If the newest Mars Rover 'Curiosity' truly landed on the surface of Mars how can The Powers That Be prove it? With pictures? Give me a break? Why Mars? We can't even put a base on the Moon or create and maintain a space station of our own and yet with a failing economy and NASA funding supposedly terminated we put another rover on Mars. I say prove it, . . . 'cause all digital pictures can be faked. It's propaganda, smoke and mirrors, special affects and a diversion. After all the recent NASA failures wouldn't it be easier to get Hollywood FX types to fake it and distract the sheep?
sort by best latest
Good answer Insane, this question was specifically designed to show that pseudo scientist wannabes are allowed to insult, use hate language and personal attacks to instigate and inflame while suffering NO repercussions from so-called HP MODERATORS!
I agree completely with your first sentence. I also would have accepted "Grade A Moron."
Dear Matt fart, intelligent people do not require insults to express themselves as six year olds do, but thanx for showing your true colors.
This question was designed specifically for the conditioned sheep, congratulations Pavlov was correct.
Could you supply a link to an article of the launching of this vehicle, an article that proves that it has been in space for ten years?
Again you word isn't enough, show some proof, give me a link. Prove it has been is space for ten years.
LOL Why does it matter so much to you? It seems you are the one distracted by it. Oh and NO again NO link would be proof.
According to NASA the vehicle was launched Nov. 26, 2011. It will take eight and a half months for Curiosity to make the 345-million-mile journey to Mars.
This question was just for you Scott as I knew you wouldn't be able to resist, it is much easier to sell a lie when the sheep are so willing to believe and you are all the proof I need.
Provide one piece of evidence that the Mars Science Laboratory is fake. If this is a multinational conspiracy involving hundreds if not thousands of people, someone must have left a clue somewhere. Find it, or admit that you are a liar.
Scott, the question was asked for you and all the other conditioned pseudo scientific wannabes to prove a point. I don't expect you to realize that you got played anymore than Pavlovs' Dog's were aware they were being experimented on just to react.
Actually I consider RT a fairly reliable source but thank you for providing a link, however YT is not a reliable source but makes for good entertainment. Let's see who were the two parties involved in the 'space race' in the 60's, the USA & who?
I also believe there is already a base on the moon.
Yeah I'm going to write another Moon article as there is a lot more new information on the Moon that needs looking into. I asked this question not because I don't believe it is on Mars but to prove a point and win a bet . . . which I did.
Speculation requires no searching and since it cannot be proven one way or another, the color images they are 'sending back' might as well be coming from Hollywood.
Slarty I haven't read any of your ramblings for at least six months but thanks for sharing I'm sure someone will read it baa, baa.