ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Let's Treat Online Abuse as a Public Health Hazard

Updated on July 16, 2017

Online abuse, health hazard?....

One of the most important breakthroughs in public health came in 1847, when a Hungarian doctor, Ignaz Semmelweis, discovered that surgeons could dramatically cut mortality rates by disinfecting their hands. At the time, he was ridiculed by his medical contemporaries. But today, hand washing remains the cornerstone of lifesaving medical hygiene.

I wonder if we’ve got something important to learn from Semmelweis when it comes to online abuse. Last week, MPs debated a new cross-party report on the rising levels of abuse levelled at election candidates. It found people on all sides of politics being subject to terrible abuse, but particularly women and ethnic minority candidates. While abuse has always been a feature of our politics, there is no doubt it has been turbocharged by the internet and social media.

While it’s hugely positive that this issue is finally getting the parliamentary attention it deserves, the political response has on the whole been utterly depressing. An entirely proper focus on who gets it the worst has morphed into a politicised debate about who is most to blame. Tory MPs have claimed that the Labour party has been too tolerant of online abuse; the chair of the Labour party wrote to the Conservatives ahead of the debate accusing them of perpetrating social media abuse against Labour candidates.


One side might well be worse than the other. But in the words of Diane Abbott, who’s been subjected to some of the most sustained and disgusting sexist and racist abuse in the decades since she entered public life: “The type of abuse I’ve received for years is not the preserve of any party or faction. To say it is devalues a very important argument.” The unedifying spectacle of politicians arguing about who’s most to blame distracts us from asking what can be done to make the situation better.

This is a question of critical importance: not just because it profoundly affects those who choose to serve in politics, but because this sort of abuse is increasingly being faced by women, BAME and LGBTQ people in all walks of public life. And it’s not just adults: with almost four in five children now using social media platforms, the NSPCC has called online bullying “one of the biggest child-protection challenges of this generation”.

It's tempting to fall into the morally superior trap of thinking that the vast majority of us are beyond reproach online

Back to Semmelweis. I wonder if we would do well to apply some of the key lessons from public health to online abuse. Perhaps its most important insight is that when it comes to many problem behaviours that affect our physical and mental wellbeing, we’re not just a collection of individuals whose behaviour is unaffected by others. Instead, in any society, there is a link between behaviour at the average and at the extreme. This means we limit the effectiveness of tackling smoking or obesity by focusing interventions purely on those who are morbidly obese or smoking 40 a day. Instead, we need to view these sorts of behaviours and attitudes on a continuum. It’s why we often see campaigns aimed at shifting the behaviour of everyone, such as the five-a-day campaign, to complement targeted support.

I suspect this insight applies to online abuse. It’s tempting to fall into the morally superior trap of thinking that the vast majority of us are beyond reproach online, with a small group of evil abusers we can’t do anything about. But this prevents us from seeing aggressive, bullying and abusive behaviour lying at one end of the scale. And from recognising that the low-level aggression that’s so easy to practise across social media platforms, which tends to bring out the worst in us by dehumanising the people at the other end, may help facilitate more serious abuse.

This holds us back from thinking how we counter abuse online. Fatalism about abusive behaviour – it’s perpetrated by evil people beyond understanding – breeds acceptance that things can never change. For example, the NSPCC has discovered that people’s fatalistic attitudes to child abuse drive public perceptions that trying to prevent it is futile, despite the evidence to suggest that it can be prevented and that abusers’ behaviour is very much affected by their context.

We shy away from trying to understand things we see as evil because of the fear that this comes dangerously close to justification. But our reluctance to develop understanding actually stops us from preventing bad things from happening. Instead of rushing to say whose lot is worse, we would be much better off seeking to understand what drives the abusers. What’s behind the toxicity they spew? What might get them to stop?

Taking a public health approach to online abuse also involves us accepting that our own behaviour might be important in preventing it: an online equivalent of the broken windows theory of crime. If we all tried to be a bit more civil to each other online, it wouldn’t get rid of abuse altogether, but I bet it would help.

When children are about to message something mean, they get a reminder flash up that it might make their friend feel bad

Social media platforms also need to rethink the way that they approach abuse. At the moment, it’s hard enough to get them even to take decisive action to shut down the most serious abusers. But this whack-a-mole approach should be the absolute minimum we demand. Given the way social media platforms seem to bring out our worst side, they should also be thinking about how to nudge us into being nicer towards each other.

Cybersmarties.com is a social media site designed to foster lifelong positive online behaviour among primary school children in Ireland . When children are about to send a message containing something mean, they get a reminder flashing up that it might make their friend feel bad. That’s clearly too naff an idea for adults, but its central principle of designing a platform to encourage us to be more civil could surely still apply.

While politicians fight among themselves about who’s doing more to encourage it, we’re never going to crack online abuse. Enough of the petty politicisation: we need to invoke Ignaz Semmelweis and take the time to better understand what’s driving the problem and what we can all do about it.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)