ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

How Old Are Pyramids Around the World?

Updated on December 11, 2016
Buildreps profile image

The author proved a 100% mathematical correlation between orientation of ancient structures, ice ages and crustal displacements.

Pyramids are believed to be not older than a few thousand years. They appear to be in some cases older than 200,000 years, proven with a new mathematical theory.
Pyramids are believed to be not older than a few thousand years. They appear to be in some cases older than 200,000 years, proven with a new mathematical theory. | Source

Common Used Dating Methods

Determining the age of a pyramid is not as easy as it seems. Stones cannot be dated to determine the age of the structure, because what the scientist will find is the formation date of the rock material itself, and not when the stones were piled on top of each other.

Scientists think they have found a reliable way to date stone structures, while they only make associative, assumptive and subjective connections between the organic materials and the stone structures themselves. They claim it is reliable, but there's no way for anyone to validate that claim. We cannot associate one thing to another with absolute certainty.

And that is directly the toughest problem in dating any stone structure: validation.

The most common way is to Carbon date organic artefacts left by 'builders' found inside and around pyramids, or organic materials that slipped between the stones. This method of dating is believed to be fairly accurate. It is often claimed as 'evidence' of the age of the structure.

What Do You Think

Is Giza Correctly Dated?

See results

How Are the Pyramids of Giza Dated?

The pyramids of Giza weren't exclusively dated by dating excavated organic artefacts in and around the pyramids. It is also done by linking the inscriptions inside the pyramids with the era of the rulers and the architect Imhotep.

What if the inscriptions were a kind of graffiti left by kings who claimed the pyramids as their own?

How exciting these carved inscriptions might look, it doesn't prove how old they really are. Christians claim that the Earth is 6,000 years old, based on the 'inscriptions' in the bible. Is this 'evidence'? For them it is. There are even scientists among them. Do you see how hard it is to reliably date something?

And we still have many unsolved questions around the building methods that were used as well.

What counts for Giza, counts for all pyramids. They are real hard nuts to crack.

What is Evidence?

According to the Oxford dictionaries can evidence be defined as: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

The words 'scientific evidence' are often misused to emphasize a certain belief or to label a certain theory.

Newton believed he had evidence for his theory. But with three or more bodies his theory didn't work. What does this tell us about one of the most successful theories in history? That empirical evidence can be your greatest deceiver. Newton's theory was incomplete.

We believe that the sun and the moon cause the tides. But how do we know that for sure? The only evidence we have are clear patterns between the moon phases, orbits and the tides. From that we are able to develop a theory which predicts what will happen next. When we can verify it multiple times with our senses, we might become more certain the theory is complete and correct.

Proof is the final verdict that removes all doubts whereas evidence only leads one in the direction of a fact or statement. The foundations of pyramids are hundreds of thousands of years old: mathematically proven.

Classifying Pyramids in Time Frames

If we can relate pyramids around the world somehow, can we then classify them in a certain time frame? Yes, I believe we can. And this is the first step to take before diving into intimidating details.

There is already much work done by many different people in finding patterns in pyramids. While doing additional research we found very interesting evidence how to classify the different pyramids around the world.

Analysing the orientation of more than 290 pyramids and temples around the world, made it possible to classify the foundations - before or after the Great Flood. The Floods and Ice Ages are one and the same event as you will see further on in this article. And it happened more than once in history.

The Great Flood and Pole Shifts

There is overwhelming evidence for a Great Flood. Virtually all cultures speak about them in their sagas. The most probable cause of the floods where Earth Crust Shifts. Every shift marks the beginning of a new ice age.

It is obvious that pyramids around the world are arranged in a definite direction, but there doesn't seem to be always a clear pattern, unless you find out where perpendicular lines intersect eachother.

  • Note: with North pole is always meant the geographical North pole. The theory of Earth Crust Shift is not dealing about the magnetic poles. The geographical pole is the rotation axis of the earth.

