ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

More on the Patterns of Maths

Updated on February 15, 2017

Check it Out

Continuing from the previous Hub, Mathematics - the Science of Patterns, where we looked at how to create formulas for sums of numbers of certain powers, this is well and good, if all you are doing is summing every one of the numbers from one only to x, but what about the sums from a number other than one, and or those having a gap between them of more than one ?

We have in fact seen one formula already which allows us to do this, at least for normal numbers, which is :

( x² + xy -+ ay ) ÷ 2y

This is the formula I mentioned with respect to finding the odd number you needed to sum to, in order to work out the square of x. Now, you might want to know where this comes from, and whether we can make similar ones for formulae of base numbers raised to higher powers. After all, we have just come up with an equation to add powers of four, but only consecutive powers of four, and all from 14. Well, the answer to the second thought, is yes, we can, since we did it with x raised to the power of one, and this is how :

Say you didn’t want to sum all numbers from one to whatever x is, but to some number other than one, but still up to x. We call this other number a. What we are then doing is the same in fact as summing from one itself to x, then subtracting the sum of all numbers from one to one less than a.

For example :

Sum from 1 to 5 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5

Sum from 3 to 5 = 3 + 4 + 5,

which equals Sum from 1 to 5, minus the Sum from 1 to 2, and 2 is one less than three, three being the number we sum from the second time.

So all we do, is use the formula for the sum from one to x, and make up one for one to ( a - 1 ), which is actually based on the first formula, but where we substitute ( a - 1 ) for x.

For example :

( + x ) ÷ 2 - [ ( a - 1 )² + ( a - 1 ) ] ÷ 2

You see, in this case, ( a - 1 ) is what we use to represent 2. The sum to 2 here is what we are subtracting from the sum from 1 to x, to find the sum from a to x, a here symbolising three, the number we are summing from.


How the Formula for summing from a to x comes about

If we wanted a gap of more than one between the bases we are summing, we insert the variable y :

( x² + xy -+ ay ) ÷ 2y,

and this is indeed the formula I showed you before, and can be used to sum from any number a, to any number x, with a common difference of y.

The Rest

Sure, and what about the rest ? Well, to find the sums of bases raised to any power, from a to x, you follow the same basic procedure as before. You take the basic formula for summing to x from one, then subtract from it the formula for summing from one to ( a - 1 ), which second formula is simply the first one, but with ( a - 1 ) substituted for x.

What, I suppose you want someone to hold your hand for you the whole time ? Rightyo, then, I shall do the formula for the sums of squares, just so you can all get the right idea. Here we go :

which really does work.

The Short Cut

A shortcut to finding this formula, without having to FOIL what will end up being polynomials to greater powers, is to leave the x part of the formula the same, but the a part begins by subtracting its first term ( in the above case, this being 2a² ), then alternatingly adding and subtracting successive terms until the last.

For example :

sum 15to x5 = ( 2x6 + 6x5 + 5x4-) ÷ 12,

so our a part to this is : - 2a6+ 6a5 - 5a4+, where a simply takes the place that x has in the original formula, and the signs of successive terms of a are alternated, beginning with negative, regardless of what the original signs of x were.

Unfortunately I am not actually able to incorporate y into this one. It seems that since the gaps between the differences between the numbers raised to higher powers are not the same, perhaps the same rules do not apply as they do to normal numbers, being those raised only to the power of one.

I have instead had to work out somehow individual formulae for each value of the difference between base numbers, which themselves do not follow a consistent pattern.

Love the Triangle

An interesting fact to be aware of, and one which has great significance, is that those values which are sums of numbers raised only to the power of one, which we obtain through the formula (+ x ) ÷ 2, are known as Triangular Numbers, simply because they can be arranged evenly in triangles with the base formed by the last number to be added :


As we have seen, if we add two successive ones of these Triangular Numbers, we get a square, and it is worked out in such a way that a given number squared is equal to sum of all numbers up to itself, plus the sum of all numbers up to one less than itself, so that, as an example, we can see that if we have 25², it = 625, which = Σ25 + Σ24.


Four !

