Discovering Theories of Environmental Psychology
Purpose of This Hub
The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with Environmental Psychology, its major theories, and its application. The author has an undergraduate in psychology and master's degree in education.
Environmental Psychology Defined
The environment for some people that suggests a level of stability may have a significantly different effect on others. Some people can stand tattered old clothing and the accompanying odor, while others have violent physical reactions to the sight and odor of the same items.
The environment is an enigma of sorts when a succinct answer requires attention unless some precedent reveals the actual application of the word. A person may speak of nature referring to the environment while another speaks of the climate.
Still further, the mention of a plane or a classroom could explain what someone indicates when he or she refers to the environment. Veitch suggests a somewhat in-depth approach to behavioral psychology as he defines environmental psychology as a science that examines human behavior relating to the physical environment with the intent to improve humanity or understand humanity better.
With understanding and/or improving being chief aims of environmental psychology, assisting people with behavioral issues that cause discomfort may yield promising data just as one focus for this young branch of psychology.
In this brief treatment, a concise definition of environmental psychology will follow focusing on a couple of the major theories of this field of study and the application of research within this field.
On a Plane. A real one not a philosophical one!
Have you ever been in a situation where you or an associate were uncomfortable but no one else seem affected?
Two passengers sit on a plane traveling to a destination for business. One passenger reaches for the "notice button" above to inform a flight attendant to provide a beverage.
The other passenger sitting next to the first squirms slightly in the seat as the flight attendant approaches and leans over him without physical contact to hand the summoning passenger a beverage.
The the first passenger enjoys the beverage, shaking the small cup—jingling the ice. The second passenger tenses at the noise with blinking eyes rapidly and sighing quietly.
A description of this scenario could continue with the two passengers on the plane. One passenger, the one with the drink, appears relaxed and at ease enjoying the drink.
The other appears uncomfortable and frustrated because of the uncontrollable forces in the environment. Both passengers share the plane with dozens of other people in the same environment, but each has a different experience.
How could two people in the same environment experience cognitively and emotionally different things while events occur the same in their physical surrounding?
Theories of Environmental Psychology
In all the fields of psychology, individual perspective color data to support the researchers' view involved. Environmental psychology consists of several theories that support certain perspectives with the attempt to understanding the relationship between the environment and behavior.
The major divisions of theoretical perspectives separate into two branches: group or social behavioral emphasis and individual emphasis. After researching all the psychological theories listed by author Veitch, it would seem that each theory has some application to any situation. However, each concept measures data more appropriately for a specific subject. For example, there are theories that apply to large groups such as ecological theories, while others apply to individuals such as behavioral constraint theories.
Ecological studies in psychology have had limited attention and it is impossible to record or quantify some human conditions in a reasonable manner for this theory of environmental psychology, which is its own branch.
That does not mean some have not so attempted. Meade, Kershaw, and Ickovic have a study suggesting that the environment helps to foster certain types of behavior—specifically teenage pregnancy in their study.
Meade et al suggested that from their research that certain environments accommodate certain behaviors. The societal implication supports a number of social programs such as the preschool program which purpose is to provide equalizing instruction to young children from underprivileged homes. People living in middle-class and higher socioeconomic statuses have the opportunity to spend more time educating and providing necessary learning opportunities for their children due to many factors. If environment helps to determine behavior, and it does, the preschool doctrine is a way to provide a substitute equivalent to the middle class and higher socioeconomic strata people to foster the needs of the economically challenged children. The assumption here is that preschool equates to some degree the education opportunities afforded children in wealthy homes.
Ecological theories suggest that the environment and the person support each other—a symbiotic existence. In the example using the preschool substitution for parental interactivity idea, there are other factors to consider that foster the educational environment of learning such as educational level of the parents, access to health care, the amount of green space, the danger to safety ratio and the number of parents in the home with still further relationship determinants to review. The students have so many factors that may or may not act in their lives, affordances as taught by James Gibson. The truth of the matter remains that in this theological concept that the environment can only provide assistance to the extent to which the actor uses the environmental stimulus.
On a plane, certain behaviors exist that would not function to the advantage of those involved in other environments. Depending on the passenger level, seating on a plane is static as opposed to a stationary environment such as a movie theater providing fewer stimuli to act upon. In a theater, if a person has problems with the occupants surrounding him, he may move locations.