Orientation of Giza

Giza is oriented to our current geo North pole and therefore constructed AFTER the Great Flood. They are older than 4,500 years and younger than 110,000 years.
Giza is oriented to our current geo North pole and therefore constructed AFTER the Great Flood. They are older than 4,500 years and younger than 110,000 years. | Source
The Giza pyramids are with such a stupendous accuracy oriented to the North pole, that deviations beyond 0.05 degrees are not measurable.
The Giza pyramids are with such a stupendous accuracy oriented to the North pole, that deviations beyond 0.05 degrees are not measurable. | Source

Stupendous Accuracy

The statement that the pyramids of Giza are oriented to the current North pole (cardinally oriented) doesn't knock people off their feet anymore.

More important to know is that Giza is oriented to the current (geographic) North pole and therefore built after the Great Flood.

A Great Flood which was caused by an Earth Crust Shift that ushered the beginning of a the last ice age

There's no doubt about the classification of these pyramids: they were built after the latest crustal shift. Which can be interpreted as after the Great Flood.

The time frame we have here to classify Giza is between the current estimations, 4,500 years, and 110,000 years.

It is a contribution to the builders to orient such a big construction with great precision. It's orientation is 0.05° precise to our current geo pole, and shows a mathematical knowledge which rivals those of today.

How old they precisely are is not in line with the intention of this article - it's the terrain of other specialists.

Did you spot the pyramid of Visoko? It's in the middle of the picture. It's perfectly oriented to the current North pole, and therefore younger than 110,000 years.
Did you spot the pyramid of Visoko? It's in the middle of the picture. It's perfectly oriented to the current North pole, and therefore younger than 110,000 years. | Source

Pyramid at Visoko, Bosnia

Most scientists still don't believe that the pyramid of Visoko is actually a pyramid, but the orientation of these pyramids to the current geographic poles is so precise, that it is hard to believe it's not a pyramid.

Ever seen a mountain that looks like a pyramid, and is also perfectly oriented to the cardinals?

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

What happened that scientists are scared of this recent new claim of a guy called Semir Osmanagić? Is it because he claims an antiquity that's far beyond the current paradigm?

This pyramid can be classified as after the Great Flood, because they are oriented to the current cardinals - our current geo poles. Osmanagić has profound evidence they are around a whopping 34,000 BC. That is in line with our findings, because it supports the claim that the crust has shifted 110,000 years ago.

There's no reason (yet) for scientists to be really scared. I think scientists should do their job and join Osmanagić's research to look what's inside these pyramids. They are real!

It will knock almost everything we learned upside down, but who cares? We only care about the truth!

How an Intersection Works

The orientation of the pyramids of Giza and the pyramid of Ping of Han (one of the 12 oriented to current North) intersect at the current North pole. They belong to the same time frame.
The orientation of the pyramids of Giza and the pyramid of Ping of Han (one of the 12 oriented to current North) intersect at the current North pole. They belong to the same time frame. | Source
This pyramid in China is oriented under an angle of 8 degrees (352 degrees) to Greenland.
This pyramid in China is oriented under an angle of 8 degrees (352 degrees) to Greenland. | Source
It is not difficult to see that these pyramids were NOT pointed to the current North pole.
It is not difficult to see that these pyramids were NOT pointed to the current North pole. | Source

Pyramids at Xian, China

This is a collection of serious pyramids that are anxiously protected by the Chinese government.

It are pyramids, that's for sure. It took scientists many centuries to figure this out.

What are the Chinese afraid of? That we find out that our ancestors were smarter than we think, and were skimming the earth much sooner?

The pyramids in China are massively oriented in just a few different orientations:

  • Oriented to the current North pole;
  • Oriented at an angle of about 8° (to Greenland);
  • Oriented at an angle of about 14 to 15°

Why are they oriented like this? The precision of the ones which are oriented to the current geo pole is so precise that the other ones that were oriented towards to Greenland and further weren't just coincidental orientations. It was clearly done to serve a specific purpose. They were oriented to the ancient cardinals, a very long time ago.

The 8 degrees oriented Chinese pyramids cluster on a massive scale to the same area as the pyramids of Latin America, and form a colossal mathematical hotspot.

