ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • History & Archaeology»
  • History of the Americas

Teotihuacan - Facts About a Mysterious Giant

Updated on December 27, 2016
Buildreps profile image

The author proved a 100% mathematical correlation between orientation of ancient structures, ice ages and crustal displacements.

Teotihuacan is colossal, and no one has any idea who built these structures.
Teotihuacan is colossal, and no one has any idea who built these structures. | Source

What do You Think?

Teotihuacan is:

See results

Facts About Teotihuacan

Teotihuacan is massive, and no one knows who built it. That's directly one of the most pressing facts.

There's already enough said and written about Teotihuacan, so it is pointless to repeat it all over again. There are enough sources to consult. This article will deal with Teotihuacan in a totally other way.

To get to the core of this impressive giant, it's necessary to separate beliefs and assumptions from the facts. The fact it that we actually know nothing about Teotihuacan. Therefore is there not much to say about Teotihuacan what not has been said by mainstream media.

The only thing that can be done is to measure, and to process the data mathematically, and to see what comes from that.

This is what some people already have tried to do before, but their attempts remain mostly speculative. It is rock solid proof that we need.

Teotihuacan Before Restoration

Teotihuacan before it was restored. It looked like a natural hill. The site had to be unearthed like most other Mesoamerican sites, before it was opened to the public.
Teotihuacan before it was restored. It looked like a natural hill. The site had to be unearthed like most other Mesoamerican sites, before it was opened to the public. | Source

Believes About Teotihuacan

There's a lot of hocus pocus around Teotihuacan, and that's logical because no one seems to know really something about it. That creates all the space to speculate.

Archaeologists, scholars, and historians tell their usual Mythos stories how things must have gone, while their stories are nothing more than a long chain of irrational assumptions. Intuitive people know better, but they seem unable to escape the realms of mysticism.

The only thing we can be sure of is that Teotihuacan will remain a mystery forever. Some mysteries cannot be solved in such way that it will be accepted by all of us.

Don't Believe Everything They Tell You

Fantasy or Truth?

Some people claim to be channelling the truth, tapping knowledge from the Akashic field. But how do we know they're not tapping from a rich imagination? Not to dismiss the Akashic fields as non existent, but that's another discussion. It is quite easy to connect the dots in a wrong way.

When you want to enter the terrain of real science:

  • your ideas must be verifiable to anyone.
  • your ideas must be accessible to anyone.
  • your ideas must be presented in a language understandable for anyone.

The rest how science is supposed to be done should be dismissed as superfluous ballast.

When was the last time we were able to verify the data and interpretations from archaeologists? I haven't seen anything yet, except conservative ideas that came from brooding backrooms.

In this respect are archaeologists and channellers more or less identical twin brothers. And if you were forced to bet your last penny on one of them - pick the channeller. They are often more open minded, and therefore better equipped to solve mysteries.

The 'blind men elephant' test is how sensing thinking types, which most scientists are, would describe an elephant as a whole when they are blindfolded.
The 'blind men elephant' test is how sensing thinking types, which most scientists are, would describe an elephant as a whole when they are blindfolded. | Source

Typical Paradigm Problems - the Nampa Figurine

A paradigm is a kind of framework in which a trained professional tends to think and tends to solve encountered problems.

Think outside the box is often said in management trainings. How well can scientists think outside the box?

What to do with the mysterious figurine, called the Nampa figurine, drilled up from a depth of about 300 feet?

Geologists say these layers are 2 million years old. Archaeologists say that is impossible. Aren't contradictions a sign of falsehood?

So, what do we do know? Science is deafening silent. Oh yes, there are some noisy extroverts on sites like badarchaeology.com. In their attempt to debunk this figurine they make a big mess of geology, drilling engineering, and human intelligence as a whole.

With the same kind of logic we could claim dinosaurs alive just a few thousand years ago. That happens when science tries to debunk mysteries, it then undermines its own paradigm, and pollutes its own nest. The best policy is therefore - stay silent. The establishment literally hates the truth.

Science is humanities best attempt to describe reality. But there are many reasons to reject many mainstream theories, especially when it comes to our ancient history. There's simply too much mystery that's left unexplained or simply ignored, because the paradigm doesn't allows it to.

Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it.

— Blaise Pascal

Note: the genius Pascal said this already 400 years ago. What reason is there to think it got any better?

Pseudoscience?

Scientists like to sneer at everything that deviates from the norm and likes to call it pseudoscience. But they have failed to understand that science is just pseudomathematics. They ought to be more sceptical about their own supposed rationality. They are gullible, credulous empiricists unable to engage reason and intellect properly. They are not ‘sceptical’ at all; they have quasi-religious faith in dogmatic empiricism and materialism. They are irrational and anti-rational.