Another feature are what is known as Rectangular Numbers, achieved by only having each dimension one apart in value :

We can work out that each Rectangular Number has double the value of its corresponding Triangular. The Rectangular Number can thus be rendered algebraically as + x, where x is the smaller of the two numbers multiplied to give us our Rectangle. If we look at it the other way, we are multiplying x by x + 1, and x( x + 1 ) =+ x, so this is consistent. It was these Rectangular Numbers we saw some time ago, when we investigated the difference between a number and its square, but in this case the x values are applied differently.

For example, the Rectangular Number two is equal to + x, when x = 1, but it is also equal to - x when x = 2, so you need to assign one value to x at a time. Let’s say x = 1, so 2 =+ x, and to symbolise 2, we call it x + 1, such that ( x + 1 )² - ( x + 1 ) ought to also equal two : + 2x + 1 - x - 1 =+ x, which shows that this works.

If, on the other hand, we decided to let x be two, then one would equal x - 1, so we would have to see if ( x - 1 )² + ( x - 1 ) = 2. When it is worked it out we get - 2x + 1 + x - 1 =- x, which also corresponds.

Patterns are not just made by Butterick™

All of this is an example of how algebraic manipulation of uncovered facts works out. Along with what we have already seen, there are other patterns among sums and squares and other such numbers, depending upon how we choose to manipulate them. From any given table constructed to show relationships between certain types of numbers, you can even generate an overall formula.

Below we shall show a table which gives first the value of x, then the sum of all squares from to . The third column will show the sum of two of these sums of squares in succession, the next will be the number in column 3 divided by x, then we multiply by three, and in the next column add (x - 1). The last column will show the pattern this takes.

Working out how everything is Related

It may seem difficult to believe, but we can obtain a formula from this lot to show how x relates to the sum of two consecutive sums to . That is, to obtain the numbers in Column Three, which are two consecutive sums of squares added together, we see the following, that after we have manipulated our sums of two consecutive sums of squares, we ended up with other sums, which just happened to be those normal sums of numbers from one to twice the original value of x.

That is, that when x = 5, we added the sum of squares from one to four to the sum of squares from one to five, and after manipulating this total we ended up with the sum of numbers from one to ten, and ten is of course twice five.

Now, to generate an appropriate formula from all of this, we begin at the end, and go backwards, since we are in fact now performing the opposite operations on our numbers. Let us begin with what we have ended up with, the sum of numbers from one to 2x. This is : [ ( 2x )² + 2x ] ÷ 2, where 2x now takes the place that x normally has in the original summation formula - a kind of compound function.

The above formula works out to be ( 2²x² + 2x ) ÷ 2 which of course equals 4x² + 2x ÷ 2, and this we can reduce down to 2x² + x. Now from this we need to take away ( x - 1 ), because when going the other way in the table, we originally added it. So next we have : 2x² + x - ( x - 1 ) = 2x² + x - x + 1 = 2x² + 1.

This number we then divide by three, to undo the previous multiplication by three we had when going the other way, so then we get : ( 2x² + 1 ) ÷ 3, and the final act we need to perform to get us back to our original value, is to multiply by x, thus reversing the original division. From this we end up with our complete formula : ( 2x³ + x ) ÷ 3, which is indeed a simplified formula for adding all squares from one to x to all squares from one to x - 1.

Thus, if I want to find the sum of all the squares form 1 to 4, added to that of all squares from 1 to 5, so that x = 5, and I go : ( 2 × + 5 ) ÷ 3, which equals, as the table also says, 85.

It is not so hard to find such formulae for any kind of such numbers you may wish to manipulate in any way. In the above case, all I did was list them, and then had to determine what needed to be done to them to form a recognisable pattern.

Now having seen how to work out a formula for the sum of all numbers to 2x, as opposed to just x, we might want to find equations that will give us the sum to other multiples of x.

