton ^ 1 is a graviton.

      A graviton ^0 is infinity.

      A graviton is a part of infinite time that was separated from infinite time.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      A contstant state of relativity between dimensions of time, is otherwise known as matter.

      Gravity, electromagnetism and space are that which forms matter.

      When the forces of gravity, electromagnetism and space (pressure) are relatively balanced for periods of time, matter forms.

      If the relative balance between these forces is altered, the state of matter changes.

      Each state of matter has a specific frequency which defines itself.

      This frequency is a statement of relativity between different dimensions of time itself.

      A graviton is a 1 dimensional particle of time, matter is a particle of 6 dimensions of time.

      1Dt graviton + 2Dt electromagnetism + 3Dt space = 6Dt matter.

      The frequency of Hydrogen is a statement of relativity f/1.

      The frequency of hydrogen is a statement relative to a 1D period of time, it is a statement relative to a defined number of graviton particles.

      Just like an Amp is calculated as the number of electrons to pass an area in 1 second,

      we can now define one second, (s) as

      s number of 1 dimensional graviton particles lined up end to end to form a cycle or period. The smallest period of time that is experienced is probably 4 gravitons...it takes 4 gravitons to mimic the force of Time which is to form a cycle.

      All forces manifest in cycles (becauses they are manifestions of the force of time), this is understood as Newtons law of equal and opposite forces.

      The very nature of a 1D graviton means it cannot be observed as observation requires relativity and relativity requires at least 2 dimensions.

      Whilst we cannot observe a graviton, we are witness to its 1D force.

      Whilst we cannot observe time, we are witness to its 1D force.

      A graviton is a particle of time.

      A second contains s number of particles of time.

      Just as a liter is a 3 dimensional decimeter, space is a 3 dimensional graviton and matter is a 6 dimensional graviton and light is a 2 dimensional graviton.

      The speed of light is fixed because it is a 2d graviton moving forward 2 gravitons for every 2 gravitons it moves to the right. It cannot move any more than 2 gravitons per 2 gravitons. It can however move any number of gravitons per any greater number of gravitons creating an infinite number of speeds less than the maximum speed of light.

      Normally infinity goes from zero to infinity but in the case of the speed of light it goes from 1 (being maximum light speed) to an infinite number of speeds less than light speed.

      Perhaps...

      Anything that is a multiple of 2 dimensions, ie, electromagnetism and matter, is bound by the speed of light. Space and gravity and other odd dimensional constructs are not bound by the speed of light.

      A graviton is not bound by light speed, a 1 dimensional graviton ^2 is the definition light speed.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      “mass” is defined as “something that represents the amount of matter in a particular space, particle or object.”

      The fourth dimension of time which we call matter, is 2D electromagnetic waves that occupy a particular 3D space for a period of 1 D time. This makes matter 6 Dimensional.

      MASS is any aribitrary "something" that is chosen to "represent the amount of matter in a particular space, particle or object."

      Kilogram is an arbitrary "something that represents" a relative amount of 6 dimensional time; Gravity relative to electromagentism relative to space, these are the 6 dimensions of time that define matter.

      What I am trying to say is that everything is made up of eternal and infinite time.

      Before time, there was nothing....with the beginning of time, a point, everything began.

      Time is the ORIGINAL FORCE, it is dimensionless, it is TIMELESS.

      From within time, when time was split, divided, big banged, we have relative time (frequency and periods) and from this derives the relative forces of gravity and electromagnetism. From the interaction of these forces come the forces of space and of mass.

      Mass and space and electromagnetic and gravitational forces are all relative forces.

      Time is not a relative force, it is dimensionless. It is the force to which all others relate yet it can only relate to each other force as a particle or unit of itself...a time period; a graviton is the particle that presumes relativity.

      A graviton is the first particle of time...it is the 1st dimension.

      Some things move in cycles which gives the illusion that time or gravity is removed.

      This is evidence that 1 dimensional time is gravity. By removing the start or end point (a cycle) the 1st dimension can be isolated and or a particle of time can be created.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Define space...

      Space according to this theory would be time split into 3 dimensions...volume.

      Gravity/time was split, creating two points of gravity/time and a time period or unit ot time or particle of time.

      Between these two particles of time we now have 1 dimension which can be duplicated/mirrored and compared to the first dimension, this creates a 2nd dimension, which is electromagnetic.

      When the first dimension of a period of time, is added to the 2 dimensional plane of electromagnetism we have 3 dimensions at right angles to each other and we have space and volume.

      If that 3 dimensional space or volume is maintained for a period or unit of time, it becomes 4 dimensional matter.

      I am saying that time is the first force, from which gravitational and electromagnetic forces are derived. Matter is a 4 dimensional particle of time. Matter has force. Space is a 3 dimensional particle of time, it has force. Electromagentism is a 2 dimensional particle of time, it has force. Gravity is a 1 dimensional particle of time, it has force. Time is the dimensionless force from which the other 10 dimensions of gravity, electromagnetism, space and matter are formed.

      Einstein began to describe it with the theory of relativity. Every force and state of matter or space is relative and bound by the unit of time.

      I will now try responding to your third post.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago

      Hi NR, I must admit, when I first read your initial response, I thought to myself "that does sound ridiculous; a graviton is time."

      After pondering it and reading your ensuing responses I am in two minds.

      It would be easy to say that your rebuttals are valid and time is not gravity or a graviton...I have been somewhat inclined to do so.

      Your questions however deserve a reply, so I will try my best, and we will see where it goes!

      I will start with your first question...about the force of gravity/time in, on and around earth.

      The force of gravity, otherwise known as a centre of gravity exists at the heart or centre of every particle or compound of particles. This is the zero dimension of time.

      About that centre point we have 1 dimensional force of gravity that points from the centre out. The force is dispersed on a 2 dimensional plane and as such, the force reduces as the inverse square of the distance from the centre of gravity. The force of gravity does not flow out from the centre and back in, it flows out from the centre and to the right...creating a 2 dimensional plane...x and y.

      When a satellite orbits the earth, the 1 dimensional force of gravity, which has been split into 2 dimensional plane is in balance. The force the is pushing out is balanced with the force that is pushing at right angles. The force of gravity/time is balanced.

      As for the sudden change in apparent gravity as an object leaves earth's atmosphere, this is due to air resistance.

      I cannot explain why the centre of earth is a centre of gravity/time, no more than I can explain why you and I are centres of gravity/time...this is beyond my comprehension.

      As for the God theory, it is not really relevant to the discussion at this stage.

      I have tried to address your questions and rebuttals from the first post, I will now respond to the second.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      I surely appreciate your questions, I will be replying shortly...

      Thanks NR.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Effilnuc... I'm not trying piss you off, but I am calling you out on your claims, you must understand what I and every other person in this field already understands, your claims, theories, thoughts and ideas have to picked apart. One by one. This is how we progress to find the truth. I am patiently waiting for your responses. If you have valid explanations that fit the laws of physics and put these "puzzle pieces" together I welcome them. But for now... This just does not add up!

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      and another thought...you said "If a graviton has no mass, it is not bound by light speed. If a graviton is time, it is the basis of light speed and the basis of relativity." ,...... now doesn't this rebuttal your own claim to the time force having a 4th dimension that is called matter? ...."As we all know, “matter” is defined as “anything that occupies space and has mass,” and “mass” is defined as “something that represents the amount of matter in a particular space, particle or object.”

      www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-mass-and-matter/#ixzz3HAs542HS

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Another rebuttal that needs explanation. You said " Without the force of time, gravitational force does not exist, electromagnetic force does not exist.

      Time is dimensionless, but when time is separated, split, BIG BANGED, it creates a time period (a graviton?), it is 1 dimensional and we call it the force of gravity.

      2 dimensional it is called electromagnetic energy, and when time is 3 dimensional it is called space, and when time is 4 dimensional it is called matter (which is really just 2 dimensional energy ^2)."

      ... Now... Your saying that time is a force, then you are saying time becomes electromagnetic energy, then space ,then matter. ... First off define space in this equation. Secondly , you are saying that a force can convert from an energy into matter, an actual physical object. What Laws of physics are these from? Also, what causes the time force of one dimension as it is created like you say from big bang/ split, etc... to just go from 1st dimension to 2nd dimension and 3rd dimension...etc...?

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Are you seriously saying that a Graviton is time? Is that the proposal that you just made? That the force of time is due to gravitons? If this is true then you have some more explaining to do and it better be good. For example.... Why then is the force of time on Earth different here on Earth than it is just outside of Earths atmosphere? Say for instance where we have satellites orbiting around the earth, where there is no "gravity" ? Just miles difference? And why is the time force "gravity" so strong here on earth? So strong in fact it attracts everything to the center of the Earth?And why that specific area , the center of the Earth? What is so appealing, that time force is so attracted to the center of the Earth? As opposed to the outer atmosphere? As for your God theory, I disagree completely. We'll leave it at that!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 2 years ago from Indiana

      True that about - everything being ruled by "TIME" - Effilnuc-

      The Universe is infinite - however it is also completely jam packed full of subatomic particles which are vibrating - which instills a Universal "Grid" of static electrical charge. The number of subatomic particles in a "specific area" of "space" is finite - and the particles can not be made nor destroyed - only their various lengths (time) of "temporary state of existence can be changed.

      Time is what determines the state (displayed properties) of Mass. The amount of "time" it takes for particular "elemental - solitary or combinations" of Mass to "transfer / conduct / alter " the static charge of the Universal Static Grid. The amount of static charge a particular "state of Mass" can "manipulate" in a set amount of time - is what determines the resulting display of energy.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      It is why humans believe that a God must be eternal.

      If the universal life force powers all the universe, and the universal life force is eternal, then ergo, the universal life force is time.

      If everything in the universe is made up of a part of the universal life force, then ergo, everything in the universe is a period or unit of eternal time.

      Time is the unifying field.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      Without the force of time, gravitational force does not exist, electromagnetic force does not exist.

      Time is dimensionless, but when time is separated, split, BIG BANGED, it creates a time period (a graviton?), it is 1 dimensional and we call it the force of gravity.

      2 dimensional it is called electromagnetic energy, and when time is 3 dimensional it is called space, and when time is 4 dimensional it is called matter (which is really just 2 dimensional energy ^2).

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago

      A thought experiment to try.

      Two viewers, one is floating stationary in space, the other is sitting on a 1kg ball.

      The 1kg ball begins to move away from the viewer floating stationary, as it moves faster and faster, closer to the speed of light, the ball and the viewer sitting on top of it, become so heavy that they cannot accelerate any faster.

      Now, relatively, the viewer floating in space is also moving at the speed of light, but their mass remains the same, or does it also gain mass?

      Perhaps a graviton is like the viewer who is the stationary point from which light speed is relatively measured? As such, a graviton may be instantaneous and has no mass.

      What if we add a third viewer on a 1kg ball that moves in the opposite direction? Relative to the original point, it is moving at light speed, and relative to the original viewer on the 1kg ball, it is also moving at light speed.

      The viewer who is stationary, is seeing both balls move away at light speed, yet is it too moving at light speed?

      The only way this can occur is if time curves. Space is not part of time, space is the antithesis of matter. Only time curves; creating cycles of time, periods of time, units of time.

      It is the force of time that curves space.

      It is the force of time that accelerates mass.

      It is the force of time that is relativity.

      Time affects; gravity is an effect, acceleration is an effect.

      Light speed is an observation, an effect, no something that affects.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago

      The speed of light is an average between two points in time. It is a measure of relativity. It simply states that mass cannot travel, relative to any other mass, faster than light speed.

      If a graviton has no mass, it is not bound by light speed. If a graviton is time, it is the basis of light speed and the basis of relativity.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Ok I did research on time dilation. According to Einstein glad we are using his work, the maximum speed of the universe is the speed of light. The closer an object gets to traveling at the speed of light the more time SLOWS down. It does not stop. Now, the biggest problem with this is according to Einstein is when an object gets closer to traveling at the speed of light, the object becomes gigantic in mass. Thus breaking down all laws of physics as we know them. Nothing like a graviton can travel at the speed of light without becoming universally big. Which is what would be necessary if your theory was correct about the graviton, and something that big would surely be noticable. It would not be elusive as we are dealing with now.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      That is Part 1, below is Part 3,

      I do not have Part 2.

      https://www.dropbox.com/s/xux2wcsyu0j949i/H.M.SCHW...

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Effilnuc, links? Or shall I attempt to search these 40 year old books down and have them shipped to me? Not being sarcastic, but ......

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago

      NR,

      A. Einstein, "Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen", Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik 4, 411–462 (1907); English translation, in "On the relativity principle and the conclusions drawn from it", in "The Collected Papers", v.2, 433–484 (1989); also in H M Schwartz, "Einstein's comprehensive 1907 essay on relativity, part I", American Journal of Physics vol.45,no.6 (1977) pp.512–517; Part II in American Journal of Physics vol.45 no.9 (1977), pp.811–817; Part III in American Journal of Physics vol.45 no.10 (1977), pp.899–902, see parts I, II and III.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      ok I have only read the first response. I got to effilnuc's second and 3rd responses and they both reference wikipedia, anyone with a college education knows UNDOUBTEDLY this (wikipedia) is NOT a primary source for information. Wikipedia is written by regular everyday people. Who can revise the information at any given time as they so choose. So please rewrite your points and thoughts and back them up with primary sources so I may verify them accordingly. I am more than willing to listen and respond. But I must be able to verify them the right way, I do not want to run around and fetch your points myself. As for Iknows.... the hadron collider is capable of seeing particles that travel at the speed of light. They would not need to be trapped. just saying! (http://home.web.cern.ch/topics/large-hadron-collid... which btw kills me because the collider itself is also powered by high intensity magnets... another coincidence... : )

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago from eastern australia

      It makes me wonder if one can reverse the ratio and apply it to the effects of gravity on space.

      IE, the gravitational constant is used to measure the force of gravity on a mass. What if we use it to measure the force of gravity on space.

      Surely the force of gravity on a mass is balanced by the force of gravity on the space surrounding the mass. As the force of gravity or time PULLS on the mass, the force of gravity or time must equally PUSH on the space surrounding the mass. This is what generates the gravitational constant.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago from eastern australia

      The universe is a construct of 6 dimensions; 3 opposing 3.

      The 3 dimensions of space oppose the 3 dimensions of EM mass and time period. To distinguish we call one positive and one negative, in reality however, there is no positive and negative, only opposites.

      Everything in the universe is either made up of 3 dimensional space, or 3 dimensional electromagnetic mass for a defined period of time = matter.

      The Gravitational constant (6.67384 × 10-11 Newtons) is an arbitrary ratio that defines the relativity between 3D space measured in metres, relative to 3D matter measured in kilograms and seconds. Hence why it is not a constant but actually a number of Newtons!

      We know that matter is a frequency and space is the opposing frequency, so the gravitational constant is really the ratio of space and matter or one half of the universe with the other half.

      The true gravitational constant is 1.

      The true time constant is 1.

      The gravitational or time constant can be any whole fraction of the true constant subject to the arbitrary units of measurement used for space, matter and time. The gravitational or time constant cannot be greater than 1 and must be a real number.

      The gravitational or time constant is unique for every atom or group of atoms, or any space, at any point in the universe. The ratio between two constants determines the outcome or difference to the whole.

      Two gravitational constants x and y, interact creating a new ratio or constant, x/y that must itself balance with the true constant of 1. Change continues until a reciprocal ratio or sequence of ratios is found...balanced in motion, or orbit.

      Once the period is known, all outcomes can be manipulated.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago from eastern australia

      The force of time cannot be stopped, however it may be witnessed or reflected in a sense. This creates a period or frequency within which the force of time is bound and oscillates and within which all things exist.

      Time itself has no dimension. Time is only perceived as a reflection against itself.

      The first reflection of time is 1 dimensional and is known as gravity.

      The second reflection of time is 2 dimensional and is electromagnetic.

      The third reflection of time is 3 dimensional and is nuclear.

      The fourth reflection of time is perhaps life?

      Time itself is not a dimension. Time is that which all other things are the dimensions of.

      Space is a dimension of time but time is not a dimension.

      Frequency is a dimension of time but time is not a dimension.

      A building is made up of dimensions but a building is not a dimension.

      We need to mathematically replace the dimension of time in scientific equations with the dimension of frequency.

      The formula for acceleration is based on the dimension of time as a frequency and hence acceleration can be calculated at any point in space.

      The formula for speed is based on a dimension of time as a unit and hence speed CANNOT be calculated at any point in space.

      The Gravitational constant is a one dimensional ratio of the force of Time reflected by 3 +ve and 3 - ve dimensions.

      space, mass and seconds are dimensions or reflections of the effects of the force of time.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago from eastern australia

      Is TIME the Fundamental Force...and

      is Gravity the quantum unit of the force of time, and

      is ElectroMagnetism the square unit of the force of time, and

      are the Nuclear forces the +/- cubed units of the force of time.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago from eastern australia

      Wikipedia says...

      Gravitational time dilation is an actual difference of elapsed time between two events as measured by observers differently situated from gravitational masses, in regions of different gravitational potential. The lower the gravitational potential (the closer the clock is to the source of gravitation), the more slowly time passes. Albert Einstein originally predicted this effect in his theory of relativity[1] and it has since been confirmed by tests of general relativity.

      Gravity is Time. There is an overarching unit of time within which exists our universe. Then there is a sub unit of time within which our galaxy exists. Then there is another sub unit of time within which our solar system exists, another sub unit of time within which plant earth exists (relative to the other planets!) and finally, there is the unit of time within which one exists.

      Each of these units of time are also centres of gravity. The period of each time unit is directly relative to the quantum of gravitational force. IE the universe is the biggest time unit - biggest quantum of gravitational force.... down to oneself, a relatively small unit of time with relatively small quantum of gravitational force.

      A graviton is the smallest unit of time that is possible. If all things are perceived as a frequency of the EM Spectrum, then it will never be possible to perceive a graviton because a graviton can have no frequency. It is only possible to perceive the effects of a graviton.

      It is not possible to perceive time, or a unit of time. It is only possible to perceive the effects of time.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 2 years ago from eastern australia

      The EM spectrum is a spectrum of frequencies.

      The elemental table is a made up of part of the EM spectrum.

      The elemental table is a table of various EM frequencies.

      The EM spectrum and all elements are bound by gravity. Nothing within the EM spectrum, no element may escape gravity.

      The EM spectrum and all elements are defined by frequency. Nothing within the EM spectrum, no element may exist without a frequency.

      Frequency is the number of occurrences of a repeating event per unit time. (Wikipedia)

      Therefore the EM spectrum and all elements in the universe are bound by, defined by and perceived by the number of times they repeat something per unit of time.

      If gravity also binds and defines all things, then I propose that gravity is the unit of time within which the EM spectrum exists.

      Nothing escapes the pull of gravity just as nothing escapes the pull of time.

      The entire universe is bound or defined or perceived as a period of time. This period constitutes the single unit of gravity/time within which all things/EM spectrum exists. Everything within the universe is defined by the its relativity to the single time unit of the existence of the universe.

      The Universe is 1 and 0. It is the beginning and end of TIME. Everything exists as a part of or frequency of that TIME; x/1 or y/0.

      All of time and all of gravity existed as a single point, 0. Then with the beginning of the universe came the BIG BANG; the beginning of time and there is now 0 and 1. This provided the UNIT of TIME for the EM spectrum/frequencies to exist. As the universe and unit of time got bigger, the potential EM spectrum got bigger! Everything continues to be bound by or defined by the 0 and 1, the beginning and end of the existence of the universe...it is referred to as gravity or time.

    • profile image

      iknows 2 years ago

      Effilnuc brings up an interesting point, The graviton being a unit of time would make a lot of sense if, time/graviton is a particle and a wave much like the photon. That makes me wonder if the photon might be exactly what we are looking for since the only matter we can observe is essentially light being emitted by the energy given off from the electron interactions. To Newtons Rivals' point that time does not/cannot stop, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle would explain why you can not find a graviton because the moment you stop time to find the particle, you lose its speed basically halting its existence since if matter is not moving/trading energies it cannot generate/produce light. And the moment you try to measure its speed, you lose its location hence you cannot find the particle-wave signature or it is drowned out by the energy it gives off, IE light. If the graviton decays into the photon it would make sense that we would only be able to observe its decay in the form of light radiation. This would also tie into Newton's Rivals' theory in that electro magnetism has affect on light since EM can bend light as if it is polarized with an EM field. Gravity bends light as well which shows light has a mass of measurable units. This shows the particle-wave duality of time/gravtiton/photon poses one of the greatest challenges science will ever tackle. thoughts?

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      And in another objection , please enlighten me... When has time ever stopped? This is not even a claim that can be used. As far as we know time never does stop. Ever! You claim if time were to stop the apple would be frozen, and when time begins again, it would continue to fall. But in real science time does not stop. In the real science though I can tell you that magnetic forces have been used, and are still being used to create anti gravity devices. You do not see any connection there? And these are REAL observational effects!

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      My point is this, you cannot arbitrarily decide that something is a unit of time when you do not even have proof of it's existence. To just claim that it "must be" because you cannot find it, or prove it is ridiculous. In my claiming that gravity is magnetism there is a real force here being recognized. The big problem with this Gravity hypothesis is also that we have an absent graviton. So in many ways I wish the graviton was found as well but it has not been which leaves hope for my theory. But to just make claims and say it's been decided, is wrong. Science is recognized upon observational facts. This is why we do experiments. My page starts with an experiment. An experiment that backs my theory. Do you have a experiment or real facts to back your theory? You cannot possibly because we cannot even place a whereabouts on a graviton. The entire basis of this theory is on the assumption that do they not even exist. I am not just making a wild claim though, it has many scientific facts to back it up. Not just a graviton missing in action.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Who arbitrarily decided that Effilnuc??? According to science this is what is says about a Graviton: We actually don’t know the answer to that question, but we have a name for that hypothetical particle if it does exist: It is called the graviton. And even though we have never observed a graviton, we know a great deal about them, if they are real. First, since the range of the force due to gravity is infinite and the force due to gravity weakens as one over the square of the distance between two objects (i.e. 1/r2), the graviton must have zero mass. We know this because if the photon had mass, it would change the “2” in the exponent and that “2” has been established with incredible precision. Like massless photons, gravitons should travel at the speed of light.

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2014/05...

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      As one travels from earth to mars and back, one moves between centres of gravity and therefore between different time signatures, hence time changes for the traveler.

      A centre of gravity is a centre of time and therefore a centre of existence. All matter exists with a centre of gravity, this is also its centre of time, its frequency.

      It is the flow of time that caused the apple to fall on Newton's head, if time is stopped, the apple remains as it was. As soon as time is returned, the apple falls, and continues to fall as per the square of time until it is interfered with by another centre of gravity, another centre of time, another frequency.

      All matter exist on a 2 Dimensional plane that is time squared.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 2 years ago

      A graviton, if it exists, is a unit of time.

      We have arbitrarily decided that everything shall be measured, including the force of gravity, according to 1 second units.

      Perhaps a graviton, which gives mass its potential force, is a unit of time that is not 1 second.

      Perhaps the graviton, is a frequency of time.

      Time gives mass its force and function. Without time, there is no matter, no mass; all is one.

      Time divides ONE into parts that are perceivable. These parts can be classified into forces, fields, matter etc. A constant time signature is what units these parts.

      Time separates everything, yet holds everything together.

      Maybe Time is the Graviton, if so, we will never see it or measure it. To perceive and measure requires a process of isolation, separation. Time cannot be isolated or separated from the fabric of existence.

      Time is the fabric, the web, the strings, the field, the egg of existence.

      Maybe...

      At the centre of time is nothing and everything... like a black hole, gravity.

      All things are connected thru time, ...like all things are connected thru gravity.

      Gravity is removed under certain conditions when planes fly a particular parabolic flight path according to the earths centre of gravity. In effect, the flight path of the plane is creating a period of time in which time stands still...the rates of change are aligned, time is removed from the equation and as such, gravity is removed from the equation. In effect, time and gravity are not removed, rather a bubble of gravity or time is created in which the plane and its occupants exist, separated for a moment or two from the outside fabric of gravity and time.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Iknows, I say to you like I have said to many before you... I will admit defeat when that collider or any other machine or scientist can show me a graviton. If we can use all kinds of instruments to see the smallest particles in the universe and even smash them together, then there is no reason we cannot SEE a graviton.

    • profile image

      iknows 2 years ago

      While i really like the direction you are going and think it is way ahead of the conventional thought in modern physics, have you considered that it may be the other way around? Gravity may be the unifying force in the universe and all other forces derive from it. What if Electro-magnitism, strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force are all different gradients of gravity relinquishing from the Higgs field. Most scientists state that gravity is the weakest force in the universe yet only gravity can create a black hole from which nothing, not even light can escape. Gravity is also the only force in the universe that can act over vast distances, IE coalescing a galaxy or on an even larger scale creating the intergalactic scaffolding that forms the veins of galaxies flowing through the universe. We don't know much about Dark matter and Dark energy but the one thing we can say for certain is it has gravity because we can see the effects it has on the matter we can observe. Maybe the Higgs field is the conduit through which dark matter/energy enter our dimension and interacts with our side of reality?

    • profile image

      Newton's Rival 2 years ago

      @ Just Wondering, all I can theorize at this point as I am still researching this myself is this.... it has to be some kind of magnetic constant. If anyone else is open to suggestion or thoughts at this point they are welcome to post them.

    • profile image

      Just wondering 2 years ago

      I read your last post Newton, and I tried the experiment. I was really confused. Exactly what you said would happen did happen. But here's what I do not understand. How can the force of the Magnetism within the earths atmosphere be exactly the same on all objects no matter how big or small they are. It seems like that force evenly distributes on each particular object to equal out as the same on any object. Does that make sense? I know that it must, I seen it for myself, but how?