To use the famous cliché again, they are simply incapable of thinking outside the box. If they did, it would start to dawn on them that many of the claims of pseudoscience are correct, albeit often expressed in Mythos terms, and often too less in pure mathematical terms.

Scientists and skeptics are in desperate need of a crash course in how to think rationally, that is to say…mathematically.

To say that science makes "it work" doesn't mean their theories are correct. They often cover just that piece of the scope that covers that working "thing". That's all.

Most of the research science has done the last hundreds of years is useless garbage. The data collection is in some of the cases well done, but the interpretations can be tossed, without reading, in the trash can.

Just for the record; this is how I think about mainstream science - useless materialistic garbage.

Why is Teotihuacan so Differently Oriented?

The pyramids of Teotihuacan belong to the biggest on the planet. The pyramids of Giza are very accurately oriented to the current North pole. This way of orientation is called cardinal orientation. The cardinals are the wind directions North, East, South and West.

Why is Teotihuacan not oriented in the same way as the ones of Giza? Teotihuacan and Giza have even some similarities, like arrangement and the dimensions of the base. There are people who have created amazing complex theories to explain why Teotihuacan is oriented in this strange way.

They have obviously forgotten about Occam's Razor, which perfectly states that a theory with the least assumptions is most likely to be the correct one. Only people who hate the truth will claim that Occam's theory is wrong.

Is there a hidden Pyramid code encrypted in Teotihuacan? Why is Teotihuacan so typical aligned? There are many new things discovered about Teotihuacan in relation to Giza by using this brand new theory.

Why is Teotihuacan Built Under an Angle of About 15.5 Degrees?

Teotihuacan is in the shown direction built under an angle of about 15.5 degrees. The reason why this is done has never been solved, until now. The Pyramid of the Sun is built under an angle of 15.3 degrees.
Teotihuacan is in the shown direction built under an angle of about 15.5 degrees. The reason why this is done has never been solved, until now. The Pyramid of the Sun is built under an angle of 15.3 degrees. | Source

Teotihuacan Was Once Oriented to An Ancient GEOGRAPHIC North Pole

When we look how the pyramids of Giza are oriented, there's no sufficient reason to assume that Teotihuacan would be oriented in another way.

There are striking similarities between the two pyramids, like the size of their base and their typical arrangement.

It is so simple folks. Teotihuacan was once oriented to a geo North pole on Greenland. Or better, Greenland was once at the North pole, because of serious crustal shifts. And that was a very long time ago. No, it's not about the magnetic pole, it's about the geographic pole. It appears to be shifting once in a while.

It gets even more amazing once you have found the location of this former geo pole. The distance from Teotihuacan to its pole, and the distance from Giza to its pole, that's our current geo pole, happens to be exactly the same. Coincidence? Again? No. Teotihuacan was built at exactly the same latitude as Giza - 29.97° and something. That something are the small digits after the decimal point.

Which pole was that? How long ago was this geographic pole at that location?

If we can solve these questions, we can determine how long ago this mysterious city of the gods was built.

Only When the Truth is Not Obscured We Will Find Real Answers

Teotihuacan Was Oriented to a Mathematically Proven GEO Pole

Teotihuacan was oriented to a former geo pole (70-73) where many other pyramids were oriented to. This geo pole is mathematically proven with a certainty of 99.9999%. That is rational.
Teotihuacan was oriented to a former geo pole (70-73) where many other pyramids were oriented to. This geo pole is mathematically proven with a certainty of 99.9999%. That is rational. | Source

How the Former North Pole is Proven

It is mathematically inconsistent to state that because Teotihuacan is pointing to 'somewhere', it is therefore a former North pole. This is not how mathematical proof works.

But when a massive amount of ancient pyramids and temples, all around the world (thus independently), are pointing to that same hotspot, that same small area to which Teotihuacan was oriented, we can calculate the probability of this event to occur.

It is simple and very powerful mathematics, impossible to escape from with statements like 'coincidence' or 'it proves nothing'. This is what we call proof. Evidence, where scientists love to deal with, is crap. Evidence gets overthrown all the time. But okay, it keeps these dudes off the streets.

How this proof is delivered is extensively explained in former articles (see links above), and it irrefutably proves that the geo pole moved, while there were already civilizations present on earth. To say that crustal movements are quite inconvenient is an understatement. Such an event wipes almost everything off the face of the earth. They are related to Great Floods. Note the plurality. Half a dozen civilizations were wiped away. Most evidence is gone or scrambled and jumbled. One big mess. That explains a lot, isn't it?

One could argue that the last crustal shift was 11,500 years ago when the last ice ages ended. Another one could argue it was 110,000 years ago, when the last ice ages started. I showed in former, related articles, it was the latter. Very sure. It faces science with again a major challenge: advanced civilisations roamed the earth much longer than scientists assumed. But of course, science is in its usual denial mode. The easy mode. The blind, dumb, and deaf mode. No veo por qué.