Orientation of Chinese Pyramids

These different orientations of the Chinese pyramids imply that this culture somehow survived a shifting geographical pole. A catastrophic Earth Crust Shift was responsible for the displacement of the North pole on Greenland over a distance of about 1,500 km to its current location. Greenland moved to an area where it would start to melt very slowly.

There are pyramids in China that were built before the Great Flood and after the Great Flood. This cultures somehow survived it, adapted to it, and built another series of pyramids oriented to the new, current geo pole.

This would mean that the ones oriented to the current North pole are of the same time frame as the ones of Giza, younger than 110,000 years. But the other ones oriented under an angle of 8° are therefore older than 110,000 years.

Is this why this culture is so advanced in medicine, religion, philosophy and many other areas, because it's so old and the traditions survived the Great Flood?

The whole perspective becomes more interesting when we go to Mexico.

Locations of Some Chinese Pyramids

Oriented to Current Pole (0°)
Oriented to Greenland (8°)
34°23'53"N / 108°42'44"E
34°21'48"N / 108°37'51"E
34°23'26"N / 108°44'21"E
34°21'43"N / 108°38'26"E
34°24'03"N / 108°45'53"E
34°20'18"N / 108°34'10"E
The pyramids of the Moon (topleft) and the Sun (bottom) at Teotihuacan. They are oriented to Greenland as well.
The pyramids of the Moon (topleft) and the Sun (bottom) at Teotihuacan. They are oriented to Greenland as well. | Source

Pyramids of Teotihuacan, Mexico

One of the most important aspects of scientific evidence is that it is reproducible and verifiable.

When we draw a line from the pyramids in China (oldest ones, 8°) and the pyramids of Teotihuacan in Mexico, the lines will cross each other on Greenland. This is reproducible and verifiable by anyone who has access to Google Earth.

The question we could ask ourselves: what could this mean?

Read in this case the article "Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?" again, and the penny might drop that the pyramids of Mexico and these ones of China are constructed before the Great Flood. These pyramids were built when the North pole was still on Greenland, and that is a very long time ago.

The cultures that built these pyramids are much older than we ever imagined possible. But that explains a lot, doesn't it?

How Teotihuacan and Pyramid Wu of Han Intersect at Greenland

The orientation of the pyramids in Mexico and China intersect each other exactly on the former North pole on Greenland. This is one of the former geo North poles. By using this method 4 former geo poles are proven.
The orientation of the pyramids in Mexico and China intersect each other exactly on the former North pole on Greenland. This is one of the former geo North poles. By using this method 4 former geo poles are proven. | Source

Verification Data of Intersection Point

Pyramid
Location
Angle
China (Wu of Han)
34.338° N / 108.5695° E
352° (360-8)
Mexico (Sun Pyramid)
19.695° N / 98.845° W
15.3°
Intersection Point
73.546°N, 043.837°W
-

The More Intersections, the More Proof

Just a few intersections like shown above proves nothing. It could be just luck. To rule out any coincidence, the data of about 300 ancient constructions and sites are examined and extensively processed. The results are staggering.

Since there was already a hunch that Greenland was once located on the North pole, we drew a line over Greenland from the current North pole to the current South pole, at a longitude of 45°W, and calculated the amount of intersections with that reference line.

The former geo pole reveals itself sharply at an exact location on Greenland. The probability of this event can be calculated by using the binomial formula. With the used data set, and with the amount of found intersections, the probability on mere chance is less than 0.00001%. The probability that it was done on purpose, and that it was therefore the former geographic North pole is certain for more than 99.99999%.

In scientific terms: we can be sure this is true, which has a very deep impact. As you will see, a puzzle starts to fall into place.

What's Your Opinion

Was this article clear to you?

See results

The Earth Crust Has Shifted Multiple Times in the Past

We can safely claim that Greenland was on the North pole, without having any geological knowledge or evidence. We don't even have to go anywhere. We don't need to walk on pyramids, or on glaciers, or to be a specialist in any of these areas. We even don't need a shred of 'evidence'. We can now understand why Greenland is melting, and why we find so many mysterious sites around the world, and why the cultures were vanished.

