Science - The New Religion
It seems that those in charge of our conventional view of science have become just as dogmatic,in their basic beliefs as many of the conventional religion's and even the fundimentalist religions in the history of our world. There are many sects,with many different views on the theology concerning basic beliefs where science and religion clash. It seems religion has been given the upper hand and science has somehow joined religions when it comes to dogmatic beliefs.
Especially when we talk about the origin of life,and the contraversey between evolution and creation.Science has become the new "Church" of Darwin's theory of evolution.It's strange though,even Darwin himself ,admitted that there is room for doubt,about his theory.
The corunderum here is ; the universities that we have today ,originated from within the Roman Catholic church .So,it comes as no surprise really that science has become to some extent indebted to the church,for the knowledge we have today ,even though the individuals who brought us that knowledge were persecuted for doing so.when ,their views collided with the views of the church,religion,or the pope.
So,why is it that today we still find ourselves divided and our leaders divided within themselves.Some are not even divided.They appear to be dogmatically following the line of "we are not going to change our basic beliefs ,even if there is evidence to the contrary."
If,that is not dogmatic ,I don't know what is.
It,may have something to do with a time honored respect for old knowledge from which the whole of science and religion depends in order to be respected as institutions of learning.The early Roman Catholic church leaders were just as dogmatic,when scientific studies went against the teaching of the church,for obvious reasons.
I can understand this from a personal point of view,no one wants to be critisized for what they believe.However,I know that I may have to change my views,when confronted with new knowledge.It's a part of the learning process.
The insistance of Infallibility,is the achillies heel of religion ,just as it is,in science..
An infant who knows nothing,has the greatest ability to learn.
Such as the program for sale called "YOURBABYCANREAD"
Adults,have the advantage of knowledge,and yet an infant can out learn an adult within a very short period of time.This,is because a infant child's brain is empty and growing ,learning every second of everyday for seven years,which happens to be the number of years it takes for the human body to replace every cell in the body.
Once,the brain has reached a point that it,can consciously choose to learn ,what it's interested in learning,that knowledge may be changing at the same time.Knowledge is not necessarily static or constant.Our perception of that knowledge may have to change,as we evolve intellectually.This happens to be true of interpersonal knowledge as well as scientific and religious.This is not to say that there is not a unifiying aspect between all knowledge.We,may think differently about the same exact thing.That doesn't change the fundimental principles of what we disagree about,just what we think those fundimental principles are.
In,chemistry they teach us that solid objects are mostly empty space.If, I didn't know better,I'd say that what we were taught in chemistry was taught by a magician,a religion.or even a huckster or hypnotist.
The conscious,and subconscious are two parts of the same brain.One part - "the conscious" we are aware of.The subconscious,we may or may not be aware of ,but we have both ,even if,we are only aware of only the one.
Our mind is serperate from our brain.The brain ,being the physical organ,and the "mind","spirit",or "soul" being in control of the concious part of the brain.
It's been said,that hypnotists can't control a persons body while under hypnosis.I disagree.
I think people are told this to make them more comfortable with being hypnotised.
It's also been said that,some people can't be hypnotised ,without voluntarily doing so.I agree.
I do ,believe mass hypnosis has been used ,in politics and paid commercials for consumer items.
This,is an example of influencing the subconscious brain.
Exsorsim,is performed by a member of a religion ,to rid the brain of an unwanted entity,spirit,or soul.
The very same thing ,could probably be done using drugs,in order for the brain to be less suseptible to an outside influence,or the other way around,as when given a drug,to make someone tell the truth.
Science is the religion of the concrete whereas religion is the science of the spiritual,or soul.
Where the two meet is the convergence of the two into a new synthesis of the understanding of both.Until then ,there will be a war between the two.One side thinking the other is wrong.
There,is a concerted effort ,by some who control science and religion ,to control peoples minds ,and in doing so ,their bodies as well.
This is a reference to the "mark of the beast"