Science has to face immense errors in its core, and simply overlooks them or rejects proof of opposers by saying it is 'pseudo science'. Who dares to argue against the power of mathematics? With evidence? Which evidence? I have never seen anything other than poorly constructed interpretations, accompanied with insane textual compositions to pretend as if it must be something intelligent. It never explains anything for real.

Teotihuacan Was Oriented to a Former North Pole

Teotihuacan was once aligned to its geo North pole, when it was at another location. This was more than 110,000 years ago. The distance between Giza and the North pole = distance Teotihuacan to its former pole. That's WHY they are closely related
Teotihuacan was once aligned to its geo North pole, when it was at another location. This was more than 110,000 years ago. The distance between Giza and the North pole = distance Teotihuacan to its former pole. That's WHY they are closely related | Source

Why Teotihuacan was Abandoned by its Builders

The most logical explanation is this: the ushering of a new ice age, which was in fact an earth crust shift, wiped away civilizations over and over again. It happened in the past, and it will happen in the future. The few people that remain after this catastrophe start to roam the planet looking for better places to settle.

Climatic zones have been shifted. The earth is in great turmoil with tidal waves, volcanoes, and mega-quakes. People had become low developed scavengers, warped back into their survival mode - the stone age.

When was the last time a new ice age started? It is estimated to be about 110,000 years ago, and lasted until about 12,500 years ago. Hm, that explains a lot.

Species Seemingly Appear Out of Nowhere

The image, or the controlling paradigm as you might call it, is that scientists perceive a species coming from virtually nowhere. This specie, Homo Sapiens, starts to migrate to the North. It is literally running after the shifted pole to the North.

When you look at the other side of the continent, like Russia, the species started to run to the South. It explains the massive amount of sudden frozen animals, like the mammoths in Siberia. The C14 dating completely fails when the latitudes were shifted. It's a laughable attempt to carbon date anything when you deny crustal shifts. This bug will be fixed in the book "Atlantis is Here".

It seems virtually that species arise from nothing, while they in fact originated from a high advanced race many thousands years before.

Scientists would say: there's no evidence for this claim! Yes, there is. It are the structures that are abandoned and remain unexplained. They are mathematically proven to align massively to former poles. There's in fact no way to get around this conclusion.

If structures like Teotihuacan remain unexplained there's something fundamentally wrong in the way how evidence is gathered and interpreted. That is also for 99.99% sure, because the geo poles are proven to be moving in relation to ancient civilizations a very long time ago.

The fact is that everything archaeology has done in the last century has to be revalued. The information that has been poured over the people through the media is proven to be completely worthless.

How Orientation Clusters Relate to Ice Ages

Teotihuacan was built between 200,000 and 240,000 years ago. The crust shifted again relatively short after it was built.
Teotihuacan was built between 200,000 and 240,000 years ago. The crust shifted again relatively short after it was built. | Source

How Old is Teotihuacan?

Teotihuacan is built between 200,000 and 240,000 years ago. The top structure might have been renovated by the many peoples who have occupied the city, while the foundation never changed its orientation.

It is said in the Sumerian tablets that an extraterrestrial species, called the Anunnaki (and Nephilim), came to earth around 450,000 years ago. How coincidental. Sumerian structures like Zabala, Nineveh, Eridu, and Sippar are oriented to a small area, a hotspot, that can be interpreted as one of the very ancient poles. About 450,000 years ago. Together with structures in Peru like Túcume, Huaca del Sol, Huaca del Luna, Caral, and Ollantaytambo that are also oriented to the same hotspot we have found the cradle of our civilization. We didn't originate from one place, but from a few places around the world.

The orientation of the foundation is the most sure thing there is. It never lies. It is the foundation of the new truth.

Were we once created as a slave species by the Annunaki? Oh boy, that explains a lot.

This and much more will be published in the book "Atlantis is Here" that might, metaphorically speaking, shift your paradigm in the same way as the earth crust did. Note that the next crustal shift isn't expected the next 100,000 years. Forget the fear mongers and doomsday preachers that Earth will be destructed soon. We have tons of time to set things straight before we're warped back into the stone age for the umpteenth time.

But we have to take back control over what science has been telling us. It is in general sensorial collected nonsense, and people believe it because doctor this or professor that says so. They have not a single clue. Mathematics is the only tool to get the truth back.


© 2016 by Buildreps


First published: March 12, 2016

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Austinstar profile image

      Austinstar 16 months ago from Somewhere in the universe

      I have never been to Teotihuacan, but always wanted to go to see it for myself.

      I think you have presented a very good case for it to be much older than anyone imagines it to be!

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thanks Austinstar! There are many scientists who don't agree with me, and condemn me as a heretic.