Well, we see that if we compare numbers obtained by summing to x to those gotten from summing to 2x, 3x, 4x, and such, we get the following details :

Comparing sums to x with sums to multiples of x

We see that to get from Σx to Σ2x, we multiply by 4 then subtract x. To get from Σx to Σ3x, we multiply by nine, but this time have to take away 3x. Then, in order to go from Σx to Σ4x, we multiply it by 16, then subtract from it 6x. The pattern here, is that we square the coefficient we are multiplying x by, then times it by that result, after which we subtract :( x multiplied by square of the coefficient, minus the sum of all numbers to the coefficient. )

For example, let’s say that x = 3, and we are going from Σx to Σ2x. We see that the square of 2, where 2 is the coefficient of 2x, equals 4, so we multiply the sum from one to three ( which is six ), first of all by four, to give us six times four, which is twenty four, then from this we subtract three, so that we end up with 21. This three is obtained by multiplying x ( = 3 ) by ( - Σ2 ), which is 3 times ( 4 - 3 ), equalling 3 × 1.

If, then, we were going from Σx to Σ3x, we recognise that = 9, so we multiply our sum to x by nine, where we get 6 × 9 = 54, from which we take away three times ( 3² - Σ3 ), which equals three times three, ( = 9) to end up with 45, which is the sum to nine, if x = 3, and we want to sum to 3x, which does equal nine.

Let us make things very clear

To clarify things, let’s see how we come about the formula : The first thing we do is to multiply our sum to x by the square of the coefficient of x we want to see the sum of. Let’s designate that coefficient by the letter c. So what we have first of all is the equation (+ x 2, which we can change to look like ( c²x² + c²x ) ÷ 2, where we see both terms in the parentheses multiplied by the term .

From this we are to subtract a given number. This is obtained by the algebraic expression :

x[- (+ c) ÷ 2 ], where we see the sum to a subtracted from , all of which is multiplied by x. To fix this up, we cannot get rid of the fraction, so we need to incorporate into it, by multiplying it by two so that when it joins as part of the numerator, the overall value stays the same. Hence, x[- (+ c) ÷ 2 ] = x( 2c² -- c ) ÷ 2 = x(- c ) ÷ 2 ( the c is now subtracted from the remaining , since the parentheses are now gone, and whatever was in them was all to be subtracted from . Next we multiply what we have by x : = ( c²x - cx ) ÷ 2, and then, all this is subtracted from ( c²x² + c²x ) ÷ 2, which would give us the following : ( c²x² + c²x - c²x + cx ) ÷ 2, realising again that the final term here, cx, which was negative is now positive, because we subtracted from our first lot the second lot as it were in parentheses, and once they go, we get a double negative, which becomes a positive. Both lots of c²x cancel, to give us a final formula of ( c²x² + cx ) ÷ 2 which tells us exactly what the sum to cx is, if we want to go to that from the sum to x itself. For example :

If x = 4, what is the sum to 7x ? (×+ 7 × 4 ) ÷ 2, which equals ½ of ( 49 × 16 + 28 ) = 406, which is the sum to 7x, 7x being 28, since x = 4.

But then if you want to see how the number which is the value of the sum to x relates to the sum to cx, then you take your sum to x, multiply it by , and from this total you subtract x times the sum of all numbers up to one less than c. When all this is worked algebraically, we actually end up with our previous formula. But for example, say you know Σ10 = 55, from this, how do you find Σ20 ? So 20 is 2x, so c = 2, and we multiply 55 by , which is four, to get 220, from which we subtract x (or 10), times the sum to c - 1, which is one, so 220 - 10 × 1 = 210, and this of course is our sum to 20.

On to the Geometric

Now in addition to the previous, which are known as arithmetic sums, with which the value added each time remains constant, mathematics has the temerity to come up with the concoction known as the Geometric Sequence, where each successive term is the product of the previous one and a given ratio.

For example, consider the numbers

1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243

From these we can gather that the common ratio is 3, so that each successive number is the previous one multiplied by this common ratio of 3.

.


