This question is for people who consume a fair amount of public affairs media. How important is...
"objectivity" to you? How important is "balanced perspective" to you? What do the concepts of "objectivity" and "balanced perspective" mean to you?
The concept of "objective" reporting by itself seems foreign. It's difficult to report on a situation when you have an agenda of your own, be it sponsors or personal bias. Moreover, how would one achieve "balanced perspective" in, for instance, interviewing about an incident? Two people reporting on a drunk driving incident will likely be against the person who was committing the crime, and not interested in presenting the opposite side of the story.
I like that the general media is completely biased; then you know what their agenda is. I can say that THIS news network will favor THIS side of politics. Meanwhile, watch the opposing network and find something in the middle that seems reasonable.
In the long run, it would be nice to see studios producing 100% factual content without excluding information about the opposing story. It would be nice if they would leave the ultra extremists to themselves and interview people who play devil's advocate. It would be nice, but not critical.
To sum it up, "objectivity" and "balanced perspective" are irrelevant as long as the person consuming the content is willing and able to do their own research. For the general public that does not have the interest in researching the topic further, well... I'm not sure about them!
by PhoenixV 2 years ago
Does Reality Objectively Exist?Provide proof.
by pisean282311 8 years ago
hey is it possible? ..or is media creating the hype?
by paarsurrey 7 years ago
Don W wrote @Rishy Rich:1. Doesn't matter who's assumption it is. If you use it as the base of a hypothetical argument, your argument needs to be consistent with it.2. same as above3. The 'Yahweh' of Abrahamic religions is also described as a personal god, i.e. involved in human affairs. That's one...
by David Livermore 2 years ago
Should the United States take an isolationism approach to world affairs?So many question on why the United States does and does not take action in various areas. The US was isolated from world affairs at some point. Should they take that stance again? Why or why not?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|