Why a Teacher Thinks America’s Public Schools Are a Mess
Are major changes needed in America's public schools?
John Whitaker has worked as a special education teacher in elementary schools in northern California for two years. And for many more years John has worked as a substitute teacher in Sacramento, California, grades one through 12.
Given the vast numbers of unemployed teachers these days, John is understandably bitter about the plight of America’s teachers and therefore quick to fire away when he thinks people don’t understand what’s really happening in America's public schools.
Please keep in mind that John Whitaker has worked as a teacher and substitute only in northern California, so much of what he says may pertain more to the schools in that particular area. However, it seems obvious to this writer that most of what John says has relevance to the public school system throughout America.
Please read reading!
Since charter schools are all the rage in American education, what do you think of charter schools?
In my opinion, the charter school movement is a Trojan horse designed to further degrade and destroy public education. The proponents of charter schools proclaim they are more successful, as evidenced by higher scores earned by their students on mandatory standardized tests. They can crow about their success because they get to cherry-pick the students they admit for enrollment. They are free to reject students who are learning disabled, physically disabled, slow learners, or who have low IQs. They can reject students who have special needs. They can also reject students who have a history of poor grades, low motivation, and who have non-involved unsupportive parents. It goes without saying they can also reject any students with a proven history of behavioral challenges.
Public schools are mandated by law to accommodate all students, regardless of their challenges and handicaps, and teach them in the "least restrictive environment" possible. Furthermore, the federal government says education is a basic right, and has enshrined that right into laws such as the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and Individuals With Disabilities In Education Act (IDEA).
If I were running a charter school, I would cherry-pick only those students with the highest grades, the highest motivation, and who had the most affluent and supportive parents, while making sure to reject students with any learning problems whatsoever, thereby ensuring that my students scored the highest possible on tests. Then, since the "teaching techniques" and "superior curriculum" my school used proved that my charter school was far superior in turning out a superior "product," I would give myself a huge raise, as well as all my corporate stockholders. I could justify that because of my proven successful results!
Is class size a problem in America's public schools?
Several years ago, grades kindergarten through three were limited to 20 students per teacher. The year after, it increased to 25. The year after that, it increased from 32 to 35. Next year, many districts are proposing increasing it from 40 to 45. The year after that, they are proposing to increase it to above 60. The fire marshal has a limit on what is safe for the maximum number of people who should be in a classroom. Sixty students will exceed the fire marshal’s limit in most cases. The only way teachers will be able to safely teach classes of that size would be to rope off sections of the gymnasium and conduct learning there. Of course, all physical education and sports would need to be eliminated. It is a huge problem!
Is violence a problem in America's public schools?
Yes! Fighting, bullying, guns, knives, and gang violence are epidemic! Students who want to learn are intimidated into not learning. We also need to stop the layoffs of our peace officers in our secondary schools. Every secondary school needs a staff of peace officers to arrest any lawbreakers and protect those students who are trying to get an education. Right now, we are laying off many, if not most of our peace officers in our secondary schools. If we do that, the violent drug gangs will take over and intimidate all the students who want to receive a quality education in a safe environment, thereby preventing the school from attaining its mission.
Do students seem to be excited about learning?
Most students are not motivated to learn and succeed. The problem is exacerbated by parents who are completely uninvolved in their children’s education. Moreover, now that “No Child Left Behind” stipulates that only the three R’s must be taught at the exclusion of all other subjects, the majority of students are not stimulated enough to be motivated to learn when they are only offered three subjects; school is boring!
Has bureaucracy become a problem in the American school system?
The main problem is that the grandstanding politicians are now in charge of classrooms even though they have no experience teaching in a classroom. We need a new law that stipulates that all principals, superintendents, and school board members should have at least five years classroom teaching experience!
Do parents need to become more involved in the education of America’s children?
Generally speaking, the only parents who are sufficiently involved in their children’s education are affluent and highly educated parents. All the other parents display the assumption that teachers need to do ALL of the teaching and the parents need do nothing except provide TV, video games, and other digital devices. And besides, everyone knows that prescribing Ritalin is so much easier than parenting!
The three R’s are sometimes referred to as reading, writing and Ritalin. Do you think the stimulant Ritalin should be prescribed to school children?
Having worked in special education, I think it’s true that some medication helps some students some of the time. But I also think these medications are being over-prescribed as a matter of expediency or convenience for both parents and teachers. Not only do these medications produce physical side effects, but the bigger problem is that these students will not learn how to cope with their issues or problems and will need to continue to take these medications as adults.