The Penny Principle

There are even formulae for working out, not only say the 100thterm of that sequence, the formula being ar(n-1), but also the sum of all terms of the sequence, being :

[ a ( rn- 1 ) ] ÷ ( r - 1 ) where r > 1, r 1

a = 1st term of sequence r = common ratio

n = number of terms

Now, in addition to this, and not aware of the above formula, I once independently devised a summation formula for terms of a geometric sequence, which has been adjusted and refined to become :

( y(x + 1)- yI) ÷ ( y - 1 )

y = common ratio x = last power y raised to

I = first power y raised to

This was in response to what is known as the infamous Penny Problem, where a person is offered the choice of something like half a million dollars per day for a month, or, to receive one cent on the first day, two cents on the second, and so on, the amount being doubled each day.

For the first scenario, we have :

$ 500,000 × 31 = $15,500,000, so that is pretty straightforward.

My own Geometric Formula and its Uses


Now for the purpose of our formula :

y = 2, since this is our common ratio - successive amounts are to be multiplied only by two

I = 0, and this is because our first term is two, which is , and as we have 31 terms, we are act-ually adding all those from to 230

x = 30, as this is the last term of our sequence The key is to work out what you are adding from, and to, and once you understand exactly what you are doing, you should be right.


So : ( 2(30 + 1) -) ÷ ( 2 - 1 ) = ( 2³¹ - 1 ) ÷ 1 = 2147483647, but since this is our amount in cents, we divide by 100 to find out how many dollars, which is : $ 21,474,836.47, which is of course nearly six million more than what you would have gotten the other way. Surprising, isn’t it ?

I had worked this formula out a number of ways, with a few variations. The main thing to notice, is that two raised to a given power, is two more than the sum of all other powers below it. For example, 25 = 32, while sum of all powers of two from to 24is equal to 30. The pattern actually works for all numbers raised to powers, not just two, and is incorporated into the formula. If we raise any number to a given power, then subtract the number itself, then divide by one less than the number, we shall equal the sum of all numbers raised to successive powers up to before that one. For example, 54= 625 minus 5 equals 620. Divide by one less than five ( that is, four ) = 155, which is the sum of ++.

Now, the first formula, which I didn’t invent, allows you also to work out sums of numbers in a sequence related by a common ratio, but where they are not necessarily all numbers raised to a given power. For example, consider the sequence :

2, 14, 98, 686, 4802 . . . In this we see each term is multiplied by seven to get the next term. Now had we begun at seven, all our terms would be powers of that number. In addition, we see that the initial term, two, is the only one not divisible by seven. My formula can solve this, but in a slightly more complicated manner, which involved a bit of clever thinking to work out. Let’s add the first 5 terms.

By the first formula : [ 2 × ( 75- 1)] ÷ ( 7 - 1 ) = 5602

With my one : ( 7( log4802 ÷ log7 + 1 )- 7( log2 ÷ log7 ) ) ÷ ( 7 - 1 ) = 5602. So mine also works, but you have to use logs, as well as be aware what your last term is, but you can use ar(n-1)to find that. In the end, do be very comfortable with whichever one you choose to use. I was simply pleased just to have been able to come up with a valid formula all on my own.

Disclaimer

Even though some of this Hub contains certain Mathematical knowledge that can be accessed in the public domain, and therefore is not subject to any Copyright, other information has been drawn from textbooks which themselves are Copyright, but only in the sense of how they deliver the information which itself is shared and sometimes ancient Mathematical knowledge. Other information has also been found on Wikipedia ( Copyright 2013, the Wikimedia Foundation ), which is a good source of information. Part of this is also my own discovery, but may also independently have been found by others. Reference to Butterick Patterns is to the work of Ebenezer Butterick ( 1826 - 1903 ), who made patterns for clothing in the 1800's.

All illustrations and tables in this particular Hub are my own work, some based on mathematical knowledge found independently by myself, but that was always there, and some based on illustrations in other sources by other people, but I have adapted their illustrations using my own methods.

Any quote or part of this material which seems to belong to any other author should be treated as such, and I claim no ownership of anything I did not myself invent or discover, nor of any obvious copyright, trade mark, or registered trade mark.

Just take a good look at it, and note how interesting it all is, then see if you can come up with anything else along the same lines. As usual, I would appreciate any comments, feedback and suggestions which would be given due credit, or indeed have a go and publishing Your ideas Yourselves, but firstly, by all means, add Your comments - it's a free Country.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.