Moving location on the plane does not fit within the normal mode of behavior on a plane, because of safety and space constraints. The seating is designated in a plane but not in a cinema. The environment is restrictive and provides fewer tools from which to stimulate behavior.
Because ecological theories support environmental harmony across broad possibilities, it has the most comprehensive application. Perception in this theory appears to be based on information, or environmental stimuli and physical sensation, which is also information.
Who is in Control the Environment or the Person?
Behavioral Constraint Theory
The opening example of the passengers and the flight attendant focuses on individual experiences in an environment.
The person who has the stressful response to the stimuli from the environment experiences a perceived limitation or disruption, which falls under the realm of behavioral constraint theory.
This passenger experiences all the classic association to support this theory—loss of control over environment, discomfort.
Miller, Deatrick, Young and Potts suggest that when elements in the environment threaten behavioral freedoms a reactance to some degree will occur to either attempt to help people cope with the new stressors or eliminate the stressor.
In the case of the stressed passenger on the plane, reactance behavior to squirm and sigh helped to release the stress caused by the disturbing environmental influences.
If the stressed passenger, irritated by the noise another passenger caused with his drink, would have applied his headphones to listen to music, it would have helped lessen stress from the environment.
This act would have provided a sense of control Veitch asserts. So, this theory alleges that normative behavioral patterns of coping with threats occur when the stressed individual perceives a loss of control and responds by changing elements in the environment to reassert control. If that controlling action fails helplessness or discomfort occurs.
Rather real or perceptually contrived, stressors are correlated with limitations on human behavior from the environment. This precludes that the individual is limited to other environments cognitively. Mentally, humans can experience each environment they can recall while experiencing the present environment. This is where the contrivance comes into play and where people can learn from an experience from another environment something diametrically opposed to the current situation, but can utilize a lesson from that other environment to succeed in the dissimilar situation.
Research in Environmental Psychology
Have you learned anything new about Environmental Psychology in this article?
As with all fields of science, the application of the scientific method is imperative in order for proper data recording. Depending on what a researcher wants to accomplish will determine the type of methods applied to produce the outcome—namely laboratory experimentation, field correlational studies, and field experimentation.
Laboratory experimentation involves a controlled environment where research has the advantage to measure and evaluate within certain tolerances. Field correlational studies have to do with juxtaposing non-controlled experiences.
Field experimentation is a combining laboratory and field experience researching to establish some type of validity for research goals. Depending on what the researcher wants to accomplish and correlate, he will use one of the three prevailing research methods.
Burrhus Fredric Skinner
Environmental psychological research is relatively new in name per se but not in practice. Behaviorists such as Skinner → suggest some correlation between the environment and behavior even if there is by the smallest percentage.
All psychology could fit within a context of environmental psychology at its broadest application to conduct multiple studies to better catalog and understand psychological disorders and improve the functionality of organizations.
Environmental psychology is the study of human behavior in relation to the environment explained from several theoretical viewpoints using the common scientific method of research to understand human behavior.
The environment for one person that suggests a level of stability for some may have a significantly different effect on others. The environment is an enigma of sorts when a succinct answer requires attention unless precedent reveals the utilization of the word.
One may speak of nature referring to the environment while another speaks of the climate. Still further, mention of a plane or classroom could describe what someone intends when he refers to the environment.
Veitch suggests a somewhat in-depth approach to behavioral psychology as he defines environmental psychology as a science that examines human behavior relating to the physical environment with the intent to improve humanity—or understand humanity better.
With understanding and/or improvement being the principal object of environmental psychology, assisting people with behavioral issues that cause discomfort may yield promising data merely for one aspect of this young branch of psychology.
It begs to rest the argument that it does not matter where a person comes from it is where he goes against the thought that a person can be removed from his environment but that environment cannot be removed from the person.
Both may have intrinsic application to human behavior equally.
(1) Meade, C., Kershaw, T., & Ickovics, J. (2008, July). The intergenerational cycle of teenage motherhood: An ecological approach. Health Psychology, 27(4), 419-429. Retrieved June 8, 2009, doi:10.1037/0278-618.104.22.1689
(2) Veitch, R. (1995). Environmental psychology. New Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
© 2013 Rodric Johnson