ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • History & Archaeology

Special Forces and Their Early Role in Vietnam

Updated on September 21, 2013
Nick Burchett profile image

Nick is a US Army veteran, husband and father of three, and has a BA in History. He is a Civil War aficionado and also enjoys genealogy.

Special Forces insignia and motto, which means "to liberate the oppressed"
Special Forces insignia and motto, which means "to liberate the oppressed"
Capt. Do CAo Bo. Montagnard commander of An Lac confers with the camps XO, Lt. Carl Freeman III, and a village matriarch
Capt. Do CAo Bo. Montagnard commander of An Lac confers with the camps XO, Lt. Carl Freeman III, and a village matriarch | Source

To describe the Special Forces role in Vietnam is one that is impossible to pigeonhole into one role, one mission or one ideology. Their “green berets” set them apart from other soldiers and they would be the first to tell you that they were not a part of the United States Army Special Forces, but were members of the United States Special Forces. The rigid structure of the conventional Army left a bad taste in the mouth of a Special Forces soldier. Their focus was on the mission as opposed to the binding of rules and regulations that ruled the actions of a regular U.S. Army soldier. This lack of conformity is exactly what made the Special Forces soldier effective in Vietnam. Another very important aspect in regards to the effectiveness of Special Forces teams in Vietnam was the unconventional nature of the conflict in Vietnam. The Special Forces soldier was well suited to play a lead role in not only the training and development of the indigenous soldier but also in fighting in a guerrilla warfare environment. The Green Beret was not only a teacher and diplomat; he was fighting force that set the standard for all other military forces in Vietnam.


The Special Forces Early Role in Vietnam

Special Forces units arrived in Vietnam in 1957 and left in 1973. When the 7th SFGA arrived in Vietnam in 1957, their mission was to train groups of Vietnamese commandos who in turn would take this training back to their own Special Forces groups. This group of Vietnamese soldiers totaled about 58 but by 1967, the Green Berets would be advising, training and assisting over 40,000 Vietnamese special operations groups. According to Col. Francis J. Kelly, this development of paramilitary groups would be the primary focus and mission of the Special Forces operations in Vietnam. In 1961, the 1st and 5th SFGA had teams on the ground assisting with the training of special operations to the Vietnamese soldiers, in particular, the Montagnards of the Central Highlands. The U.S. Army assessment of the strategy in Vietnam made it clear that Special Forces teams, with their abilities of being combat-oriented, capability of independence in the field, trained for rugged guerrilla operations, and positioned for cooperation with the Vietnamese people made the Special Forces ideal as the early and sustained force implemented in Vietnam.


In Vietnam, depending on the year, the location and the group involved, one would see results of an entirely different set of circumstances from that of other Special Forces units, possibly with the same overall mission. Many of the glamorized Special Forces units such as reconnaissance projects and MIKE Forces were the minority and the A-Camp strike forces made up the heart of the Special Forces in Vietnam. These camps usually occupied by a dozen or so American Special Forces soldiers, Army of South Vietnamese (ARVN) soldiers and LLDB (Luc-luong Dac-Biet – or Vietnamese Airborne Special Forces) and in some cases Chinese “Nungs” (indigenous Chinese who were employed as mercenaries by the Special Forces). They faced not only the enemy at a fundamental level, but found themselves involved in operations at all levels. An A-Camp Special Forces soldier would find himself not only training, advising and fighting with the indigenous population but also providing medical care, education, agricultural and construction assistance to the Vietnamese troops, their families and the local villagers. They were self-sufficient and able to support the camps population over a sustained period or during a prolonged siege. And regardless of rank, they would work side-by-side with everyone to ensure the success of the mission.


An up-close and personal intimacy that the Special Forces team had with the indigenous population would be a major factor when U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MAC-V) assumed responsibility for the Civilian Irregular Deffense Group (CIDG) program in 1962. The ability to make initial assessments of campsites, and areas would be something that the Special Forces teams would be experts in due to this personal intimacy with the local people. This would lead to more camps built in “hot” areas that the Viet Cong were dominant and the ARVN and US military presence was minimal to non-existent. Strike force missions from these camps resulted in significant amounts of enemy contact during the intelligence-gathering patrols. Positioning these first-tier camps in proximity to the Cambodian and Laotian borders facilitated their tasks of border surveillance and delaying, disrupting and destroying enemy forces and supplies. Green Berets assigned to the second-tier camps, positioned nearer the interior of Vietnam, would conduct combat reconnaissance missions as well as interdiction of infiltration routes. Equally important as these counter-guerrilla operations of a Special Forces strike force team was the psychological operations that they carried out. By raising the standard of living, developing a loyal identity with the government and enlisting their active support these units were able to transform a hostile area into one that became hostile to the enemy. Waging, as Francis Kelly aptly stated, an “unconventional war under conventional war conditions” was how the Green Berets trained. However, in Vietnam, they now found themselves fighting guerrilla warfare not in enemy territory, but in “friendly” territory.