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Ok, so I have been away for a while because I have been doing a lot of research. I still have more to do, but this is some of where I am at..I wanted to go back into Newton's work and Einsteins General Theory of relativity. Now ... We all know Newton sees the apple fall, (light bulb moment) and he writes his laws. Well on his 3rd law he states, for every force, there exists AN EQUAL and OPPOSITE force. (we'll get back to this)... He then in his work states that he believes there is a thing called gravitational "Pull", when he was questioned about this theory he did NOT have an exact explanation. This was unacceptable to Einstein! So Einstein (going with the gravity theory already laid out initially by Newton) decides he is going to figure out the missing information that Newton does not have and attempt to prove it (general theory of relativity). This is a long and tedious task, but this is what occurs.... he spends many years dong calculations and trying to figure out what exactly it is that he is dealing with. He cannot get the math correct. Finally he ends up calculating the orbit of Mercury, (Mercury orbits the sun differently from other planet, it makes a flower like shape around the sun as it orbits), he states this mathematical observation must prove that space/time is curved/malleable. ( I theorize that mercury's magnetic poles reverse more often than any other object in our solar system) For Einstein though, there is only one way to prove this beyond math. He needs to have an astrophysicist take pictures of the sun during a solar eclipse so they can measure the stars around the sun. If the stars have the illusion of being 0.84 of an inch away from the sun during the eclipse then this will prove his theory correct. Space/time will be malleable/curved. So he enlists Campbell, a astrophysicsts in California to do the work. Campbell gets the pictures, he has Herbert D. Curtis do the calculations but there is a big problem, Curtis sees NO difference. So Campbell goes to Newtons Founded Academy The Royal Astronomical Academy Society in 1915 and announces that Einsteins theory is wrong in front of all of these prestigious scientific scholars. Well, at the same time another man Eddington is in Africa attempting to take the same pictures during an eclipse, its a really bad storm. Through the rainy clouds he manages to get a few pictures. This was a time of great war. Eddington comes back and says wait a second I did the pictures and checked them and Einstein was right. The scientific community doesn't know what to think. They think that Eddington is making a bias claim because he was like Einstein and made blatant disgusts about the war. So in 1922 there is another solar eclipse in Australia. 7 different expeditions set out to take pictures to prove or disprove Einsteins theory. Campbell is one of them. They take the pictures, low and behold, those stars are measuring just as Einstein predicted 0.84 of an inch away from the sun. Space/time is malleable. The Theory of General Relativity is proven. Not only does his math prove it but so does the pictures with measurements of the stars. Now.......Here's where my mind begins to go crazy. Ok Einstein proves that space/time is curved. He says that by proving that space/time is curved by the measurements of these stars it is an explanation of that missing information in Newtons theory of gravitational pull theory and that because space/time is curved this is why the planets rotate around the sun. But does this REALLY mean it defines gravity where Newton was lacking information? I hardly think it does. Here are my arguments....It does prove that Mercury has a specific orbit that can be calculated, however who is to say this is not magnetically produced? Now back to Newton, I noticed something very weird while thinking about his third law. Again he states that for EVERY force, there exists an EQUAL and OPPOSITE force. I couldn't help but to think about the Earth again in this theory. Because Our planet is so different from all the rest and we have the gift of an inner "gravitational " PULL, this may prove useful in this law. Newton claims that, and I quote..." the ground pushes us back, this is why when we jump our force of jumping is met by the force of the ground and the ground does not move" So I began to speculate this thought. What if I was standing on a porch on a second floor and I dropped a ball. Just like the apple that fell. I do not throw the ball. I simply hold out my hand, keep my hand still, and simply release it. What will happen? The ball will fall. This is a downward force...correct? What is the opposing force that Newton is describing in this scenario? If there was an actual opposing force that was fighting hat downward force the ball would simply float right? ok, so... "Gravity" pushes this ball towards the ground. The ground pushes back. This is the basis of his entire theory. So how come then planets that are NOT Earth also rotate around the Sun? According to Einstein gravitational pull does not exist. The planets rotate around the sun purely on the basis of space/time curvature- aka-General Theory of Relativity. WATCH THIS 3 MINUTE VIDEO.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEZupmpTcOU .......Now if we contend that space/time is curved, we must picture a big net, like a fishing net, the sun being the heaviest would be in the net, it would immediately go to the bottom of the net with it's weight and density. It would look like a closed (at the bottom) basketball net with a basketball in it. The rest of the net would have walls of net going in a more upward position, now picture our planets on these walls rotating around the sun. Why would the Sun's gravitational field not just "suck" the planets in? What is keeping these planets from being pulled into that sun and being destroyed? If it was as simple as space/time being curved, why would they not just slip into the sun from it's dense mass? There has got to be an opposing force!!! A force that these objects are emitting to protect themselves from this happening. Surely the sun's gravitational field is stronger than the gravitational force of other smaller objects in the solar system. At least it would have to be if Newton is correct in his mathematical statement of F=GM m.r^2 which translates to: Force due to gravity is an attractive force between 2 bodies and inversely on the square of separation between the 2 bodies, it DOES NOT depend on the objects shape,density,or composition, but ONLY on it's MASS AND DISTANCE. (read all of that last part again so it sinks in, it's a awe inspiring moment) Which brings me to my last thoughts of this excerpt and I think your going to love this one.... When realizing the implications of what I just wrote I decided this can actually be tested. I was shocked by the results. I wanted to know what the MAGNETIC PULL... NOT... GRAVITATIONAL PULL (as Einstein and Newton were wrong on this one)of the Inner atmosphere of the Earth was mathematically. So I thought to myself well I can figure that out mathematically. All I need to know are some basic things... 1. the weight of the object, 2. height from which the object falls (no force applied humanly) 3. the speed it falls, 4. And, how long it takes to hit the ground from that height. But something happened that shocked me.... I want everyone to try this. Take 2 solid objects, any two solid objects . When I say solid, I mean nothing that is goin to allow the regular wind/air to interfere with it such as a feather or wings on a model plane, etc.. get like a quarter and a can of deodorant. One light and one heavy. Hold them both above your head, film it, or watch closely... drop both objects at the same exact time.... guess what happens?? They both hit the floor at the same exact time..... Mass has nothing to do with it. Speed influences force. But mass does not change the magnetic pull. Not only is the Magnetic Pull inside of the earth's atmosphere a constant, but it is in fact completely measurable.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 2 years ago from U.S.A

      Yeah I was thinking about it for most of that day and came to the conclusion that this hubpage is actual documented proof of prior ownership. But you have to admit that is a real nutty thing for someone else to do. People in this world are truly crazy. If they like something or think it is right they think they can just take it and claim it. This hubpage has now been here for 6 years. The url even says gravity is magnetism right in it. The only times it has been changed it to fit around the way hubpages sets their advertisements up. Sometimes their ads will run right through your content and change the entire layout of your content making it unreadable so you have to lay it out better. But other than that. It remains the same. All I can assume is this female has a few loose screws.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Don't worry Newtonsrival!

      You have the earlier posting / publishing date of (this) your hubpage - here with hubpages. Copy and save your personal info where it states when you first published this hub.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      I am having a VEEEERY rough morning..... I just did search on a different search engine to find our placement on the page. I know on Google we are the first placement and have been for a very long time. Well... on this other webpage another site came up called ... gravityismagnetism.com it is owned by a female who claims to be a Doctor. Her page is copyrighted for 2011, years after our page. What bothers me the most, is in her files on her page, she actually stole what I have here. Most of it word for word. I am in awe.... If she really is a Doctor, why would she do such a thing? It looks as if she has had her page done very professionally and put some money into it. I'm really confused right now, and don't know what options I have if any... I know you cannot patent a scientific fact. So where does that leave us? If her connections are better than ours, or they are willing to hear her voice more than ours , does she get to claim a victory for figuring all of this out? IDK!!! Just so lost at the moment.....

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I know my theory sounds ridiculous - but - Light is a static electrical "pulse" created when the "smooth" Electron Function (Strong Force energy delivery to a single or several Protons) is "disturbed". This pulse (Photon) can not travel across the "emptiness" of space without a medium by which to "travel". Photons do not and can not travel "willy nilly" across the vastness of open space. They are static electrical "pulses" that are relayed from subatomic particle - to - subatomic particle. The Universal Grid of Static Friction Charge - maintained by the "vibrating aether of jam packed subatomic particles" (Dark Matter) - each subatomic particle uses this abundant / readily available / Charge to "RELAY" a Photon (or series of Photons) (like a miltidirectional wi-fi - of infinite subatomic Newtons Cradles) from one Dark Matter subatomic particle to the next - across space until the Photon is RELAYED into the Electron Function of an atom of mass.

      When a Photon is relayed into the Electron Function of an atom of mass - it "disturbs" the atom's "Electron Function" and the energy (Photon) is absorbed - and reflected - back out through the same Dark Matter subatomic particles that brought the Photon into contact with the atom of mass - in the first place - eventually dissipating the "RELAY".

    • John Paily profile image

      John Paily 3 years ago from Bangalore, India

      At last some one is speaking a reality - Gravity is nothing but electromagnetism or electricity that is neutralized - http://www.scribd.com/doc/161406415/Origin-of-Grav...

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      How electric currents are formed and how and why they conduct.

      Gravity is the byproduct of the Universal Static Grid of the Aether (Dark Matter) supplying Protons with the Strong Force.

      A Magnet (natural or electromagnet) forces the "Grid" to supply the Protons of a particular element in a particular direction - IE - South Pole - to - North Pole "flow" (the Electron Functions are "aligned" instead of spherically/radial around the entire circumference of the element) (this creates the magnetic field - which is the area around the "directed flow" that is interrupting the normal spherically/radial delivery of the Strong Force energy supply to the Protons of the element.

      When a magnet (natural or electromagnet) is "moved" or "passed" near a non Ferrite - but electrically conductive element (such as Copper) the magnet temporarily "magnetizes" the Copper - but the Copper resists accepting the magnetic orientation - (alignment of Electron Functions - IE - Eddy Current) and this "resistance" causes the Electron Functions to switch back and forth between FORCED Magnetic South-to-North alignment / and natural spherically/radial Gravitational "alignment".

      (IE - a piece of NON magnetized Ferrite (Iron) readily accepts the temporary alignment of Electron Functions and thus why ATTRACTION and NO Eddy Current.)

      A fast rotating magnet (rotor) inside a ring of Copper coils (stator) causes the Electron Function "alignment" of the Protons of the Copper coils to "quickly" switch back and forth between Forced Magnetic / and Natural Gravitational Electron Function energy supply to the Protons. This "switching" creates "disturbances" in the "timing" of the Electron Functions - which results with micro static electric "shock-waves" being emitted by each atom/Proton of the Copper element.

      Since the Magnet (rotor) passes by the Copper coil at the same place with every revolution - the micro shock-waves have no choice but to "conduct" (be relayed from Proton to Proton / Electron Function to Electron Function) AWAY from the CONTINUED / CONSTANT disturbance along the entire length of the conducting element.

      The static electric "pressure" from the surrounding "Magnetic Field" (The backed-up Dark Matter - Grid) - ASSISTS in keeping the electric current CONTAINED within the "directed relay" through the Protons of the Copper conducting wire / element.

      DC generated electric currents situate the magnetic field to force the "relay" to originate from a single coil source and flow AWAY from the disturbance. (Batteries use this same principal)

      However-

      AC electric currents situate the magnetic field to force the Electron Functions to originate (individually - but at high speed - sequential intervals) from multiple Copper coils which are connected to the same Copper Wire conductor - which each coil relays its separate / relayed Electron Functon"disturbance" AWAY along the same conductor - and the current "alternates" between which coil is "creating" the disturbance as the magnet (rotor) rotates.

    • profile image

      Aticoexport 3 years ago

      Atico Export offers technical educational lab equipment / instruments for school, college and teaching labs including thermodynamics, fluid, mass transfer http://www.aticoexport.com/technical-educational-e...

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      i agree-

      I can see (after the initial formation of "mass" throughout the universe) how once the universe expands to a certain degree - it could reach a gravitational "limit" and retract to a single unified "mass" (hundreds of thousands of light years in circumference) - only to incur a "Big Bang" which would result with another cycle of expansion. This expansion / retraction cycle could repeat infinitely.

      On the other hand - the detected "red shift" can possibly be explained by the photons of infra red and etc. frequencies - traveling through - and being affected by / slowed down by - the gravitational fields surrounding each galaxy (and / or significant sized celestial "entities") they travel "past / or through - giving false indications / detections of the expansion / retraction of the matter / mass observed.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      IE - electric currents are merely the forced - directional "manipulation" of the Strong Force energy delivery from the Aether to the Protons of a electric conducting element. (Magnets do this more naturally)

      The excess energy beyond the Strong Force NEEDS of the Protons of the conducting element - is "relayed" from atom to atom (electron function - to electron function) - then the excess "energy" is used to do work (electric motors / etc.) then the energy is "released" or "returned" GROUNDED to the natural Strong Force energy delivery to the Protons of the larger Mass - the Earth itself - IE = GRAVITY

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Great link S.O.!

      I don't believe that neither Tesla nor Einstein took into account that Gravity is the by-product of the static electric action of the Aether supplying the Strong Force energy to atoms.

      Since the fundamental basis of the formation and maintained state of Mass (Protons) CAUSES Gravity - electric currents merely force the manipulation of the direction of FEED FLOW of the Strong Force energy delivery from the Aether to the Protons of a electrical conducting element - which also results with a manipulation of the "act" of Gravity on a electrical conducting element of Mass - IE = magnetic field.

    • profile image

      i agree 3 years ago

      Ive come to a similar conclusion in that the magnetism or gravity of spherical bodies in not conserved and results in the red shift of the universe. when all matter in the universe becomes spread apart due to the depletion of gravitational forces masses will slam into one another eventually creating a massive collection matter eventually leading to a big bang event and starting the cycle all over again

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      S.O. I will check it out tonight, thank you, and Pharma12 there is no reason you need to write the same comment 10 times. I deleted all the rest of the same comment. I recognize it was good comment but not necessary 10 times. Also using different names does not help your cause as it shows me your ip address. I usually never delete comments, but in cases of duplications, and offensive material I do. Have a good day and thanks!

    • profile image

      S.O 3 years ago

      N.R, Effilncuc, Sharpencil and others chek this out. a new approach of gravity and electromagnetism.

      http://truththeory.com/2013/12/30/tesla-vs-einstei...

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Math / Subtraction.

      If Stars are powered by nuclear fusion (hydrogen into helium) IE - two hydrogen atoms for one helium atom - the rate of energy released by Stars would display a detectible ratio of hydrogen LOSS - which would easily be detectible from an overall energy and physical elemental component "change" in a relatively short period of time) Any "Stars" appearance / energy release / physical elemental components would be detectible in a constant altering state of observed "change" without recovery - which would be detectible in a relatively short period of time. (A few hundred years would result with obvious "drastic" changes / alterations in a Stars performance / operation.)

    • profile image

      Gilged 3 years ago

      Without math theory can neither be proven nor disproved. These "experiments" could also be explained by the statement "Magnetic force is stronger than gravity."

    • profile image

      Johnd413 3 years ago

      When some one searches for his necessary thing, so heshe desires to be available that in detail, thus that thing is maintained over here. fkeefkakfkcf

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I took your advice effilnuc - and started my own Hub-

      https://hubpages.com/education/Einstein-was-Wrong...

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      And to conclude my rant...Awareness is the web of life and each strand of that web. Awareness is neither light or dark, male or female, positive or negative. Awareness creates NEW shades of light and dark, male and female, positive and negative. Awareness is everything beyond and everything within the boundary between light and dark, male and female, positive and negative.

      Without life's awareness; light and dark, electricity and magnetism, good and evil, they are static and eternally separate.

      Through awareness, light may become dark, magnetism may become electricity and good may become evil...and of course the inverse applies equally...this is the life force.

      You could say 'Awareness is the Cause, Life is the Effect', but then again, some may argue that 'life caused the effect that one is aware is called awareness'!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      The universe is a static binary print that appears as a flowing 3D hologram manifested by Consciousness or Awareness. At every point that Awareness awakens a new perspective/reality is realized giving the appearance of dynamism. The universe is static, awareness is dynamic.

      The universe has not changed and never, ever will change. Awareness, since the day it awakened, has changed, and will forever and ever change...creating forever changing reality.

      The universe is NOT expanding, awareness is expanding. The universe is not 13 billion years old, awareness is 13 billion years old. The universe is not unbounded, awareness is unbounded. The universe was not created, awareness awoke. The universe is not a sea of unlimited potential energy, awareness is the sea of unlimited potential energy. There is only one universe, there are infinite shades of awareness. Life is awareness...is awareness eternal? It is now!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Magnetism or Voltage define states of separation.

      Electrical current and amperage define states of unification.

      IE. A magnetic field or voltage exists between two opposing planes or points...north/south or positive/negative. A magnetic field or Voltage are beyond TIME.

      A current is the same at all points or planes between two points or planes. Current and amperage are within TIME.

      Together, Current/Electricity and Voltage/Magnetism define the outer boundary of potential AND every point in between.

      Magnetism is OFF, Current or electricity is ON.

      Magnetism is BLACK, Current or electricity is WHITE.

      Magnetism is ANTIMATTER, Electricity is MATTER.

      Magnetism is POTENTIAL, Electricity is KINETIC

      BLACK HOLE = Magnetism = beyond TIME/GRAVITY

      SUN = Electricity = within TIME/GRAVITY

      Gravity is Time.

      Light/Electricity is within time, bound by gravity; speed of light.

      Dark/Magnetism is beyond time, and is unbound by gravity; speed of light.

      Gravity/Time exist between electricity and magnetism.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi Guy, I remember your query a few weeks back on the nature of magnetism and was rather stumped! It raised a lot of queries of my own as magnetism is a word with so much meaning attached to it.

      You asked

      "Does magnetism always act the same way?Will the characteristics of magnetism change dependant on the flux density or some other factor?"

      Here is my understanding of magnetism...

      Magnetism always acts the same way. Its characteristics NEVER change.

      I know others will baulk at this concept but here goes...Magnetism is high Voltage. Electricity or electric current is high Amperage.

      High Voltage/low current = MAGNETIC force ; characteristics are female negative cool binding centripetal sphere

      Low Voltage/high current = ELECTRICAL force characteristics are male positive hot radiating centrifugal point

      Both forces are equal and opposite. Both forces generate power when combined with gravity/time. If the natural cycle between the two states is interrupted, power is lost, if the natural cycle between the two states is uninterrupted, power is accumulated (in a closed system).

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Lineal time; A causes B.

      Cyclical time; B causes A causes B.

      Electricity does not dominate magnetism.

      Magnetism does not dominate electricity.

      An electromagnetic universe is not based on cause and effect, it is based on balance.

      Space does not exist without boundaries, and boundaries cannot exist without space. Neither one dominates, neither one causes the other...they are equal and opposite and complimentary.

      It seems to me that since the physical properties of mass - as I experience it - display definable, predictable and cyclical periods of balance, that any theory prescribing to 'cause and effect', is mortal.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Cause and effect, the great paradigm paralysis!

      Does fire cause wood to burn?

      Does oxygen cause wood to burn?

      Does wood cause fire to burn?

      Does wood cause oxygen to burn?

      Is flame the cause or the effect?

      Is rain the cause or the effect?

      Are the tides the cause or the effect?

      Does gravity cause mass or does mass cause gravity?

      It is pretty obvious that 'cause and effect' is an egoitistical theory, far, far away from observed reality!

    • profile image

      Guy 3 years ago

      The pattern twists and changes until we are all back to where we were and have always been. Perhaps this time it will be different. Immortals dream to be mortal at least they do if they ever find out they are immortal. I for one would rather power. Have some fun while we are here mooching around as humans on a world full of dispare and starvation and drugs and addictions and speeding tickets. Let there be light and so there was. Sounds like a hoot and a half to me.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      It seems to me that since the physical properties of mass - as we experience it - display definable / predictable "cause and effect" properties.

      If the quantum world is NOT derived from "cause and effect" directives - we should be able to easily manipulate the properties of ANY element of mass with minimal energy / effort - IE - with only only will and desire.

      I believe the Aether itself may contain / maintain a "consciousness" - but WE as "cause and effect" beings of mass can not access this "state" until our "assembled bodies of electrical / chemical functioning mass" have been "released" from or "cause and effect" duties for survival / sustained LIFE.

      However - for any MASS to exist / manifest - there must be cause and effect from the smallest beginning to the largest compilation - or there would not be any predictability in function / display of properties.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Sharpencil, I hope you hang around for comments etc but encourage you to dedicate your own hubpage to further explore your COPYRIGHT ideas.

      Does it have to be a "cause and effect" universe?

      Does it have to be a linear timeline universe?

      If the above are criteria for our universe to exist, then I cannot answer your question. If these are NOT fundamental to our universe, then the concepts of "before" and "caused" are not relevant.

      Everything in the universe is both a cause AND an effect; this relationship is cyclical...not linear. Stars, mass, matter, are all products of awareness. The dichotomy of force has always existed and will always exist. The awareness of the dichotomy is what created the waves, stars, mass etc. Awareness is sometimes called, God, Creator, Enlightened, Buddha.

      What is the one that is aware?

      that which the one is not aware of.

      What are the things that one is aware of?

      that which one is not.

      The creator is everything that it has not yet separated from itself. The creation is that which is separated from the creator. Creator and creation = one...universe.

      We are all both creation and creator, it is our own awareness that decides where the line is drawn between the two...or perhaps the line is drawn around the two?!?

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Sharpencil, I hope you hang around for comments etc but encourage you to dedicate your own hubpage to further explore your COPYRIGHT ideas.

      Does it have to be a "cause and effect" universe?

      Does it have to be a linear timeline universe?

      If the above are criteria for our universe to exist, then I cannot answer your question. If these are NOT fundamental to our universe, then the concepts of "before" and "caused" are not relevant.

      Everything in the universe is both a cause AND an effect; this relationship is cyclical...not linear. Stars, mass, matter, are all products of awareness. The dichotomy of force has always existed and will always exist. The awareness of the dichotomy is what created the waves, stars, mass etc. Awareness is sometimes called, God, Creator, Enlightened, Buddha.

      What is the one that is aware?

      that which the one is not aware of.

      What are the things that one is aware of?

      that which one is not.

      The creator is everything that it has not yet separated from itself. The creation is that which is separated from the creator. Creator and creation = one...universe.

      We are all both creation and creator, it is our own awareness that decides where the line is drawn between the two...or perhaps the line is drawn around the two?!?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      effilnuc-

      I shall take your advice and graciously bow out of this Hub.

      However - I do have one question for you before I leave.

      I understand the principals of dimensional wave interaction between various wave properties. But, before Stars, and Mass (etc.) - what caused these "waves" to come into existence in the first place? The Big Bang?

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Simply look at the mathematical equations.

      Electricity is a linear relationship based on distance...one dimension.

      Magnetism is based on distance cubed...it is three dimensional.

      Gravity is based on distance squared, it is two dimensional...a cycle, a period, perhaps gravity is time.

      Gravity is the universal meeting point between these two incongruent forces. Gravity is the equal and opposite reactive force to the PRIMARY and ETERNAL force of the electric and magnetic fields...originally known as male and female, Yin and Yang, evil and good, hot and cold!

      The 2 dimensional nature of gravity means it creates cycles or periods that allow the electric force and magnetic force to find harmony or balance...so, mix male/electric force with female/magnetic force and you have created gravity matrix/periods/cycles. Mix these periods or gravity in with electromagnetic forces or waves and you create frequencies of matter. By my definition, matter is an electromagnetic standing wave of high frequency (subject to high quanta of gravity/periods/cycles). If the wave is very stable and relatively simple, we call it an element. If the wave is more stable when it is compounded, we call it a compound. Matter has a half-life because no standing wave is perpetually stable...except perhaps pure water! From water, all matter is condensed and radiates, and all matter eventually condenses back into water.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      A theory that was proposed quite some time ago; experiments were financed by Westinghouse (http://tesla3.com/free_websites/zpe_russell.html), is that gravity is an effect of, or a result of the radiation and contraction of our electromagnetic universe...

      Magnetism is the force field that separates.

      Electricity is the force field that unifies.

      Gravity is the product, gravity is the observation, gravity is a perpetual state of balance thru motion generated by the constant dichotomy of electric (unity, point) and magnetic fields (schism/space).

      Gravity is observed wherever magnetic and electric fields are imbalanced! Gravity is not a primary source of force, gravity is an instantaneous, equal and opposite balancing force to the perpetually imbalanced electric and magnetic force fields!

      I have to admit, I no longer consider that Gravity is Magnetism.

      I now believe that gravity is an instantaneous and opposite reaction to the imbalance between electromagnetic fields such that at any instant in space or time, there is balance.

      Gravity is the matrix formed by electromagnetic fields on which matter condenses and radiates. It is a mathematical grid defined by the relationship between electric fields and magnetic fields.

      Electric fields are 1 dimensional, magnetic fields are 3 dimensional. The gravitational field exists as the 2 dimensional centre (of gravity) between the 1st and 3rd dimensions. Mass which is highly organised and stable electromagnetic frequencies is four dimensional (1 electric and 3 magnetic dimensions), and has a 2 dimensional centre of gravity which mathematically and instantly relates the mass to every other point/space in the universe.

      All Matter is a stable frequency held by 6 dimensions

      1 electric dimension of contracting force

      2 gravitational dimensions of balancing force (manifesting as centripetal and centrifugal)

      3 magnetic dimensions of expanding force

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      OK...

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      That's great Sharpencil, perhaps it may be more appropriate to extrapolate your copyrighted nutshells on your own dedicated hubpage...

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      BTW-

      My Copyright covers my theoretical plausibility that the Universe is jam packed full of primordial sub atomic particles. After any number of "singularities" the entire Universe of subatomic particles began to vibrate and cause friction - which - in turn - instills the Universal Aether to be a CONSTANTLY GENERATING "Electric Grid of Static Charge" which supplies the Golden Number frequency vibration particles with the "Strong Force" energy to form Protons.

      Furthermore - I surmise the majority of the particles making up the Universal Aether vibrate in NON Golden Number frequencies - but instill a Universal Static Grid of Electric Charge - these individual "odd frequency vibrating" particles, collectively are "Dark Matter".

      Dark Matter is the Aether jam packed full of NON Golden Number frequency vibrating particles.

      These NON Golden Number frequency vibrating particles (Dark Matter) use their "collective charge" - individually - to relay ENERGY between each other (from one - to the next - to the next - etc.) across their vastness of themselves UNTIL the energy "relay" is "disturbed / stopped / absorbed / reflected" by MASS.

      MASS is the collected Particles / Protons (Golden Number frequency vibrating particles) WITHIN the Universal vastness of the Dark Matter - at the displayed locations and properties that are detectable as Mass.

      ANY Dark Matter particle (Aether vast majority of NON Golden Number frequency vibrating particles) in DIRECT CONTACT with any Golden Number frequency vibrating particle (Proton) is a NEUTRON.

      The ACT (relay / transfer / energy - charge exchange / delivery / grounding / etc.) (call it what you will) of the Universal Static Grid (collective charge of NON Golden Number particles) delivering the STRONG FORCE energy "PULSE" to the PROTONS - through the NEUTRONS - is the ELECTRON - or more accurately - the "ELECTRON FUNCTION".

      This "relay - delivery - grounding" - of the Universal Static Grid "CHARGE" into Protons is the most primordial / initial display of subatomic electromagnetic "connection" between Golden Number frequency vibrating particles = STRONG FORCE.

      The result of this "electrical action / electromagnetic bonding" - is the primordial / initial - subatomic state of "GRAVITY".

      (As Protons compile into MASS - the flow of the Grid (Electron Functions) to the Core of a Mass - pulls on the Electron Functions of any Proton outside the Core = which is actually "compiled subatomic gravity" - which is the Gravity we DETECT - and is obviously displayed by MASS.

      ENERGY is created when the Electron Functions (the delivery of the Strong Force into any Proton) is DISTURBED. A Micro Shock-wave will "ripple" outward away from the Proton (RELAYED AWAY from the "disturbance" from individual Dark Matter particle to Dark Matter particle OUTWARD) The intensity of the Disturbance - results with the equal and opposite resulted display of ENERGY released as the consequence of the initial disturbance.

      When an INDIVIDUAL Electron Function in any Proton is "disturbed" - IE - the "delivery" of the Strong Force "pulse" through the Neutrons - to - the Proton is "disturbed" - a "micro shock-wave" is emitted back outward through the Dark Matter - this is ENERGY. The intensity of the disturbance of the Electron Function in a Proton determines the equal and opposite resulting ENERGY display. (Photons / Gamma Rays / etc.)

      A sustained series of "particular intensity disturbances" to Electron Functions of numerous Protons in a Mass (element) - results in "Photon Packets" (Or Gamma Ray "packets") being "released"

      Magnetism is a DISTURBANCE in the Universal Static Grid being able to DELIVER (ground) the Strong Force energy charge into the Protons of a mass spherically/radial around its circumference - because the Electron Function of the Mass has been altered - IE - the Protons are receiving their Strong Force energy delivery in a PARTICULAR DIRECTION = SOUTH Pole - to NORTH Pole THROUGH the mass in a SINGLE direction.

      IE - the DISTURBANCE of natural spherical/radial circumference Strong Force delivery (grounding) from the Universal Static Grid between the "Poles" to a "magnetized mass" is the MAGNETIC FIELD.

      The Earths Core is Ferrite (Iron) and the enormous amount of Strong Force energy delivery to it - (individual Proton / Neutron / Electron Function) has been ALTERED to a North - to - South direction = which CREATES the Earths MAGNETIC FIELD because of the "interruption / disturbance" in the NORMAL spherically/radial Strong Force energy delivery to the Core from the Universal Static Grid.

      The Universal Grid "flow" through the Earths core is slightly "backed up" at the South Pole and the Protons at the North Pole are somewhat overwhelmed - the charge has nowhere to go - but to rotate between the Poles - and cause HEAT (LAVA/ground) as it "balances" the ELECTRICAL input - to - ground Electrical OUTPUT at the (nearest / local - available Protons - (Granite / Copper / etc.)(UN-directed UN-Magnetized Electron Functions) = outer Core.

      The "interruption" of the Universal Static Grid NOT being able to deliver the Strong Force to the Earth's core spherically/radial (around it's circumference) - (because of South - to - North - Magnetism - Electron Function - Strong Force energy delivery) causes the Earth's MAGNETIC FIELD.

      The Sun (or a normal Star) displays the SAME magnetic (Gravitational) properties as does the Earth - HOWEVER - a Star does NOT have sufficient COMPLEX elemental Protons to "GROUND" the charge to - outside it's HUGE Ferrite core - so the HUGE charge ROTATES - VISIBLY - outside the Core and is BACKED UP = IE - (Electrical Resistance) as it is FORCED to WAIT for OPPORTUNITIES (AVAILABLE Electron Functions) in the NON Magnetized (Gaseous) Elements to ground to.

      IE - the charge has MINIMAL (Hydrogen / Helium / etc.) Proton Numbered Elemental Nucleus's in the OUTER CORE in which to "dissipate" the HUGE charge to - so it "radically disturbs" the Electron Functions of these Gaseous elements into ENORMOUS NUMBERS of PHOTON PACKETS being released as it "dissipates/ rounds" the CHARGE.

      IE - the HUGE core has "invited in" a HUGE - "Aligned" charge (South - to - North) due to "Altered - or Aligned" (Magnetized) Electron Functions in the Core.

      BUT - there are no "heavy elements" to form "Lava / etc." - so it "disturbs" the Electron Functions in the "lighter available elements" - (Hydrogen / Helium / etc.) and an ENORMOUS number of "Photon Packets" are released every second.

      I shall not go "deep" into explaining how I surmise the function of a Quasar - but -

      The Ferrite Core of a Quasar has been "sandwiched" into a "plate shape" at its equatorial plane between where the North and South hemispheres would NORMALLY be located. (Like the Sun or the Earth) The Universal Static Grid (Strong Force energy delivery - to the magnetized "FLAT" core results with the INPUT SOUTH Pole being restricted to a "Band" around the "equator" - and the OUTPUT NORTH Pole is "SPLIT" - and Exits BOTH hemispheres simultaneously - displayed with DUAL plasma discharge "Cones".

      In another nutshell-

      A Black Hole is simply a Quasar on steroids and the "flow" of the Universal Static Grid (Magnetized Electron Function Strong Force energy delivery) is so intense - that Photons are "pulled" in and must "go with the flow". The "Event Horizon" - is the line where the strength and speed of the flow "captures" the trajectories of Photons through the Dark Matter.

