Qwark..can any definition based on logical thought be factual? If not, then God is unprovable.
I ask this because you are always on the lookout for proof in the existence of God. You are an extremely intelligent man (after reading your hubs) however: I am confused over this incessant demand for proof; when you should know that the proof that you say will satisfy you is no proof at all. Any definition is just an idea. Words strung together forming an imaginary concept. How can an opinion expressed in language prove to you God is real?
Surely the only real proof is if you directly experience God yourself? And as experience is not transferable there can never be a shareable proof?
The desire for proof comes from our ability to only conceptualize things emperically. The big questions are not proveable in the traditional way. That does not mean there are not true or real answers.
For example: Can you prove the universe is limited or unlimited?
For us it goes on forever, but how can forever be real? Where is the start and the finish? Because of the way our world works, we view things in one way, but not all things work according to the rules of this world.
If you think of life itself, although we know some of the mechanisms and can explain how some of them work, we cannot explain the process of the actual creation.
Can you prove love? What is it? You cannot see it - only the results of love are observable. You can feel it, but you can't see the feelings. You know it is real, but you would be hard pressed to prove it by scientific exam.
We can drive ourselves nuts thinking about it. LOL!
I have no idea where you are coming from?
I have NEVER asked for "proof" of this god thing.
Why would I ask for "proof" of something that can't be defined in other than opinion or conjecture?
I ask for a definition that FACTUALLY (operative word) defines this god thing so that I can "consider" it.
There is no monotheistic scripture that does that.
The bible,torah,qur'an all refer to a supernatural entity, but only define it in terms of opinion.
The English dictionary defines god as: "the supreme reality, the creator and ruler of the universe." Isn't that just "opinion? i.e. a belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge.
I would be considered to be a fool if I asked for proof of that which can only be opined.
Thanks for asking Ashmi.
Factually?..what can I say....the world in front of you is God? God is the world?
by mishpat 4 years ago
First, for my brothers and sisters in Christ, I believe grace through faith is the only way of salvation. I do not believe God or the Bible are short of the real meaning of fact or factual. We are addressing the unbelieving mind here, Proverb 26:4-5.Now, as to the subject, sometime back...
by Marc Lee 3 years ago
Do you take the Bible story to be 100 percent factual or do you some of it as analogy?
by JAKE Earthshine 3 weeks ago
Let’s keep it FACTUAL: A living and evolving repository to store ALL the public evidence, both criminal and civil which exists against Mr. Trump, his family and associates including Michael Cohen, there appears to be more than enough damning evidence to reach a guilty verdict for the average...
by Don Bobbitt 6 years ago
Do you ask a Question to get an Answer (factual) or to get an Answer (high comment count)?Be Honest!Do you use the Question option for Hubbers in order to get a factual answer from your peers, or do you ask them just to get a high count of Answers for rour ranking with HP?I tend to see an awful lot...
by Doc Young 4 years ago
... ever notice when believers speak of God, invariably the debates will arise regarding and demanding proofs of his existence, ad nauseum ... yet ask naysayers for their adverse proofs, or any proofs or facts supporting evolution or related subjects, all one gets is theory and the latest updates...
by SaiKit 8 years ago
A lot of skeptics made the following logical fallacy:Skeptics: Can you prove that God exists? if not, then you are illogical if you believe in a God that you can't prove to be existing! This is the fallacy of "False Delimma" Just because you can't prove a theory or belief, doesn't mean...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|