ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Greek Offensive Towards Eskisehir, Turkey, Jan. 1921

Updated on March 15, 2009


Most Americans and Europeans know little about the Asia Minor War between Greece and Turkey from 1919-1922. It was a direct result of Turkey being a loser in WW1. The Allied nations (France, UK, Italy, Greece) had all planned to occupy parts of Turkey and to allow Greece to pursue its concept of a "Greater Greece", which was much of Turkey. However, the Allies would only support the Greeks fight with financial loans, while the Greek Army did the fighting and invaded what remained of Turkey. When the war started to sway in Turkey's favor in the Fall of 1921, the Allies withdrew their financial loans and Greece was on its own! By August,1922, the Greek Army would be routed.


The First Greek Offensive

The Greek 1st Corps (also referred to as A) attacked ostentatiously within a small depth towards Banaz – Sivasli, to prevent the Turks from moving forces from the southern  front to the northern one. The Tzavelas Detachment ( III/5 and I/38 Battalions ) crossed the Buyuk (Great) Menderez River, south of Nazli, moving to Arpas in order to continue east until Dunlar. The 1stInfantry Regiment moved towards Banaz on the next day, while the 7thtowards Kilica Sogut – Sivasli and II/4 and III/4 Battalions towards Pinarbasi – Burgaz.


The main operation began with 3rd Corps attacking in the direction of Eskisehir. The 7th Division was on the right and one the 30th Reg.\10th Division on the left. The 30thRegiment advanced from the area of Burcun with the Divisional C.O. Colonel Boukouvalas leading. It arrived at Yeni Sehir at 1300. The Turkish Greeks and Armenians  there welcomed them. It had reached Kopru Hisar bridge by night, while the 22ndRegiment was on the Sivardi – Ulukman line. The southern detachment had seized the Emir Hasan Pasha – Ortakoy line.

  The northern group continued their northeastern march on the 5th, with the exception of the 30thInfantry Regiment that had met strong enemy defences at Kopru Hisar on its way to Bilecik. The central column with the 22nd and 23rdregiments reached Bahce Sultan and Gumug Deresi  and the southern column, under Staurianopoulos, with the 2Bn /39, 37thRegiment reached Karaca Kaya. The 7th Division C.O.  quickened the advance to Karakoy, ignoring the 30thRegiment’s dilemma at Kopru Hisar, where it faced strong defenses. Except for the 30th Regiment, the Greek advance shined in execution.  It was a missed opportunity, for the Turks were able to retreat without being pursued the night of the 5th-6thfrom Kopru Hisar to Sogut. The 30thRegiment finally crossed the Kopru Hisar bridge the next day, while 7thDivision’s columns had reached Kurtkoy with the 4thBn/22 Reg., Katakoy  with 22ndand  23rd Regiments,  and Koz Pinar  with the 37th  Reg., and 2 Bn/39 Reg. overrunning the weak Turkish defenses. The 4thRegiment had seized Civril by 1100 in the southern front.


The 7th Division continued moving relentlessly in the morning of the 8th. The southern column ( 37th, 2/39 ) seized the bitterly contested Kara Agac defenses using the Anagnostopoulos Detachment. Much Greek blood had been split. It then reached west of Saraycik with the Spiliotopoulos Detachment. The central column ( 22nd, 23rd Regs.), began advancing two hours later than the time set because the order to move had not been issued to the 4thBn/22 Regiment.  When it finally reached Boz Eyuk it was quickly pinned down. Meanwhile, the 4thBn/22 Reg. ( under Captain Ieronymakis ) reached Ali Bey Tuzu where it was reinforced with two of the 23rd Infantry Regiment’s battalions. The 30th Regiment  stopped at Bilecik by error. It was suppose to rush towards Sogut to support next day’s attack. At the same time, the Turks were reinforcing the Avgin – Kovalic area with strong forces, moving them from Afyon. The Greek 3rdCorps ( Colonel K. Petmezas ) continued to request (in vain)  that the Army issue orders to the 1stCorps to attack towards Afyon, as a diversion. The Army refused.  Thus,  by the 9th, Greek forces had suffered numerous losses. A thick fog that morning obstructed artillery from firing, while rifle fire was being heard from the area of Kovalic. The attack began with the Spiliotopoulos Detachment in the south and the Staurianopoulos Detachment that had seized the Porias Heights by afternoon. The Staurianopoulos Evzones (special infantry) attacking Kovalic had many casualties. Their C.O. requested, in vain, that the  Division send reinforcements. The 2ndBn/39 Reg had struck a well fortified force of 6000 Turks!  However, the Turks were overran at bayonet point by the Evzones with a frontal attack, as other Greek units tried to encircle them. The fierce Turk counter-attacks were crushed by the Evzones  bayonets and hand-grenades. The Turks now retreated towards Inonu. The battle ended by 1500. A critical mistake now prevented the Greeks from pursuing the Turks: It was against Army orders!