In the book that is currently in the making under the working title "Atlantis is Here", the location of this intersection line has been calculated at a precise location of 47.091°. It is in this article too far fetched to explain how this figure is accomplished but the results from the calculations along this line deliver even more amazing insights.

The book won't expose you, like scientists love to do, to intimidating mathematical equations which forms the basis of this new theory. But if you are interested in it, there will be extensive appendices in the book dedicated to the mathematics behind it together with tons of data.

Reference Line to Measure the Amount of Intersections

When we examine the amount of intersections with the North-South line, we find the former North pole. For the book "Atlantis is Here" the line has been calculated at 47.091 degrees. It delivers amazing results, and 100% proof.
When we examine the amount of intersections with the North-South line, we find the former North pole. For the book "Atlantis is Here" the line has been calculated at 47.091 degrees. It delivers amazing results, and 100% proof. | Source


© 2015, 2016 by Buildreps

The Unobscured Truth Is Unbelievable But Explains All

Why the Orientation of Pyramids Correlates to Ice Ages
Why the Orientation of Pyramids Correlates to Ice Ages | Source

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 5 weeks ago from Europe

      Hi N. Randy Gordon, I see you're not a member of HP, so I can comment on your questions, but I'm not sure you will get a notification. I used GE to measure foundations, and used maps to verify the measurements if they were correct. I don't use GE to find poles, I used spherical trigonometry to find the intersection points. You can do this with GE as well. I think it's accurate enough to find patterns as well.

      The original foundations of Baalbek are older than 110ky. They are between 130 and 180ky old.

    • profile image

      N. Randy Gordon 5 weeks ago

      Now you have completely seared my mind and set it ablaze. I've spent hours upon hours now in Google Earth and am finding myself chasing ancient foundations back to one of your North poles and there is definitely a pattern going on here. I think you are onto something big. Now about the dates...Baalbek, which I always thought Romans moved in built upon a very ancient foundation is looking like a Pole 2 or Pole 3 to me. Are you using Google Earth to measure/arrive at your conclusions? Its difficult for me in GE and I thought I would ask. Nevertheless, this means the original BaalBek goes back more than 110k years?

      Great Work BTW!

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 12 months ago from Europe

      Thank you for the compliments, Boomer Music Man. There is still so much to discover on this issue that the book "Atlantis is Here" still takes at least a year to complete. I'm daily working on it, so imagine that. Thanks for reading and commenting.

    • Boomer Music Man profile image

      Boomer Music Man 12 months ago

      I like your style of writing plus the details that you have in this article. I didn't know that there are alot of aspects to be considered in determining the age of pyramids, Thank you for sharing your knowlwdge

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 13 months ago from Europe

      docdknowles, it is true I am not a native English speaker. On top of that am I predominantly a Beta guy. Thanks for the compliment anyway.

    • profile image

      docdknowles 13 months ago

      Just a thought. I noticed several grammatical errors and incorrect word usage. I find your theory very intriguing and quite possibly true, so don't allow serious critics of your work to point to these errors in order to dismiss your theory. I suspect that you are not a native English speaker and so your overall grasp of English is excellent. Anyway, thanks for your work and offering of an alternative viewpoint.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thank you for reading and commenting, Jason.

    • Jason Ironsntone profile image

      Jason Ironstone 16 months ago

      Very interesting article, Buldreps. Thanks for sharing.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Pyramids all around the world are aligned to several clusters that were in fact former geo poles, like you correctly stated. When they would have used another kind of pole star, our ancestors must have had an advanced concept of a rotating sphere. The precision in which they could determine the location the geo pole exceeds the precision of eyesight, which indicates they must have used instruments for that.

    • cam8510 profile image

      Chris Mills 16 months ago from St. Louis, MO until the end of June, 2017

      I suppose, to point the pyramid at the north pole they used the pole star of their day. Does the precision indicate more than mere eyesight to line it up?

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thanks for reading and commenting, Chris. See you around. :)

    • cam8510 profile image

      Chris Mills 16 months ago from St. Louis, MO until the end of June, 2017

      Fascinating. I have no bias against considering older dates for civilizations. In fact, older is more believable.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thank your for your comprehensive contribution, Scandinavian.

