ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Archaeology of Sodom

Updated on December 31, 2018
david tee profile image

Dr. David Thiessen is an educator, writer, pastor, and speaker. He has authored several books on a variety of topics including Archaeology

Introduction

The exact location of Sodom has been an ongoing debate for maybe a century or two. Until very recent times, Josephus’ identification on the south east shore of the Dead Sea has been the accepted location. Ancient writers like Eusebius and Jerome and others up through the centuries to Dr. Robinson have accepted Josephus’ location (McClintock & Strong, 2000).

But this location has not gone unchallenged as Dr. Albright has excavated at another site Bab edh-Drah, now thought to be Sodom and Gomorrah, but dismissed it due to the lack of homesites in the region. He thought that the people of Sodom used Bab edh-Drah as a religious high place which they would visit at festival time. This theory explained the lack of homesite in that city (Harland, 2001).

Another explanation for the lack of homesites in the Bab edh-Drah region is that the destruction that took place was so thorough that nothing was left standing to be found by anyone even millennia later (Easton’s Bible Dictionary, 1897).

It is not till the later have of the 20th century that Bab edh-Drah was considered to be the actual location of Sodom. The desolate region doe s not have any people living there, nor is there any well-watered land. Paul Lapp started the new excavation which was carried on by Walter Rast and R. Thomas Schaub. In their work they were able to uncover a second city, Numeria, that existed in the Early Bronze Age and suffered from a destructive catastrophe (Van Hattom, BA).

The identification of Bab edh-Drah received lots of support from other scholars who have written in different archaeological journals, Have Sodom and Gomorrah Been Found? (1980). BAR, 6(5) & Dr. Bryant Wood’s article Have Sodom And Gomorrah Been Found? (BSP 3:3 (Summer 1974) p. 69).

Yet, this support and work has not deterred others from trying to find a third possible location for Sodom and the other cities of the plain. Dr. Steven Collins, who declares that his site, Tall el-Hamman, is the best candidate for Sodom (Final reports 1 to 10), is not the first to suggest that the 5 cities that were destroyed in Genesis, were located in the North-eastern area of the Dead Sea.

One Mr. Tristam explored the Dead Sea region quite thoroughly and came to the conclusion that Sodom was located in the north far from the asphalt pits that dominated the Southern Shore region. Mr. Tristam uses some of the same arguments that Dr. Collins uses today to defend his identification. He goes to one specific verse found in Genesis which he claimed states that Lot camped ‘at’ Sodom not toward it. Also, he limits the translation of the Hebrew word Ciccar to mean the local Jordan region found at the north of the Dead Sea (McClintock & Strong, 2000).

So today we have a dilemma as to which site is the actual location of the 4 cities destroyed by God. It is strange that with all the press, all the fame and all the investigations that have taken place over the centuries that these cities remain unfound (Harland, BA).

One of the purposes of this paper is to look at the archaeology of all three locations and see which one best suit the biblical description. We will also look at the evidence presented though in the case of Sodom lying under the Dead Sea, the evidence may be a little sparse. Then we will analyze some of the arguments for each pointing out why those identifications do or do not work.

Finally, we will go a step further than Mr. Harland and state that we already know the site of Sodom and Gomorrah, but archaeologists and scientists being what they are, do not stick their necks out and firmly state which location is the real Sodom.

This paper will tread where angels fear to go because we have nothing to lose by making this identification. This paper is more about truth because even in archaeology, Christians need to speak the truth and shun faulty theories.

Our credibility and reputation lie in speaking the truth even when we must go against scholars and archaeologists. How can the unchurch world trust what we say when we can’t even get the location of Sodom correct. To get the unbeliever saved, they have to know that they can trust us and Jesus.

© 2018 David Thiessen

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)