How Old Are Pyramids Around the World?
Common Used Dating Methods
Determining the age of a pyramid is not as easy as it seems. Stones cannot be dated to determine the age of the structure, because what the scientist will find is the formation date of the rock material itself, and not when the stones were piled on top of each other.
Scientists think they have found a reliable way to date stone structures, while they only make associative, assumptive and subjective connections between the organic materials and the stone structures themselves. They claim it is reliable, but there's no way for anyone to validate that claim. We cannot associate one thing to another with absolute certainty.
And that is directly the toughest problem in dating any stone structure: validation.
The most common way is to Carbon date organic artefacts left by 'builders' found inside and around pyramids, or organic materials that slipped between the stones. This method of dating is believed to be fairly accurate. It is often claimed as 'evidence' of the age of the structure.
What Do You Think
Is Giza Correctly Dated?
How Are the Pyramids of Giza Dated?
The pyramids of Giza weren't exclusively dated by dating excavated organic artefacts in and around the pyramids. It is also done by linking the inscriptions inside the pyramids with the era of the rulers and the architect Imhotep.
What if the inscriptions were a kind of graffiti left by kings who claimed the pyramids as their own?
How exciting these carved inscriptions might look, it doesn't prove how old they really are. Christians claim that the Earth is 6,000 years old, based on the 'inscriptions' in the bible. Is this 'evidence'? For them it is. There are even scientists among them. Do you see how hard it is to reliably date something?
And we still have many unsolved questions around the building methods that were used as well.
What counts for Giza, counts for all pyramids. They are real hard nuts to crack.
What is Evidence?
According to the Oxford dictionaries can evidence be defined as: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
The words 'scientific evidence' are often misused to emphasize a certain belief or to label a certain theory.
Newton believed he had evidence for his theory. But with three or more bodies his theory didn't work. What does this tell us about one of the most successful theories in history? That empirical evidence can be your greatest deceiver. Newton's theory was incomplete.
We believe that the sun and the moon cause the tides. But how do we know that for sure? The only evidence we have are clear patterns between the moon phases, orbits and the tides. From that we are able to develop a theory which predicts what will happen next. When we can verify it multiple times with our senses, we might become more certain the theory is complete and correct.
Proof is the final verdict that removes all doubts whereas evidence only leads one in the direction of a fact or statement. The foundations of pyramids are hundreds of thousands of years old: mathematically proven.
Classifying Pyramids in Time Frames
If we can relate pyramids around the world somehow, can we then classify them in a certain time frame? Yes, I believe we can. And this is the first step to take before diving into intimidating details.
There is already much work done by many different people in finding patterns in pyramids. While doing additional research we found very interesting evidence how to classify the different pyramids around the world.
Analysing the orientation of more than 290 pyramids and temples around the world, made it possible to classify the foundations - before or after the Great Flood. The Floods and Ice Ages are one and the same event as you will see further on in this article. And it happened more than once in history.
The Great Flood and Pole Shifts
There is overwhelming evidence for a Great Flood. Virtually all cultures speak about them in their sagas. The most probable cause of the floods where Earth Crust Shifts. Every shift marks the beginning of a new ice age.
It is obvious that pyramids around the world are arranged in a definite direction, but there doesn't seem to be always a clear pattern, unless you find out where perpendicular lines intersect eachother.
- Note: with North pole is always meant the geographical North pole. The theory of Earth Crust Shift is not dealing about the magnetic poles. The geographical pole is the rotation axis of the earth.
Orientation of Giza
The statement that the pyramids of Giza are oriented to the current North pole (cardinally oriented) doesn't knock people off their feet anymore.
More important to know is that Giza is oriented to the current (geographic) North pole and therefore built after the Great Flood.
A Great Flood which was caused by an Earth Crust Shift that ushered the beginning of a the last ice age
There's no doubt about the classification of these pyramids: they were built after the latest crustal shift. Which can be interpreted as after the Great Flood.
The time frame we have here to classify Giza is between the current estimations, 4,500 years, and 110,000 years.
It is a contribution to the builders to orient such a big construction with great precision. It's orientation is 0.05° precise to our current geo pole, and shows a mathematical knowledge which rivals those of today.
How old they precisely are is not in line with the intention of this article - it's the terrain of other specialists.
Pyramid at Visoko, Bosnia
Most scientists still don't believe that the pyramid of Visoko is actually a pyramid, but the orientation of these pyramids to the current geographic poles is so precise, that it is hard to believe it's not a pyramid.
Ever seen a mountain that looks like a pyramid, and is also perfectly oriented to the cardinals?
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
What happened that scientists are scared of this recent new claim of a guy called Semir Osmanagić? Is it because he claims an antiquity that's far beyond the current paradigm?
This pyramid can be classified as after the Great Flood, because they are oriented to the current cardinals - our current geo poles. Osmanagić has profound evidence they are around a whopping 34,000 BC. That is in line with our findings, because it supports the claim that the crust has shifted 110,000 years ago.
There's no reason (yet) for scientists to be really scared. I think scientists should do their job and join Osmanagić's research to look what's inside these pyramids. They are real!
It will knock almost everything we learned upside down, but who cares? We only care about the truth!
Related Article to Expand Your View on This Topic
- Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?