      Einstein showed that light would "bend" into / toward a Gravitational field because MASS warped space/time. I have to disagree.

      I surmise that space time is NOT warped - and light merely "bends" toward a Mass because of the Universal Static Grid "flow" into a Mass - supplying the Strong Force energy (Electron Functions = GRAVITY) simply "pulls" on the trajectory of Photons as they are "relayed" through the particles of Dark Matter toward / past - a Mass.

      This - in a nutshell - is what I have Copyrighted.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I have to disagree because if mass is merely a volume of standing waves - and gravity is a wave holding mass together - then - any intense energy wave (gamma etc.) should immediately and quite noticeably disrupt or cancel out gravity AND the strong force on mass.

      IE - the overwhelming battery of intense waves from the sun would easily overcome the elemental strong forces of meteorites and comets and quickly disassemble their wave volume structures due to lack of large enough protecting magnetic field.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      I think mass is made of volume, volume is defined by standing frequencies/waves. A quark is, as you say, very high 2D frequency. Multiple high 2D frequencies that intersect, will create 4D standing wave frequencies that create volume, mass, matter.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      effilnuc-

      Sorry if I sound arrogant. I guess it's because I believe the current "Illuminati" founded and controlled education / media / space exploration / etc. are directed toward profits for those in places of power.

      If there are no "actual" particles or subatomic particles - then what is mass made of? Waves?

      I am saying that the entire Universe is - and always has been - jam packed FULL of Planck particles (Quarks) BUT only the ones that vibrate at the correct frequency are able to come together / unify / to form protons (compiled Planck particles = Quarks / compiled Quarks = Protons / compiled Protons = Mass )

      As far as the "Big Bang" being the "singularity" that all of the mass in the universe came from - a point smaller than an atom - that in itself - to me - is as ridiculous of an explanation as an electron actually "orbiting" an atom.

      I propose that in the beginning the entire Universe was a motionless "sea" of subatomic particles. A single (or multiple) friction "singularities" occurred. IE - an individual (or several) particles just happened to display geometric shaped properties that the particles surrounding it - caused it to turn / spin / rotate / etc. This set off a chain reaction of vibrations throughout the entire aether of the Universe. (Possibly several friction "singularities" happened in different locations - possibly instigated by the chain reaction after the first singularity.

      The rest of the odd ball frequency "particles" of the aether - mixed in with (surrounding the compiling Protons) are Dark Matter and are what relay energy (light, etc.) and sustain the Universal Static Grid of electrical charge.

      ALL of these particles (individual "odd balls') vibrate at their "odd ball frequency" and CONSTANTLY create friction between themselves - which instills a repeating / constantly replenished / sustained "vibrating" generator - which creates a UNIVERSAL GRID of "static charge" throughout the aether of the Universe.

      The act of the "compiling" (Golden Frequency) particles (Mass) using this "charge" to compile - within the "GRID" - is the primordial beginnings of GRAVITY. (the "Electron Function" is the Grid being "focused" into a "compiled" "unified cluster" of Quarks (Atomic Strong Force) - which creates the Proton - the "act" of this constant electrical / electromagnetic creation and compiling of Protons - is GRAVITY)

      The Protons "cluster" to form Mass - and Mass is what focuses the "effects" of the various strengths of "Electron Functions" into ENERGY.

      TIME - is the measurement of the energy being relayed between / through / from odd ball frequency particle - to - odd ball frequency particle between MASSES. (light / sound / all frequency waves)

      The "disturbance of" Electron Functions (Proton positions) in a primary Mass is what FOCUSES / INTENSIFIES the Electron Functions (Atomic Strong Force) - the aether (odd ball frequency Quarks = Universal Static Grid) then relays the "disturbance" - BUT - we can only see, or detect, this relay of focused (relayed) energy - when it strikes / is absorbed by / or repelled by a secondary Mass.

      (IE - when it "disturbs" the Electron Function in a secondary Mass.

      The (astronomical) number of individual particles is always the same. (The aether is packed full of them - there is no "empty space" in between them - they are "outer space" / the aether of the universe.

      The only thing that changes is the "state" of their existence.

      Golden Number frequency "vibrating" Quarks form Protons - and these Protons may - at various times / places / and under certain circumstances - may be stripped back down into individual Quarks / Planck particles - only to reform later into another / different Proton.

      The Universe is a huge - long term "cycle / re-cycle". Nothing is DESTROYED - only "changed" - the "changes" are ENERGY.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi Sharpencil, I like your explanations...up until the particle thing!

      Particles do not exist as tiny balls and sub-atomic particles are NOT parts of tiny balls. The label 'particle' is a description of an observable event/change. A wave is a condition; where two conditions are present there is change, which is observed as a particle.

      When you think of the word 'particle' or 'sub-atomic particle' I think you should replace the image of a tiny ball (or part thereof) with an image of a 'point', 'line' or 'plane' where fields/waves intersect.

      'Particle' is not a noun, 'particle' is an adjective describing an event. Particle or Quantum Physics describes a method of observation focused at instantaneous points in time or space. Waves do not exist in the instant...they are defined by their rate of change in time and space.

      This is crucial to understanding Qualitative Physics!

      The intersection or boundary layer between two or more fields of force is what we term a 'sub-atomic particle'. A stable enclosure for a period of time and space, between boundary layers/fields, which is 3D, has volume and therefore, it obtains a quality that we label mass.

      If you have two forces or fields that intersect, you may describe the points in time and space of the intersection of those fields as a quark or maybe an electron. The electron appears relative to the magnetic field, the electric field and the observation field. If the observation field is not present, the electron does not manifest. A proton may manifest without the observer's field, however it requires more stable conditions between additional fields.

      Side note, what exactly are you claiming that you own? You sound a wee bit arrogant in my culture! How can everything in the universe, (which is 'particles' according to you), be connected by other particles that relay energy? Do you mean particles that do NOT relay energy, are connected by other particles that DO relay energy? Is space connected by these particles, or are these particles connected by space? Does time connect these particles or do these particles connect time? Do the particles relay time or space? Or do the particles only relay energy? What happens when a particle appears or disappears? Are these particles increasing in quantum since the Big Bang or are they reducing in number?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I have also detailed how and why electricity is made - and how and why it "is" and how and why does what it does.

      "The Good Vibrations"

      www.customaudioproductions.com/The_Good_Vibrations

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      By the way-

      I have re-updated my "Theory for an Electric Universe" (The Good Vibrations) and have also up-dated my COPYRIGHT on it.

      In a nutshell-

      You all know that I surmise the entire Universe (Aether) is jam packed full of subatomic particles - which vibrate and cause friction - which causes the entire Aether of the Universe to maintain a constant Static Electric Charge = "Dark Matter"

      Only the Quarks that vibrate in Golden Number Frequencies combine to form mass.

      When the Planck/Quarks (particles) combine (Up/Down/etc.) they are = Protons.

      I surmise that the other individual Quarks (Dark Matter Quarks) packed tightly around and in between the "Golden Number Quarks making up the Proton" - are the "Neutrons".

      Furthermore - the Universal Static Grid electric supply to the Protons (the Strong Force) is delivered through the Quarks (Neutrons) around / within the Protons.

      The "Electron" - is not a particle - it is the ACTION of these static pulses being delivered to the Proton through the Neutrons - it is actually an "Electron Function"!

      (The supply/delivery of the Universal Static Grid - Strong Force energy - through the Neutron to the Protons (Electron Function) - is the primordial beginnings of GRAVITY.

      The "Electron Function" is actually micro pulses of static charge being delivered through the Quarks around the Proton (Neutrons) to the compiled Quarks comprising the Proton in different locations around the outer circumference (and through the inside) of the Proton (atom) - which GIVES the ILLUSION that it is an orbiting ELECTRON..... (electron "shell")

      With this said-

      It is this "Electron Function" that creates GRAVITY and MAGNETISM-

      Gravity=

      As clusters (mass) compile - the Electron Function of the core (inner most Protons) must be DELIVERED their Strong Force feed - but - the Protons in any "layer" outside the core are "in the way of the flow to the Protons in the core" - this is by definition - ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE!

      IE - the flow of the Universal Static Grid to supply the Strong Force energy to the Protons in a Core of a mass - must also supply the Strong Force energy to the Protons surrounding the Core - and the outer Protons get "pulled" by the "flow" ===== LOCAL GRAVITY!

      As the Grid draws in more charge to supply the Strong Force demand to ALL Protons of a mass - it creates an "electrical pressure" surrounding the mass ==== PHANTOM GRAVITY!

      Magnetism=

      Gravity is the act of the Universal Static grid delivering the Strong Force energy to Protons of mass.

      This "delivery" penetrates mass equally spherically/radial (all around its circumference) simultaneously- (except that the Electron Functions are sequential - or "alternating" around the outer parameter of the Protons (Electron Function "shell")

      When a piece of Ferrite (Iron) is magnetized - (an electric current is passed through it) - this causes the "Electron Functions" (Strong Force energy delivery) to be directed in a particular direction - SOUTH pole - to - NORTH pole.

      (IE - the "Grid" is UNABLE to deliver the Strong Force equally spherically/radial along the entire length of the magnet - and this "disruption" or "interference" creates - or is - the MAGNETIC FIELD!

      The same is true when electricity is passed through a NON Magnetic conductor! (Copper / Aluminum / etc.)

      This is why a magnets SOUTH pole is ATTRACTED to the NORTH pole of another magnet. GRID FLOW!

      And this is why the same poles (N-N / S-S) REPEL!

      And when the NORTH POLE of a magnet is placed against your refrigerator - it is PUSHING the Grid flow INTO the fridge (aligning the proportionate/appropriate number of electron functions for the "strength of the magnet" of the Iron fridge) to cause ATTRACTION - (the "Grid" flows OUT of the Magnet - into the Fridge and resumes its (Gravity) "flow" back to the Earth's core.

      When you place the SOUTH POLE of a magnet against the fridge - it PULLS the Grid flow OUT of the fridge - through the magnet - and then back with the main Grid flow toward the Earth's Core.

      A permanent magnet RETAINS this "aligned" Electron Function (Strong Force energy delivery)

      However - this is why when an electric current is passed through a NON magnetic element (Copper) - it only displays a magnetic field WHEN there is a current flowing through it-

      As soon as the current is turned off - the magnetic field disappears!

      I OWN THIS THING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      (IE - I have answered the mystery of the Universe -

      AND I have it COPYRIGHTED!)

      I'm working on a video explaining EVERYTHING with examples / experiments / displays / presentations / ETC.

      EVERYTHING in the Universe is connected by particles that relay energy!

      Here is the link to my full text written theory -

      "The Good Vibrations"

      www.customaudioproductions.com/The_Good_Vibrations

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Guy-

      Magnetism properties and the flux density of a magnetic field are determined by the means by which the field is being created and by what particular element is used to create the magnetic field.

      IE - a permanent magnet will display a particular magnetic field (flux) depending on its particular elemental components /its size / and the amount of electric current applied to it to "magnetize" it. The "characteristics" of a permanent magnet will eventually "weaken" over time.

      (Unless it is "re-magnetized".)

      However - the flux density and a magnetic field properties created solely by an electric current passed through an element is determined by the particular element (copper/aluminum/etc.) / and the size of the element / and the particular elemental components (metal mix) of the "conductor" / and the shape of the element = IE - coil of wire / a straight wire / a block of copper / etc.

      And the amount of current passed through it.

      All of these factors determine the "characteristics" of an electromagnetic field and its flux properties.

      Even "electromagnets" (IE - their properties) can weaken over time - even under the same circumstances-

      Conducting elements "corrode" after being subjected to an electric current for prolonged intensities and periods of time - and even if the same voltage/amperage current is passed through it.

    • profile image

      Guy 3 years ago

      Please forgive my ignorance. Does magnetism always act the same way?Will the characteristics of magetsim change dependant on the flux density or some other factor?

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Energy is information and is everywhere, power is the balancing force realised proportionately and opposite to the rate of change. The rate of change can be either velocity or frequency...time or space.

      Power is mechanical, a compression wave, pressure, temperature, sound. Power can be created and destroyed...energy cannot. Power is resistance to change, resistance to change in pressure, resistance to change in temperature, resistance to change in sound.

      Energy is pressure, temperature, sound, mass, matter...EM field.

      Power is the rate of change of same.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Sound is the mechanical or z axis of the electromagnetic spectrum.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      IE -

      Sunburn-

      The sun puts out constant streams of the various EM waves.

      A gamma ray (wave) from the Sun travels so fast that it is slowed down (resisted/collides with atoms of mass/air/O2/ CO2/etc.) in the Earth's atmosphere to an Ultraviolet wave - which MIGHT reach your skin and help give you a sunburn. (Or an Ultraviolet wave leaves the sun and "luckily" reaches your skin and helps gives you a sunburn)

      This same Gamma wave MIGHT be slowed down into an Ultraviolet wave - which is further slowed down (by more atoms of mass in the atmosphere) into a visible light wave - which reaches you so you can see the redness of your skin.

      The Earth is constantly bombarded with a wide range of different "intensities of waves" from the Sun. The atmosphere slows down (resistance) the fastest "waves" before they reach the surface.

      The "visible light" (and frequencies slower than "visible light" - (infra red/microwave/radio) are not "resisted" as much by the atoms of the atmosphere. These slower waves are actually somewhat "relayed" by the E-Rings in the atoms of the atmosphere because they are not as fast or as intense as Gamma and UV "waves".

      Example -

      Roll a bowling ball down a lane in a bowling alley - it rolls fairly smoothly with little resistance. (other than friction with the wood lane and the atmosphere)

      (Visualize the bowling ball as a single Gamma ray (pulse/wave) traveling (in my theory = being relayed) from the Sun to the Earth.

      Now - visualize the bowling lane is running down hill into a pond of water. The water reaches half way between you and the bowling pins and the water at the half way point is the "shore of the pond" - and the bowling pins at the far end of the lane are completely submerged in the pond.

      The bowling ball is going to slow down when it reaches the half way point because of the resistance when it begins to encounter the water. And - the closer the bowling ball gets to the bowling pins - the slower it will roll - because of the higher resistance of the deeper water.

      The bowling ball is a Gamma ray (wave) entering the Earth's atmosphere - and at some point (depth) - it will get slowed down to an Ultraviolet ray (wave) - and at some point (depth) the Ultraviolet ray (wave) will get slowed down to a Visible Light ray (wave) and then it will reach the bowling pins (your skin) - but the bowling ball has much less power and speed than it did when it began encountering the water at the half way mark (or the Gamma ray/wave has less power and speed than it did when it encountered the atmosphere).

      Since the E-Rings of the atoms of the atmosphere "somewhat" help in the relay of the relay of the slower Visible Light waves - they are more "plentiful" in the atmosphere and thus is why everything is illuminated so well (without everything instantly getting fried by Gamma and UV rays)

      IE - The atmosphere creates (by resistance) more Visible Light waves than are emitted by the Sun toward the Earth.

      (Of course there are a lot of invisible Infra Red/Radio/Micro waves - emitted by the Sun and directed at the Earth - but the atmosphere also "enhances" the total number of all of these "slower" waves through the differing "potentials" of wave resistance.)

      Radio waves are faint in respect to "sound" itself. They must be processed (amplified = intensified into audible atomic "collisions") to be "audible".

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      effilnuc-

      To me - you are "terming" "energy" as "sound".

      Energy = results from the transformation of the state of the atomic structure/situation of "mass" = which is displayed by the propagation of waves.

      When the atomic structures of "mass" are manipulated/changed/transformed - energy is created-

      However - the particular circumstances of the atoms involved in the "transformation" - (number of and type of atom(s) / intensity of the interaction / etc.) DETERMINES the "frequency" of the "waves" that are "propagated away from the "disturbance" - IE - the energy level of the "display" (speed and power of the waves produced)

      The known EM spectrum is-

      Gamma radiation = fastest - most powerful propagating "waves"

      X-ray radiation = slower - less powerful...

      Ultraviolet radiation = and so on...

      Visible radiation = and on down the line...

      Infrared radiation = ...

      Terahertz radiation = ...

      Microwave radiation = ...

      Radio waves ...

      The display of the "intensity" of "disturbance" is the EM Scale.

      My theory is to state that ALL of these EM "displays" - must have a "conductor" by which they "propagate" from the disturbance (mass CREATING the "energy/waves") - to get to a secondary mass (mass receiving/displaying the absorbed/reflected effects of the energy/waves.

      "Sound" - by definition - literally means the "frequency" of these waves being detected/converted into an "audible" power and speed (sine wave)

      (IE = waves/vibrations/frequencies that cause atoms of mass to "absorb/collide/vibrate" so intensely that these "collisions" can be heard.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Gravity condenses, sound radiates. Gravity is stillness, silence...

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Perhaps sound is the anti-gravity particle...your thoughts Newton's Rival?

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      The sound coming from a black hole reflects back as light and mass which condenses back to the centre of the black hole from where sound is reflected back out...pump, pump, pump...like a heart beat.

      Light and mass condense in and sound radiates out.

      Every living cell has a black hole at its centre that pumps the sound energy out as it consumes light and mass.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      If light and mass are absorbed by a black hole, i propose that sound is radiated from it at the speed of instantly, then it slows as it gets further from the black hole, it decelerates from instant relative to the acceleration of matter as it is condensing towards the black hole...maybe!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      A four dimensional unit that has distance and area, has volume and is the smallest "particle" if you like, relative to the time period (bit rate) of the observers frame of reference.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Perhaps

      E = S^2 where S = the speed of sound (it is not a constant but relative to the medium in which it is traveling).

      This automatically means that the denser the mass, the greater the energy as the speed of sound increases with density...this explains why it seems as though matter or mass contains and/or is energy....

      However, the reality is that Energy is sound...but the quantum of energy at any point in space/time is relative to the instantaneous speed of sound or the derivative of the speed of sound at that moment in space/time.

      Work done = distance x area of sound traveled x period = power

      Work, power, energy, reality is a 4 dimensional unit.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      An internal combustion engine uses very low frequencies and stabilises them into a smooth RPM sine wave to drive the shaft.

      An hydraulic power station uses a range of low frequencies in the same manner.

      Tesla understood how to create a WELL/Antenna for multiple high frequencies, stabilise and lower and retransmit them for suitably tuned devices to operate.

      This is a much more advanced version of the Pantheon.

      Radios transform and stabilise high frequencies into other high frequencies rather than converting them to a low frequency torque and therefore it seems that radios cannot be used to provide electromotive force.

      Crystal radio is they key to obtaining electromotive force from crystals, broaden the receiver signal range, then somehow tune the SPEAKER output frequency right down to a single sine wave of 50 Hertz and connect the speaker wire to a squirrel cage motor...its about tuning the sound output rather than the tuning into a single frequency input...

      i think ;-)

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      A side thought,

      The power to your home is a 50/60Hertz sine wave. This power is absolutely useless/lost unless the machines using it are "tuned" to the same 50/60Hertz sound frequency.

      If the Sound (frequency) of the wave changes, so do the instruments receiving that sound (frequency).

      The instruments/machines that run on a 50/60 Hertz sound wave can also run on multiples or sub-frequencies of that sound...as long as the frequencies are resonant.

      All livings thins are the same, we live or are powered by a particular frequency and sub-frequencies that are resonant to us.

      Some frequencies/sounds are supportive, some are destructive, some are neutral.

      Humans have the ability to create instruments that tune into multiple frequencies, stabilise them and output the same as a single frequency to which other machines/instruments are tuned and can be powered.

      The Pantheon is such an instrument, however crude!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      The symphony interpreted through the limited senses stimulating every living thing is reflected back, creating a constant feedback loop propagating eternally outwards and condensing inwards.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Reality, for any living thing, extends to but is limited by the range of EM frequencies the living thing can sense and is influenced by.

      Species are defined by the way in which they sense and interact with the EM spectrum.

      The majority of humans are able to sense and interact with the EM spectrum within a similar range of scale...that is to say most humans can sense and interact with an enormous range of the em spectrum.

      In spite of this, humans are still only able to sense and interact with less than 1% of the EM spectrum. For me, matter, mass, light, smell, heat and love are all part of the EM spectrum. Because each label is associated with a different frequency range of the EM spectrum we use different senses or a combination of different senses to interact.

      Most of us cannot use our eyes to sense anything beyond one octave of the spectrum. Most of us cannot use our ears to hear anything outside of around ten octaves of the spectrum. We use our nose and mouth the sense another series of octaves. Our brain then assimilates this symphony of sound into a reality, limited by the input of parts of the EM spectrum.

      Particle is a label that defines a certain scale of the EM spectrum to other scales of the spectrum. So a particle only exists in a theory of relativity. A particle and sub-particle are defined by humans relative to our scale of reality. A particle and sub-particle are defined by bacteria relative to their scale of reality. What behaves as a particle in our scale of reality does not behave as a particle in the bacteria's scale of reality.

      The human element has the capacity to accept and process more sensory input across a broader range of the EM spectrum than we culturally accept.

      I accept the notion of particles and sub-atomic particles but only within the context of the theory of relativity. Within a broader context, particles and sub-particles are labels for scalar geometric relationships...laws of interaction.

      Every sound, no matter how big or small is made of up smaller sounds...it is a function of the period which is a matter of relativity.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I understand what you are saying-

      But I guess I'm just a "Gotta see it - feel it - to believe it and make it work" theorist.

      I work backwards from the "solid" physical aspect of "matter/mass".

      To me - mass is as real as knowingly/provable real can get - as far as more than one person agreeing on the obvious "properties" of an agreed existing "object". (A tennis ball...)

      From the widely agreed/accepted "fact" that mass (a tennis ball) is something that everyone can agree on the basic properties of its visible and physically touchable existence -

      I surmise everything else (energy/propagation of energy) must be rooted from the basis of solid particles (however individually small - but collectively powerful) must be the foundation for everything that is not visible or physically touchable.

      Comparatively - faith (and most emotions) are invisible in themselves (just like the vast aether of individual particles) However - the acts one performs to "prove - or show" "the existence of ones faith" - is - the same as the propagation of energy is a show of existence from a vast sea of individual particles acting as a single entity.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      The Code as you say can be understood through geometry...all matter, all sound, all maths, all life and all forces manifest and propagate geometrically . Geometry is the law governing the propagation of the EMS since the Big Bang / the voice of god first spoke!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi Sharpencil,

      I like what you are writing, perhaps there is a middle point. Rather than particles and sub-atomic particles, perhaps it is particles of sound and sub-particles of sound. Each sound wave is a particle, and each tangent on every wave is a potential sub-particle...a particle or sub-particle of sound is qualitative and may be quantified through ratios.

      In this case, only certain harmonious or golden frequencies/sounds would be stable, and there would be an infinite number of sub-particles/sounds, (these are the infinite tangents of golden frequency waves/sounds).

      Humans can see 1 octave of the spectrum at high frequency and we hear/feel more than 10 octaves of the spectrum at lower frequencies. Each part of the ElectroMagneticSound spectrum is a quality, not a quantity. The qualities can be compared as ratios to create a quantity...Some ratios are harmonic, some are disharmonic.

      The EMS wave is three dimensional. The EM component carries the information and the S component propagates the information. The axis of the three waves are always be perpendicular to one another, however the vectors are infinite.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Every form of energy is a wave.

      Most are electric in nature (static charge /gamma/radio/visible light/etc.

      They are all relayed "vibrations - or pulses" = wave.

      When a wave (pulse/vibration) of light is relayed - into a mass - it is absorbed and reflected - the "vibration" is at such a high frequency and the individual pulses (within the "fast" streams of vibrations) are INDIVIDUALLY so weak we don't hear it - we SEE it as a STREAM.

      Audible sound is just a slower type of wave that is below the visible frequency range that utilizes (vibrates) mass when it is relayed into it. (Air / etc.) and we HEAR the INDIVIDUAL "pulses" (bang) - or we can hear a STREAM of "bangs" = music.

      Sound in an information frequency is higher than a visible light (radio) frequency - but it has to be slowed down to audibly hear it.

      Radio waves can definitely carry information - but the trick is to decipher - or "receive" and "slow down" - IE process the waves/pulses into a format that the sender (intelligent or inanimate) "coded" or "sent" the relayed frequency (information) OUT with -

      That is - if it was "coded" in a "frequency" that the "sounds" or "vibrations" make sense when slowed down to an audible speed.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Sound waves are not only longitudinal, they have a lateral aspect called a shear wave that moves perpendicular to the energy/force. I suspect this shear wave carries the information associated with the force/energy.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Think of it this way...two houses cannot be in the same location at the same time, however, a person can penetrate in and out of houses carrying information about how to build the houses. Any number of houses could potentially be built on the one block but only one house can exist on the block at any one time. Any number of people can be in the house at any one time, people can move in and out of the house through many openings. The houses cannot build themselves, the people build the houses and carry the information and carry the materials with which the house is built. The house is made from sound information and sound materials. The house design is held in place by the EM fields yet the design was created by people.

      People are like sound. EM fields are like houses!

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      I agree that sound waves can be faster than light. but do you see possibility that sound waves can be highly penetrative and can bear (or transfer with itself) optic/light information Effilnuc and others?

      please response.

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      laser (instead of liser)

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      I always thougt about the possibility that there are such waves that carrying/transferring optic information and can penetrate through everything. Now it come evident that the role of that waves could be sound waves. We may not forget about coherent sound waves like liser- it would be SASER then.

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      Hi Effilnuc. Yesterday night I thought about the same thing- sound waves and decided to post as awake and saw your topic about that... amazing.

      Now what I wanted to post here is about your opinion of Teslas ideas. He insisted that light waves also radiowaves are not transverse but longitidinal, like SOUND waves. here is his citate. ""I consider this extremely important,. said Mr. Tesla. "Light cannot be anything else but a longitudinal disturbance in the ether, involving alternate compressions and rarefactions. In other words, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the ether.."It being a fact that radio waves are essentially like sound waves in the air, it is evident that the shorter the waves the more penetrative they would be... When will television come around the corner? he was asked.

      "It ought to be with us soon, and some day it will be on a par of perfection with broadcasting of music. Then with a circular sweep of his arm and added, "there will be large pictures thrown on the wall".

      In ansient hindu texts Akasha was considered one of the "According to the Samkhya school of Hindu philosophy, Akasha is one of the five Mahābhūtas (grand physical elements) having the specific property of sound.[3]".

      In addition I want to say that once in my dream when I desired to know the answer of all reality I get perceived that quant is ANTINEUTRINO. I heard that qute clearly. Also that information is sound. I know less about antineutrino and would like to know your ideas, espesially yours Effilnuc and also about Teslas ideas. Could that be possible.?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Very interesting effilnuc.

      I know you disagree with me about a finite particle universe -

      however - we do agree that sound waves are an important portion of the spectrum of waves in the universe.

      We just differ on the specifics of their total properties - and the impact those properties have in the universe.

      BTW - for anyone interested - I have updated and upgraded my "visual enhanced" The Good Vibrations".

      If anyone should visit - let me know of any missing pictures or bad links - please...

      http://www.customaudioproductions.com/Reference_Th...

      Thanks!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi NR,

      I am thinking about the nature of sound waves and electromagnetic waves.

      EM waves are transverse waves...side to side, up and down

      Sound waves are longitudinal...forward and back.

      It would seem that the notion of sound waves as a third relative dimension to EM waves is fundamental to our universe.

      I am trying to understand the relationship between the three.

      I am currently theorizing that the electric field and magnetic fields are perpendicular storage fields of information, whereas sound waves are the means of transferal of information or energy in motion.

      EM waves slow down as the medium through which they pass becomes denser. Sound waves speed up as the medium becomes denser, sound waves can travel faster than light!

      EM fields are bi polar, they exist between two opposing points. Matter is confined and defined by EM fields. Sound is not a field, it is the energy that fills the EM field. Matter is confined energy/sound.

      Sound is Energy. Sound is information. Sound is harmonic and dis harmonic. Sound is Matter. Sound bound by EM fields is matter, Unbound sound is energy. All frequencies of sound are information.

      Stable matter is harmonic sound bound within EM fields. Unstable matter is dis harmonic sound bound within EM fields, or unstable EM fields.

      EM fields don't vibrate. EM fields generate points of interference that define how sound/energy vibrates. The vibration of sound cannot be stopped or destroyed. It can be transferred and dissipated, but it cannot be stopped. EM fields and waves can be stopped and destroyed.

      I propose that elements and matter are parcels of sound trapped within EM fields, then those elements can be transmuted by altering the EM fields and/or adding or subtracting the Sound/energy/information within those fields.

      The apparent forward motion of electrons through conductors which is measured as the movement of energy (Current) is actually the measurement of sound waves moving through the conductors.

      Electromotive Force is the force of Sound waves. The force that spins the needle of a magnet to align with the magnetic field is the force of SOUND! Every living thing can hear and feel the force of sound within a much wider spectrum than that which it can sense in the EM spectrum. Sound is energy, Electricity and magnetism are the fields which determine how the energy of sound is transferred, communicated, radiated and received.

      Sound is the mysterious energy of the aether!

      Sound propagates life, EM fields do not propagate, rather EM fields define the vector and rate of propagation of sound.