      A crustal shift over an angle of between 5 to 15 degrees is not only very catastrophic, and indeed wipes out cultures. It will also change the natural habitat, making the inhabitants to migrate to better places. Migration is by definition a source of conflict, because tribes will enter each others territories.

      Massive migrations of the survivors warps people back into their survival mode, leaving not much place for intellectual or philosophical debates or a spiritual life. It logically turns people into low level, surviving scavengers.

      The last earth crust shift was probably 110,000 years ago, and that means that the outer parts of the icecaps on America, Russia and Scandinavia might have started to melt not long after that. And of course there were a new huge ice formations growing at the new pole location. But since this geo pole was now shifted to sea it was easier for the cold to be transported to the equatorial zones.

      Your explanations about the Finnish Wolf Cave is very interesting, and I thank you for that. It sheds another light on the spread of Neanderthals.

      I agree with you that mainstream science is deteriorating, I think it is even an insult to human intelligence. Modern day science is ruled the laws of capitalism, and therefore by the elite that wants to protect their often unlawful positions.

    • profile image

      Scandinavian 16 months ago

      Thanks for answering me. Now I know when the next pole shift will take place. I am an amateur and that is why I have many questions. Some of what I mention may be OT, but interesting. Skip what you want to skip.

      I was thinking the last flood was very big and unexpected. Some ice melted when the pole shifted and much more water entered the ocean when the ice lakes collapsed in a short period of time. It may have happened only 12.000 years ago.The pole may have shifted much earlier.

      I play with the idea that an ancient advanced culture, or several, were wiped out in a matter of days. The old religion was abandoned (Gobekli Tepi in Turkey, for example) and the survivors moved to new lands. Perhaps that started agriculture in Europe and in other places. We got new religions and tribes started moving around and were in conflict. It may or may not explain the spread of the indoeuropean languages. It could also explain why some advanced cultures appeared from nowhere, Sumer (Sinear), for example. Perhaps Egypt. The cultures in America are much older, as I understand it thanks to you.

      The ice lake in North America is said to have been huge. It may have taken millenia for that much water to melt. The ice wall was on land and closer to the pole and also took a long time to melt. The ice wall on the west coast of Sweden may have melted at some other time, so we may have had several floods of different magnitude. Some British Iles disappeared only a few thousand years ago and I have never seen an explanation. There are seals in some Finnish and Russian lakes and I don't know why. How and when were they trapped? When the pole moved to Greenland and attracted lots of ice? The flora and fauna on Svalbard, reindeers, for example, are related to Scandinavia, so there must have been a land bridge in ancient times.

      If it was possible to survive on the Norwegian coast, on Lofoten, for example, perhaps parts of Scandinavia was re-populated from the North before the other three immigrant waves took place (hunters, farmers and last a herding warrior-people).

      The Finnish Wolf Cave, varggrottan in Swedish, turned everything upside down for the experts. Neanderthals may have live in Northern Finland about a 100.000 years ago, if I remember correctly (there is more on the net). Some archeologists started speculating that there were holes in the ice as far north as Swedish Jamtland (there are two dots above the "a"). I mention it because the land may not have been under one massive ice sheet. Other Swedish archeologists still refuse to investigate the many Swedish caves. The Finnish archeologists were very reluctant to look at the finds in the Wolf Cave for the same reason. If there were holes in the ice, humans may have survived a part of the Ice Age in Germany and Poland (I am thinking of what one day became Konigsberg (Kaliningrad) and the area around it).

      Your theory is great. It rests on reasonable assumptions. I once learned the maths and I am sure you got it right, though I didn't check (even if I had the raw data, I don't have the time). The idea of ice lakes is not essential to your theory, but, if they do appear sometimes, they can cause destruction long after a pole shift and partly explain the disappearance of advanced old cultures.

