What is the world’s most unsuccessful Hypothesis?

1. 67

   sriramapriyaposted 9 years ago

   What is the  world’s most unsuccessful Hypothesis?

   replyreport
2. 0

   IslamWashiaposted 9 years ago

   The theory in the famous book "Origin of species" for Charles Darwin.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Robert the Bruceposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      How so?

      replyreport
   2. 0

      IslamWashiaposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      All theories of evolution are about some changes that happen in some species, which lead to changes in these species, and these theories didn’t cover all the changes, only a few, but there is no biological clear theory about the creation of life.
      
      Ab

      replyreport
   3. 59

      Robert the Bruceposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Your claim that all theories involve simply the changes within species is false. Also, evolution is well established by facts and is compatible with the idea of a creator. Evolution does NOT claim to know what the "first cause" was if anything.

      replyreport
3. 79

   dashingscorpioposted 9 years ago

   The world is flat. Many "experts" once thought you could sail to the edge and drop off the planet. Today know one believes that.

   replyreport
   1. 92

      UnnamedHaraldposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      I agree... wait...what? You sayin' it AIN'T flat? Now THAT'S just wrong. You'll be saying the sun and planets don't revolve around the earth next!
      
      Seriously, I think the most unsuccessful hypothesis is that the world is less than 7,000 years old.

      replyreport
   2. 79

      dashingscorpioposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      UnnamedHarald, You've got a point about the age of the earth! I also find it hard to believe Samson killed (1000) men with a donkey jawbone and both Adam and Noah lived to be over 900 years old! Of course that's a discussion for another day!

      replyreport
4. 68

   wrenchBiscuitposted 9 years ago

   That all humans have a spirit, or soul. Many are simply functional organisms who serve no other purpose beyond the grave. The atheist has no soul, and so his disbelief in God is more of a reaction to his unfortunate circumstances than a true representation of knowledge,understanding, or intellectual superiority.

   replyreport
   1. 52

      Ian Mooneposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Most people out there are none self's, & very few find their real self..It's like what the singer Richard Ashcroft says, some are living some are hiding & some are already dead.

      replyreport
5. 67

   sriramapriyaposted 9 years ago

   The latest Intelligent Design arguments as evidence of God's influence in biology. He looks at human behavior for evidence of immaterial souls and the possible effects of prayer. He discusses the findings of physics and astronomy in  weighing the suggestions that the universe is the work of a creator and that humans are God's special creation.

   replyreport