Is Drug Abuse a problem in America’s public schools?
Prescription drugs could be a problem but their use is hard to detect. Alcohol and pot have an odor so users would be easy to detect, because campus security and/or the police force watch for such activity. Moreover, any student who engages in extracurricular activity must past a drug test, which includes random testing. Be that as it may, one time a kid blew crack smoke in my face, and I’ve also smelled cannabis smoke odor on several students early in the morning, particularly at the lower income schools.
Would giving more money to public schools help?
Absolutely! It is a simple fact in our world that anything worth doing is worth paying for! And while we are at it, let’s double teachers’ salaries!
In general, test scores for America’s students appear to be below average. Assuming this is true, what needs to be done to improve test scores?
We have to stop teaching the three R’s exclusively. That’s where we lose the vast majority of our students—by taking away music, art, physical education, vocational education, life skills training and sports.
Teachers and advocates such as Michelle Rhee, founder of Students First, have asserted that ineffective or incompetent teachers and/or principals need to be disciplined or fired. What is your viewpoint on this issue?
Michelle “Chainsaw” Rhee needs to be fired and prevented from ever coming within 2,000 feet of any school or any children ever again! Any boss or supervisor should know that the human capital of any organization is its most valuable asset. If a boss is less than satisfied with an employee’s performance, then the boss should demonstrate what changes should be implemented by the employees and the employees should then be trained on how to implement those changes! To barge into a classroom to fire a teacher with an entourage of TV cameras rolling so as to advance one’s own political career is the very epitome and essence of everything that is wrong with so-called education reform today! Michelle Rhee is a grandstanding politician who is clawing her way to fame and fortune on the backs of our students and children. She needs to get a job at McDonalds!
Michelle Rhee has also suggested that teachers be paid according to student achievement. Would this “merit pay” be a fair way of compensating teachers?
That is the very worst idea currently being presented as educational reform that I have ever heard of. What would happen is that the teachers in affluent schools - who do relatively little work because their students are highly motivated - would get merit raises; but all the other teachers, who do much more work trying to motivate their less affluent students, would get no merit pay or possibly be fired. There is no way this idea could ever reduce the achievement gap.
Should the process of tenure be continued with teachers?
Absolutely! Tenure provides some security to teachers from political witch hunts conducted by politicians, school board members, politicians and capricious administrators. It is also an excellent way to retain exemplary employees.
Should it be any harder to fire a teacher who has tenure?
As things stand today, any teacher who has tenure and breaks any laws or any school code of conduct can be fired immediately. On the other hand, if an administrator (such as Michelle Rhee) didn’t like someone’s looks, it should be relatively difficult to fire the teacher - and relatively easy to fire the administrator!
What do you think of school vouchers?
The people who advocate for school vouchers are ideologically opposed to public education. Giving public funding to private schools is an inherent conflict of interest. I am absolutely opposed to public funding for private schools, whether for profit or not!
Should teachers use standard or nationalized tests or be allowed to use tests they deem appropriate for each individual class?
Teachers should use both types of tests in their practice. They should also use individualized tests to differentiate their instruction.
It’s been said that in the old days, teachers ran the classroom but nowadays students run it. Is this statement true?
Nowadays, politicians run the classrooms. Teachers these days have no say or input in the choice of curriculum and have no say into the pacing of their instruction - or any say in the individualized, differentiated instructions that their students are so desperately in need of!
Since the late 1990s the graduation rate in American public schools has been reported to be around 70 to 75 per cent. Do you think this rate is accurate?
Absolutely not! School districts are not required to accurately report dropout rates. For example, if a student informs a school that they are transferring to another school in another district, no tracking is done to determine if indeed that student transferred or dropped out. The real dropout rate in the large school districts in California is in excess of 50 per cent, and in some schools in Los Angeles, the dropout rate for these “failure factories” is in excess of 80 per cent!
If you had millions of dollars to spend on public schools, how would you spend it?
I would bring back the teaching of art, music, sports, physical education, vocational education, life skills training, science, geography, social studies, and humanities! I’d also triple teachers’ salaries and cut all administrators’ salaries!
Do you have any closing words?
We need to get back to educating whole individuals, which includes an emphasis on the teaching of critical thinking, creative problem solving, collaboration and cooperation, life skills training, career skills training, vocational training, music, art, drama, physical education and conflict resolution. Moreover, we need to kick out from the entire educational realm any politician who has “never” taught one day in a classroom. For the most part, we need to make education RELEVANT to our students again!
Please leave a comment.
© 2011 Kelley Marks