      EM fields store the energy of sound. Where no more energy can be stored within a particular field, the energy is radiated and propagates another EM field within which more energy/sound can be stored.

      Heat is high frequency sound. Cold is low frequency sound. Sound always propagates from high frequency to low frequency.

      Electric current is Sound. The transfer of sound is defined by the EM fields through which it is transferred.

      Perhaps this is why religions talk of the sound of god and Stephen Hawking talks of a big bang (sound) rather than a big flash...EM fields...light!

      I don't think sound is the vibration between two particles, rather it is the vibration between two boundaries. The boundaries are defined by planes that are defined by points of EM interference. Particles appear only relative to our current visual scale of reference within the EM spectrum.

      If the spectrum of sound is considered, particles are irrelevant, only ratios are required!

      The problem with a theory that accepts particles and sub-atomic particles as factoids, is that the theory is not scalar but finite and only applies from one scale of reference...humans!

      particles and sub-atomic particles exist on many scales, not just ours...humans are subatomic particles of the solar system, the earth is a sub-atomic particle of the universe. Electrons are not sub-atomic particles from the perspective of a photon or a neutron.

      The nature of our universe is not quantum but qualitative. It is the quality of the relationship between two opposing points, sound is how these two opposing points find a common ground, a fulcrum. The two opposing points are themselves fulcrums between other opposing points and so the universe propagates.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      The first problem we have when "detecting" individual subatomic particles or static Grid charge "pulses" - is that we - and our detectors - exist in/with/ and are made of these same exact entities. How can we accurately detect anything of such a primordial small "size" when we (and our detection devices) display the same properties of the exact thing we are trying to detect?

      I don't believe that particles actually travel at or near the speed of light. Any particle that is being emitted from the sun - in my opinion - is being "pushed along" by the constant and intense, various - frequency pulses/waves of light/energy being relayed through the aether of Dark Matter Quarks - IE - the solar wind...

      "I use this analogy to compare the particles in the solar wind - Like keeping a balloon with regular air in it (not helium) suspended while moving it across the room by blowing at /on it. The air blowing out of your lungs "mostly" goes around and right past the balloon while a portion of the friction/impact actually "pushes" the balloon along."

      Any individual "particle" anywhere in the aether - displays its own charge from the Grid. If the frequency of a particular "particle" is "close to - but not quite in" the Golden Number frequency range - it could be detected as a neutrino. (IE - it "almost" possess the ability to "bond" with other particles - but not solidly or for very long - if at all.)

      I surmise that MOST of the particles in the Dark Matter of the aether are neutral or even negatively charged "Quarks" - and any one that is "detectable" from the rest surrounding it - very well might be because it retains a "close to Golden Number Frequency" and displays SOME properties differing from its NON Golden Number neighbors.

      Any of these "almost" Golden Number Frequency Quarks - could bump into another "almost" Golden Number Frequency Quark - and their individual "frequencies" - cancel each other out - rendering both of them into a definite NON Golden Number Frequency. (Possible anti neutrino.)

      I believe that the detected "particles" are mostly in fact pulses/waves of light and energy. Any actual particles detected "caught up in the solar wind of pulses/waves" could be from any elemental source - IE - sun conduction elemental erosion, etc.

      Or-

      Any pulse/wave detected and thought to be a particle (neutrino) because of properties differing from those of simultaneously detected close proximal "pulses/waves" (also thought to be particles) could be because of what I would call a "pulse/wave signal overload".

      So-

      Each individual Dark Matter Quark that relays the "energy" of the cosmos - is constantly relaying numerous "pulsed signals" from numerous sources - to numerous destinations.

      IE - (In a millisecond) a single Dark Matter aether Quark is obligated to "receive" a "pulse/wave/signal" of various frequencies - from ANY direction and at any time - the Quark is then obligated to "relay" that pulse/wave/signal to the next Quark in a straight line trajectory of the trajectory of the pulse/wave/signals direction of travel (IE - line of fire)

      However - any Quark at any given location can receive two or more (or several) signals - from differing directions - simultaneously - and become "overloaded" when trying to "transmit/relay" them.

      This could result with several outcomes.

      1. The Quark inadvertently emits a pulse/wave/signal relay that COMBINES the energy of all of the received pulses/waves/signals - into a single pulse/wave/signal - of a DIFFERENT frequency than any one of those received - and it might be relayed in a direction NOT in the line of trajectory of ANY of those received.

      IE - the COMBINED power - and trajectories of several "signals" received simultaneously by a single Quark - COULD be relayed out - as a combined SINGLE signal - but at a different frequency - going in a different direction. = NEUTRINO

      2. An individual Quark might get overloaded to the point of where the multiple simultaneously received pulses/waves/signals - (frequencies) "cancel each other out" = ANTINEUTRINO

      3. A Quark might receive several "signals" simultaneously and have its own individual "static" frequency slightly altered because of the overload.

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      I dont deny the probability of EM essennce of cosmos. it was interesting to know your opinion Sharpencil. And what about neutrinos/antineutrinos emanating from the sun, at what range are those probable particles involve in the range of EM waves?

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      I dont deny the probability of electromagnetic essence of cosmos. It was interesting to know your opinion Sharpencil. And what about the neutrinos/ antineutrinos that emmited from the sun, what level are those particles represent in the range of EM waves?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Maybe I missed your actual question - maybe you were asking if I had a way to interpret my theory of how the subatomic electric / electromagnetic interactions of atoms would work in the case of the sun (or a star) actually functioning through nuclear fusion.

      I personally believe the sun (or a star) is indeed an electric transformer.

      However - if it were proven that they instead were in fact nuclear furnaces - I would have to agree that the most plausible explanation (as stated with past/present theories) is that the intense Gravity (Grid penetration in my theory) of a star would be sufficient enough of a force to cause the fusion ( heat and pressure joining) of 2 Hydrogen atoms into 1 Helium atom.

      I don't believe this to be how a star functions - but if it does -

      The astronomical number of fusion energy releases would create a constant and also astronomical amount of intense "pulses/waves" of atomic "joining" of individual atomic electric / electromagnetic "patterns" - IE - photons (pulses/waves created from E-Rings being temporarily separated to allow a second atoms Protons and Neutrons to "join" the "combined" structure - and another photon (pulse/wave) release when the E-Rings are re-assembled around the newly formed and more complex structure.

      The same would be basically true as with my electric version-

      The pulses/waves would have no where to go - but be relayed out through the NON Golden Number particles of the aether.

      My issue with this scenario is two fold-

      1. = The sun (or each star) has a finite number of - or particular amount of (or number of Hydrogen atoms) "sacrificing" themselves for the sake of "energy" - the fuel supply will run out - and as with most "nuclear sun" theories - that is how and why a "star" dies - it basically runs out of fuel.

      2. If there are 2 Hydrogen atoms being sacrificed to make every 1 Helium atom - there must be an astronomical "out of balance" proportion of Hydrogen / to Helium count when a star is "born".

      Furthermore - there should be an exponential eventual "balance" and then eventual "reverse" to the comparative number of these two different atoms present throughout the life of a star.

      And - by the simplistic mathematics of "2 for 1" - the total number of Helium atoms should quite quickly begin to outnumber the total number Hydrogen atoms in a relatively short period of time.

      Remember - every individual "pulse/wave" of light coming from a star - is the death (transformation/elimination) of 2 Hydrogen atoms - in this nuclear theory.

      (And from what I understand this theory to state - there are not any Hydrogen atoms being "made" - there is just a finite number of them being transformed in to Helium.)

      Plus - the rapidly increasing Helium atom "count" should become quite "evident" in a relatively short period of time.

      For a visual of why I believe stars are indeed electrical transformers - look at this link below-

      http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I surmise that there are various "frequency" (vibrations) (a scale) within the "Golden Number" vibrations which particular particles display that make up "mass".

      Certain "frequencies create a "strong bond" and others frequencies create "weaker bonds" within this "Vibration Frequency Golden Number" scale.

      I also surmise that even atomic fusion and fission - are in fact electric/electromagnetic interactions - only at the subatomic level.

      Fusion is the JOINING of atomic structures via pressure and heat - forcing the electric / electromagnetic structures of individual atoms to "share" a single geometric shape - or particular geometric "patterns" for the electric atomic "pulses" to follow.

      Fission is forcing the geometric shape (breaking of the geometric electric pulse "pattern") in a single atom.

      I surmise it with the following 2 analogy's-

      Fission- (separation)

      If you take 2 neodymium magnets (the size of peas - or BB's) and allow them to touch. Then it takes quite a bit of force to separate them.

      In my "theory" - the magnets get their "power" from the static charge of the aether Grid in the first place.

      Now, visualize two (or more) subatomic particles (proton and neutron/electron) bonding in this same fashion - from the same Grid energy source. It is very difficult to separate these subatomic particles.

      However - heat (particular rates / frequencies of pulses bombarding the particles of the atom) - allows the internal pulses of the atom to be more easily "manipulated" - separated - which creates even more heat - with even higher frequency "pulses" resulting when the atoms individual particles are forced to "break apart" the electrical / electromagnetic "bond".

      Fusion - (joining)

      When Golden Number particles form an atom - they have a "balanced" series of geometrically shaped "patterns" that each individual particles electric / electromagnetic "pulses" follow to maintain its particular atomic shape.

      Heat and pressure allow the atoms internal electrical / electromagnetic pulses to be manipulated into "accepting" the electric / electromagnetic "pulses" of another atom to "fuse" into a NEW geometric shape (pattern) for the additional pulses to "share" and "follow" as a COMBINED set of patterns to make two individual atoms become a single "entity".

      Depending on the frequency (particular vibration) of each individual Golden Number frequency atom (element) - (or its "geometrical "pulse" pattern shape) - some are more easily to "fuse" together or - to "separate" their individual particle components - than other Golden Number frequency atoms (elements).

      Melting solder (or we can even use freezing and thawing of water (ice) as an example.

      When heat is applied to an atom - its internal - individual particle electric / electromagnetic "pulses" get excited - or speed up - and the "state" of the atomic structure is more easily manipulated. - IE - ICE atoms MELT (combine) into liquid water.

      IE - when solder (tin & copper) is heated - it MELTS into a liquid - and cools into a solid.

      And when heat is taken away (reduced / IE cooling) the atoms internal pulses are slowed down and LESS easily manipulated.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      S.O.

      I not sure that I understand what you are saying - or maybe how you are saying it...

      The sun (or stars) (in the nuclear furnace theory) supposedly generate "energy" from nuclear FUSION - this is the "melting together" of atomic structures.

      Nuclear FISSION - on the other hand (atomic bombs) is the separation of atomic structures.

      Here is a link to define these two terms-

      http://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/sciences/wh...

      If the sun or stars are actually emanating light/energy from pure radioactivity (nuclear fusion) - then I guess my theory explaining stars as being electrically driven transformers is absolute BS.

      I suppose most of the explanations for the displays/propagation of energy in my theory is still a strong possibility - even if stars are in fact not electric transformers.

      I suppose it is also possible that all atoms exist in some degree of a constant state of radioactive decay. However, if energy is simply the action of the universe "coming apart", then it will only be a matter of time before we are all in big trouble.

      However, I surmise that half life radioactive decay occurs because particular elements display unstable electron (and nucleus) formations and as the "Grid" penetrates (or creates Gravity) on these particular atoms - their atomic structures slowly decay (lose electrons/protons/neutrons) from the "constant" bombardment of "pulses/waves".

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      what if sun/stars and all atoms (by analogy) are made of different kind of radioactive matter (of different densit)y and just exist in splitting state. The steady longlasting radiation is different for all stars hence there are different light/ray speed. How you will explain radioactivity/split in electric universe concept Sharpencil?

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      @ effilnuc... enlighten me... I notice that since we mentioned B-Flat's ability to separate hydrogen from oxygen with vibration way back you have been interested in the vibration of particles. Do you have a bigger thought or agenda? Please share if so, I am interested.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      A beam of light travels in space and it travels in the earths atmosphere.

      I surmise that light is actually a continuous series of electric pulses that are "relayed" from one individual NON Golden Number particle to the next NON Golden Number particle in BOTH places.

      The difference is that in space - these relayed pulses travel UN-interrupted and can be "detected" (seen) from great distances (or they are relayed UN-interrupted until they strike some form of mass.)

      But - in the Earth's atmosphere - the atoms of oxygen/nitrogen/co2 and etc. - interrupt the SAME relay as happens in space - but in the atmosphere - the light pulses are dissipated from the resistance/interruption.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Oh - the heat from the flame of the lighter.

      The "heat" is a small "explosion/expulsion" of various frequency pulses. The Heat is the IMMEDIATE slowing down of the electrical pulses created from the dis-assembly of E rings in the butane and oxygen atoms at the point of "energy transformation". The electrical pulses are slowed down from their initial "speed" - the most intensely as they begin encountering the "atmosphere atoms" directly surrounding the "flame" and the "pulse frequency slowing down" continues as - HEAT DISSIPATION - mostly UPWARD.

      The light frequencies (visible/infra red/etc.) are the pulses/waves that are able to only be initially slowed down enough to "overcome" the initial resistance and begin a "smoother" consistent "relay" outward.

      We can not see the heat - like we can see the light - because the heat is in a pulse frequency that is NOT in the visible light frequency range.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Here on the surface of the Earth - the "energy" is "transformed" by combining different elemental particles of mass with particular circumstances/situations. (heat/pressure/etc.) We exist IN an environment of atoms of mass ALL around us (atmosphere) - and the elements we "combine/transform" are in constant "contact" with these other gaseous elements. So our "perception" of the propagation/transformation of "energy" - is one where there is mass constantly surrounding the masses (elements) being transformed. When (as) the transformation of energy takes place - the "surrounding elements of mass (atmosphere) have an effect on the "display" and "propagation/transformation" of the energy - but out in the aether there is no "constant" presence of mass (atmosphere) to "alter" the transformation/propagation of energy.

      The NON golden number "particles" are completely surrounding every atom of mass - everywhere.

      However - it is the atomic structures of mass that "prevent" these NON golden number particles from "relaying" the transformed/propagated "energy" as efficiently as they do through/out in - the aether where there is no combined particles of mass (atmosphere) to "interrupt" or "alter" the relay.

      We transform the elemental particles in an environment where the "propagation/transformation" of energy is "affected" by the other elements of mass surrounding the "act". (burning wood = wood+oxygen+heat = fire+smoke+carbon dioxide+carbon monoxide.

      Or to start a piece of wood on fire by lighting a fire with a lighter-

      kinetic force+iron+flint= spark+pressurized butane+oxygen= fire

      The light from the lighters fire is a "portion" of the transforming energy - and heat is the other.

      The light is the electrical pulses created from the heat - which is the dis-assembly of oxygen and butane atom Electron rings - which create both light and heat.

      The "visible" portion of the transformation are the micro electric pulses from the E rings being dis-assembled - then relayed through the NON golden number particles outward - and the atoms of oxygen/carbon dioxide and nitrogen in the atmosphere HELP relay the pulses - but they are actually "interrupting" the relay more than they are helping.

      The light is a fast enough frequency "stream of pulses" that it moves through both the NON Golden Number individual particles - outward radially - very quickly and is also somewhat "relayed" (distorted / slowed down) by the E rings of the surrounding gaseous atoms of the atmosphere.

      The heat (temperature change) is created at the immediate location of the butane and oxygen E ring dis-assembly (transformation) - and dissipated upward from the pressure of the "cooler" (heat rises) surrounding atmosphere in the immediate surrounding atoms / E rings/protons/neutrons.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Both.

      Individual particles make up the entirety of the aether. They all vibrate at a subatomic frequency from friction which gives the entire "population" of particles in the aether a collective universal static charge.

      Particular particles that have particular geometric shapes "vibrate" at "Golden Number Frequencies" from the static charge - which causes them to be the particular particles that are able to form "Mass".

      Every mass (compiled "golden number" frequency particles in the vastness of other particles throughout the "aether") create "energy" (light/sound/em fields/etc.) - sends (relayed) these more intense - or lower frequency "vibrations" or "pulses" of energy - out through (propagation) the vastness of the NON Golden Number frequency vibrating particles.

      The combined particles of "MASS" have the ability to create more intense or focus more powerful frequency vibrations/pulses than do the rest of the aether (vastness of individual NON Golden Number particles) and these "more focused" vibrations/pulses (light/sound/etc.) are relayed through the individual NON Golden Number particles - UNTIL the relayed vibration/pulse strikes another MASS.

      The effects of the "impact" of these more intense/focused vibrations/pulses on the secondary mass IS the display of ENERGY.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Sharpencil...waves or particles...which is it?

    • profile image

      N.R 3 years ago

      I do not doubt that they may be picking up proof of some kind of waves. However here is another classic case of labeling it wrong.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Here is a "work in progress" web page with visual references to help explain my Copyrighted Theory for a Unified Electric Universe called "The Good Vibrations".

      (I do not claim any ownership to the visual or expressed ideas from the "references" from which I gather some of my information.

      I have Copyrighted my "Theory" - and the consequences created from - the fact that the universe is a sea - jam packed full of primordial subatomic particles that directly cause the displayed properties of the known universe.

      Maybe this will help explain my Theory in terms more easy to comprehend and relate to.

      Like I said - this reference page is a work in progress...

      www.customaudioproductions.com/Reference_The_Good_Vibrations

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Note taken...

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Research Mr Nobel, you may not be so keen to receive his prize....

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Oh - and dang it - I was hoping to receive the next Nobel Peace Prize...

      For my "Good Vibrations Theory"!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Uh huh - Gravitational waves, Hummm. Could these waves simply be the aether static grid charge spherically entering every body of mass in the universe???

    • profile image

      N.R. 3 years ago

      Stories like this one piss me off. It was on CNN this morning. They start off with, WE DETECTED GRAVITATIONAL WAVES! in the beginning of the story they are like " we detected the mythical gravitational waves Einstein theorized about", then in the end of the story , the last paragraph is like..... We THINK we did! Huh!!!!???? http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/17/tech/innovation/big-...

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      The currently accepted "mind set" for physics is either locked in the stagnant theoretical assumptions of yesterday - or creates "magical" displays which contradict the known laws of physics.

      It seems that the simplest explanation is totally unacceptable by the established physics community.

      There is only a single dimension universe and it is completely driven by electricity in all of the various frequencies it can and does display. The missing factor is that we currently do not have the capability to "detect" the entire spectrum of existing electrical frequencies.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      There is no reason to apologize for anything. I was just having a difficult time grasping what it was exactly that you were saying. This last post was helpful in stating your direct points. I do not agree or disagree. This is what physics is about. Putting our thoughts together like pieces of a puzzle. I will have to check out your link and do some research on it.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Newtons Rival:

      I apologize for not being more specific. I had posted a link to my - self protected Copyrighted - text written - full theory in an earlier post here. Much of my "statement referrals" are directed to my personal - protected / Copyrighted theory. Copyright filed 1/7/2014

      Once again - here is a link to my Copyrighted Theory called "The Good Vibrations"

      www.customaudioproductions.com/The_Good_Vibrations

      If my statements, or personal theory, or my personality are troubling or out of order - I will graciously refrain from posting here - after all - it is your Hub.

      I do not contest any potential for the EM fields of the sun or the planets to be partially or directly responsible for the stable orbits of the planets.

      My theoretical interest rests more in explaining how each entity obtains and maintains Gravity and its EM field.

      I theorize the aether is in fact a sea packed full of subatomic particles - Quarks. This "Grid" maintains a continuous alternating static charge due to constant subatomic friction. I theorize that this static charge (Grid) also tries to maintain a balanced - or equally distributed - electrical equilibrium. However, mass (Mass = particular Quarks displaying particular static electric "frequencies" which attract to compile the strong force = "The Good Vibrations" / IE - Mass) creates resistance in the static Grid equilibrium. The particular size and elemental composition of any mass determines the amount of resistance incurred.

      I surmise this "resistance" to be the cause for Gravity and the EM fields. IE - the flow of the "Grid" into any mass creates Gravity (and its EM field) on/in/around each mass. The flow of the "grid charge" into the largest mass in an "area" will have a pulling effect on any smaller mass in the "area". And possibly the "repulsions" of the EM fields between masses in the "area" creates stable orbits.

      To understand the full effects my theory implicates on most known states of matter, energy and etc. - one would have to read through the entirety of my theory to understand my theoretical views on any particular individual aspect/statement I have made here in this Hub.

      Again, I apologize to you Newtons Rival (and any or everyone else) if my statements or views have offended in any way.

      Sincerely...

      Sharpencil

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      @ sharp pencil. The sun flipping magnetic positions should have no reason to cause havoc amongst the planets. It still has the opposite magnetic pull from the earth. It is the earths north that repels the suns north. It is how the earth is constructed that stops the pull. We must remember the earths core in this situation. The magnetosphere ______to the core "pushes". The magnetosphere__________to the sun "pushes." Therefore maintaining the stability. If you still do not grasp this perhaps an illustration is in order.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      @ sharp pencil, I am trying to understand what you are saying. Please specify your direct points. You said "you own this" I assume you mean you have a great knowledge of what is being discussed, however I am finding it difficult to weave in and out of your posts to grasp your power points and comprehend what it is that you are trying to have highlighted. Can you please state your position precisely. on another note: If you post copyrighted material. Please state Copyright "Protected" and give the date and source of the information. Please properly reference what you post. When a post is linked to a video or page, that is a proper reference, however other things that are just written should be referenced. Unless you copyrighted it yourself, in which case please be sure to state this along with the word "protected". Thanks.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Dov Henis-

      I tried the links you posted (and other links on the pages the links took me to) but I only get the same basic statements as you made in your post here???

      So I ask you directly - where do all of these non biological particles - such as gravitons, and/or "elementary particles" and etc. - get their energy to function?

    • profile image

      Dov Henis 3 years ago

      איך נברא היקום יש מאין

      Origin And Nature of the Universe

      New Science 2013 versus classical science

      Classical Science Is Replaced By 2013 Gravity Comprehension !!!

      http://universe-life.com/2014/02/24/gravity/

      Attn classical science hierarchy, including Darwin and Einstein…

      “I hope that now you understand what gravity is and why it is the monotheism of the universe…DH”

      =================================

      Gravity is the natural selection of self-attraction by the elementary particles of an evolving system on their cyclic course towards the self-replication of the system. Period

      ( Gravitons are the elementary particles of the universe. RNA nucleotides genes and serotonin are the elementary particles of Earth life)

      כח המשיכה

      כח המשיכה הוא הבחירה הטבעית להיצמדות הדדית של חלקיקי היסוד של מערכת מתפתחת במהלך התפתחותה המחזורית לעבר שיכפולה. נקודה

      ( הגרוויטון הוא חלקיק היסוד של היקום. הגנים, הנוקלאוטידים של חומצה ריבונוקלאית והסרוטונין הם החלקיקים היסודיים של חיי כדור הארץ)

      Dov Henis(comments from 22nd century)

      http://universe-life.com/2013/11/14/subverting-org...

      http://universe-life.com/2013/09/03/the-shortest-g...

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      I reckon that there is only one thing that is conducted from the sun to earth...heat is not conducted through space. Heat appears at points of interference between fields. Heat appears at the surface of the sun (cold heat) and at the surface of the earth (hot heat). The sun is a vacuum for electrons...it is a massive positive voltage. The electrons collide at the surface as there is only so many that can fit through the sun's boundary layer at any one instant.

      The only thing that is conducted from the sun to earth is a whole range of electromagnetic waves, the voltage/gravity field (1), and the magnetic field (9) create a matrix of points (2) and (0) at which electromagnetic energy appears and disappears in a form that appears as waves through the field.

      When the sun's electromagnetic field interferes with another electromagnetic field, interference occurs and heat appears. The heat from the sun is not conducted to earth. Rather, the heat appears at points of electromagnetic interference.

      Its similar to how a coil of wire can create more heat with the same ac current than a straight wire due to the electromagnetic interference.

      The static grid you speak of is not a quantum grid, it cannot be quantized, but rather it is a qualitative grid. It is a set of mathematical relationships that define how and when energy will eternally manifest to restore universal balance...harmony...good vibrations!

      Each of the 5 fields exist through mathematical relationships defined by this energy grid, and the four elements or points manifest at defined instants/intersects between the field lines on this grid. Energy is the derivative everywhere between the intersects or elements. Energy therefore defines and maintains the 'space' between the four elements and five fields.

      So, 5 fields (which appear to be energy fields as they are defined by the energy grid) plus four elements plus 1 space = Universe (10)

      A universe (10) and 5 fields and 4 elements = 19 = 1 + 9 = 10 and so on....

      It is an infinite scalar Multiverse eternally expanding AND forever reducing to a single Universe. Thanks to energy, the fields and elements can never condense back to a singularity, nor can they expand beyond a totality...they oscillate or vibrate between the two....with energy gluing them together...a set of mathematical laws.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Just as we can not see light traveling through space until it strikes a body of mass - we also can not see any other form of energy (frequency) traveling through space until there is some form of a display of "contact" on a body of mass.

      I find it extremely difficult to believe that any form of energy (frequency) simply appears, or originates, at a body of mass at point "A" and the displayed consequences of that energy manifests on a mass at point "B" without a medium to do so.

      There is a multitude of high speed "pulses" (a constant battering) received and transmitted by each individual quark through a multitude of energy trajectories encountered by any given quark. Any quark in the path of any energy frequencies trajectory - is obligated to "relay" the signal in between any other signals already being relayed.

      We see light as a stream - and at night - several hundred stars are sending out continuous pulses of light that could potentially be relayed by a single quark near your eyeball. The quark relays these individual pulses so quickly and efficiently - we see them as individual streams from several stars in the sky - but in reality - the individual frequencies of each stars "light" is a series of high speed pulses - alternating through the quarks in the line of trajectory.

      We, and our detection devices, are made of, and interact with, the same energies (relayed pulses) we are trying to detect. That is why any obvious display of their existence eludes our detection/perception.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I guess I frayed away from the subject of the effects of a detectable increase in energy originating from a mass at point "A" and the resulting effects being displayed on, or at, a mass at point "B".

      My theory surmises that the display of increased energy at point "A" is relayed by a physical quantum (transmission) through the aether to point "B" by means of the universal grid using its static "at rest" energy potential. The grid does not amplify any "signal" - rather - each individual quark merely draws only the necessary energy to relay the exact same level of each individual incoming pulse "frequency" to the next quark - along/through the line of trajectory - until the pulse strikes another entity (atom(s) of mass.

      The static grid is universally friction energized - and it serves as "fuel" for Gravity / Core functions / EM fields (etc.) on bodies of mass. It also serves as a multi - directional (type of UN-confined fiber-optic) medium for the transmission of energy - from any mass of higher energy origin - to other masses in the line(s) of trajectory - in the various frequencies of energy.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      effilnuc - I agree that energy is present continuously everywhere.

      However, if I correctly understand your answer to my question - you are saying that the light and heat the earth receives from the sun does not travel the distance between the two entities - rather it is a simultaneous and instantaneous reaction that has no transfer through distance or time. It works as a manifestation in an unknown system and only when there is demand - and it can not be quantized.

      I understand and appreciate your point of view because I agree that energy is a universal constant. However, I believe it is, or can be, quantized - but it is difficult, if not impossible, to detect it - at rest in its "static energy state". It is only noticeable or detectable when the static energy level is resisted, or "changed" by mass into a higher level energy display.

      However, my theory "The Good Vibrations" delivers the same "result" as what you are indicating - but I surmise there is a "medium" by which both the universal energy exists and by which the higher energy displays caused from individual disturbances of mass in the universal constant MUST traverse between entities of mass or every entity in the universe would have a direct and equal energy impact on every other entity in the universe.

      I theorize that the aether grid of static energy is at rest until disturbed - or resisted by mass. The static universal grid displays varying results depending on the elemental make up of any individual entity of mass. The largest mass in a resisted/quantized area is the focal point for smaller mass within the same resisted/quantized area affected by the larger mass.

      IE - the largest mass of the sun makes it the focal point for the solar system - and the medium masses of the planets make them the focal point for the smaller masses of their moons/satellites.

      The spherical/radial flow of the universal static grid into the larger mass of the sun - creates a "pull" or "energy pressure" on the surrounding masses - making the sun the "focal" point of the solar system. The less intense localized universal grid "pressure" on planets makes them the focal point for their moons. But the largest mass of the sun makes it the focal point for all smaller masses in the solar system. (IE - any smaller mass within the radial outward extent of NEEDED flow into the sun to equalize the energy resistance due to its largest mass/elemental component demands in the "area".)

      This manifestation of "Gravity", in my theory, is directly due to variable degrees of - on demand - energy levels of quantized universal aether grid flow into each individual entity of mass by means of high speed frequency relayed pulses/waves. The calculations for energy demand by any entity of mass are derived from two factors - the size of the mass AND the elemental make up of the mass.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Same as a falling object...the energy appears as the instantaneous rate of change of gravity/voltage, it is not stored in the earth or in the object falling, it gathers around the falling object and expresses itself through the point of impact.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Take any capacitor or battery, the amount of energy or power it contains is directly related to the discharge rate of the capacitor or battery (the advertised capacity or energy rating is an average). The only way this is possible is if the energy is not stored in the battery or capacitor itself, rather the energy appears instantaneously and proportionately to the instantaneous rate of change of the voltage/gravity!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi Sharpencil, I do not believe there is any means of propagation or transmission...there is no substance by which energy is transferred or transmitted, radiated or condensed.

