ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Language Myths

Updated on July 21, 2013
Myths are commonly debunked. It's a myth that this can only be done during the Spring Equinox, when in fact, this can be done ANY time of the year. Although linguistics isn't as physical and is more abstract, doesn't mean we can't disprove them.
Myths are commonly debunked. It's a myth that this can only be done during the Spring Equinox, when in fact, this can be done ANY time of the year. Although linguistics isn't as physical and is more abstract, doesn't mean we can't disprove them. | Source

There are widely spread misconceptions held about language and although they may sound correct, more often than not, these beliefs falsely represent language. It is important to realize that these ideas and beliefs do not correlate to reality. I am going to challenge two misconceptions commonly held about language. The first belief I will challenge is that swearing degrades a language. The second belief I will challenge is that the secret to having a better world is having a common language. Through challenging these beliefs, I hope to shed some light on these fallacies and demonstrate that linguistic problems can be broken apart and analyzed.

Common Language Myths

1. Some languages are simpler than others.

2. Lazy speakers are running language into the ground.

3. People who speak a different dialect are less intelligent and articulate.

4. It's easier to speak Chinese if your ancestry is Chinese.

I am going to challenge some myths about language to prove that these are in fact myths, and that these stereotypes about language, like with any stereotype, is a drastic oversimplification of reality.

Claim 1: Swearing degrades a language.

Seems like it might have some truth in it, right?

I think it would be appropriate to address why people might associate swearing and profanity as a degradation of language. Like many of the important aspects that make up society, misconceptions arise out of an oversimplification of reality. Society places emphasis on what fits the impression that we’ve already created as a collective whole.

These ideas we hold dealing with the realm of linguistics and language, in our minds, fit what we perceive because our assumptions and expectations of groups of people greatly determines how we see them

We rank people based on how they talk. So, if an individual’s every other word is profanity, people would rank that individual as “lower class”. Why? Because that is not an “appropriate” or “proper” way to talk. Grammar (from my understanding), is a particular set of language rules or the quality of a language: basically, what to do and what not to do. If an individual were to say that profanity is bad grammar, they would be speaking from a prescriptive grammar perspective. Prescriptive grammar is what is considered a proper way to use language.

We can see that this is the kind of grammar that the education system tries to enforce in school. For instance, as they work to homogenize us to speak a particular way, we’re told to not use double negatives or that it’s a big NO to curse. Therefore, prescriptive grammar is something we have to be taught; it’s not actually apart of what we know when we know a language and is inconsistent with what the speaker actually does. If we hear others curse today, we might think that that particular person must be less-educated. However, language isn’t prescriptive grammar.

Prescriptive grammar tells us how to speak and write according to society’s ideas of what’s “normal”. But this is not the basis of language. Instead, our mentally represented linguistic competence is what’s at the very foundations of language. Linguistic competence is a person’s hidden ability to speak a language.


Even when we aren’t actually speaking, our linguistic competence is still there. The patterns that occur in our language are stored in our mental grammar. This is not something that can be wrong or incorrect- it just is. From this, it can be concluded that cursing is just another part of our language- it’s a pattern of language that occurs naturally (descriptive grammar). Though when people use their prescriptive grammar, they will try to avoid profanity, because according to the collective whole of society, there is an idealized way of speaking and of what sounds good. However, prescriptive grammar is not the basis of our linguistic competence.

Claim 2: The secret to having a better world is having a common language.

Society and its systems have taught us that there is basically one way to be. They work hard to homogenize us, even when it comes to our speaking. From American Tongues we can see a clear example of this, when our language and speech can potentially get in the way of the job market.

But language really is molded around the culture we live in. Shariatmadari (2006) says that because language only comes into existence when people use it (through speech or writing), it would be impossible to try to control it. There are so many factors that play into language variation- from age, to gender, social status, religion, etc. Also, it’s unnecessary. For instance, there’s no need for me to communicate with someone from Dubai- even if we did speak the same language.

Since language is the product of people and their culture, to say the world would be better off with one common language wouldn’t be feasible. Many ideas and roles that take place in a region/culture are distinguishable from one another. Aspects that are unique to one culture aren’t interchangeable to another and to try and represent that with a common language wouldn’t be logical. For instance, politeness and manners vary from culture to culture and is reflected in language. T

o have one language would be an attempt to alter another society’s ideas. Language is natural, and is not something that should have to be changed. It’s beneficial to have more than one language- by having many diverse languages we can acquire knowledge and insight into the intricate relationship between language and the mind. We can learn more about ourselves.


Summary and Implications

Even though there are certain beliefs about language that exist, that we hold to be true- they are often misconceptions and misrepresent language. From the arguments made, we can see that we can go about challenging language myths scientifically using the field of linguistics. By looking at the sociolinguistic branch of linguistics, we could see that factors that played a role in these myths and were able to challenge them. These assumptions about language seem very real to people because it’s what they perceive. It’s important to understand that sensation and perception is different; what is actually happen in regards to language (what we sense) is not the same as how we perceive.

Our perception is filtered from previous experience, assumptions, and an oversimplification of reality. People often don’t think about this because our perceptions feel very real to us- it’s our “truth”. It may seem very real to us that swearing degrades a language, but if we look at it analytically through the eye of a linguist, we can see that this is not reality.



Submit a Comment
  • Tim Truzy info4u profile image

    Tim Truzy 

    2 weeks ago from U.S.A.

    Splendid. No one language can tell all of humankind's story because of our diverse backgrounds and experiences. One important point: since language is an essential component of culture, one group may prefer certain "ways of doing things" linguistically as a strategy to suggest to others they are somehow inferior.

    English, for example, is a vibrant "living" language with little threat of dying off any time soon. The words: cool, jazz, and even rock'nroll were viewed as almost vulgar until mainstream society adopted these words and phrases to express ideas which began in subcultures.

    Part of the acceptance of language has to do with economics as well.

    Presently, it's not difficult to find movies on TV where a fair amount of cursing is involved. Furthermore, rap music has been credited with saving the music industry in the 1980s.

    Ironically, the expansion of cable and dish television as well as music through downloads have allowed cursing to enter regularly into our homes and everyday environment, the same places once perceived as needing protection.

    The difference today? Cursing sales.

    This is an astounding well thought out article with relevant points for our ever changing linguistic realities. Have a great day.

  • MazioCreate profile image


    7 years ago from Brisbane Queensland Australia

    A wonderful hub that will help readers understand the nuances of our complex language. I particularly liked your example of swearing and how we judge those who use it extensively, in both written and spoken language. Liked and shared!

  • Paul Kuehn profile image

    Paul Richard Kuehn 

    7 years ago from Udorn City, Thailand

    This is a very useful and well-written hub about language myths. You have successfully shot down two held myths about swearing and everyone being better off with a common language. Although English is now the lingua franca for science and technology, it can never be used as a working social language by all the cultures of the world which are so different. Voted up and sharing.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)