    • Austinstar profile image

      Austinstar 16 months ago from Somewhere in the universe

      Well, that is what they do. No one wants their theories debunked or even questioned. But good scientists welcome the questions and evidence like yours. The rest of them can just be ignored.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Agree, it's unpleasant to see your theory debunked. On the other hand, one has to ask itself the question - do I love the truth, or do I love to see my own ideas spread around? I think that the former is of the highest order, while the latter is an egoic exercise. If theories are mathematically underpinned, they are hard to debunk, and more likely to be true. If they are not they are likely to be false, and debunked over and over again.

      Thanks for the response, and the support.

    • billybuc profile image

      Bill Holland 16 months ago from Olympia, WA

      I would follow you just out of loyalty and friendship, but I get a bonus because your articles are always so interesting.

      In other words, lucky me!!!!

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thank you very much for your friendship and your comment, billybuc! I feel lucky too. :)

    • AliciaC profile image

      Linda Crampton 16 months ago from British Columbia, Canada

      This hub is interesting and thought provoking, as always, Buildreps. I've never heard of Teotihuacan before, so I appreciate learning about it.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thanks for your comment and the compliment, Linda. Much appreciated. Teotihuacan is an enigma, similar as the pyramids of Giza. There is still so much work to do. :)

    • emge profile image

      Madan 16 months ago from Abu Dhabi

      Interesting hub. Hadnt heard of Teotihuacan before. Post added to my knowledge

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Thanks for reading and commenting, emge. Teotihuacan is maybe a strange name, which is not so easy to pronounce. Many people have seen these pyramids ever on TV, but don't seem to remember it. The name Teotihuacan means "city where the gods were born".

    • profile image

      Robertl 16 months ago

      Your theory is interesting, but You have verified the result of your analysis whit the study on poles shifting reported in

      http://www.attivitasolare.com/wp-content/uploads/2...

      There are the pole shift in the last 2000 years and they are very fasting, as said by the writer .

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 16 months ago from Europe

      Robertl, like so many people, you confuse the magnetic poles with the geographic poles. The magnetic poles move constantly, the geographical poles not.

      You can read the difference here: http://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geograph...

      Geology never considered the geographical pole to be moveable, so you won't find much information about that issue on a geology source.

      Thank your for reading and commenting.

    • owl3764 profile image

      owl3764 13 months ago

      Have loved all the articles you've written. It's nice to read things that I can actually agree with for a change. Science seems to have become a religion full of dogma. I wonder how many lettered scientists out there want to write the truth but know their grant money will evaporate if they do. It's a shame, science should always be about the pursuit of the truth, instead they seem deadly serious about keeping it hidden. I don't understand the hows or whys of that. What are they afraid of? Looking forward to your book. Thanks for the genuine service, I feel, you're providing those of us in pursuit of the ultimate truths. Good luck and stay safe.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 13 months ago from Europe

      Thanks for the reading and your kind comment, owl3764. Science has become a religion because of its stifling paradigm. That's a pity, indeed. As you perfectly state, science should be a pursuit to the truth. The love for the truth should prevail above the pursuit for money or fame.

      What are they afraid of? Good question. I wondered about this myself for a long time, until the penny dropped: if we don't know where we came from, we don't know where we are going to. And that is exactly what the elite needs to stay in control - know more than the herds, and you control them.

      The point is that Sitchin and Von Daniken (and so many others) are most probably correct with their theories, although I don't agree with their datings. Antiquity extends much, much further than usually presumed.

      Even the most controversial researchers and authors still lean too much on carbon datings, that appears to be awfully flawed because of an unstable biosphere (due to crustal shifts), which I have proven mathematically but haven't published yet. The time frames that are provided now with this new theory are ALL for more than 99.8% certain. This way of presenting the 'evidence' is something anthropology, geology, or archaeology have never considered to do. And if they would, their theories wouldn't even make it to the public, because of their ludicrous unlikelihood.

      The book is still far away from publishing, because there is still much very controversial stuff that has to be verified and reviewed. None of these things have yet been published here on HubPages., because it is so very controversial that it requires sufficient mathematical proof.

      Good luck and enjoy life!

    • Boomer Music Man profile image

      Boomer Music Man 11 months ago

      This is such a great article to read and I didn't know that the teothituacan pyramids belong to the biggest in the planet. Another great article written by you.

    • Buildreps profile image
      Author

      Buildreps 11 months ago from Europe

      Thank you very much for the compliment, Boomer Music Man!

    • profile image

      Paul 8 months ago

      These structures, as well as many other stone constructs, were built by the advanced predeluvian civilization...these people were the materialized angels and their hybrid offspring, who were much larger then ordinary humans...they had use of energy fields and could levitate large stones by negating gravity using electro-magnetism...these and their global civilization were destroyed in the flood of Noah's day.

    Click to Rate This Article