      If I understand this right, a pole shift is followed by volcanoes, change of climate, starvation and such. It is not nice to think about, but it does explain the disappearance of old cultures. There may have been many on Earth over the ages. Many traces have been lost and mainstream researchers are not interested in what does exist. You challenge them and that is good. Todays science (I studied a social science and see deterioration everywhere) has become dogmatic and almost religious. If it is not revived, we are going down and not because of a pole shift.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thanks for commenting, Scandinavian. I'm not sure I can address so many questions, but I will try.

      When the geo pole shifted from land (Greenland) to sea (where it is now) there followed logically a period of substantial melting. Because when the geo pole is located at sea, like we have today, this part of the globe cannot accumulate enough cold to cover a large area in ice. Water has a transportation capacity that is about 4.2 times higher than air when measured in weight. When measured in volume the difference is much higher, about 3.200 times in favour of water.

      So, logically, the large icecaps of the last ice age could not be maintained after the crust shifted to its current, and thus flooded all coastal regions around the world, and indeed even the North Sea. Like so many sunken cities found around the world.

      There is a clear shifting pattern found. The next shift is expected in about 100,000 to 150,000 years. The reason why the crust shifts is related to the eccentricity of earth's orbit around the sun (part of the Milankovitch cycles). It is expected to shift from its current location to the New Siberian Islands over a distance of about 1,500 kilometres. Oslo will be at the latitude of Lyon and Milan - nice and warm.:) More land mass will move into the polar region which will cause new icecaps to form over Siberia. Northern Siberia will be compressed while it move more to the North pole.

      A crustal shift will stretch the areas of Canada, Greenland, and the seas located in between. The Gulf Stream will probably move accordingly more Northward into the Arctic Ocean, but might be blocked somewhat in its progression by Iceland and Svalbard. Due to the stretching of the seas between Greenland and Norway it might open up somewhat for the Gulf Stream to pass and turn around Iceland to make its way back through the Western part of the Atlantic.

      I don't know anything about ice lakes, Neanderthals found in Norwegian, or that Plato might have confused one for another, so I skip that part if you allow me.

    • profile image

      Scandinavian 16 months ago

      Thanks for sharing your theory. It makes sense. I have a few questions. Right or wrong, I have been told there were at least two ice lakes that melted and caused a flood. One in Scandinavia and one in North America. When the ice walls melted, the water flooded the land. The North Sea was inhabited land at that time. The water may also have entered the Black Sea and flooded land everywhere. Were there ice lakes? What if Plato confused Gibraltar with the Bosporus and the Dardanelles? Your theory may also explain why the whole of Siberia was not covered in ice. Also the neanderthal traces in the Finnish wolf cave. They shouldn't be there according to accepted theory. Scientists in my country now speak about "holes" in the ice. Btw, the Norwegian costal regions were never under the ice. The mountains are too pointed and people may have lived there. Mountains in Sweden were deformed and leveled down, though. They say the ice moved in a southwesterly direction. Perhaps because of the pole shift?

      The next question concerns where the north pole may be the next time. Closer to Russia? What happens then to the Bering Strait and the stream? When are the poles expected to shift again? Have you found a pattern? Or, do you save that for the book? If so, I understand.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 17 months ago from Europe

      Thanks for the comment, crispy. The relation between the temperature proxies in ice cores and the Milankovitch cycles are very clear. And that relates directly to the eccentricity of earth's orbit.

      The waxing and waning of glaciations shows a clear harmonic pattern. Impacts of meteorites aren't like that. It seems unlikely that an impact caused the end of an ice age, because an impact also spreads dust in the atmosphere, blocking incoming sun light. Yes, it might cause a short heat burst, but after that, wouldn't that cause a cool down?

    • profile image

      crispy40 17 months ago

      Hi Builreps thank you for claryfying. There was likely a flood (the one Plato refres to that may have flooded Atlantis for good) 12000 years ago, (I can't remember), when the last ice age ended and temperatures quickly went up. The northern US has geological features of that flood. Graham Hancock speculates that it was caused bya meteorite hiiting glaciers in Canada and sending a plume of vapor into thye atmosphere hence a quick global warming effect besides large amounts of water melting from the impact site(s).

      maybe in his 2012 lecture www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4k8pdJ2so4

      this one with the meteor hypothesis I think:

      is on utube --can't post link apparently-- "Graham Hancock Dec 2015 - Live at Crystal Star-Gate "

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 17 months ago from Europe

      You're welcome, Tim. You have to think in terms of cause and effect. What causes what?