      The same amount of Energy is everywhere, at all times.

      It appears or manifests within a system as and when required, it appears in the apparent vector required to balance the rate of change in the system...magnetism changes gravity/voltage changes current changes torque changes acceleration changes magnetism. As the ratios between these concurrent rates of change vary, the heat radiated or condensed varies accordingly. IF the ratios of the derivatives are harmonious, superconducting occurs. This occurs within every atomic, biological or electromechanical system.

      Energy is not measurable, it is not quantifiable (except as a ratio)...it can only by qualified. Energy is work done to restore balance or create imbalance. It appears as change and disappears as the status quo.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      How about this analogy-

      If a metal detector could be designed to "detect" individual subatomic particles - it would constantly give "FALSE Positive" readings because the detector itself is made of subatomic particles and it would subsequently, and constantly, detect its own subatomic particles. (Even in a scientific supposed vacuum.)

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Oh - IE - the haystack -

      And while trying to detect a particular strand of hay in the stack of identical strands - one is using an identical strand of hay as a detector.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      effilnuc. I understand and embrace some of your conclusions.

      However, what is your stance on the means for transmission/propagation of energy once it "leaves" the source of kinetic origin? (In a scientifically supposed "vacuum".) IE - light from a star?

      I agree that for energy to be "detectable" it must have organized particles of mass involved in its creation/propagation/change properties.

      However, ALL known or manufactured devices used to "detect" the presence of - or displayed properties of - "energy" - are (were) created (manufactured) at - or in the "ZERO" - or consist of the same displayed properties as does the "control" state of energy itself.

      IE - it is difficult to detect a particle, or the state of a particle, with a detection device that is constructed with, or displays the same properties - as does the particles and state of particles that one is trying to detect.

      IE - looking for an unknown property display from a single, particular, strand of hay in a haystack consisting of identical strands of hay.

      This is where the differing displayed properties of various elemental masses CREATES the possibility to detect energy and etc. with a "CONTROL" to work from.

      However, this "CONTROL" is only established AFTER THE FACT.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Point being energy is NOT A QUANTUM. It is found in the relationship between quantities...it is the quality that relates quantity.

      There is no particle that contains energy in an of itself. Only through relationships between particles, objects people or ideas does one discover ENERGY!

      1 electron has no energy. Only two electrons, or an electron and proton or electron and neutron has energy....and only then when the relationship between those particles CHANGES, does energy reveal itself!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Whoops, I think 7 velocity might be 7 acceleration or light?

      A constant acceleration = no free energy, but a positive rate of change of acceleration = radiation and a negative rate of change of acceleration = condensation.

      Ie all matter is accelerating. Some matter accelerates fast, some matter accelerates slow, this is irrelevant. The rate of change of acceleration is what determines the energy. To accelerate at a constant speed, requires no additional energy. To increase or decrease the speed of acceleration requires additional energy.

      To change voltage or current at a constant rate requires no energy...it is balanced. To change the ratio of voltage or the rate of flow of current requires energy.

      Energy only flows through wires when the voltage is changing, the rate of change of voltage determines the amount of energy or power.

      A conventional generator has a sine wave rate of change of voltage and current. In order to extract free energy, the system needs to use elliptical sine waves at ratios based on 9 periods per cycle as opposed to 4 periods per cycle (conventional).

      Free energy appears whenever there is a change in the rate of change.

      The rate of change of distance between earth and an object falling towards earth is increasing which leads to free energy that builds up.

      The rate of change of acceleration of an object orbiting earth is zero, so there is no build up of free energy in either the earth or the object.

      The rate of change of distance of an object leaving earth is decreasing which leads to a decrease in free energy.

      The rate of change of acceleration of an object travelling near the speed of light that travels faster is so tiny, that very little free energy is available whether it increases or decreases acceleration. However, the rate of change when a photon hits and is absorbed is so enormous, that the free energy is felt in the form of radiation.

      The rate of change of acceleration of a photon when it leaves something is so fast that it too can be felt in the form of condensation. The area surface of the sun is cold as it is condensing energy due to the rapid acceleration from 0 to lightspeed of the photon!

      The outer atmosphere of the earth is hottest where the rate of deceleration is greatest as the photons are intersected and deflected...radiation energy.

      Positive rate of change is hot, radiating, expanding

      Negative rate of change is cold, condensing, contracting

      Constant rate of change is neutral

      By understanding, manipulating and harnessing rates of change of each force field, free energy can be redirected for intentionally applied outcomes. Free energy cannot be stored as such, it is only available if it is being used to restore balance.

      So in essence, free energy can be tapped by intentionally creating imbalance. When the free energy rushes in to restore balance, some of it is redirected for another purpose...usually to create imbalance elsewhere.

      A piece of timber is held in balance so no free energy is flowing into it. By setting the timber on fire, an imbalance is created, free energy flows in to restore balance. The rate of change is positive so radiation and heat is experience.

      A piece of ice in a freezer is in balance so no free energy is flowing into it. Place the ice outside to melt, an imbalance is created and free energy flows in to restore balance. The rate of change is negative so condensation and cooling is experienced.

      Rub two rough materials together. Free energy enters the system to maintain balance in the atomic structure. The rate of change is positive so heat and radiation occur.

      Allow a condensed gas to rapidly expand. Free energy enters the system to restore balance. The rate of change is negative so cooling occurs.

      Compress a gas rapidly into a sealed chamber. Free energy enters the system to restore balance. The rate of change is positive so radiation and heating occur.

      In all these cases it is the RATE of burning, melting, expanding, compressing that determines the energy available.

      If the volume of material is the same, how can the energy released change according to how fast or slow the RATE of change was? This is not what we are taught at school. We are taught that a block of wood has x joule of energy and and ice block has y joules of energy and that x amount of gas in a container has y joules of energy.

      In truth, the amount of energy available is determined by the rates of change occurring in the system. A block of wood has no energy until some sort of change of imbalance is placed on it. IE it is picked up and gains potential energy, it falls off a cliff and has kinetic energy, it deteriorates slowly, rotting and radiates, it deteriorates rapidly burns and radiates. The block of wood has zero energy until change is imposed. The amount of energy available is directly proportionate and seems to oppose the rate of change that is occurring. This applies to everything and anything, not just electromagnetic fields...oh hang on, that's right, we live in an electromagnetic universe! The observer is always part of the system hence why the energy seems to oppose the direction of rate of change.

      Matter can be created and destroyed. I have kids...trust me!

      Matter is not energy....obtaining it and destroying requires a lot of energy!

      Energy is the quality which balances the rate of change between gravity, voltage, current, torque, acceleration and magnetism. Energy is the quality that balances the forces that hold our quantum world together.

      As a quality, energy is everywhere, is freely available, cannot be created, cannot be destroyed, cannot be sold, cannot be bought and cannot be used.

      Energy can only be felt and experienced. It is felt and experienced in the balance that exists between all things. It is felt as warmth or cooling, it is felt as acceleration or pushing or pulling or stopping or growing or melting or vibrating or light. Energy is never held, it has never been sampled or biopsied or discovered, or owned or generated or created. Energy comes and goes when and where it is needed to maintain balance in the rate of change of the universe. The total rate of change of the universe must equal 0. The rates of change within various parts of the universe may be positive or negative. Energy appears wherever there is positive or negative rates of change such that the local rate of change appears to be zero also....the laws of thermodynamics.

      Sorry, that was a bit long, kinda gotta on a roll!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      You know how they say they universe is numbers and maths rules the universe, well I was wondering if I could allocate the 9 numbers to 9 different things that make up the universe.

      Here is what I came up with, it is pretty simple.

      1 is Gravity/Voltage - I have concluded that the word for voltage and gravity actually mean the same thing!

      2 is electron

      3 is electric current

      4 is neutron

      5 is torque

      6 is proton

      7 is velocity

      8 is Atom/matter

      9 is Magnetism

      0 is the zero point between magnetism and gravity/voltage.

      The cycle is clockwise

      1,3,5,7,9 are force fields

      2,4,6,8 are points of force

      A change in the rate of change of an odd number causes change in the next odd number clockwise around the circle. Ie Voltage effects current, effects torque, effects velocity effects magnetism. These are multiplied or subtracted.

      The even numbers add together to build bigger points! The can only be added or divided.

      Magnetism effects voltage/gravity instantly and voltage/gravity effects magnetism instantly as they are separated by the zero point.

      All other effects are based around the leverage point of the even number between them. Voltage/gravity uses electrons to create current..123.

      A change in current effects the neutrons, torque, protons, velocity and atoms before the magnetic field is effected...hence the pronounced delay between change in current and change in magnetic field of various materials.

      A change in voltage/gravity effects electric current almost instantly.

      A change in velocity effects the magnetic field almost instantly which then effects the voltage, then the current, then the torque.

      Every time the cycle goes from 1 to 9 through the zero point and back to 1, energy is released into our system based on the rate of change of change! The centre of mass, or centre of gravity that lies between the numbers 8 and 1 is 9, the magnetic centre. A system or body that has a centre of mass, now has its own magnetic field...gravitational field.

      A traditional generator follows this principal but does not go full cycle and hence needs fuel.

      It destroys number 8, matter in order to achieve a constant rate of change of velocity, then torque, then current, then voltage, then magnetic field, at which time it destroys more matter to keep the cycle going in reverse.

      It is possible to build a generator that uses the natural cycle of numbers to focus and harness EMF using earth's gravity/magnetic field rather than from the destruction of matter.

      A generator has voltage, electrons, current, neutrons, torque, protons, velocity, matter, centre of mass and magnetic field...123456789

      Using geometry one can set up a generator that needs only an initial pulse to create an initial rate of change to start the cycle. Each cycle period, the generator extracts enough energy as it passes through the zero point to service its load and maintain constant rate of change of torque to maintain the cycle.

      There are 5 interacting fields around 4 points, that's the geometry bit...binary computers are incapable of calculating, no matter how powerful!! The points cannot be in same place at same time but the fields can. Where the 5 fields intersect, potential points exist!

      The rate of change of and between fields either radiates or condenses free energy! Increasing rate of change radiates, decreasing rate of change condenses. The sine/cosine wave!

      The rates of change could be for example

      1/9 to 8/9 which is increasing, or radiating

      8/9 to 1/9 which is decreasing, or condensing

      9/18 to 9/18 which neither radiating nor condensing!

      Negative voltage or negative current is actually irrelevant! It is the increasing or decreasing rate of change of voltage and current that determines energy or power! This is where the -1 in Lenz law is wrong!

      Energy is free when the rate of change of any field is increasing or decreasing. Elliptical orbit is constantly changing rate of change, electrons follow elliptical orbits for this reason. Electrons are maintaining the free energy flow that feeds the atomic structure. Without the elliptical orbit of the electron, the free energy would not condense towards the centre or radiated from the centre of the atom to maintain its state of equilibrium.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I forgot to mention - that the Created Friction CHARGE is merely passed (relayed) from Electron to Electron in the atoms of the wire-

      And the magnetic field around the wire is created from this "Electron pulse relay" because the now "busy" Electrons are forcing the DM Quarks normal pulses of GRAVITY to be slightly "interrupted" and as long as the current is energized (interrupting) - the surrounding Dark Mater Quarks will display the magnetic field - while ALSO creating Gravity on the wire itself.

      COPYRIGHTED

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      An electric generator (stator and rotor) spin a magnetic field (rotor) inside several coils of wound copper wire (stator) - which creates an electric current.

      The current theory is that the Electrons themselves "shift" or move down the "line" of copper atoms - from atom to atom - in/through the wire.

      I agree that as the North pole and South pole of the magnetic field take turns passing by the copper coils (rotates) each pole has an affect on the electrons in the atoms of the wire (eddy currents) The N pole "Pushes" on the Electrons in the coils and the South Pole "Pulls" on the electrons in the wire.

      HOWEVER - this "back and forth" shifting is NOT making the electrons "jump" from one atom to the next!

      Just as the magnetic field is present WITHOUT a copper coil - the ever present Dark Matter Quarks are relaying the magnetic field into the DM Quarks ALL around the Electrons in the atoms of the copper wire and creating FRICTION from the "back and forth" (rotation) motion of the magnetic field!

      The friction in turn creates small "pulses" of "static electric charge" that - as the speed of the rotor increases - the "pulses" have no choice but to "flow" down/along the wire - AWAY from the point of FRICTION - and the ELECTRIC CURRENT is CREATED!

      Electricity is just a SLOWER frequency than/of - light - and light itself is not a particle - it too is a pulse/wave being transmitted (relayed from Dark Matter Quark to Dark Matter Quark)

      IT'S ALL ABOUT THE PULSES/WAVES.

      Everything is held/pushed/pulled/pressed together by these Good Vibrations!

      COPYRIGHTED!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Ever wonder just exactly how, or why, an electric generator/alternator "makes" electricity? Its does just "pull" it out of the air - but not from nothing or nowhere!

      I know its all in the charging of "electrons" but its caused by the INTERACTION between the electromagnetic field of the magnet and the copper wound coils that "corral" the aether static grid and force it into a contained electric current. Similar to what is happening on a STAR!

    • profile image

      NR 3 years ago

      Gotta say , I love the thought processes that are flying around here. I love Tesla he is a favorite of mine. I love to see so much communication, collaboration and elimination of processes going on. It helps all of us to be more open minded and to think and explore more and more. You guys are great! Very inspirational.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I'm telling you - I own this thing!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Oh yea - radioactivity - is caused from a similar interaction with the Electrons of particular types of mass reeking havoc on the flow of the Universal Grid as it creates GRAVITY!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Want more proof that the universe is driven exclusively by electric pulses and waves?

      (I've updated Gravity and Electrical Conduction and added Magnetism/Electromagnetism in "The Good Vibrations".)

      (Currently Up-Dating my Copyright)

      (MAGNETISM / ELECTROMAGNETISM)

      A magnetic field uses the DM Q’s to relay the magnetic (electrical pulses/waves) signals; however an electric current uses the Electrons of GNR/FCS Mass to relay the signals.

      (EXAMPLE)

      Visualize a small wire that has a 110 volt current flowing through it. Then visualize the wire being cut two times with a ten inch long piece cut out of the center of the wire (the circuit has been broken). Now visualize placing a thin, but very large (square) window glass in between the cut ends of the wire. Now visualize pulling both cut ends of the cut wires up to either flat side of the glass, in the center, so that the only thing keeping the wires from touching is the thin layer of glass between the cut ends. Even though the ends of the cut wires are only a fraction of an inch part - they will not conduct the electric current through the glass and reconnect the circuit. This is because the glass is an insulator of electric current – or its nucleus's do not contain enough Electrons in the correct formation to conduct an electric current.

      Now, take away the wires and replace them with magnets. The magnets will attract and repel each other right through the glass, with no problem, because a magnetic field uses MOSTLY - DM Q’s to relay the signal – NOT the Electrons in mass. This is why an electromagnetic field will “connect” or “work” right through almost any mass – depending on the strength of the EM field and the thickness and/or density of the mass.

      The denser the mass – (particular Electron groups – IE metals) the BETTER it will conduct an electric current. HOWEVER – the denser the mass - the WEAKER an electromagnetic field will penetrate.

      (END EXAMPLE)

      An EM field MUST have a “medium” to “work its magic”! = DM Q’s!

      (MAGNETS)

      An iron bar has little magnetism when it is made. However, when the bar has an electric current applied to it – it becomes an electromagnet. This is because the nucleus's (Electron groups) of Iron will “align” with the flow of electricity - but most other elements of GNR/FCS do not have this particular property. And, if enough current is applied – the bar will retain the electromagnet field (the Electrons “retain” this particular “alignment”) once the current is taken away and the Iron bar becomes magnetized.

      This is because ANY conducted flow of electricity (relay of current through Electrons of mass) causes the DM Q’s in the surrounding area to also align a portion of the static Grid of DM/PG current to have its direction of flow “altered”. This means that the more powerful the conducted current – the more powerful the EM field.

      The DM/PG Grid still has a gravitational “pull” on an energized conduction wire. However, when the electrons in a conductive wire are energized – the surrounding DM Q’s are forced to allow their natural DM/PG Grid pulses to sequentially “alternate” back and forth from Gravity – to EM field - in high speed alternating pulses.

      A permanent magnet simply has retained the “Electron” alignment that forces the surrounding DM Q’s to CONTINUE to alternate their pulses – even though there is no electric current present. This is how Electromagnets work too.

      The particular “alignment” of certain GNR/FCS elemental Electrons (Iron) - within a magnetic field – causes the DM/PG Grid flow to be interrupted from being a single flow of GRAVITY alone. The DM/PG Grid flow becomes slightly “trapped” in an “alternating cycle” as it tries to flow through the “magnetized” mass. The particular Electron arrangement of a magnetized element of GNR/FCS causes the DM/PG Grid flow to “circulate” AROUND the mass with a portion (half?) of the DM Q/Grid “alternating” pulses.

      (This is also why a magnet/electromagnet will only adhere (have an affect on) Iron (ferrite) and not other elements. Because the AVAILABILITY of correct particular Electron group positioning MUST be present in the secondary object of mass. IE – When a magnet is near a piece of Iron/ferrite – it “magnetizes” the appropriate portion of Electrons in the secondary object – depending on the SIZE of the secondary object – and the size/strength of the primary magnet.)

      The “transfer” of Electron “organization” from one object to another in magnetism MUST have the medium of DM Q’s and the energy of the DM/PG static Grid to do so!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      All I need is a decently equipped lab to prove this! (And demonstrate the plausible/probable state/function of several other supposedly unresolved issues...)

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      All bodies of mass demonstrate Gravity as the static flow of the Grid travels to the Core (equally - spherically/radial) in between the atomic structures of mass. When the Grid flow comes to a central focal point (spherically/radial) at the Core - Induction occurs and the static Grid flow is forced (restricted/resisted) into a contained electrical charge. (The +Positive and -Negative poles are formed.) This causes the ferrite core to magnetize and the electromagnetic field is formed.

      The -Negative "ground" (contained electrical charge) displays energy/heat by convection in the elemental mass surrounding the core to dissipate the "heat/energy" created outward by using the Electrons of the atomic structures of the mass.

      The incoming static Grid charge balances the necessary input "flow" to equalize with the particular size (induction/convection) demands of the core and surrounding elemental components (particular number of available Electrons / IE atomic weight - which determines the Gravitational properties AND the EM field properties of the mass.

      The elemental components/size of the core, and elemental components surrounding the core - determine the "state" of the mass = IE - planet, star, etc.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      The aether static Grid encounters HIGHER resistance in DENSER elemental mass. However, contained electric current encounters HIGHER resistance in LESS DENSE mass.

      The aether Grid must work AROUND atomic nucleus's and electrons - however, contained electric current USES the electrons to propagate.

      These two electric/electromagnetic entities work together - but in opposing manors of propagation.

    • profile image

      Sharpencil /Audiowriter 3 years ago

      I believe the universal aether can be somewhat compared to an electrical circuit board (such as a computers). The information (light/energy-waves/pulses) are transmitted with little energy - however - to make anything of mass propagate (move) through the aether (within or outside of a gravitational field) requires the conversion of (waves/pulses) into higher levels of energy. The "information" (energy) itself is propagated (relayed) by the static charge from one quark to the next by means of each quarks individual CONSTANTLY REPLENISHED static charge being used to relay the signal(s).

      This is also how gravity works. The aether's static "Grid" charge enters any and all bodies of mass by means of relays of the static charge through the aether of Quarks as it flows to the core of a mass. As the charge passes by/through (and somewhat interacts with) the Electrons of elements of any secondary mass near the primary mass, the interaction with the electrons manifests in a "pull" of the atomic structure of the secondary mass toward the core of the primary mass. This "gravitational pull" affects atomic MASS as well as pulses/waves of LIGHT and any ENERGY within the "field" or "flow" into a primary mass.

      That's why differing weights fall at the same speed (they are pulled by the same power of "gravitational" force) - however, the DENSITY (number of electrons/atomic weight) of the atomic structure of a secondary mass determines its weight at REST in the "gravitational field" of the primary mass.

      Its ALL about the relayed pulses and waves of energy.

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      N. R. as to swiss watch and teleportation it may be a hoax. But if not I think the only explanation is that there exist parallel realities with time difference of milisecond in each of them. that is every possibilites exist. it can explain the swiss watch phenomena that is a product of 400 yrs ago in Switserland but not on Earth... the hard problem for me is how it appeared or teleported here. As to the cell talking woman in Chaplin film it could be producer's idea to make surprise the future generation as they could predict it could be invented in future. In medeivil times, even 13 th century or early R. Bacon then John Dee and many others could use mirrors like remote watching. in 1600 people use a device to communicate in distance. it was similar to our radio equipment . two man took a compass inside where adapted alphabet and when one of them move the arrow to a sertain letter the other compass arrow also moved in far distance...

      I tend to believe Montauk experiment by Dunkan Cmeroon. There is an iron truth in Dunkans saying thats why I bilieve him. In that experiment Dunkan was sitted on a chair made by Tesla and in high magnetic field he could open a virtual yime portal in space and what is interesting - people stepped into it get losted. its amazing, even someones returned from far future with samples. The fact is that our mind have direct influence on reality and can create everything. if our reality doesnt differed from our imagination than our reality could be someones imagination. I can explain teleportation by mind as in avatar film, but the facts shows that phisical matter also teleported...or may be traveled by extraterrestrials. Its obvious that humans had lived on Earth over millions years ago.

      Anyway we may say that living being, mind is more fundamental, even our Universe can be a living entity inside whom we live now and trying to explain -is the space inside it magnetic or electric. the answer is we are , it is in us.

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      Sharpencil I like in your theory that photons do not travel through space but are relay signaling or rythmic pulsation. It may be true as rythmic pulsation is present everywhere which represent quantum phenomena. Its like an algorithm where the same sequences iritated creating an illusion of movement or steadiness. Though in your theory the main base is electricity I think there must be another level of field and interaction which may influence on photons. It might be a superweak field of subatomic vibrations which make thick interferenced web, an overall matrix through which manifests EM field. It's called also subtle field or energy. Living organisms, mind can affect on it and interact with that field. (see Garyaev- DNA Fanthom). It could be a level low beneath EM field but the same as magnetism such as gravity as another expression of magnetism in an octave higher. And I think the interaction must be higher than in EM field, as faster rythmic pulsation than photons are. Our Universe is a unified whole where I think unfolding an algorythm just like us.

      Effilnuc your idea about sun is excellent.Do you know that russian astronomist N. A. Kozirevalso thought that sun is a machine which get its energy from TIME. He considered time as carrier of energy and also it has density, can reflect as light beam and be measured. He said time flow has two dirrections and can change its flow. its a pseudoscalar and makes principle distinction between left and right and all life forms has asymmetry as in antiworld there is symmetry. He calculated time flow as C2=2200km/s

    • profile image

      Sharpencil / Audiowriter 3 years ago

      Monty Childs (SAFIRE) If your hearing me - I can help with making it work...

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      R = Resonant Frequency

      The Resonant Frequency divides the Energy Quanta at the velocity of Light

      Thanks for the Link.

    • profile image

      S. O. 3 years ago

      by the way I found a cool websyte where is written Tesla's energy equation was C=E/R in his dynamic gravity theory. I am not spec in pysic/math. anybody knows what this can mean and what "R" means here?

      here is the link

      http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_...

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      hi Effilnuc. I haven't finished it yet, but as it be ready I'll send you.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Anybody out there in the established scientific community willing to "help" me here! I will share! I don't want to have to file any law suits!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I have revised the effects/reactions that the static Grid has on masses of differing elemental compositions. Included are the potential for creation of gravity, and the interactions/consequences of the Grid on the cores of stars & planets. I believe I have sufficiently explained how this works in my layman's terms. I know I do not possess the institutionally and commonly accepted equation/descriptions to render my theory mathematically "plausible".

      But, I know that I'm right about what I now understand.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I believe what you have discovered (or uncovered) is one of a few possible ways to induce dual electromagnetic fields to partially cancel out gravity, or at least cause a neutral zone.

      Gravity is the flow of the static charge in the aether into every mass. Depending on the size of the mass, the elemental properties of the core and of the mass, is what determines the strength of both gravity - and the EM field around the mass.

      Your EM fields might be creating a neutral zone in the static flow into the core of the earth.

      I'm not sure what will happen when you begin rotating your EM fields at higher speeds?

      However, if you could focus your field, or direct the neutral zone on demand, you possibly have found a way to maneuver the coils (and EM field within the coils) plus an "object" within the field - around while cancelling out planetary gravity. Anti gravitational object.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      @ Sharpencil

      Have you done experiments with the magnetic field of a bifilar or trifalar Tesla pancake coils?

      From experiments that I have done, it seems that gravity is a product of electromagnetic fields and rotation....

      I am not sure of the relevance, but I have designed and built a device that generates a doughnut like magnetic field that has North South at the center and South North around the circumference...the direction of the magnetic field at the centre of the the circle is opposite to that at the exterior of the circle. There seems to be no field in between the centre and circumference. A shaft runs through the centre and its manetic field is North South along its length but at the centre it is South North.

      When a trifilar Tesla pancake coil is held at a precise position relative to the shaft and rotating magnetic fields, an EMF is induced in the coil. When I close the circuit, a current flows along the wire in the coil, yet the magnetic field induced by the current does NOT oppose the original magnetic field...

      I think this has something to do with Michael Faraday's 'Paradox'.

      From my calculations, if I can spin the external magnetic field (in which the coil sits) at a speed of 10,800 RPM (based on the dimensions of my prototype), the entire device will either increase in weight, or decrease in weight, depending on the orientation of the coil to the magnetic field. It should be diagravitic...(like diamagnetic) a gravitational field that opposes that in which it is found.

      I intend to test this later in the month once I have finished building a more sturdy frame and another trifalar Tesla coil, will keep you posted...

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      @ Subjective Observer,

      I would love to read a copy of your Sensory Perception and Reality document.

      Thanks.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I checked out Dr. Electrics web site. Very cool and interesting!

      He might take interest in my "theory" or "ideas" for experimenting, but I'm not sure what could be done other than me giving him specific instructions on what and how to perform the experiments I have in mind. Because I don't have the capitol to "take a trip" to Australia - even if he were to actually invite me to mosey "down under".

      I'll send him a note and I thank you Chris, for the blind referral! :)

    • chrisdildilio profile image

      chrisdildilio 3 years ago

      Sharpencil, do you know Dr. Electric? http://www.tesladownunder.com/

      Might want to send him an email. I surely think he would be interested.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Ideally I would like the temporary use of an existing high tech electrical theory lab to set up and perform a series of experiments.

      That's mainly what I'm referring to when I say "investing".

      Currently, I am restricted to the basics in my small basement lab. (240 volt AC access with several "customized" apparatuses and subject devices/items to manipulate/create a range of electrical conditions/situations. I have very little detection/documentation abilities though.

      However, to build the necessary lab would require the following (I'm purposely not going to be extremely specific here -

      1. Acquiring materials for - & building individual lab experiment environments.

      2. Acquire raw materials for - & building custom experiment electrical components/devices/apparatuses.

      3. Acquire the raw materials for - & building custom experiment subject items and related.

      4. Acquiring proper detection and documentation devices.

      That, my friend, is a fairly DEEP pocket full of cash! Not to mention the "time" involved in ordering, assembling, experimenting and documenting.

      I'm sure just the BASIC physical "materials" would cost a minimum of several (probably more) thousand dollars.

      (Unless someone knows where to get custom made discounted electrical devices etc. Or a lab that is no longer in use - or is getting rid of "outdated" equipment / etc. These might reduce the cost considerably.)

      (On top of all of that, I would probably need a location better suited for this than "my basement"!)

      :(

    • chrisdildilio profile image

      chrisdildilio 3 years ago

      Sharpencil,

      How much funding are you looking for?

    • chrisdildilio profile image

      chrisdildilio 3 years ago

      Yea, kind of posted that one quick. Just need more time. I'm a dreamer, everyday pursuing the answers of our vast universe. I would love to stand in the middle of a 3d projection of at least the milky way. And not to mention at least the last billion years it's been in existence. I can't get it out of my head. Gravity is magnetism makes sense!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Perhaps one could find an absence of gravity beyond the boundary of the universe or at its centre...where awareness lives?

      This would lead one to question if awareness is found in the space where nothing else resides, no gravity, no magnetism, no electric charge, no matter...just space, awareness, the perfect vacuum, zero point or infinity...from where intent comes forth.

      Intent, free will, pushing beyond...these hallmarks of life are born and energized from and through awareness.

      Intent through awareness leads to action which needs time?

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      I am not too certain that it is possible to find anywhere in the universe where gravity is absent...you can find neutral gravity, like neutral electric charge, but you can't find NO gravity.

      There is a difference between Zero gravity which is a balance of gravitational fields, and NO gravity which is an absence of gravitational fields.

      Would it be possible to perform an experiment in the absence of space?

