ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

A Nightmare On Elm Street (2010)

Updated on February 17, 2014

Don't Fall Asleep!

Don't you dare fall asleep, as this serial killing monster stalks and preys on you in the one place you can never hide.......in your dreams! In the tradition of remakes in this era of movies such as "Friday the 13th" and "Halloween", it seems only fitting that someone would eventually try to take a stab at remaking "Nightmare on Elm Street." No pun intended of course. Let me start off by saying that, I've never been a huge fan of the slasher horror genre, as most of them are basically the same in terms of the story. Sure, it has different scenarios, and the names are different along with the alleged killer. However, the events are typically the same. You have a bunch of stupid teenagers hanging around areas they're not supposed to and instead of calling the police or seeking help, they choose to investigate the scene. Gee, and I thought I lacked real common sense sometimes. However, to be fair, I thought the original "Nightmare on Elm Street" had a unique spin on the genre, where this killer didn't just slash, kill, mutilate, and terrorize his victims; he did it in the one place they couldn't hide or suspect.....in their dreams!

In the case of the "Nightmare on Elm Street" movies if you die in your dreams, then you die in real life. One would think that if you were only in danger when you go to sleep, then you'd have nothing to worry about as long as you stay awake. Unfortunately, the body needs rest in order for you to live, and it doesn't matter how much caffeine or pills you take.....eventually your body will start to shut down on you. Ranging from passing out to hallucinating (otherwise known as micro-naps in the remake), to where you'll be dreaming, but you won't realize it. This is also where Freddy can strike you when your most vulnerable......and kill you. Hence, why I firmly believe that's one of the reasons why Freddy Krueger has become such a iconic figure within the genre, and our modern pop culture today. How do I feel about the remake some of you may ask? Well, let's go over the basics here.

The remake tends to follow the original film quite closely, with the notable exceptions of a few scenario changes and dialogue. The story starts off about these four everyday high school teenagers, who discover that they're all being stalked and tormented by the same illusive dream every night. A dream that seems so real that all of them are immediately convinced that a paranormal being is maliciously stalking them in their sleep. Naturally, one would presume that if one of your buddies told you that their girlfriend died, due to a nightmare, as they watched some invisible entity slice them in half, then you'd probably assume they were freaking crazy, right? Or that he was making it up to cover up the fact that he murdered his own girlfriend? Well, not these kids. No, it seems these kids seem to have no problem accepting the fact too quickly that an invisible boogey man type figure is tormenting them in their dreams. It was almost like the writers could have easily had one of the characters say something like:

"Wait, your dreaming about some dude name Freddy Krueger stalking and trying to kill you in your dreams too? Wow, what a freaking coincidence, I've been having the same dream too! Gee, that must mean Freddy is freaking real? Whoa!"

Granted, none of the characters said anything like that, but they might as well considering how quickly the four main protagonists immediately accept the fact that Freddy Krueger was real......in about ten minutes going into the movie. Seriously, at least the original made it more realistic to where the kids didn't buy into the whole dream killer aspect until around the middle of the film, to make it more believable. Making it even more harder to believe when these kids don't buy into the connection of what Freddy did to them in the past that could easily happen to any child in real life, but they're able to grasp the concept of a dream killer? Oh well. I won't say what Freddy did to these kids before he was burned alive by their parents, as I wouldn't want to ruin the movie. However, lets just say that it's very disturbing and holds true to Wes Craven's original vision of Freddy Krueger. Which leads me to my other gripe about this film.

I thought Samuel Bayer did a terrible job setting up the tone for this movie. As it seems, every other scene in this freaking remake had Freddy Krueger in it terrorizing these kids, and attacking them. I know this is a slasher horror film, but I always found horror movies to be at their best when they build up slowly towards the gory and violent parts. Making the horror scenes unexpected. Where as this remake, you could practically see the gory and violent scenes coming from a mile away. Taking away any of the suspense build up that most true horror stories tend to do, as the new version of "A Nightmare On Elm Street" relies solely on shock value alone. Sure, I'll admit shock value in any horror film can be pretty scary but when it's used in every other scene throughout the entire movie, it just becomes boring and redundant.