      When you want to align a structure East-West, you've to find out where the sun comes up, and where it goes down. When you perfectly align your structure in that order, you've effectively aligned your structure to the North (or to the South).

      That the sun comes up in the East and goes under in the West is not a phenomenon in itself, it is caused by the rotation of the earth - the geo North and South pole.

      I hope it's sufficiently explained?

    • profile image

      Tim Titian 17 months ago

      Thank you for the article. Although I could not help but notice that you didn't mention the structures east west alignments. Which to me would be simpler in tracking the sun or the shadows. Which would give you a structure aligned to the poles.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 17 months ago from Europe

      You're probably not the only one who is confused. Most scientists are confused as well as myself. Welcome to the club!

      It is clear that many pyramids are pointing to a former geo pole. That's the pure and unmistakable outcome of math, and 99.99% sure.

      The next question is then: how long was that ago? Here starts the interpreting job. Glaciations, Milankovitch cycles, and earth crust shifts can be combined to one event with some effort. The idea that then follows from that, is that the last event took place 110,000 years ago, when the geo pole shifted from Greenland to the current location.

      So, the first series of pyramids are older then 110,000 years.

      When the crust shifts it generates an enormous flood because the oceans start to slosh. The melting of glaciers causes of courses enormous flooding as well, but this is a much slower and more constant stream of water.

    • profile image

      crispy40 17 months ago

      Hi,

      I am confused:

      the last glaciation started 110000 years ago but the "great flood" was only 12 or 14000 years ago wasn't it?

      the pyramids aligned to the Groenland pole would be over 11000 years old if your theory of what starts glaciation is correct so why do you bring up the flood in your article?

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 19 months ago from Europe

      Thanks for the comment and the compliment, vcragain. You might be right about the stones with soft edges and wonderful fit. These structures are incredible. There are still many secrets to discover, that's for sure!

    • profile image

      vcragain 19 months ago

      This is the first place I have read a theory tying all the loose ends together - many other authors try to explain it all but those 'ice ages' keep getting in the way - no explanation at all, thanks for your great concept - looking forward to your book ! The one thing that I have been cogitating over for a long time is the walls of huge blocks all over the place - with those soft edges and incredibly fitted structure - my theory for those is that they were built of semi-soft clay-like blocks - the only way they could get that 'cushioned' look - how did they do that - maybe they had a way to make the rock semi-soft - I think there was a theory already put out on that years ago, so I may have read it there originally. So many hidden secrets !

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 20 months ago from Europe

      Thank you for your visit and for your compliment, Alicia! The book will make a connection between geological events (nature) and human events (artificial). There is no reason to treat them as separate events like geology and archaeology does. Have a great day.

    • AliciaC profile image

      Linda Crampton 20 months ago from British Columbia, Canada

      This is another very interesting and thought provoking hub. Your book is going to be fascinating!

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 20 months ago from Europe

      It's certainly a fascinating topic. Thank you very much for your comment, Larry! Have a great day.

    • Larry Rankin profile image

      Larry Rankin 20 months ago from Oklahoma

      Fascinating topic. There are many engaging aspects to explore when it comes to the pyramids.

      Wonderfully done, as always.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 20 months ago from Europe

      Thanks do much, my friend for your great comment. When the progression continues like it's going the last months there will be a great feast of Truth soon. :) Have a great weekend!

    • billybuc profile image

      Bill Holland 20 months ago from Olympia, WA

      Exemplary as always, my friend. It's like a history lesson from a dear friend when I read your articles.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 20 months ago from Europe

      You're welcome, Austinstar. Thanks for your visit!

    • Austinstar profile image

      Austinstar 20 months ago from Somewhere in the universe

      Many people also leave out the incredible stone buildings and stone works of South America, allegedly made by the Incans.

      There is so much that we do not know or have forgotten/lost. Thank you for presenting this hub as I did learn some new things!