      It is like static electricity. There can be zero electric charge but that does not mean that electrons or protons are absent, it means they balance. Likewise, an absence of gravity is more like zero gravitational imbalance, rather than an absence of mass.

      What do you think?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I appreciate the offer Chris. However, the experiments I wish to conduct consist of higher voltage/amperage induced electromagnetic fields and other electrically oriented experiments.

      But I agree that anytime a person can be exposed to different ideas and perspectives - the mind opening possibilities can open doors to the truth.

    • chrisdildilio profile image

      chrisdildilio 3 years ago

      I have some extremely powerful rare earth magnets if you wish to borrow them. You must be careful they don't touch, especially by holding them, you can lose a finger or crush bone. They are very large. I believe that do to the metal content of each planet, magnetism is the force that is holding them together. Too much to really type here, but I always think mechanically, and lots of it could be common sense, just to explain in simple terms. I like this post a lot, and I hope that by sharing here isn't abusing anything. I think it's great if we all bump heads. Passion will propel you to great lengths.

      Also, I have some experiments but they must be performed in space with the absence of what we call "gravity"

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      chrisdildilio - I re-read my last statement in my first post from 15 months ago - I have a completely different (personal belief... / understanding) about gravity itself now. However, I'm not ""absolutely"" convinced that even in deep space - (even considering my current theory about the cause of gravity) - the two touching magnets - could not resist the force of inertia to separate if spun fast enough...?

      However, I believe there are certain celestial bodies (pairs of stars) that possess certain elemental compositions that are more susceptible to the action of gravity (in my theory of gravity) and they would hold a binary - high speed orbit near or around each other - where a pair of rare earth magnets would not - given both (stars and magnets) were subjected to identical conditions / "forces" (gravity, spin, etc.)

      I have made small Tesla coils and (I don't want to reveal all of my secrets here...) have executed some very interesting experiments that produce very interesting results with electric currents and etc. However, I need "more power" and better (difficult to obtain on E Bay (lol) "materials" to experiment "with" and "on" (more professional construction ability) - plus better detection and documentation devices.

      Like I said - I don't want to give away ALL of my secrets and be "that" guy who worked (theorized / experimented) his entire life to end up potentially "giving" a revolutionary, partially / mostly proven, concept away with no recognition what so ever. (historical or fiscal)

      I have no formal education or reputable references to catapult my innovative mind into ANY prominent arena of established, or "establishing" - physics circles.

      I'm more like Tesla - (he was experimenting in a time of not yet having information available - he WAS one of the pioneers) he did all of his experiments without knowing the "math" behind the ideas and experiments. - I am just busy paying my bills and too impatient to take time away from theorizing to connect the dots - to learn the "supposed" FACTUAL math currently considered to be the "standard" for physics. I understand the math behind actual documented and proven physics concerning electricity and electromagnetism, but the properties of the quanta are not "solid" factual proven numbers - too much is referred to as being "probable" and "only there when NOT being observed".

      I guess it boils down to "trust" (or binding contracts with the "maybe" or "if proven to be fact" clauses - LOL). Who do I trust to help me prove/disprove anything?

    • chrisdildilio profile image

      chrisdildilio 3 years ago

      Sharpencil, Last statement in your first post 15 months ago, remove gravity from the equation. What is the extent of your experiments, and what kind of lab equipment are you in need of?

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      Our reality is nothing more than a PROCESS; interaction, movement. everything is in motion. EVERYTHING (matter, time, pi, energy, space, gravity, magnetism, electricity, fields, etc.. even information( as it is nothing more than reflection of that changes/motion) are result of that nonstop motion. if it stops than EVERYTHING (including us and our consiousness) will dissapear in a moment. so we may say our reality is virtual. the hardest problem is to find the reason of that motion which brings to egg or hen problem. may be really Awareness or higher Consiousness exixst in that motion or a part of it or outside our reality? One thing i believe that time and dimensions being in such way -infite and relative to each other let everyone to be equal to God. everyone or from every movement may be created infinit realms with infinite rational/nonrational beings in it. in example a dog with his one breath can bring to life a new universe or switching a match we create a new perpetual reality like ours. Our reality may be also a result of a common electromagnetic generator with strong magnetic surrounding which a child turned on say outside our reality. it may seem funny but no one cannot say it cant be true. i have also another strange idea. As Nature apply same laws to everything and as i thing everything is alive so i think the basal unit is life. so by analogy our universe is a living organism where all stars are atoms, galaxies- cells, constellations are biomolecular connections, black hole is a contact membrane to other dimension, and so an. and imagine how bigger are the rest of our entire reality...

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      Interesting theory. I hope we eventually will reveal the Reality of which part are we all, and God (if really exists) or other more rational Beings will be surprised (smile)...

      only i think phi (1.168) golden ratio also has part in it; not only Pi. (3,14)and i think the relations between dimensions are also holographic. Holography is integral and a must to this theory. All kind of waves (including Light) comprise/make our reality; therefore there are interferences everywhere. so we may say the space or fields are filled of interference patterns or interferograms that is- holografic information and in every point there is information about all. it may also explain superposition or entanglement so on. It leads to the idea that our reality not only fractal -like but also holographic. so the idea that universe is a superhologram may seem real in this view and the information may be in inverse state - time-space as fourier transformations... and everything is strongly interconnected. by the way i try to finish my book which i titled "Sensory perception and Reality" where everything began from telepathy. I strongly interested in it and revealed a lot in terms of our sensory system, awareness.... which bring me to the field of physic and can say that each science are more interconnected than we think.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Then again, my ideas are not absolutely "original". I know several past and present physicist's have and currently do believe in an electric universe - so, I'm sure I'll see my theory fully or partially proven by someone already established. Even though, I have "connected the dots" with a more than likely useless copyright.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      I wish someone would "invest" in my idea(s) so I could perform and document several experiments to prove several of the statements in my theory. I just don't have the capitol or resources to set up the necessary lab equipment. :(

      Sharpencil / Audiowriter

      customaudioproduct @ centurylink.net

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Thanks Chris...I agree with Mr Shipov, we need new mechanical breakthroughs with real applications before we can collectively progress new theories.

      A device that demonstrates the relationship between inertia, torsion, radiation and time would be cool.

    • chrisdildilio profile image

      chrisdildilio 3 years ago

      Cool link from 2006 Shipov:

      http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cac.../files/200506_news09.pdf+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Mr Shipov and many others are expanding (internalizing?) their awareness to understand the interaction from the virtual into the real and vice versa. I know this for a fact as I have been conducting real experiments between the five dimensions using geometry and have successfully twisted electro-magnetic fields inside out and stabilised them.

      Geometric effects between (affects of) magnetism, electricity, gravity, matter and time are fully tractable and manipulable.

      Soon it will be commonly understood, accepted and utilised...

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      S.O's and N.R's recent posts and The Good Vibrations Theory has sparked a few concepts.

      Electricity, Magnetism, Gravity and Matter/Mass (as commonly understood) can be explained as follows.

      Electricity and Magnetism are circular fields that create Torque Force.

      Gravity and Matter/Mass are linear fields that create Inertia Force.

      Electricity is an ''out' force - it is a torsion field (vortex) spinning out

      Magnetism is an ''in'' force - it is a torsion field (vortex) spinning in

      These two fields are at right angles to eachother and are virtual and can be understood by circles, spheres and PI. They also relate to Time and Frequency and Period. Because Time is PI which has an infinite mantissa, it continues forever forward.

      Gravity is a linear field that pulls in.

      Mass/Matter is a linear field that pushes out.

      These two fields can be understood by triangles, squares, cubes and PHI. These are REAL.

      When Light, which is the Whole LOT put together is a wave, or electro magnetic, it is VIRTUAL.

      When Light is gravito Mass, it is REAL.

      Because the electro magnetic torsion field is eternally expanding (thanks to PI), there is an infinite potential sea of Light in its virtual form spinning Out to eternity as potential light wave photons and spinning In to eternity as potential Zero Points.

      This provides infinitely expanding virtual space and infinitely contracting zero point for the interference patterns to form into linear fields of gravity and volumes of matter. The virtual photons are converted into real mass at gravitational centres of electromagnetic potential.

      The centre point is virtual, Magnetism, First Dimension

      The circumference is virtual, Electric, Second Dimension

      The area is real, Gravity, Third Dimension

      The volume is real, Mass, Fourth Dimension.

      TIME is PI which interlinks the these DIMENSIONS to become the Fifth Dimension or the ZERO Dimension. Time is absolutely linked to gravity and mass but proportionately linked to magnetism and electricity.

      PI or TIME is both First and Last...it starts with PI and ends with TIME...In TIME we find PI and in PI we find TIME. At every point along the way we find VIRTUAL REALITY...an infinite number of eternal realities in which there is but a single truth or source... Awareness.

      The centre of the universe is AWARENESS and the Universe is surrounded by AWARENESS. From beyond awareness and within awareness exist all things. All information is contained at the centre and beyond the outer edge of the the universe. As every real point in between the centre and edge of the universe sits on a straight line somewhere between the two, all information may be accessed from any point in the universe.

      There is only one universe with infinite realities and infinite time within that universe bound by awareness...which lies within the centre and beyond the edge of the universe.

      The relationship between the dimensions is geometric and therefore tractable at any point in time or space...memory is not required as such, as any point in space or time, and any volume of mass or area of gravity is fully tractable based on geometry....not maths. Geometry gives rise to real numbers but real numbers cannot trace the virtual domain.

      Mass and Gravity are absolute in the Fifth Dimension of TIME, Magnetism and electricity are relative to the fifth dimension of TIME. The FIFTH Dimension of TIME is also the ZERO POINT. TIME is forever expanding in cycles, each cycle it also contracts closer to the ZERO POINT. These cycles are dominated by PI and will eternally expand and or contract. Mass and gravity are controlled by time lines, electricity and magnetism are controlled by time cycles. Time links mass and gravity in straight lines, Time links magnetism and electricity in cycles. There are geometric tools for tractability between the linear and cyclical, the real and virtual that are far more powerful than any binary computer that has or EVER could made. A silicon chip is restricted to the linear real domain where time is absolute. Geometry is capable of linear and cyclical operations at the same point in space where time is relative and/or absolute.

      The photon light wave packet is a geometric tool for tractability between the real and virtual. I am not too sure of my understanding of gluons and quarks and such. Electricity, magnetism, gravity, matter and time can all be measured with the photon! As such, they are all different expressions of the photon...LIGHT.

      Light, from which we and all things are formed, is eternally seeking its internal source and external limit and it does this according to a few geometric laws....the rest is virtual reality folding and unfolding!

      Subjective Observance, or

      Subservient Object, or

      Objective Subservience.

      Electricity, or Electron is the closest common understanding we have to LIGHT which leads to a conclusion that the it is an electric universe!

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      2 cool!

      I keep updating my theory as I get things worked out and become confident enough to "share".

      (I have "theoretically" resolved several more issues and mysteries just in the past 72 hours!)

      I'm telling you - the universe is driven by electricity!

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      Here are some interesting items. what do you think of it

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_field_(pseudo...

      http://shipov.com/history.html

    • chrisdildilio profile image

      chrisdildilio 3 years ago

      Little late in the post, but you got Dr. Michio Kaku's attention! I support your theory... I stumbled on this idea after a few experiments with neodymium magnets. I myself believe that gravity is merely the effect of magnetism. Lots of great information here.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi Subjective Observer (SO)

      I am feeling THE GOOD VIBRATIONS ;-) and considering your recent post....I hope to respond soon.

      There are infinite realities...but only one truth.

      The smallest unit of time is PI - 3.14.......

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      Your thoughts are always shining Effilnuc. there are many original ideas here either such as Glenn H M Jr' s, M's and others... So from your viewpoint energy is the primary essense which is forever and aware (or consious or God) right? and all type of motions, separations, oppositions, forces, waves, senses etc. must emerge from that energy. But if we identify energy to God then this theory may explain as a church priest or Holy books explain the creating of world... I dont think energy is the same as God or has consiousness, but may agree with you if we say it is aware or may cause awareness (or subjective experience). In some way energy and magnetism are the same i think; and in this context we may include information as well - as conserved memory which is the keeper of balance... by the way Effilnuc you never talk about information, it would be interesting to hear your opinion on this . I think everything is in balance and you are right saying energy is both distroyer and recoverer of balance, but for complicated systems energy need to remember the former balanced structure ; a memory or information (or recorded information) is required...and here we may consider either the energy-information has also awareness or the information is being kept (recorded) by magnetism which has subjective behaviour... anyway all this lead to an idea that Reality is strictly programmed rationally. As to time being energy its a bit odd for me. Dont you think time may be both relative and absolute? i mean there can be instantanous interaction such as infinite superluminar speed. i also consider quasar as common lihgt photons in its dimention.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Very interesting concept, effilnuc.

      I have a theory which follows the concept that the universe is in fact based on electricity, vibration frequency and quantum physics.

      I have even copyrighted it...

      It is basically complete (currently) 16 pages, (but I have a few notes to add yet) and I call it "The Good Vibrations"

      (I'm trying to get it read (critiqued/disproved) by anyone interested...

      For anyone here interested...

      www.customaudioproductions.com/The_Good_Vibrations

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      I have written some thoughts/ideas about the recent comments, I apologise now if they are scattered...

      Subjective is looking in from without.

      Objective is looking out from within.

      It may be the other way around but that depends on whose perspective you take and your field of awareness.

      A force is experienced at the threshold between the object and the subject that is equal and opposite. This force is what defines the boundary between object and subject.

      Electric force, magnetic force, gravitational force are all vector forces whose total sum is zero as the two vectors are always equal and opposite. They contain no energy, no source. They only exist at the boundary temporarily and disappear as quickly as they manifest.

      The Energy that causes apparent imbalance between these balanced forces is kinetic energy, which is motion or rate of change...it is simply TIME. Time is energy and Time is the only form of energy. It is always flowing, it is infinite and it flows only in ONE DIRECTION.

      Time is energy and is always equal to ONE. Time cannot be negative or less than one or more than one. Forces must be both negative and positive and equal ZERO.

      To travel back in time can only be done through information retrieval and reconstruction so technically you are not going anywhere but forward in time whilst looking back at what has been recorded. One cannot travel "back" in Time and change what occurred, but one can witness what has occurred in the past. The information of all time is recorded in the present and and can be reviewed.

      Likewise, one cannot travel forward in time and change what will happen. One can witness what may occur but can only change what will occur at the present threshold where information is recorded.

      Time is not a force, Time is not a dimension. Time is Energy.

      0 Dimension is virtual Point (a point cannot exist in reality)

      1 Dimension is virtual circumference around point which creates real point

      2 Dimension is real line between two real points

      3 Dimension is real area between three real points

      4 Dimensions is real Volume between four real point.

      A force is always measured as positive or negative at a particular point or surface. Force is always zero between two points or surfaces.

      Energy is always zero when measured at a particular point or surface. Energy is always positive when measured between two points or surfaces.

      Force is not Energy. The PERIODIC interference between forces creates the forward flow of time, or the outward flow of energy. The faster the interference between gravity, electricity and magnetism, the greater the frequency, the greater the flow of energy.

      Forces are manifested through separation, exclusion. Objective and Subjective are the Male and Female, the positive negative, north south, up down....IN OUT!

      Energy is the relative PERIODIC motion between the objective and subjective which maintains a perpetual balance. Every atom contains energy due to the periodic relative motion between the objective and the subject...the proton and electron. The Neutron is the interection of the electromagnetic fields and is the centre of gravity...or mass.

      When the periodic motion changes, energy leaves or enters the object/subject relationship in order to maintain perpetual balance.

      By teaching kids that force is energy, we are blinded to the infinite energy of the universe.

      Energy is infinite, periodic, time. Energy can be extracted or inserted into any object/subject system by altering the balance of electric, magnetic and gravitational force fields that maintain that system.

      Energy creates and destroys. Energy is neither object or subject. Energy is the field of awareness surrounding the object/subject. The energy field, awareness, the source...Mother Nature, GOD...only flows out from the source and inwards to the universe.

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      The question about time travel is -

      Is it just the information (data, dna, etc.) that gets exactly "duplicated" into another place and/or "time?

      Or, is it possible for complete structures to be transported "whole" without damage?

    • profile image

      N.R. 3 years ago

      Here is another topic that I would like to open up, what do you readers think about time travel? How about the Philadelphia project? Do you believe with the basis of my hubpage that they can actually use and may be using these concepts to do this? But have yet to perfect it? I have seen some pretty cool videos on youtube that really make me wonder, some that stands out the most to me are: ( mind you they ALL made big news as well)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhA6cxtncgY , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOeU7cBN8TQ , I love this one, especially 1:34 into it ..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBUv4j3DINE

    • profile image

      N.R 3 years ago

      BTW Effilnuc good answer on his question.

    • profile image

      N.R. 3 years ago

      I believe that all forces in the universe have "awareness", that me be a hard concept for people to grasp as forces are not like people, but we must remember that even people are functional and alive through electrical entities and energy. There are many things in life and physics that we struggle to explain, one thing I am glad for is that I also have a nursing degree. I can see medical ties with physic ties all the time. For example, lets analyze the SA node of the heart. This node ejects electrical impulses that cause the heart to beat, thus being the primary energy causing life force behind living. But it is a natural power, not a battery right? So , what causes that SA node to fire? How about all the electrical transmissions in the brain that fire off? Our bodies not only use electricity but naturally create it. Now if that is not food for thought, I do not know what is.

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      and i do believe the magnetic field possess awareness

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      i appreciate the other your thought that"In essence Energy is not a thing in and of itself. Energy is an intellectual concept defined by two subjective opposites.". I have another view in terms of contradictions. In essense they are the same. suppose all opposite charges or polars are of same charge/polar and call them separate egos. each of them will be apart and therefore will oppose other separate egos...hence comes the contradictions. then- as they all apart so they will repell each other, to be correct the bigger ones will attract small ones forming structures like particles, atoms, etc but as they all of the same ego they will be attracted by more big ego-field.. its difficult to imagine but i guess it' s more realistic and explain its aware behaviour. Or maybe equal separated masses repel each other , when the balance disturbed by decreasing energy the interaction acts- the bigger ones attract small ones ( and the contary) to keep the balance. the balance = to neutral charge. what you think of this?

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      its obvious that everything is interconnected and every feeble act cause an adecvate motion or reaction. If carges are not primary stimulations then what is the primary entity, what is the primary overall single whole from which begins the separation-creation of micro-macro universes-realities? and what is MAGNETIC FIELD, how you explain magnetism... is it depend on electric flow or charges or may be (as i can argue) there is a stable overall PRIMARY magnetic field which is the same first single entity from which/within begins separations as similarities- that is all that separations have the same property of that whole - the same entity ( which means they are not separated by dual or opposite poles/ charges) . To understand the real essence of REALITY we must think not only subjective but also objectively... It may sound odd to you but I think for grasping reality we must include the other property of matter which include subjective experience... To be honest i try to reveal the essense of consiousness-awareness and chain brings me to here...thats why i am here. I was surprised reading your writings Effilnuc that is " For all of this to occur, it required a single moment of conscious awareness which was created by a single moment of separation or a magnetic moment!" What cause You to think so Effilnuc?????

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 3 years ago

      Charge is relative...negative is opposite of positive in the same way as spinning out is opposite to spinning in.

      A positive charge APPEARS to be spinning out from the perspective of a stationary body,, and a negative charge appears to spin inwards relative to a stationary body.

      The charge is "created" by relative motion between bodies. It is not matter. It is not energy. It is the definition of relative motion or flux between two magnetic resonant fields.

      The charge of an electron and a proton and a neutron are created through their spin relative to the other.

      Macroscopically, charge is equal to acceleration which is a vector quantity. Negative acceleration is towards centre. Positive acceleration is awaw from centre.

      Like acceleration, charge is a relative vector between two bodies.

      Stable Matter is the balanced relative motion of in, out and stationary or neutral. It has no charge as there is no net in out motion.

      If a body of matter holds charge it holds a nced state of tension between spinning in and out. If a body of matter has a PV with another then there is relative spin between them that is imbalanced.

      So charge is the relative vortex vector of in out and stationary. Hence why area and square of distance between centres determines strength of force or potential energy and why it is scalar.

      Magnetism, electrical charge and gravity are scalar nouns of the one balancing force between in out and neutral. Negative positive and zero.

      Electric charge defines atoms. Magnetic defines compounds of atoms...matter, gravity defines universes of matter.

      Electric scale leads to magnetic scale leads to gravity scale. Each can influence the the other at scalar nodes defined geometrically.

      If two things are spinning out relative to neutral point they oppose. If spinning in they oppose. If one spins out and the other spins in then the whole is balanced and neutral. Same for electric charge, magnetism and gravity.

      Electric charge is a temporarily observable relative state of spin between two external fields. From our perspective matter is a balanced state of electric fields that generate a magnetic field perpendicular to the first which is perpendicular to the gravitational field. The field lines are circular so every point is a cube when observed or a wave when experienced.

      Points and cubes are scalar, fields are vectors.

    • profile image

      Subjective Observer 3 years ago

      I am proud that there are brilliant-logic individuals like You -Newton's Rival and Effilnuc. I also think that gravity is the same magnetic force only in higher dimension... and Reality is constructed due to hierarchic PI or fractal division where in such proportional octave/dimention is iterating the same laws -that is magnetism. One thing I couldnt explain- What is electric charge and how it come foth? ...as its the base of ALL - separation, polarity dipole momentum, time, speed , distanse.. etc even as effilnuc wrote - consious awareness...

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 3 years ago from Indiana

      Squibster - your electromagnet coil and penny experiment can partially be explained due to the eddy currents caused by copper (aluminum and other non-magnetic metals) introduced into a magnetic field - look at these-

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E97CYWlALEs

      and

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBN_cYEgeMA

      I believe that penny's also have other metals combined with the copper - which might explain your particular result.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      ok, I retract the statement about Michio, I just looked and somehow his comment is back, the only weird thing is, is that his picture is no longer their (avatar). Comment seems to be the same though.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      yes the root of all science is observation, however what makes a theory into fact in science is the math. thanks for the comments, Squibster I liked your experiment. It's sad that you just let it go once the coil burnt out. I think a lot of the problem with this theory is that ...it is sooo much work. Scientists have misinterpeted these observations for so long they simply dismiss this notion quickly. SO all these actual experiments and observations have to duly noted over and over again. It is a matter of the Professional scientific community actually taking it seriously, and many educated scientists are not willing to put their reputations out on the line. Those of you that have been here for a while know that Michio Kaku had a very good comment on here for a very long time. After being noticed by others in his field he quickly deleted his comment. They are afraid to stand up and say..."hey I think we may have F*d this up!"

    • profile image

      Arthur A Haglund 3 years ago

      I have a real proof of this theory, however.

      The supposed tests of flying an atomic clock in opposite directions, claiming to prove time dilation actually proves that gravity IS magnetism!

      The earth's gravity field is actually its magnetic field and the supposed time dilation is actually the effect of magnetic drag upon the atomic clock. the clock frequency + earth's rotation and then - earth's rotation, depending upon the direction of travel.

      Perhaps someone on this forum could confirm this through the math?

      This is the Haglund Theory.

    • profile image

      Arthur A Haglund 3 years ago

      I have made this assertion since the late 70's, in 9th grade.

      The observable traits between a magnet and gravity are the same, they attract, affect the course of light, etc...

      The rub, or hitch was the idea of a ferrous magnet not attracting wood.

      The difference, of course is nothing more than size. The mass of the planet as compared to the mass of our largest magnets, is ridiculously vast.

      Size matters, because the massive field is actually week. IF we had a planet with as strong a magnetic field as a very strong Neodymium magnet, life could not exist on earth. The iron in our blood would gather in our feet!

      in fact it would affect different materials differently, as well. as we currently can test the attraction to local, strong magnetic fields on different metals and things that are not obviously affected by magnets, we would see those things being experientially heavier. even not being able to turn over certain materials and this force would make things lighter at the equator, as well.

      But, the mass of the earth and its weak field do penetrate, by the size of the field, the very atomic structures of all things, causing the soft gravity, rather than the harsh magnetic pull of localized magnetic fields.

      I, however do not have the math background nor the academic study to formulate such egghead equations to support this idea. Unfortunately, too many feel the elitist pull to ignore such theories, as automatically invalid, because one does not have the paper on the wall.

      Well the roots of science are observation, not math.

    • profile image

      Squibster 3 years ago

      I find your hypothesis refreshing to say the least. I have shared a similar belief in the effect of magnetism on gravity and vice versa. After a stint in the U.S. Army in the 60’s, not of my own volition, upon being honorably discharged my brother and I had an exempt commodity carrying business where we operated an over the road tractor trailer hauling produce, back then most food was pretty much organic, but things were already starting to change. I know how is this relevant to the magnetism gravity premise? I was an admired of James Clerk Maxwell, and very interested in earth physics, have been my entire life. I took an interest in Einstein’s research in gravity and had inquires similar to your own. During the 1970’s I use to discuss the possibility of developing an anti-gravitational device where one could enter in coordinates of the present location of the loaded or unloaded semi rig enter in the coordinates of the desired destination and push a button on the trucks dashboard and be transported there at nearly the speed of light, pretty much instantaneously anywhere in the country or world.

      I also thought that it could be possible to make what I called a ‘Magalift’ device in which one would program the HxWxL dimensions of an object push a button and render the object weightless then using the handle on the ‘Megalift’ move the object easily by hand alone to where it needed to go, lowering it to the ground and then de-energizing the anti-gravitational field and moving on to the next task. Basically a neutralization of gravity within an induced dimensional magnetical field. I think the premise holds water and it will just be a matter of time before it comes to fruition.

      Interestingly a friend of mind in the late 80’s had shared a similar interest in the relationship of magnetism on gravity. We built a large electrical coil in his garage with a hollow core, the same principle used in an electro-magnetical solenoid, only with a free center core. When energized it induced a strong magnetical field. What we discovered was at the core there seemed to be a destabilization of the force of gravity at the magnet coil’s open center area when energized. Non-metallic objects appeared to slow as they were dropped through the center of the coil always falling out through the bottom of the open coil and landing on the garage’s floor.

      We realized that we needed to find a non-magnetic metal to best test the theory of induced magnetism on the earth’s gravitational force. We decided to drop a copper penny through the magnetic induction field. Holding the penny just above the surface of the energized coil and dropping it into the open center space of the coil had an interesting result. The penny dropped and slowed in descent until it reached the approximate center point of the coil. It hung there in midair for a few seconds wobbling just slightly unstable.

      We were amazed until it began to violent wobble, destabilized and smashed into the inner side winding on the coil; shorting it out and consequently destroying the coil before we could reach the disconnect switch to de-energize it. We concluded that there was a reasonable relationship with magnetism and gravity. The makeup of the substance we derived could also be effected by magnetic force fields. What we found of interest is the ‘copper penny’ concept, (we had only choose the penny because it was handy, literally in our pocket).

      After the destruction of the coil we realized the significance of our choice in using cooper in the experiment. Copper has no magnetical attraction properties to it and yet it has very good electrical conductivity! Its ability to float unaided in thin air in an electrically produced magnetic field has always had me curious as to why it did that. I often wonder what the results would have been if we chose a nickel instead of a penny. One can only surmise that it was either an anti-gravitational magnetic field or a conductivity issue, possibly even the aligning of electrons caught in parallel attraction. After the coil burned up we abandoned our magnetic gravitational garage experiments.

      What has me believing in the validity of what many Physicist’s say is the recent discovery of quantum mechanics and general relativity having proven to be at odds with each other. The equations no longer make any sense and the physicists are at a loss not knowing what they are supposed to do about that. As Dr. Michio Kaku said, “That it’s awful; physics is having a nervous breakdown, it means the collapse of physics as we know it, something is fundamentally wrong, nature is smarted than we are.”

      The problem being that there is now a difficulty in the perception of the forgone conclusion that quantum mechanics and ‘gravity’ can live together, it would appear that the big and the small are not mathematically compatible. The equation for the gravitation force of a black hole and its infinity small size at its center is inconsistent with Einstein’s theory of relativity and when worked out mathematically the equation ends in zero. This is a mathematical impossibility in physics, what is even more revealing is if worked past the zero point mathematically the resulting equation’s answer becomes infinite. To the physicist this is impossible, and what makes it even stranger is it becomes like the infinite expressions of pi. The infinite answer to the quantum mechanics and gravity equation then goes infinite again continuing on through infinity itself. I would think that this might be proof therefore of three things, that your hypothetical theory on magnetism and gravity may very well have merit, that man and all his wisdom is just so much foolishness to God, and that this equation may give a greater credence in the belief of God.

      As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.

      Albert Einstein

      Before God we are all equally wise – and equally foolish.

      Albert Einstein

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      Thanks Geonator for your last post, good information there.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 3 years ago from U.S.A

      Your right effilnuc, h8O is a highly detoxifying agent. And I believe it is now available on the market again. Pharm companies do not want this water out there. I'm sure you know why. http://www.amazon.com/H8O%C2%AE-Polycarbonate-Gall...

    • profile image

      geonator 3 years ago

      I'm by no means a physics guru, so if I say anything that lacks verity forgive me.

