sort by best latest
If anyone can look at the skulls of the various Homo types and not see themselves then I probably can't say anything to enlighten them. To suggest that there aren't any links just shows you are blinded by religious rhetoric to scientific proofs. Done
Please share this wealth of information! You sound like you may be the first humanoid that has finally found the missing link between Homo erectus & Homo sapiens; LOL! What religious rhetoric? Monkey faith?
Insane M (well-fitting name, by the way), the evidence of transitions are all over the place. Please just Google "transitional fossils," find reputable scientific websites, and READ! FYI, it takes more effort to study than to make stupid comments.
I'm sure I have studied it more than you albeit the entire thing involves more storytelling than the Bible. Perhaps when the day comes that your own mind evolves, you will quit being brainwashed by trending groups of scientifically accepted morons.
It's very juvenile to assert that you've studied more, without any knowledge of me whatsoever. Also, it's characteristic for those with no intelligent answers to resort to name-calling.
No, it's just that I've seen your ilk all over the Internet and it's the best way to respond. Hey, if you like to read, you can start here: http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html
Is there a main website for this link?
You seem like a very angry person, unable to have a civil conversation without using a plethora of personal insults. It only reveals to others the shallowness of your mind. This can be helped by studying all sides of an issue.
LOL! Actually, I find the ineptitude of most people that are involved with such debates, to be amazingly amusing.
Haha...to a point I agree, though coming from a person who's name starts with "Insane" seems ironic........... ;-)
My screen name is a reflection of humanity, as the majority is insane and mundane while I'm actually sane and otherworldly; ha!
The problem with these arguments is that they are based on false premises... The word 'Theory' in Science is a proven Premise. ie a Fact until proven otherwise. Your use of 'theory' is just a 'premise.' The Theory of Gravity/Evolution/etc are proven
I'm failing to understand your response... For example, they have not "proven" or even shown a true, factual link between the Homo erectus and the Homo sapiens as of yet, etc.
Insane, no one tries to prove that a raptor turned into a turkey. You are creating a straw-man argument, a logical fallacy. I understand because I once struggled with this too. You must realize that evolution is VERY SLOW. Research subtle changes.
I realize your brain is very slow. If you can't detect the obvious storytelling involved with this mythical storybook tale that portrays itself as scientific, you truly are an idiot.