MAJ Charlie Beckwith, at left, CO Detachment B-57, 5th Special Forces Group, during October 1965 siege of Plei Me Camp.
MAJ Charlie Beckwith, at left, CO Detachment B-57, 5th Special Forces Group, during October 1965 siege of Plei Me Camp. | Source
Source

Significant Special Forces Operations in Vietnam

Many of the earliest engagements that took place in Vietnam involved, as stated previously, A-Camps stood up by Special Forces teams in areas known to have high concentration of Viet Cong and little to no ARVN or U.S. military presence. These camps were in very remote portions of the country, out of the normal range of friendly artillery and mostly left to their own defenses. Retired Vietnam Special Forces soldier Gordon L. Rottman stated that, “cut off from civilization, they were more akin to Old West frontier army posts within Indian Territory and surrounded by hostile and capable foes.”

Most, if not all, the camps were attacked at least once, and usually multiple times. Attacks ranged from simple harassment to major assaults and sieges. Of all the camps, only seven actually were overrun and fell to the enemy. Many were close to being overrun, however once counterattacks began and reinforcements arrived the camps would ultimately prevail and drive out the enemy forces. On prime example of this is the attack at Camp Nam Dong.

This typical A-Camp was 15-miles from the Laotian border and like many of the A-Camps was comprised of a mix of ARVN, U.S. Special Forces, LLDB Special Forces, Nungs, and even an Austrailian Chief Warrant Officer. The camps total military population of barely 400 soldier found themselves being attacked on the very early morning of 6 July 1964. The sheer determination and exceptional valor allowed these Special Forces soldiers to prevail and hold the camp, even with, as it was found out later, over one hundred Viet Cong sypathizers in the ranks of the South Vietnamese strike force with orders to slit the throats of those sleeping nearby before the attack. When air strikes rolled in during the later morning hours the VC retreated and the camp remained in the hands of the Special Forces team, despite poor defenses, the large number of turncoats, and the lack of military support from the remaining ARVN and LLDB soldiers. What is considered to be the saving grace for the camp was the dedication and loyalty of the Nungs, a solid inner perimeter, and unified and cohesive actions of the Special Forces team. Green Beret Captain Roger H.C. Donlon, wounded numerous times during the battle noted, after observing the dead VC that were left behind, that, “We had been fighting hard-core professionals, not poorly trained, ill-equipped guerrillas.”

Captain Donlon would become the first American to receive the Medal of Honor in Vietnam for his actions at Camp Nam Dong.


While Camp Nam Dong barely survived, Camp Plei Me would be a resounding success for a Special Forces camp. The camp was a critical center for Special Forces movement in Vietnam and would be the site of an extensive siege that lasted from 19 October 1965 to 27 October 1965 and was a precursor to the battle that took place Ia Drang. The battle involved a large number of CIDG forces and ARVN Rangers along with the very small number (twelve) of Special Forces soldiers. The training that the CIDG received at the hands of the Special Forces soldiers would be instrumental in their success in the repulsion of the North Vietnamese Army (NVA). This would mark the first major commitment of troops to combat in Vietnam.


By the end of the Special Forces stay in Vietnam, many of the earmarks of their early endeavors would come to an end. By New Years Eve of 1970, the CIDG and LLDB programs would end and see it’s members absorbed into the ARVN. Many of the camps that were stood up by the Special Forces would be used by the ARVN. But in the end, when one thinks about the role that the Green Beret’s played in Vietnam it cannot be said that it was for naught. Their training and advising of CIDG camps had allowed them to provide a government presence in remote areas that had no chance of convential unit occupation. The Montagnard villages were protected, indiction routes maintained a constant source of problems for the VC, and provided the ARVN and regular Army forces better ability to operate in crucial areas.

The Special Forces in Vietnam would have unswerving support from the top military commanders. Even with their distaste for conformity to Army rules and regulations, the Green Berets proved time and time again that their methods were effective. Their ability to function in remote areas, under adverse conditions, with little to no additional support system and in unconventional warfare would be the standard for the Special Forces of today. One can look at the situations our modern day Army faces and can see the similarities to the adversities the Green Berets faced in Vietnam. Francis Kelly sums it nicely when he stated,

"The Special Forces men earned on the battlefield their rightful place in the United States Army. Tough, resourceful, dedicated and efficient, the men of the Special Forces stood and fought as well and as bravely as those of any fighting unit in our country’s history. They are firmly committed to their official motto of ‘Free the Oppressed’ and with equal firmness to their official yardstick: ‘We are known by what we do, not by what we say we are going to do.’"


Works Cited

Donlon, Roger H. C. Beyond Nam Dong. Leavenworth: R&N Publishers, 1998.

Kelly, Francis J. The Green Berets In Vietnam 1961-71. New York: Maxwell Macmillan Company, 1991.

Rottman, Gordon. Green Beret in Vietnam 1957-73. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, LTD., 2002.

—. Special Forces Camps in Vietnam 1961 - 70. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, LTD., 2005.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Carl Freeman IV 4 years ago

      This is great! Can anyone else teach me more about my father? Alcoholism took him when I was 16, but i know it was a price for his service. i want to teach my boys about him as a soldier. i would call him a hero, but that would just piss him off. A true Beret all the way!

    • TerrencePlank profile image

      TerrencePlank 5 years ago from Boulder Creek CA

      Enjoyed the article. Met a lot of you guys at Ft. Bragg when I was with the 82nd. Writing a few 'Nam stories myself.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)