      Just recently I became quite intrigued with the concept that gravity and electromagnetism are related or even the same force; After all, Albert Einstein himself coined the term "unified field theory" and tried to derive an equation that would relate all of the fundamental forces, including gravity and magnetism, together, though he was ultimately unsuccessful.

      Here's something to consider:

      Since atoms can generate small magnetic fields due to the motion/spin of electrons (metals such as iron demonstrate this trait), then technically all matter responds, in varying degrees, to magnetic fields. This gives rise to several different types of magnetism. Of those include ferromagnetism, diamagnetism, and paramagnetism. Ferromagnetic materials are unique in that their atoms (which can be considered tiny dipoles) align to form a observably strong net magnetic moment in normal conditions when introduced to an external magnetic field. However, diamagnetic and paramagnetic materials respond much less noticeably to magnetic fields. If gravity is really caused by magnetism, then wouldn't gravitational attraction vary based on the composition of the object? For instance, a planet composed solely of iron, which is ferromagnetic, would exert a stronger pull on objects than would a planet composed solely of lead, which is diamagnetic.

      However, there is a counter argument. Much of our current understanding of gravity is based on Newton's work; in particular his universal law of gravitation. Essentially, the equation takes the ratio of the product of two masses to the distance between them squared, and offsets this value by the gravitational constant, G, in order to obtain the value of the gravitational force of attraction between the two masses. It is important to note two things:

      1. That all of the experiments that have been conducted in order to measure this constant have been in reference to earth's gravitational pull and

      2. That scientists have obtained differing values for it using the SAME setup for the experiment, and, furthermore, don't understand why.

      This last point is important. If indeed gravity was its own separate force, then wouldn't there be little to no variation in the measurement of the constant? But it does vary, and the tolerance is inexplicable! Here are some articles that support this fact:

      http://phys.org/news/2013-09-gravitational-constan...

      http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=p...

      http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-rupert-sheldrak...

      Measurements have ranged to as much as 10 times more than the "accepted" value of Big G, as it is know. And scientists aren't entirely sure why this is; there are postulates, but nothing provable as of yet. This provides evidence, then, for the fact that gravity could in fact be caused by magnetism, which is affected not only by mass but by composition. What if the gravitational pull caused by the earth is in fact the net result of the magnetic moments of earth's various constituent elements? Interestingly enough, earth is primarily composed of iron...

      Just a thought.

    • profile image

      maxping 3 years ago

      Ed Leedskalnin

    • profile image

      mcomb 3 years ago

      Unifying the forces of the Universe is hardly seen and greatly respected by myself. When people use words such as quanta, entropy, strings and waves (No solid evidence to confirm their existence) I get scared of their ideas. The simple fact is when you bunch up stuff to the size of an atom they immediately behave under the laws of Special and General Relativity. Quantum thinking can not and never will be married to Relativity because Relativity is predictable and quantum thinking is based upon probabilities. We will never move forward unless we replace the quantum world with a predictable set of equations.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      I don't think my description of the electron at the end of my last post was correct.

      An electron defines the PD between a point or volume of stillness and an infinite number of other potential points of stillness defined by a specific volume of space determined by the relative dimensions of the internal volume of stillness.

      EG.

      Hydrogen atom is one point of stillness defined by one volume of space defined by an infinite number of points on a sphere defined by the motion of an electron.

      Oxygen atom is eight points of stillness defined by eight/one volume of space defined by an infinite number of points on 8 spheres defined by the motion of 8 electrons.

      Stillness has mass and potential energy,

      motion has energy and potential mass.

      A proton has mass and potential energy

      An electron has energy and potential mass.

    • profile image

      effilnuc 3 years ago from eastern australia

      Hi NR,

      Glad to see you are well.

      May I suggest a couple of things in response to your post?

      Hot Cold, Up Down, Right Left, Slow Fast, Big Small etc... are all labels defining E (energy). ie E = Hot/Cold or Up/Down or Big/Small etc. The terms Hot, Up or Big, simply provide a frame of reference or context in which the Energy is relatively manifesting.

      Energy is therefore a manifestation of the universe's perpetual balancing act.

      E = MC^2 defines the balance between Matter and Light. Because Matter and Light were never considered relative opposites like Hot Cold, or Up Down, Einsteins revelation of the energetic relationship between Matter and Light was quite profound.

      In essence Energy is not a thing in and of itself. Energy is an intellectual concept defined by two subjective opposites.

      Energy is always defined by the relationship between two other opposing variables. The greater the relative proportional difference between the variables, the greater the potential energy. Those variables that are more precisely defined, provide a more precise definition of Energy.

      Gravity is energy because it is defined by two opposing variables described by their MASS.

      Magnetism is energy because it is defined by two opposing variables described by their Poles.

      Electricty is energy because it is defined by two opposing variables described by their Voltage.

      Pressure is energy beacuse it is defined by two opposing variables described by their PSI.

      Heat is energy because it is defined by two opposing variables described by their temperature.

      Cold is energy because it is defined by two opposing variables described by their temperature.

      If one uses Heat Energy, one is referring to the vector of expansion.

      If one uses Cold Energy, one is referring to the vector of contraction.

      Expansion and contraction is energy because it is defined by two opposing variables described by the difference between the two extreme points of whatever is being measured...distance, heat, pressure etc.

      Gravity is Magnetism is Electricity is Pressure is Heat is Cold is Expansion is Contraction is Energy.

      Energy is the mother term for the universal gift generated everytime the balancing act is performed.

      Hot, Cold, Volts, Watts, Time, Money, Expansion, Gravity, Magnetism, Electricity etc are sub-terms that give a frame of reference or context from which the energy was released, manifested or gifted during the balancing act.

      The instant the universe went from being balanced in stillness (potentially infinite energy) to balanced in motion (manifest infinite energy), the first energy was released (the big bang). Whilst universal motion continues in balance, energy will continue to be infintely manifest...freely available!

      The concept of entropy is the return to a state of potential infinite energy (balanced in stillness), which continually holds the potential for manifest infinite energy (balanced in motion). Entropy is therefore not an end state but a necessary point on a continuous cycle.

      Light is a wave which is balance in motion.

      Space or Dark is a point which is balance in stillness

      The Light wave moves through space, or the dark, or between two points of balance in stillness.

      Light is energy in motion.

      Space or Dark is energy in stillness.

      Energy = the volume of space or darkness between two points of stillness.

      Eg.

      Two measurements of temperature reveal two points of stillness within which there is a potential space for movement. Between these two temperature points is therefore potential energy that begins to manifest when any relative motion within that space occurs.

      An electron is that which defines the potential difference between two points of stillness and as such, can never EVER thefore be still in and of itself otherwise it would become that which it is relatively defining...!

      I would appreciate your feedback.

      Thanks

    • profile image

      4 years ago

      I guess I knew, but can now see why the spiralling vortex's is so important, because it is the basic formation of prima fields, the template of space/time and forms.

    • profile image

      Sharpencil 4 years ago

      Now, if prime magnetism is the key, how do those pesky photons fit in?

    • profile image

      Sharpencil 4 years ago

      The non-magnetic steel balls in the video were not affected by the different polarity of the cone prime magnets, but, would this play out the same in our solar system when the sun (or even the earths') poles reverse? Does the N/S polarity orientation between the earth and sun really matter when considering this reversal? Would it make a difference to the gravitational pull / repulsion if the earth's poles remained the same when the sun's flipped? It seems not, according to the basic reactions to either magnetic or non-magnetic balls in the video.

    • profile image

      Sharpencil 4 years ago

      I can plainly see how when a singularity (or a star) "explodes", it creates the different atoms for individual elements at different locations within the event with different temperatures, pressures and etc. And, as the atoms or molecules are expelled, their mass, no matter how small or large, could create a primal magnetic field. And how a collective body of atoms will each retain their own individual field, however, the collective individual fields act together as one larger field. IE, galactic shapes / pulsars / gravity within our own solar system, all the way down to the atomic nucleus and electrons. This theory seems very plausable. (I can't help but think of Adam and Jamie from Mythbusters when using the word "plausable")

    • profile image

      Sharpencil 4 years ago

      That video explains it all, well, it does to me anyway. Is there part 2 (or 3,4,or5) anywhere on youtube? I did a search but did not find anything but part 1.

      By the way, several years ago I was trying to conduct an experiment by placing (glueing) small, flat cylrindical shaped magnets all over a ping pong ball - with each neighboring one having the poles in opposite directions - ie = down - up - down - up, etc. - so that the ball was completely covered with these magnets but no magnet had the same polarity as any of its immediate neighbors. I was trying to use the stationary, but alternating, polarity on the surface of the ping pong ball to levitate it - in any position / or any direction / or rotating - near an electro magnet. I almost succeeded, but gave up before actual success. I was in the same frame of mind at the time as these guys with the Primer theory - but I wasn't thinking of it to explain uniform universal strong force theory

    • profile image

      4 years ago

      @ Sharpencil

      The previous link should answer your questions with flying colours.

    • profile image

      4 years ago

      I also found it fascinating that the photo of Saturn had a ring shaped aurora at its pole. It would be a logical shape for plasma coming out of a opening because a solid object should at lest have a cap for a aurora and not a ring if the solar wind is only illuminated at the currently be-leaved solid surface poles. The whole presentation also explains what has been theorised as dark matter e.c.t so simply.

      But I am not so sure of the simplicity of its evolution.

    • profile image

      4 years ago

      Ronnie Johnston

      That link has to be one of , or the most amazing I have seen.

      Sincerely thank's!

    • profile image

      Ronnie Johnston 4 years ago

      Hi NR, I'm still working through your fascinating theory. Have you seen this yet?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedd...

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 4 years ago from Indiana

      Here’s something else that seems difficult to explain for magnetism causing gravity. If I understand this correctly, the sun’s magnetic pole reversal occurs every 11 years. Its north and south poles reverse on an 11 year regular cycle. However, the earths magnetic pole reversal cycle is anywhere from a few thousand years to several thousand years. My question is, if magnetic attraction / repulsion are indeed the force responsible for the stable orbit of the planets around our sun – then how does the more frequent pole reversal of the suns polarity not wreak havoc on the solar system planetary orbits? I mean it should at least cause somewhat noticeable variances in every planets orbit, especially on or around the 11 year mark. This should cause more than just changes in climate. It should cause changes in orbital distance from the sun, right? Even a minimal change in the earths distance would be easily detectable, especially if it were to occur on the regular 11 year cycle.

      I guess my point is that if the magnetic N and S of the planets and the sun are a prominent factor in orbital gravity – why then do the planets not react to the suns magnetic field reversal by gaining or losing magnetic attraction or repulsion?

    • Sharpencil profile image

      Sharpencil 4 years ago from Indiana

      I am a completely uneducated lover of physics. I have long believed there is a direct connection between gravity and magnetism, if they are in fact not the same. However, it seems to me that if magnetism is the force, or primary force, causing planetary orbits, and galactic and other “universal orbits”, then repulsion must also be a primary factor. This would make repulsion the key force that keeps the orbiting entities from being pulled into cataclysmic contact with the entity being orbited. I understand that inertia is another prominent factor contributing to stable orbit patterns.

      But, why are certain stars entangled in close proximity orbital “battles”, which will end with one devouring the other, or the total annihilation of each other? I mean, even the gravitational pull of our very own sun is so much more tremendous than the repulsion force of, let’s say, Mercury. Why is this small planet not pulled in and swallowed up? Is it repulsion, inertia, a combination? Why do man made satellites orbit the earth? Is it their magnetic properties, and inertia, and the “warping” of space due to “space – displacement” by matter itself? This is what puzzles me about magnetism being a prominent factor for explaining gravity, even though we know magnetism is present in all things.

      Plus there is the constant motion factor. Everything in the universe is in motion, right? Nothing can be considered completely “at rest”. If the big bang theory is correct, everything has been in motion for millions, or more, of years to form what we know to be the universe. It seems to me that this constant motion causes magnetic friction. By this I suggest that everything must be pulling, pushing or etc, on everything else because everything is in constant motion, and at a very HIGH rate of speed. Even particles and atoms within every celestial being are either conflicted or adjacent. And the particular combinations of + and – must settle into some sort of equilibrium, if only for a short time, which defining a “short time” in cosmic relevance could actually result in millions of years.

      Again, as you must be able to tell, I am uneducated, but it seems to me that with just the several movements of the earth - 1. = rotation, 2. = orbit around the sun, 3. = solar system orbiting the center of the Milky Way, 4. = Galaxy moving through space – there must be a magnetic force keeping even the smallest particles from being thrown into utter motion chaos. I mean, as I write this, my body is moving at an ungodly speed when I glance out my window at a supposedly “stationary” fence post in my back yard.

      Take two equally sized and equally powerful rare earth magnets – allow them to attach. It’s a strong bond, right? But, if you spin them fast enough, the inertia will eventually pull them apart and they will fly away in almost exact opposite directions. Inertia has the power to overcome magnetism. And how fast are we zipping through space, and mostly in a circular, or spinning motion? Even gas planets have the power to remain compressed while zipping through space at unbelievable speeds.

      Sorry to barge in on you guys.

      Sharpencil

    • profile image

      4 years ago

      @james perlinger.

      good point on time and probability.

    • profile image

      james perlinger 4 years ago

      a better way of viewing the probability of the creation of planets that could produce life is to look a little deeper at the math of it all. most importantly the repetitive process that occur. then to realise that this is continuous, and not simply a single occurrence. if we are determined only by our galactic standings. then that would say every galaxy must, if properly aged and condensed support a several solar systems like ours with planets capable of sustaining life, and again as ages pass the occurrence would only perpetually increase due to the increasing amount of heavier elements present within each. so the possibility would increase as would the the closeness of each new planet that has that possibility. (mind you that "if" we are alone within our galaxy that would only mean that with more time if not even occurring now life is, has, or will be starting upon a relatively close planet in our deep dark woods...)

    • profile image

      Newton's Rival 4 years ago

      @ M... completely agree!!!!

    • profile image

      4 years ago

      Maybe they are, without public knowledge. Like the all electric car they have been bringing out every year for the last 50. You go to buy one and they say its not efficient yet. When the first cars were electric and were far superior to the later gas guzzlers. I would say its is very likely some people have for a very long time had mind blowing technology, and the more people realize the possibilities the more we will see misleading info an what is really taking place in some of these multi billion dollar projects. They say the best way to hide something is in plane sight.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 4 years ago from U.S.A

      an opinion on dark energy: Magnetic forces of the universe that have no light from stars. Magnetism is a constant force, whether there is light enough to see it or not. Scientist all over the globe are currently spending millions of dollars to figure this energy out. I wish they would go with this concept of magnetism=gravity when they approach it, it would make this project a much cheaper objective.

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 4 years ago from U.S.A

      @ Effilnuc....Goofball.... lol! (kidding)

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 4 years ago

      Sorry, found it at the top, thank you.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 4 years ago

      Hi NR, I can't see the link to where the edited version of Keeker Theory is?

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 4 years ago from U.S.A

      Hopefully all the content abides by hubpages policies. They really can be a pain in the butt sometimes!

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 4 years ago from U.S.A

      Here above is the edited version of Keeker Theory... Please read and comment. TY

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 4 years ago

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 4 years ago from U.S.A

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 4 years ago from U.S.A

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDtsuofgRJ0 please check this out and give me your input! This is not my video!

    • profile image

      .^. 5 years ago

      Here's an interesting experiment, about magnetism and temperature changes.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8ZHQQUusGo

    • profile image

      Anonymous Atom 5 years ago

      I once said light had to have weight. People laughed at me. Light will be one of the last things fully understood, not some Boson. What do you think moves freely through space, this Bosob field...it's light. Light is the key...

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      ;-) me 2

    • profile image

      Al C.Rose 5 years ago

      I will be following this avidly from now on :)

      I'm so grateful to live in a world where we keep on challenging the modes to nurture this nature of truth and unveil the beauty of it. This idea in particular seems rightly due. I think you are BRILLIANT.

    • profile image

      Al C.Rose 5 years ago

      This is marvelous. I support this idea, I'm so glad it's being taken seriously. The way you have presented it is brilliant too, I think most people could understand this. Some time ago, during a general discussion something sparked the topic of Gravity and that lead me to the thought of Gravity being Magnetism, and at the exact conception of the idea it just seemed natural and so obvious to me personally that I felt I must have learned that at school, because it looked right in my head, like I'd been shown it all before. I was thinking tonight and several thoughts brought me to Newton and i was reminded of that momentary thought of gravity being magnestism so I decided to actually look it up, and I found your writing! I think you are correct. I don't have any cause for doubt, I'm not a physicist. I like to spend time in my head, sometimes in space, thinking and feeling things out, using that timeless classic, common sense ;D (to the best of my own ability hehe)

      I love this, you have set the world a delicious roar of a challenge! I'm excited. Good luck all, let's see where it goes 8)

    • Newton's Rival profile image
      Author

      IAMCHOSEN 5 years ago from U.S.A

      This hub has over 750 comments... crazy... It's funny to me that for a subject Ten yrs ago I couldn't even get ppl to listen to, how much interest and foot gaining it has now. Thank you all for your thoughts and opinions. @M, I am still thinking and working things out on paper and in my head. I will post soon. Also I had to change the layout several times, hubpages keeps changing positions of their ads, its getting quite annoying, so if it seems hard to read, please just take your time and try. Thanks.... Keeker-

    • profile image

      .^. 5 years ago

      Newton's Rival, if you was Stephen Hawking, i would be very shocked why the royal society, dont accept concepts showed on this hubpage.

    • profile image

      bolonny 5 years ago

      wow that was long didn't read nearly enough ......any ways i watched some show on tv that made me think of how all the large objects in the world were lifted,,,,,looked up ed 'coral castle' read all his stuff ''very interesting...and then some russian with the cavity structure effect ,,interesting than that brought me to magnets,,then sound tesla ,then atoms,,,then light ....this was the shortened version anywaysso far i have learned that basicaly we are all ridding a magnetic wave and we are in harmony with the stuff around us.. yeah crazy sounding and would agree .......so one of my many ?s what are what are photons made of,,,,so far i think they must be electrons"magnets"go figure.....and what would happen if you cut a magnet in half again,again,and again...what would be left ......and a magnet hanging on a fridge why does it not loose mass..e=mc .....................anyways ive looked up so much stuff and have a great memory that i can look at every thing and put them togeather and just looking for a few anwsers....if my grammer it messed up its because im missing some keys on my laptop these ones qtyisfhlb,/ sorry

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Perhaps it would be a great exercise to read all this again and write down key facts, mainly the most mysterious..

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      My mum taught me "necessity is the mother of all invention!"

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Problems always have been and always will be opportunities..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      NR, I cant wait to hear your opinions on such valuable subjects, please don't think there is such a thing of thinking to much. Remember Einstein believed it was not that he was smarter, but just stayed with problems longer...

    • profile image

      NR 5 years ago

      Yeah, I told you earlier on, sometimes I think waaaay to much about all of this, and need to take breaks , to just clear my head and start over with what I already know, and things that I've recently learned. Lately, it's all flushing in my head again, so I'll take some time read through all the comments and respond. : )

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      What is a fact is positive and negative electric charges which induce magnetic fields, waves, interference patterns and poles of repulsion and attraction....

      Protons, electrons, gravitons, neutrinos...these are labels that are used for theoretical mechanical scenarios for the purpose of input/output forecasts.

      Within certain parameters, these labels and the theories work to forecast output with a known set of inputs...however, the labels and theory is not able to forecast all outputs within all parameters...hence the attempts to discover a unified field theory.

      When one attempts to reconcile a gravitational field and a magnetic field...one repeatedly fails. A unified field theory does not exist...a single field theory does exist.

      There is a substantial difference between unifying existing field theories into one unified field theory and the real single field theory.

      One could say that the only theory that works to tie a magnetic field and a gravitational field together is with strings...string theory, but even this does not satisfy all outcomes within all parameters.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      There is another theory about electrons that is not so well known.

      Protons repel electrons - they do not attract them.

      Space is filled with a sea of electrons that are repelled and compressed by the repulsive force of protons.

      Neutrons are mini black holes that attract mass(protons) but not electric charge.

      The neutrons reduce the repelling force of protons allowing the electrons to get closer to the proton/neutron centre.

      If space is full of electrons, the wavespeed within this sea of electrons travels at "lightspeed" meaning that the electrons do not move at lightspeed but rather the wave function through which their energy is transferred, moves at lightspeed.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      DEP -

      If Lightspeed is an inverse ratio of energy to mass, then the Neutrino, which has a large mass, will have a slower speed compared to the electron which has relatively no mass...

    • profile image

      DEP 5 years ago

      Wow ty, you reitterated the fuk out of what i said, i just hate numbers. So to continue, 2 same charged particles contained in the same area for a long enough period of time, will build potential energy equal to the particles speed magnified times the repelling particles speed. So my question is why does this not change the calculation for the energy of a free neutron, since neutrino speed is much slower compared to that of the speed of light along with them having a much larger mass compared to that of a light particle?

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      DEP

      yes, e = mc^2 when

      e = 1 energy unit contained in 1 particle of matter

      m = 1 particle unit containing 1 energy unit

      c = 1 unit of distance traveled by 1 particle unit of light in 1 period

      e = mc^2 is a joke! It has taken us 100 years to get the punchline - it is a theory of relativity...this means the units used to quantify and define the variables e,m,c are relative!

      I prefer to say that

      e = infinity/zero

      where

      zero = 1/infinity

      therefore

      e = infinity/infinity

      or

      e = 1

      So

      1 = mc^2 is more correct than e = mc^2

      or

      1/m = c^2

      or

      1/c^2 = m

      or

      m = m

      or

      c = square root of 1/m

      or

      e = 1

      m = 4

      c = 1/2

      1 = 4 * 1/2^2

      1 = 4 * 1/4

      1 = 1

      therefore electromagnetic wavespeed or lightspeed (if you prefer) is a universal ratio, not a universal constant!

      Lightspeed is a ratio of energy to mass of 1/4

    • profile image

      D E P 5 years ago

      Hello guys I know this isnt an actual magnetics question but its about E=mc^2 and how to explain it. Any comments would be appreciated.

      Each part of the atom is comprised of multiple same charged particles(i.e. electron), which are repellent of each other but are forced together into a mass by a more dominant opposite charged mass(in this case proton), causing the repelling particles to react with the stronger force instead of the weaker forces, which by using coulombs law, we can see how the interaction between two opposite charges magnitude increase from the decrease in the distance between the two.(hence q1 x q2 / r^2) We also know that when we bombard an atom with enough em energy we can overload the electron and cause it to burst apart due to the proton no longer being capable of maintaining the balance due to the increasing distance of the two oppositely charged masses as well as the increasing energy of the electron. By knowing the ionization energies required for an atom, we are able to calculate how many particles or how much energy an electron of an atom must have in order to interact with its own charge and burst apart(the em particles that make the electron) instead of the opposite charge which is at a further distance away(but larger mass).

      My point is, that the magnitude built up in each particle of the electron mass is released upon the removal of the electron at a distance that is negligible(0) and since particles are mass less energies it requires a negligible amount of energy in order to transfer the momentum to the particles energy. For example charge1xcharge2/r^2 where r is equal to 0 and the charge of the particle is its speed would give you c x c or c^2/r^2(where r is still equal to 0) In addition anything divided by 0 is considered to be infinite, and since the charge is the speed and the speed of light is considered infinite or absolute then c^2 is your released energy per particle(and not just the speed of light) in an object of mass of x. So we would take the mass multiply it by the released energy per particle and voila!!! e=mc^2.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Effilnuc.Great answer!

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      The above is right on, Effilnuc, Seems like you got it spot on.Its a great take on Heat and the Sun.

      It also shows how heat is tied to Electrical Energy.

      Something mostly unknown by people to this day.

      Very Good!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      True Heat is about electromagnetic interference, temperature as we understand it in Celsius or Fahrenheit is about heat transfer through particle contact.

      The thermosphere is much Hotter in this sense than our sea level atmosphere, however, because the sea level atmosphere is denser, it has more capacity for heat storage and heat transfer through particle contact.

      So, although it is Hotter in the upper atmosphere, there is less thermal transfer through particle contact but more electromagnetic interference due to the same lack of particle density.

      The energy of heat initially comes from electromagnetic interference, however the transfer of thermal energy is done through particle contact. Can you see why it is really ignorant to use thermal combustion to drive electromagnetic motors to transfer energy through metal wires. The truly efficient manner for harvesting and transfer of energy is found through electromagnetic wave potential and rates of interference...wireless!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      If one understands "hot" to be a number of Kelvin or a degree in Celsius, then one is looking at air pressure and molecular velocity only. At the upper level of the atmosphere, the ratio of air pressure to molecular velocity is minimal so the Kelvin or Celsius measurement is also minimal...however...

      If one understands "hot" to be high levels of electromagnetic interference then the thermosphere is "hot" and the lower atmosphere is cooler.

      As for the Sun. The Sun is "hot" in terms of electromagnetic interference, however, one might suggest that above and below its thermosphere/corona, it may well be substantially cooler in terms of Kelvin or Celsius due to a lack of atmospheric pressure or molecular activity/density.

      We know that electromagnetic wave interference, density and resistance gives rise to heat. We know that particle interference, density and friction give rise to heat.

      The cause of the heat is the same in both cases, interference, density or potential difference and resistance. This occurs simultaneously between the wave functions of electromagnetic fields on an atomic scale as well as between particles on a quantum scale.

      An experiment to try.

      Take a glass container of air from earth's atmosphere at sea level. Launch it in to the thermosphere such that the electromagnetic waves from the sun are able to interfere with the air inside the glass container. The "temperature" in Kelvin or degrees Celsius would rise considerably higher than the temperature measured outside of the glass container where there is less potential interference of electromagnetic waves.

      The shows us that the energy from the sun is not provided by combustion or thermal induction but through electromagnetic interference. This is what I mean by the sun is "cold", it is NOT a big heat lamp, rather it is an electromagnetic generator probably driven by a zero point vacuum.

      Through this understanding, one can develop much more efficient uses of solar electromagnetic energy instead of the current applications for solar atmospheric thermal energy...there is a significant difference between the potential energy of the two forms of energy harvesting.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Effilnuc. the temperature of the atmosphere is the temperature of the atmosphere. You cant say the hottest level of our atmosphere is freezing when its much warmer on the ground. I know what there saying but it doesn't make sense. Its like saying the hottest part of our atmosphere is the flame on a hot air balloon.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      From Wikipedia "Thermosphere"

      "The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer would read significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact. In the anacoustic zone above 160 kilometres (99 mi), the density is so low that molecular interactions are too infrequent to permit the transmission of sound."

      It is crucial to understand that temperature is really a ratio of pressure and velocity of electromagnetic interference. It is a statement of relativity.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Comet Lovejoy was estimated to be between 100-200 meters, after it survived the sun! NASA said well it must be more like 500 meters to survive LOL!!!!

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      The most amazing fact though is that Mercury can come as close as 47 million kms to the sun and the recent comet Lovejoy (made of ice) survived coming as close as 120,000 KMS!!!

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Another point to back up the idea the suns outer atmosphere is hot while the surface is cold, is that earths most outer atmosphere the thermosphere (translates as hot sphere) is the hottest layer of our atmosphere. Just a thought..

    • profile image

      effilnuc 5 years ago from eastern australia

      Answer me this!

      Scientific community says that when an asteroid flies close to the sun it begins to burn up because the sun is really hot!

      Scientific community says that when an asteroid flies close to the earth it begins to burn up, not because the Earth is hot but because of the earth's atmosphere. Huh??

      These two statements are in conflict with one another.

      The truth is that the Sun has an atmosphere, and we are inside that atmosphere! The faster the rate of change within an atmosphere, (pressure change) the more heat that is generated.

      The Sun's atmosphere is as "hot" as the earth's atmosphere. When an object enters either atmosphere and the rate of change in pressure is great enough, the object burns up.

      Just as there is a distinct "line" where objects begin to heat up upon entering the Earth atmosphere, so too there is a specific "pressure line" outside of which one is safe from burning up near the Sun.

      Just as we cannot see below the atmosphere of Jupiter or Venus, so too can we not see into the atmosphere (corona) of the Sun!

      An atmosphere is created by magnetism, not gravity! Mass is as unreal as Gravity! Volume and pressure and rate of change are the key! NOT mass and density and acceleration- as these are simply relativity statements between dimensions!

      This is a bit like saying the Earth is round, not flat...it is going to piss a lot of people off...but that does not detract from its essential truth!

    • profile image

      effilnuc 5 years ago from eastern australia

      I typed in "photos of sun from space" and found this. http://www.turbophoto.com/space/webart/sun-small.j...

      on the site

      http://www.turbophoto.com/products/spc/home.htm

      There are very few photos of the sun from space to be found on the net...I wonder why...seriously? There are heaps of earth and the moon, and heaps of earth with the sun in the background.

      The photo listed above is a photo of the sun, from space, and without any filter, it is obviously blue and is not sending out light and heat to the solar system, but rather some sort of electromagnetic energy.