The 23rdInfantry Regiment had reached Porias Heights, while the 30th  Reg. in the north had passed Sogut and had arrived at these heights west of Avgin. The Turks fell back towards the Biskardas Ulubali line, having sustained heavy casualties.  In this battle, Greek casualties were 51 dead ( 8 of which officers ) and 130 wounded ( 6 officers ). For some unknown reason, the Greek 22ndRegiment had been sent towards Zemzniye instead of being sent to encircle and destroy the Turks in the Poria Heights battle. Another Greek chance to crush the Turks had been wasted.


To make matters worse, as the Turks were withdrawing to their last line of defense before Eskisehir and the Greek forces were ordered to fall back ! The order prevented a crushing blow to the Turks because the Army HQ had considered the reconnaissance operation a success (which was to ascertain the Turkish strength). 


Thus, the rather successful advance of the Greek Army had returned to its fortified positions east of Bursa by the 12th. The military action had also freed 3000 Turkish Greeks and Armenians. The most serious error  was the uncoordinated operations of the 1st  and 3rd Corps, and not taking advantage of Etem’s revolt (local Greeks) deprived the Greeks from a quick success. Etem was crushed in the Greek zone. Thus, by not advancing the 1st  Corps to Cediz ( where Etem was fighting ) and then Etem’s move to Nazli and Banaz allowed the Turks to throw all their forces in the Avgin – Kovalic area with horrific, bloody results.


The operations, though giving valuable information about  the  organization of the new Turkish Army and giving them a hard blow, had the impact of  raising Kemal’s authority. It was now propagandized as the ‘ First Inonu Victory ’, a victory in a battle that never happened (both sides have very different views on this).The  French and Italians claimed that the Greek Army had failed since it didn’t seize Eskisehir. The truth was that a chance to seize Eskisehir and Kutahya with an offensive towards the north six months earlier was lost.  The Greek inadequacies in staff organization and supply were considerable, but the failure was mainly due to the Turkish fortifications and tactical organization, which had greatly improved. Oddly, the Greeks had known this since November 1920, that the Turks were fortifying and reinforcing the area between Bursa and Eskisehir, but election fever in Greece and party purges dominated their attention. The Turkish claims regarding the defense at Inonu  was, in hindsight, Turkish  propaganda.. The fact remains that Greek soldiers overran Turk soliders near Inonu on January 8-9 with the  23rdInfantry Regiment seizing Porias Heights from the flanks and rear of the Turks, while Greeks attacked frontally with the Staurianopoulos and Zoitopoulos Regiments. These critical attacks were not followed up. The Mantas Battery ( Vladimiros Kolokotronis Artillery Battalion ) hammered the Turks that were withdrawing in thick formations towards Kutahya. It was now, as claimed by the Greeks, the fateful order to withdraw came. If true, it would not be the last time victory would flee from the Greeks in the campaign.

The January offensive showed the inadequacies of the Greek Army. Many of the regimental and higher commanders had recently re-entered the army, not having fought since 1913. In ten years, new tactics and weapons had all profound impacts on combat. During the attack towards Eskishir,  six regiments of the 10th  and 7th  Divisions were advancing in three columns. The center, under Staurianopoulos had crushed Turkish defenses. However, irregular bands appeared on the left flank (where the Corps Commander Petmezas and the Divisional C.O. Karakalos were)  threatening, instead of striking them with assaults, an immediate withdrawal was ordered ! The older officers panicked, which spread panic to all the regiments that night. This panic that overwhelmed the officers mentioned above would also contribute to Papoulas’ decision to postpone operations. The new staff  wanted reinforcements for the new  March operation they had to undertake.


 The next offensive, in March, would be along the same routes of advance and the Turks knew of the  plans. Why did the Greeks decide on an offensive in exactly the same area, using the same routes?  The powerful Greek attack upon Inonu would be pinned down by the Turks’ defensive organization, something that, in all probability, would not happen if the January operation would not come first.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      That's correct, Ethem was a Muslim Circassian (ethnically no Turkish) warlord with some communist sympathies. At first he fought against the Greek army, then he quarreled with Kemal, and tried to change allegiance, but the Greeks failed to exploit this opportunity to split their enemies and Ethem played no significant role in the continuation of the campaign.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      "Etem’s revolt (local Greeks)"

      Etem or "Ethem the Circassian" was a valiant and fierce guerilla leader who was fighting very successfully against the Greek army. He was on the verge of becoming a living legend. The problem was, he wouldn't want to join the regular army. This was considered a revolt in Ankara and a regular army force was dispatched against him. Ethem didn't fought them, he was no traitor. Instead, he disbanded his forces advising them to join the regular army. Only after that, he took refuge with the Greek army only with his small entourage just to save his life, because he knew he would be executed if the regular Turkish army caught him.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)