ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Princes in the Tower: Resurrected

Updated on November 21, 2015
A portrait of the Lost Princes.
A portrait of the Lost Princes. | Source

Plantagenet Princes

Everyone knows the story of how the Princes in the Tower were taken into custody "for their own protection" by King Richard III, a man much vilified by historical culture. They were seen playing happily on the Tower grounds in 1483. However, neither of the boys were seen following the summer season. Their whereabouts have remained a mystery for over 500 years.

During their suspected murder, King Richard III was on progress. He wasn't physically present at the Tower of London. So to say that he himself committed the deed would be false. However, as others have put forward, it is surmised that he had in fact ordered someone else to do it. And, indeed, it would be all too convenient for him to distance himself from the bloody act, washing his hands of what had happened. It would also make it an alibi, which, if guilty, he could use to corroborate himself.

I have considered the political ramification if in fact he had been responsible for their deaths. They were already deemed illegitimate by Parliament. So in the eyes of the law, they were no longer royalty.

Would he, then, want to take it one step further and kill them, to ensure the security of the crown?

Considering the Motives

No, I highly doubt it. The cost would be far too great.

Infanticide, and furthermore, the murder of two innocent children would not sit well with the people of England. They were the sons of a very popular king. One could argue that he did it in secret to avoid the public ramifications of the act in question. It still doesn't answer why he would murder his two nephews who had already been declared illegitimate.

I didn't know him personally, of course, but I have concluded that he would most prefer to have kept the princes close, but barred from the succession. I do not, in my heart, believe he would have wanted any harm to come to them. Nor do I believe that he would have wanted them to run around England where they could have gained popular support.

Rather, I believe, he would have wanted them in his care and protection.

So this begs the first question: if they were murdered, who would have the most reason to do it?

The Game of Clue

Let's consider others who could have held either the power or the inclination to carry out the murders:

  • James Tyrell: Suspected by Thomas More to have been guilty, and apparently confessed under torture. He had no direct access to the Tower and would have needed permission from Richard III to carry it out.
  • Duke of Buckingham: Constable of London. He was widely rumored around the time of the princes' disappearance to have committed the act. Motivations remain unclear, as it could have been for the side of York or Lancaster.
  • The Duke of Norfolk: Was Constable of the Tower briefly during July of 1483. His motivations could have been based strictly on economics (as the younger Prince currently held the title he coveted).
  • Queen Anne Neville: I have to wonder if in fact the Queen of England may have ordered their deaths. Perhaps she viewed the boys as threats to any potential children she may have had. Or, maybe she did it to try to soothe the nerves of her husband, who had newly ascended the throne. We cannot overlook the possibility of her involvement.
  • King Henry Tudor: He did not ascend the throne until 1485; however, his mother was arranging his marriage as early as autumn 1483. He needed Elizabeth of York to be declared legitimate, but he needed the princes to be illegitimate so he could marry her. It was quite a conundrum.
  • Queen Margaret Beaufort: She would have done anything for her son. Her close relationship with him cannot be refuted. Perhaps, then, she ordered the deaths of the princes to pave the way for Elizabeth of York to become queen. Her husband, Thomas Stanley, was High Constable of the Tower at the time that the princes disappeared.

A portrait of King Edward IV, father of the princes.
A portrait of King Edward IV, father of the princes. | Source

Other Possibilities

If the princes were not murdered, as was popularly believed - even their mother thought it so - what was their ultimate fate?

  • Death by Natural Causes: Edward V had a jaw infection. Is it possible, in the time of medieval medicine, that he succumbed to this illness? And is it possible that his younger brother Richard perished from something else, perhaps plague? In a time that was fraught with disease, it's very possible. The death of such high nobility would have been catastrophic for the cause. If this is what happened, perhaps they were buried in secret so that they would not be found guilty.
  • Escape: Perhaps they fled the Tower, willingly or through the assistance of others. If so, where did they go and what was their ultimate fate?

Hiding in Plain Sight?

There are theories that at least one of the princes survived into adulthood. Here are the accounts below:

  • Bricklayer in Essex: In one remarkable case, a man resembling the late King Edward IV knew perfect Latin. In medieval Europe, the vast majority of commoners did not know how to speak this language, reserved exclusively for nobility. He told his employer that he was a son of King Richard III. Still, though, it doesn't explain why he was not accounted for by Richard, who freely acknowledged all of his illegitimate children. Was this man, in fact, the long-lost Richard, Duke of York?
  • Sir Edward Guildford and Dr. John Clement: There is a theory posed by one historian which claims that both Edward V and Richard IV survived into adulthood. It postulates that Edward V became Sir Edward Guildford, and Richard IV became Dr. John Clement, President of the Royal College of Physicians. He references a portrait which contains Dr. Clement, with a royal fleur-de-lis and the words, in Latin, which read "John, the rightful heir." This historian also speaks to the fact that very little is known about Dr. John Clement (no records, signature, or portrait), which is unheard of for someone with such a highly-esteemed position. Dr. Clement rose to a high-ranking status in a very short period of time, only over the period of a few months.

A portrait of "pretender" Perkin Warbeck.
A portrait of "pretender" Perkin Warbeck. | Source

The "Great Pretenders"

  • Lambert Simnel: The first of the "pretenders." Lambert had apparently come from humble origins and was raised from the age of ten by a kingmaker named Richard Simon. Initially passed off as Richard IV, Simon changed his mind and presented Simnel as the Earl of Warbeck (son of the Duke of Clarence). Following an unsuccessful attempt at an uprising, he was later pardoned by King Henry VII and given a position in the royal kitchen.
  • Perkin Warbeck: Around 1490, he first made his declaration of being Prince Richard, the younger of the two princes. There is no confirmed reports of his earlier life, only what was gained from a forced confession later on. He had been in the care of Sir Edward Brampton, who was a Yorkist supporter. Warbeck claimed that, from the years 1483 until 1490, he had lived on the Continent after his escape. He went on to say that two men had come to murder the princes, but his killer had sympathized and let him go free. He reportedly resembled King Edward IV greatly. He also, like Prince Richard IV, had a strong and natural ability for music. In addition, he was fluent in a variety of languages and had international support from many sources. In his confession, drawn out under torture, he claimed to be an imposter. I found three things to be curious: the first, that he was beaten beyond recognition (just how much DID he resemble the late King?). The second, that his potential sister, Elizabeth of York, was forbidden to see him. And the third was that the King of Scotland had himself arranged the marriage between Warbeck and someone from his court. Why would he do such a thing for a commoner?

My Own Conclusion

Until other evidence can come to light, I am of the belief that Perkin Warbeck WAS Prince Richard IV. The evidence, in my opinion, is too compelling. I am of the belief that Edward V did not survive into adulthood and was either murdered or died prior to being murdered. The fact that Edward V himself suspected he would be murdered does, however, point more strongly to that end. His illness of the jaw likely would have made it easier. He was far too important to be kept alive, and I believe it was more likely that it was at the hand of the Tudors than anyone else. It is my opinion that the remains were secreted away and his body is one of the two small coffins which were buried with Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville.

What do you think? Please vote in the poll listed below!

What was the fate of the lost princes?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image


      3 years ago

      Margaret Beaufort was never a queen.

    • TrixieShi profile imageAUTHOR

      Diana Strenka 

      3 years ago from North Carolina

      I heard about that. It would be hard to prove it without DNA testing, but I fear the queen won't give it. :(

    • profile image


      3 years ago

      They did find the bodies of two young boys buried under some steps in the tower.. the bodies were about the age the boys would have been


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)