Many scientists agree that man evolved from fish or chimpanzees. If that is the case, why are there still fish and chimpanzees. Why are there not stages of evolution going on now? There may be a fish/monkey anomaly but evolution suggests a process. I'm thinking of caterpillar to a butterfly. What do you think?
sort by best latest
Thank you Mike! Well thought out and organized. It is difficult for me to recognize the difference between German Shepherds and some wolves. Not that I've looked that closely.
Wow! This is really heavy. Thank you for your perspective LoneStar!
Well Melissa, Garafalia, Meg, Emily, Jeremy, and Jonathan, my dilemma is selecting best answer. I personally agree with Emily because I believe the Bible. The interesting about evolution it that everyone has their own version. Hp picked Melissa!
Earth is mentioned in Genesis 1:1, but don't take any of it too literally. Remember the wisdom -- the letter kills, but the spirit of the word brings life. Only humility (an empty cup) will allow you to learn the wisdom hidden in the Bible.
Thank you phriot ... especially for the civil tone. I asked specifically about humans, chimps, and fish because I had read/heard about those theories. In school we did spend time going through the neanderthal, cromagnon, and ? (name escapes me).
So humans evolved from?
Scientists are only guessing about our ancestors. But they may find that they're wrong. Neanderthal, for instance, could've been merely parallel evolution, like new and old world cacti. God created evolution for a purpose.
i dont think that human are evolved from chimp in my view it is from dog becoz the brain capacity of dog is more thab monkeey and dog is domestic whereas monkey is wild and another point those organs such as pinna of ear which doesnt exist in monkey
1 answer hidden due to negative feedback. Show
1 answer hidden due to negative feedback. Hide