    • profile image

      Guest 5 years ago

      Reading the first comment from "reality" makes one realize the outrage from the scientific community when you tell them their version of God known as "gravity" is made up by scientists just like trying to tell a Christian their version of God is made up by Christians. Both are made up, plain and simple. No physical evidence of gravity has ever been found other than scientists saying that every occurrence related to the law of attraction is a force called gravity. God forbid they actually look at the KNOWN phenomenon (magnetism) that actually does cause attraction and repulsion. I guess that would make sense.

      Dark matter is another scientific religious belief. Since astronomers don't understand why galaxies spin at the same speed at inner and outer bands, they created a magical force that serves the purposes of wrapping itself around galaxies and spinning them around.... weeeeeeee!!! well of course they spin equally because clearly stars are attracted to one another and are constantly being pulled together. Galaxies might look like whirlpools, but they function like anything but. Magnetism and the basic concept of attraction /repulsion are the forces in this universe that makes everything move, not unicorns, gravity or santa clause.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Its actually very similar to the observations of gravity...

      Gravity exists between two masses of different scale. Gravity does not exist if there is only 1 mass...there must be two different bodies in mass for "gravity" to be observed.

      So, just as a graviton cannot be discovered, so to will a pure energy source forever remain hidden.

      The true source of energy is found within the system. If the system is broken apart into its individual components, the energy is lost, destroyed!

      If you want to destroy energy, destroy a system....energy can be destroyed and energy can be created because energy is not matter and it is not light....it is the system and rate of change that creates and distributes the universal, ever present, limitless potential energy.

      In this sense, new energy sources will always be discovered until we realize that the TRUE source of energy is found in the type and rate of CHANGE. How efficient the energy created is, is determined by the finesse and knowledge used to CREATE the TYPE of change and and CONTROL the RATE of change in any system.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      I wonder if these means that for the old

      e = mc^2

      Energy = rate of change between matter/volume and speed of light^2.

      Because lightspeed is a measurement of two vectors, distance and time, then it needs to be squared in order to match the 4 vectors of matter being 3 distance and 1 time.

      This means that the potential energy is greatest when described as the rate of change between the two known extreme states - being matter and light!

      There are many other little amounts of energy realised during smaller states of change in between these two extreme states... such as when the state of coal is changed.

      Again, the key is the rate of change between states as well as the scale of the change.

      energy = the change in state or (current state - initial state) * rate of change

      or

      full potential energy = the difference between the state of light and the state of matter

      So, universal energy or full potential energy exists between the sun - light source and the earth - matter source.

      The energy or power is not sourced at either extreme but found in the system as a whole.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      $$$$$MONEY$$$$$$

      An analogy (just an analogy) is Money is the same as electrical energy.

      Money is really worthless except when exchanged for something else.

      Sometimes it is goods and services, sometimes it is other forms of money...the exchange rate! (a transformer is like an exchange rate)

      Someone can try and make money by changing a small value they paid for a product and selling it for a larger value...this is the hardest way to make money. (like putting coal in a machine to drive electrical current)

      The simplest way to make money is through rapid exchange. This may be in the form of goods...ie cash flow or it may be in the form of exchanging with other forms of currency (energy).

      The banks know that the fastest and most reliable way to make money is through rapid, really rapid exchange of money, just money! The faster it changes hands, the more money is generated! The exchange rates are the key. (transformers/diodes play a vital role in free electrical energy.)

      The RATE OF CHANGE (pulse frequency in DC circuits) is the key! However, unlike money, the concept of harmony and synchronicity and synergy are crucial to discovering unlimited electrical power in the same way banks discovered unlimited financial power!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Perhaps RATE OF CHANGE IN PRESSURE is the key. Consider the following train of thought.

      Seeing as we have

      Air pressure

      Fluid Pressure

      Electric/magnetic Pressure

      and probably some others that I am not aware of,

      and we know that rate of change in pressure of fluids and gases is very important then perhaps...just perhaps, we should also be looking at the rates of change in pressure in electrical circuits.

      By this I mean - the rate at which voltage (potential difference or "pressure")changes - scale, vector and volume.

      If rapid and sudden pressure changes generate heat, ie more pressure, which is fed back into the initial system, we have more pressure, or potential energy available than we started with.

      So, if you have an electric circuit with a potential energy or pressure of say 12V and you pulse that circuit rapidly so that there is a sharp change between high and low pressure, you will introduce more potential energy, pressure, into the system.

      Because we know that electrical energy is wave like, we know it has a certain frequency. If we pulse the circuit at a rate fast enough - at the right frequency, the wave generated from each new pulse will be overlayed exactly on the existing pulse traveling through the circuit. As we know, the addition of 1 wave on another creates a bigger wave than the sum of the 2 waves...this is the key to zero point energy...energy must be added at the zero point of the wave in order to exponentially increase as a standing wave.

      Because these waves are three dimensional, the zero point is not as it appears on one of those screens that measure the wave of electric currents (forgotten what they are called).

      Think more of a wave that pulses around the earth, it gets wider and weaker as it nears 1/4 way, comes back to a strong point at 1/2 way on the opposite side of the planet, returns to widest and weakest point at 3/4 way (same place as 1/4 way) then returns to its starting point, where all the wave energy returns to a single or zero point.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Little side thought...this would make an anti gravity machine - any machine that creates an outcome opposite to the outcome normally observed.

      So, a Plane which creates an observation opposite to the NORM, is an anti-gravity machine.

      An elevator which creates an observed situation (observation) opposite to the NORM is also an anti-gravity machine.

      Now that we have realised that anti-gravity has been "solved" many, many times before...can we please try and figure out the truths behind electricity and magnetism?

      Physical laws such as the law of gravity are not true FORCES, they are merely labels for consistent observations under certain conditions.

      Put two people in the same situation and they behave differently...unless a LAW is used to make them behave the same.

      Put two objects in the same situation and they behave the same...and a LAW is created by us to label the set of constants which create this predictable outcome.

      See how a LAW such as the LAW of GRAVITY or the LAWS of THERMODYNAMICS are not TRUE FORCES but OBSERVATIONS of predictable behavior under a given conditions. We are confusing the labels (laws) which are simply agreed observations and outcomes (observed conditions) with the TRUTH.

      All laws are man made because they are all founded upon human observations of a real set of conditions and outcomes. Unless we claim that we have observed all conditions and outcomes possible, we are not able to truly claim that a LAW is TRUTH, until then...

      Any LAW is only a label for a known and agreed set of conditions that precede a foreseeable outcome...such as GRAVITY which all began when NEWTON tried to explain something he OBSERVED!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      @ Newtons Rival - Hi, I hope your are well, we have not heard or seen from you on this post for a while.

      I would love to know what you think about the hypothesis that Gravity is an Observation, not a FORCE.

      ie: GRAVITY IS NOT MAGNETISM but simply an observation of magnetic force under certain constant conditions.

      It disagrees with your original theory that Gravity is Magnetism but yet it also supports a lot of your arguments.?

      Thanks again for creating this public discussion.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Higher altitude = low pressure = low heat

      SPACE = no pressure = no HEAT

      CONCLUSION - IT IS HOT ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN AND BENEATH THE SURFACE, BUT IT IS NOT HOT NEAR THE SURFACE OF THE SUN - OUTSIDE OF ITS IONOSPHERE perhaps!

      Under the Sun's Surface there is a lot of pressure which equals a lot of heat!

      Just a few concepts that could be worth considering or trying to disprove!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Temperature = Pressure

      When there is an explosion, it is the air pressure, or water pressure that creates a pressure barrier that contains the pressure of the explosion and focuses the energy of the explosion.

      In space, there is no air pressure, it is a vacuum. So when there is an explosion in space, it is much, much different than what we OBSERVE here on earth due to the atmospheric pressure.

      So, it makes complete sense that the SUN is not HOT but a pressure barrier is created by the atmosphere/magnetosphere/ionosphere that creates a potential difference by trapping the magnetic energy of the sun, putting it under pressure and converts it to heat.

      Just like electricity is not hot when it runs through a wire that is extremely large (no pressure/atmosphere), when the electricity/magnetism is forced under pressure (resistance)...that creates heat!

      So, the Sun is like a big cold electro magnetic generator that is NOT HOT...the heat only comes when the energy from the sun is compressed in our atmosphere...like RESISTANCE in an electric wire.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Ooh, I like this, the Sun is not hot and air pressure creates the observations we call gravity - gravity is a myth!

      I had not posted for a while because I have been working on the same theory...there is NO SUCH THING AS GRAVITY...it is purely a term for various common observations - it is NOT A FORCE.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      I found the most curious points in this article that the higher the altitude the colder it gets, hence ice caps on mountain tops, there for if the sun is hot as it is said to be the closer you get to the sun the hotter it is, but if you go anywhere at day light,go hight enough altitude and it gets freezing. Plus that comets have been seen travelling so close to the sun and miss! comets are mostly ice. Anything considered close the the sun in astronomical terms should burn up from the extream heat. The idea that makes most sense is that our atmosphere is gases and when the sun's cold plasma/radiation (electricity) hits it makes it glow because of the powerful fiction from the collision of the solar winds and the atmosphere.

    • RK Sangha profile image

      RK Sangha 5 years ago from USA

      I congratulate the author of this thought provoking hub, with a long chain of comments that I could not finish reading all. Thanks for this hub.

    • profile image

      Jon Ball 5 years ago

      I've agree that gravity is just another word for magnetism. Although I do however believe that matter on Earth is pressed to the Earth because of pressure from our atmosphere and internal core elements, not gravity or magnetism. The elliptical orbit of the Earth around the sun explains that gravity does not cause orbit. This simply explains that our 2 poles and the Sun's main North and South poles cause perihelion and aphelion. If the force of gravity was the same no matter what, objects wouldn't fall faster and faster if they were up high, they would fall at whatever speed gravity was pushing, which by all scientific definitions, is a constant speed. Gravity is not real.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      please google, the sun is cold, there is also a part 2, sounds pretty far fetched (the title) but the simple points made in these two articles are incredible and obvious.

    • profile image

      Glenn H M Jr. 5 years ago

      The funny thing is, depending on how you arrange the Magnetic Particles will decide gravity, energy, magnetism, and both whether it's matter or anti-matter. I do agree M that it makes a great capacitor, however wouldn't it be so much more fun to truly tap magnetism to travel close to the speed of light squared. Just imagine being able to travel to the other side of the universe within less than a year or being able to send probes to study black holes very closely and knowing they can go into it and get back out (of course with the shield holding from the pressure), and so forth. Humanity truly exploring other Galaxies, Solar Systems, and such with each all by using magnetism properly. Just accounting for the wavelength of particles and using magnetism to make them more efficient to reach higher speeds and gradients.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Lets also remember the sun has permanent coronal holes at its poles venting out permanent solar winds. Just as the Earth does, logically speaking regarding the earth.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Yes,I think so also. Everything is so much more than anyone ever belived. You say it very clearly M.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      But as for keeping them forever, I think evolution will reveal all..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Lets just hope that unjust secrets really can not be kept from the majority in this lifetime.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Daniel. Agreed, it also makes a lot of sense there are infinite realities in so many way's than the land, sea and space that's always on TV. and if the whole earth at one stage was all over thick ice, even for a few months how could any prehistoric man survive with no ocean or land? unless earth is more like a giant geode in structure and every other active astral body.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Im thinking objects in space are more likly to be hollow than not and if true such leads to new understandings of how the solar system works.

      Many more new realities unfold.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      J. I do sincerely hope however you do find more clues on this important subject.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Of course evidence has to make sense or it is not evidence. We cannot afford comfort zones when we discover new realities.Instinct is our freedom to evolve new comfort zones, and to discover the hidden but obvious.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      J. How much evidence do you need? no matter how much you find there is always more, some more significant than others. At the end of the day witch has more evidence hence which makes more sense..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Daniel. I think that one example of the gradients of electricity could be shown in the basic gravitational sense as various G-forces, grater speed/velocity conducts more electricity, or gravitational/magnetic forces. I think that more kinetic energy in a object is basically that the object has become a capacitor storing MORE electricity by movement. Just as G-forces become greater by more movement. Which explains why non explosive warheads (depleted uranium projectiles) are so much more powerful than the conventional being based solely on kinetic energy.Or shall we say electrical energy..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      GlenHMJr..I have also been thinking that permanent magnets must be basically natural capacitors ( storage of electricity) and so could be literally used as battery's if set up correctly..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Today on space weather someone photographed a brilliant blue cloud on the top of the setting sun and in this report it states that there have usually (through out history) been a emerald green flash seen on top of the sun at sunset(because the sun appears bigger at sunset because it is magnified) on occasion by some astronomers. NASA has the same statement as with everything.. ITS a optical illusion (its not actually there!). Just as has been seen on the moon and of course Earth (auroras).. I spoke of the likeliness that Earth and all celestial body's are hollow, and that auroras come from the polar openings! how much more evidence is there when you have PROOF of brilliant coloured clouds at the polar openings of the Earth the Moon and the SUN!!!

    • profile image

      Glenn H M Jr. 5 years ago

      M, I do believe electricity is Magnetism, as is mass, not the other way around, it's just easier to see it's interactions as such than such as it is with mass. Magnetism decides the mass, energy, magnetism, and whether it is matter or antimatter in nature of anything and everything and only it is constant and can explain all that we have seen and measured in the universe as a singular force in a reasonable and rational manner.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      M : Im thinking your saying;

      'Gravity is a electrical gradient' of electro-magnetic field's.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Gravity is JUST another gradient of electricity. And the various density's of matter is JUST another...

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Electricity is infinite in frequency's or forms gravity is only one of them...

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Magnetism is electricity and all is magnetic!!!!

    • profile image

      Glenn H M Jr. 5 years ago

      Magnetism, Energy, and Gravity/Mass "or illusion of mass" are all based off of Magnetism in various degrees. Magnetism is the most logical theory to explain all of these forces and magnetic properties explain both energy and gravity/mass and how they work with the Conservation of Mass and Energy. If one force is both, aka magnetic particles, however decided by how the magnetic particles are arranged would explain how the universe could of been one for so long, how the universe contracts and expects beyond understood means, and hold true to most laws of physics.

      To J, Newton's Rival, and others, instead of just testing whether Magnetism = Gravity/Mass, also be sure to research it's affects on energy, wave lengths, and so forth since they are all logically tied together by single magnetic particles and how they're arranged within a given space. It doesn't mean Newton was wrong, nor Einstein, or others, it just explains more in depth how right they were and why. Trust me, what you find will be exciting.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      I've actually been contemplating whether gravity = magnetism or not, and I think it is. In fact, I plan to devote a significant amount of time to experimenting and researching whether magnetism = gravity.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Typo above: nettle should be: needle

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Yea M: Thats why I think even Tesla would have loved to have seen that water orbiting the nettle in space. As it conferms so much.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      I have also read and realised that Victor Schauberger's perpetual water implosion generator carried electric currant through the water vortex

      as opposed to using a wire coil. Like a Tesla coil that uses water as the conductor instead of copper wire. because the water moves rapidly the voltage literally being moved by the water increasing the CURRANT.....

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Please look up, unlimited free energy identified. A You tube video proving the best place to hide something is in plain sight!

      And proving this short video, look up, mini Tesla coil with

      110v led bulb.asf..and be shore to read peoples comments..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Daniel. Amazing, what a simple experiment can prove to people that are told what to believe. It shows that even a non conductive substance can still be magnetized with static electricity, causing matter (in this case water) to be pulled in spirals to the magnet along it magnetic fields..

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      MUST SEE: Water droplets obriting knitting needle in space - NASA Space station experiment.

      Google:

      Youtube.com/Science off the sphere

    • profile image

      mrthewanderer1 5 years ago

      M:

      Proof has not yet been obtained, otherwise my conversation here would actually be taking place on a global scale. :)

      Two of the experiments would need to be done in space, away from other gravitational objects (like the earth itself).

      So first i need to complete the few experiments I have that can be done now and here, then i will present the findings and try to get assistance on the last two. (If these actually find information in favor of the theory).

    • profile image

      Kent Green 5 years ago

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Sorry, the collective unconscious determines what is excluded and included.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Collective unconscious determines the point of determination between exclusion and inclusion.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Back the front is really just a matter of perspective.

      Explosion, exclusive v implosion, inclusive.

      Dissipation from one perspective is really inclusion from another.

      An explosive force is also an inclusive force and an implosive force is TRULY exclusive...just give me a point reference!

      Free Will = choice of perspective!

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Victor Schauberger was a real pioneer of free energy and anti-gravity. He realised natures ultimate formation on all scales is the spiral/vortex, which can be found everywhere from our DNA structure to galaxy's. He found that like empty space water has huge amounts of energy which is obvious when you see twisters, cyclones. He believed all our technology is back the front because we use explosive force that is destructive and fighting nature, which is why it is not perpetual because nature counter acts this force with dissipation, where implosion he noted was working with nature hence the term reverse engineering. Look into Schaubergers work with the vortex, I think understanding his research could be priceless.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      What are the most significant of your experiments so far.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      mrthewanderer1. would be great to see your proof..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Maybe Normal is a blueprint for for extremeness of conformity, where the current leaders investing in a moving monotony, in a circle of perpetual involvement of all of us. Some of the worlds new seeds are sprouting. All evolves, even time....

    • profile image

      mrthewanderer1 5 years ago

      Ok, i had an idea the gravity was magnetism when i was a child as well. Then, of course, school tried to teach me otherwise. Now however, I have not only a theory, but i have multiple experiments that will prove that the atomic magnetic field generated by protons and electrons extend far beyond the orbits of the electrons. Thus attracting and being attracted by magnetic fields generated by nearby atoms. And the more atoms collected in this matter(generating more mass), increases the magnetic field's diameter and strength. This theory does strengthen the fact that the greater the mass, the greater the gravity. This will also explain the fundamentals of Black Holes, and other gravitational phenomena.

      I do understand that this theory is generally shunned by the scientific community, but then, so was all theories that originated against the norm of popular opinion.

    • profile image

      .^. 5 years ago

      @Effilnuc :)

      More videos about the "famous" Beifeild-Brown effect:

      -Possible explanation and experiment

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBBlZ8agldE

      -How to build one

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9smZ_-wFIc

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      @ .^. Thanks again!

    • profile image

      .^. 5 years ago

      Ivor Catt talking about Oliver Heaviside

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbWWrR4dgtw

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      All nations are a part of it, we are all human beings and the old divide an conquer is what has given the illusions of fear that suppress evolution, which is ironic because evolution is nature and can not be pined down. technology is the footprint of this process not the process itself. We are all the same just in subjective experiences. There is lots of technology we use that has not been our own individual creation. When the world realises that the individual is a branch on the same tree than I think technology will evolve at a rate that only the crazy can imagine. For anyone crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones that do.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      With 7 billion people on earth we need to find ways to create new development that improves the world and life.

      Space Development even if very very slow can do that.

      Finding ways for all nations to be a part is another story.

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      From what I can gather, most of this stuff has been researched very seriously in the last 60 years and whilst itis currently used privately by corporations and militarily, it is not public knowledge thanks to copyrights, trade and water mark laws developed in last century.

      Now, thanks to the threat of terrorism and the like, even less of this type of information is being made public for PUBLIC SECURITY reasons.

      Think about it, if YOU had developed Free Energy Technology and anti-gravity machines, would YOU make them completely public so that any Tom, Dick or Harry could construct them and abuse the inherent power such devices hold? I certainly would not!

      I think that if you are able to figure this stuff out for yourself, you have earned the right to use the technology!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      Oliver Heaviside was able to show the relationship between gravity and magnetism in 1890s. Conventional physics of the day dismissed the Heaviside circuit however new evidence clearly shows its existence and the scientific community is fast catching up. I would not be surprised to see some of this technology made public before the year is out.

      Look up THE HEAVISIDE PAPERS FOUND AT PAIGNTON IN 1957 from the Library of Electrical Engineers in London.

      All of the information is already found, it just needs application.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Another real good experiment is: Will a compass in space point to earths North Pole or the Suns.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      You can vote for Magnetic experiments in the Space Lab.

      Experiments are from 14 to 18 year olds to YouTubeLab. Go To:

      YouTube.com/SpaceLab

      Voting ends Jan24-2012.

      One reld good experiment is 'Can water orbit a + positive charged rod in space as Oxygen carries a - negitive charge. (H is + charge)

      Many good magnetic experiments made the finals for voting.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      If space is real mass, than however nature creates the visible is the key to finding free energy. It seems complicated but I think complications come from misinformation witch seems more abundant than information. If the best way to hide something is in plain sight than we might be able to call currant technology not even half of it's true potential. Einstein said it was not that he is smarter than anyone else, he just stayed with problems longer..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      It could be possible that what we call mass is really true space and vice versa. Such as small holes inside a rock full of electricity in varying density's, labelling these small holes we might live in as mass and the foundation around them conducting invisible light as space. Perhaps the term physical is just a name for visible.

    • profile image

      .^. 5 years ago

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      The Internet is truly history's biggest library...

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      google. the Beifeild-Brown effect

      A pioneer on anti-gravity

      LOTS TO RESEARCH!!

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      I think it's all like setting up a new tv, there are lots of ways to connect the wires but once in the right order you have a clear picture.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Google The cause of Earth's Magnetic Field SOLVED

      It is a good insight into the Atlantic anomaly.It would be a pleasure to here it summarized. And please note that THEY are masters of disinformation. a theory only works when it make sense In my humble opinion...

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      What is all means!

      The Magnetic field is not centre on the globe or in the center of globe and its tilted.

      DLP 2012

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Please forgive my typos.

      ib the globe = in the globe

      do-pole = di-pole

      di-pole reading at the poles 70,000 nT (nano-tesla)

      di-pole readings at equator 35,000nt

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      M : Theres consern because the(di-pole)field has been weaking in the area,with increase's in rad's.

      The surface readings are 2.2 . 2.4 and past highs of 2.6 guass

      do-pole readings 70,000 nano-teslas

      Manna in the wilds claims were .oo4 milli tesla.

      So he was just a no nothing bully ! Wonder what other BS he was trowing we didnt catch?

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      The field in the N. Pacific is weaker.

      So the magnetic field is all over the place but the researchers are slowly sorting such out (the other many fields)So we already known of the tilt,now its seem to me its tilted ib the globe also. Its also confusing as some will say the field is weaker and on checking its stronger. Depends on where they checked the field.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Perhaps the crust is not as conductive for some reason in that area?

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      It will make more sense if there is a similar anomaly at the opposite side of the globe, like a east and west pole???

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      So the sun field hits the earths field at an angle. Supporting the findings of the suns field causeing earths rotation, orbit and tilt.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      So. Pacific should read So. Atlantic.

      See both.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      It should mean the field is tilted (In Earth) somewhat like the axis tilt. With a high point off Brazil. Also the So. Pacific Anomaly is at the same area.

      Im thinking it maybe related to the field also.

      knowing the true size and location of the field would be more then interesting. Also why the anomaly is at that location could be another clue to the field itself.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Daniel.. Very interesting, aprox 440 miles(because it is reletively close to the equator where the crust would be thickest because of centrificle force, which is why the earth is slightly squashed vertically) I guess this is what NASA would call another coincidental optical illusion. It is strange it is closest to Brazil. I wonder why, it would be great to here some idea's. Understanding the earth this way could make the answer to anti-gravity so much simpler.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      I did some simple math from using the Van Allen Belts size and Im showing from that a centre point of earths magnetic field should be at apox,440 miles below the mean surface of earth and is about 100 to 200 miles thick. (thickness is a estmate based on distance between the proton belt and the electron belt)

      DLP 1/18/2012

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Brazal = Brazil

      Earth's surface magnetic field near Brazil is alittle over 2.2 Gauss.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      M:

      Yea, also I found that the Van Allen belts are nearest the earth near Brazal and earths field is highest there.

      My guess is their is now enough data to prove where earths field is really located.

      400-500 miles down or at the center of earth.

      I belive there are now at least two ways to do the math on it.

      I hope someone beats that Clown Manna to it!

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      I mean't stroke the stoking with a plastic bag not stoking the stoking...lol..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Daniel. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I know i have probably only listed a few thing's. So I would like to here more interesting points on the matter, even if it's to long for this blog.

      I do have another. When I was looking into simple exercises with static electricity I came across one called the Invisible leg. All you need is a stocking and a sandwich bag, stocking the stocking with the sandwich bag from toe to end in the same direction. Then holding the stocking on the opening the stocking fill's with electricity giving the impression of a invisible leg.When you stroke the nylon with the plastic bag. these 2 material acquired opposite electrical charges. Because the stocking material became the same charge and all like charges repel each other, the sides of the stocking repel each other, taking on the shape of a real leg. This means the crust of the planets could be thinner in many cases than predicted or vice versa, and supported by the same way a the stoking is filled with the same charge...

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Effilnic, I heared H80 in the 1800's was put on Tonic lables of lixers and such. Also its now a name on some type of cleaning products.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      M : Yea. 400 hundred miles is not that far compared to the miles to the core.

      Thats why I was a sayer of a 'hollow earth' would change science as now known.

      You listed only a few things above, The list would be too long for this blog.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      NOT TO MENTION EVERY OTHER acid and mineral......

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Effilnuc. in away there is no need for H80 because what it is that we breath is what allows us to be, FOR NOW.

      Life is proven to thrive everywhere. The are places on earth discovered to be living in areas of life that are comparable to finding bacteria in a beacon full of sulphuric acid, one of the most corrosive (heat generating acids!)....

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Effilnuc. Interesting.. How would we come across water of that purity and what would the major significance be..

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      My guess with magma is that there probably is not as much of it we are lead to believe. It is possible and likely that magma is created not by friction but by chemical reactions of water reacting with concentrations of minerals and radioactive metals.Some minerals explode when in contact with water and we know how much heat and pressure can come from explosions.also it could be that maybe 100 miles of the centre of the crust could be magma leaving 300 miles each side.I would think more likely there are massive pockets of magma in some areas of the crust. Also it is predicted the earth's crust to be up to 800 miles thick!

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Daniel. "only 400 to 700 miles deep" 400-700 miles is a long way. The deepest hole ever drilled was in Russia at a depth of 7.5 miles.The highest commercial jets travel's is between 6 and 7 miles. space begins at around 62 miles up so if the crust is 700 miles then hypothetically speaking there could be at least 5 worlds with a sky 62 miles hight and a crust 62 miles deep each (artificial or natural).

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      I have also realized the a solid core due to pressure is also the same as thinking enough pressure on a ice cube will stop it melting..funny!

    • profile image

      Effilnuc 5 years ago

      On the subject of digging, I came across a youtube video of a guy talking about H8O, instead of H2O.

      Upon further digging, I uncovered a copy of a document http://www.archive.org/stream/anaturalphiloso05qua.../n3/mode/2up that states in 1856 that pure water was 8 parts Hydrogen and 1 part oxygen.

      Looking at the Hydrogen Atom and the Oxygen Atom, it makes sense that PERFECT water would be 8 parts Hydrogen to 1 part oxygen.

      Does anyone know of any other info on this...?

      If Perfect Water is 8 parts hydrogen and 1 part oxygen, that would make water the ULTIMATE anti-oxidant?

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Also our Sun could interact with earths magnetic field very EZ if its only hundreds of miles deep.

      WOW!

      A little more digging and science will know in a short time.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Like craters on the moon,we see pikes in the middle of craters and what looks like surface rebounding in craters giving a flat look.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      If earth is hollow, Then the magnetic field is not at the center of earth. It may only be 400 to 700 miles deep.

      It would change science as we now know it.

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      I have also read impact craters prove planets are hollow. Because small impacts are deepest in proportion to the size of the asteroid, medium size craters are shallower and wider with a peak in the centre much like when a water droplet hit's water and the centre rises,meaning the surface rebounding which is impossible with a solid object. And huge craters are of course very wide but the shallowest in proportion without a centre peak indicating that the extream impact caused the crust to rebound many times levelling out the surface indicating the planets surface rebounds to resume its previous spherical form via the magnetic push from the centre.

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      You know NASA !

      If it aint Swamp Gas then its in your head, Theres Nothing to see Folks! Also

      They coundnt find swamp gas on YU 55 so they havnt given the public or News Media any close up photos yet.

      Nothing to see gang!

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      Another interesting point is that it is claimed our Earth's core (residing in the hottest part of the planet so to speak) will not melt because it is under to much pressure. which is the same as saying enough pressure will stop Iron reaching melting point. That makes about as much sense as seeing light's on the moon and NASA saying it's actually not really there it's all in you head lol!...

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Great Comments M, I agree.

      Dan

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      It just goes to show if it does not make sense it normally is not true.

      "The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated" -Dr.Stephen Rorke

      "For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD" -Gibson's law

    • profile image

      5 years ago

      It just goes to show if it does not make sense it's normally not true.

      "The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated" -Dr.Stephen Rorke

      "For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD" -Gibson's law....

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      Its seems everywhere you look in orthodox science, Its wrong or overly miss leading.

      Big Bang

      Plantary formation

      Solid core Stars and Planets

      Magnetic fields

      The list seems endless nowdays!

    • profile image

      Daniel 5 years ago

      I found through the years of my research I kept hitting dead-ends till I stepted out of the establishment box of science.

      We now are seeing ideas from over 100 years ago had it right all along.

      It seems the suppressed research in the passed and still today is to maintain the Status Quo and such.

      As everything seems to change when taking a deeper look.

    Click to Rate This Article