Greenland is covered in ice and no one knows why. Science has explanations, but they are absurd and unscientific. The most rational explanation is explored in this article which is part of a series.
How an Intersection Works
Pyramids at Xian, China
This is a collection of serious pyramids that are anxiously protected by the Chinese government.
It are pyramids, that's for sure. It took scientists many centuries to figure this out.
What are the Chinese afraid of? That we find out that our ancestors were smarter than we think, and were skimming the earth much sooner?
The pyramids in China are massively oriented in just a few different orientations:
- Oriented to the current North pole;
- Oriented at an angle of about 8° (to Greenland);
- Oriented at an angle of about 14 to 15°
Why are they oriented like this? The precision of the ones which are oriented to the current geo pole is so precise that the other ones that were oriented towards to Greenland and further weren't just coincidental orientations. It was clearly done to serve a specific purpose. They were oriented to the ancient cardinals, a very long time ago.
The 8 degrees oriented Chinese pyramids cluster on a massive scale to the same area as the pyramids of Latin America, and form a colossal mathematical hotspot.
Orientation of Chinese Pyramids
These different orientations of the Chinese pyramids imply that this culture somehow survived a shifting geographical pole. A catastrophic Earth Crust Shift was responsible for the displacement of the North pole on Greenland over a distance of about 1,500 km to its current location. Greenland moved to an area where it would start to melt very slowly.
There are pyramids in China that were built before the Great Flood and after the Great Flood. This cultures somehow survived it, adapted to it, and built another series of pyramids oriented to the new, current geo pole.
This would mean that the ones oriented to the current North pole are of the same time frame as the ones of Giza, younger than 110,000 years. But the other ones oriented under an angle of 8° are therefore older than 110,000 years.
Is this why this culture is so advanced in medicine, religion, philosophy and many other areas, because it's so old and the traditions survived the Great Flood?
The whole perspective becomes more interesting when we go to Mexico.
Locations of Some Chinese Pyramids
Oriented to Current Pole (0°)
Oriented to Greenland (8°)
34°23'53"N / 108°42'44"E
34°21'48"N / 108°37'51"E
34°23'26"N / 108°44'21"E
34°21'43"N / 108°38'26"E
34°24'03"N / 108°45'53"E
34°20'18"N / 108°34'10"E
Pyramids of Teotihuacan, Mexico
One of the most important aspects of scientific evidence is that it is reproducible and verifiable.
When we draw a line from the pyramids in China (oldest ones, 8°) and the pyramids of Teotihuacan in Mexico, the lines will cross each other on Greenland. This is reproducible and verifiable by anyone who has access to Google Earth.
The question we could ask ourselves: what could this mean?
Read in this case the article "Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?" again, and the penny might drop that the pyramids of Mexico and these ones of China are constructed before the Great Flood. These pyramids were built when the North pole was still on Greenland, and that is a very long time ago.
The cultures that built these pyramids are much older than we ever imagined possible. But that explains a lot, doesn't it?
How Teotihuacan and Pyramid Wu of Han Intersect at Greenland
Verification Data of Intersection Point
China (Wu of Han)
34.338° N / 108.5695° E
Mexico (Sun Pyramid)
19.695° N / 98.845° W
The More Intersections, the More Proof
Just a few intersections like shown above proves nothing. It could be just luck. To rule out any coincidence, the data of about 300 ancient constructions and sites are examined and extensively processed. The results are staggering.
Since there was already a hunch that Greenland was once located on the North pole, we drew a line over Greenland from the current North pole to the current South pole, at a longitude of 45°W, and calculated the amount of intersections with that reference line.
The former geo pole reveals itself sharply at an exact location on Greenland. The probability of this event can be calculated by using the binomial formula. With the used data set, and with the amount of found intersections, the probability on mere chance is less than 0.00001%. The probability that it was done on purpose, and that it was therefore the former geographic North pole is certain for more than 99.99999%.
In scientific terms: we can be sure this is true, which has a very deep impact. As you will see, a puzzle starts to fall into place.
What's Your Opinion
Was this article clear to you?
The Earth Crust Has Shifted Multiple Times in the Past
We can safely claim that Greenland was on the North pole, without having any geological knowledge or evidence. We don't even have to go anywhere. We don't need to walk on pyramids, or on glaciers, or to be a specialist in any of these areas. We even don't need a shred of 'evidence'. We can now understand why Greenland is melting, and why we find so many mysterious sites around the world, and why the cultures were vanished.
In the book that is currently in the making under the working title "Atlantis is Here", the location of this intersection line has been calculated at a precise location of 47.091°. It is in this article too far fetched to explain how this figure is accomplished but the results from the calculations along this line deliver even more amazing insights.
The book won't expose you, like scientists love to do, to intimidating mathematical equations which forms the basis of this new theory. But if you are interested in it, there will be extensive appendices in the book dedicated to the mathematics behind it together with tons of data.
Reference Line to Measure the Amount of Intersections
© 2015, 2016 by Buildreps
The Unobscured Truth Is Unbelievable But Explains All
- Why the Orientation of Pyramids Correlates to Ice Ages
The orientation of about 300 pyramids and temples randomly spread around the world correlates with the temperatures of the last glaciation cycles. Most pyramids are hundreds of thousands years old.