Although I have been bashing this movie quite a bit, I will admit it does have one thing I liked about it. I actually liked Jackie Earle Haley's performance and portrayal of the iconic dream monster, Freddy Krueger. Even though I did like Robert Englund's portrayal as well, when I watched the original before writing a review on this remake, as I thought Robert brought a dark twisted sense of humor to the iconic horror figure. Something that very few horror icons have, which made Freddy unique in the original movies. However, for true horror story purposes, I just found Jackie Earle Haley's portrayal to be a lot better. Toning down the campy and twisted humor of Robert's portrayal, to a more dark and sinister presence that creates horror as he slowly taunts his victims. Don't get me wrong, I thought both actors portrayed Freddy quite well; just in different ways. Kind of like how I feel about Jack Nicholson and Heath Ledger portraying the Joker in the Batman movies. Both were great in their own unique ways. Granted, Heath played a far more sinister and deeply disturbed Joker, but Jack brought a warped twisted sense of humor to the character that Heath couldn't duplicate. Needless to say, I felt exactly the same way about Jackie's performance. Sure, Robert brought the traditional dark warped sense of humor to the character, but Jackie brought the much darker and sinister presence.

Unfortunately, as good as Jackie was playing the sinister Freddy Krueger, the sinister presence he brings quickly becomes too overly redundant as the writers conveniently have him show up in every other scene. Taking away any kind of build up or tension that would've complimented Jackie's performance.

Overall, "A Nightmare On Elm Street" isn't as scary as advertised. Like "Saw VI" from last year, this film relies too much on shock value and gore to create any kind of real suspense, rather than allow for the tension and story build up towards them. I can't see why though. I mean it's not like creating a horror story that slowly builds up tension didn't work for such movies like "The Exorcist" or "The Shining", for instance. Nah, I guess Samuel Bayer and his team of writers assumed that instant gore equals instant horror. Sadly, that's not the case. Sure, you might scare a few young preteens and under age teenagers, who sneak into the theaters to see films like this, but it does little for the true horror and/or movie fans in general, who know what a horror movie is supposed to be. And the new remake of "A Nightmare On Elm Street" fails to deliver.


Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Stevennix2001 profile imageAUTHOR

      Steven Escareno 

      6 years ago

      Well to each their own. I appreciate you coming by to share some of your thoughts with us. :) much respect and love. :)

    • wisdom25 profile image

      Maurice Wisdom Bishop 

      6 years ago from San Tan Valley

      The person that played Freddy in this movie was a lot scarier than the original one. However I think the first Freddy was a lot funnier. lol..But overall Nightmare on Elm Street was a great movie. 10 stars. Much Love and Respect

    • Stevennix2001 profile imageAUTHOR

      Steven Escareno 

      8 years ago

      that's cool. im glad you liked the movie brandy. yeah, it's amazing to always learn where these directors and writers get their ideas. anyways, thanks for stopping by and sharing your thoughts with us. :)

    • profile image

      brandybay 

      8 years ago

      I've watched horror movies ever since I could remember. And my favorite would have to be a nightmare on elm street. I would have to say though I was a little surprised to knw that freddy was based on 2 people in wes's life. I had bought the dvd collection when it frist came out and wes tells the story on how he came up with the idea on the special features on the 1st movie. But I did see the second movie and even though it wasn't as good as the orignal ill still buy it since I'm in love with the genra.

    • Stevennix2001 profile imageAUTHOR

      Steven Escareno 

      8 years ago

      Wow, sorry to hear that. I honestly can't say I ever had a dream like that before, but I do remember having like a ton of dreams as a kid about the future, and years later about half of them came true. Some of them never did happen, but most of them did. It was kind of scary. Of course, now a days, I can't even remember anything I dream about anymore. Although I do have trouble sleeping at nights.

      Anyway, thanks for stopping by, and sharing your thoughts with us. :)

    • 2besure profile image

      Pamela Lipscomb 

      8 years ago from Charlotte, North Carolina

      I remember as a kid having nightmares when I tried to wake up, I was yet in another dream. The most frightening thing is not being able to wake up from a nightmare! I still can't watch A Nightmare On Elm Street!

    • Stevennix2001 profile imageAUTHOR

      Steven Escareno 

      8 years ago

      @glimmer515

      Yeah, I agree with you about that. I think anytime when you make a remake about a classic, the chances are it'll never be as great as the original. Sure, there might be some remakes that come close, but it rarely ever happens in this day and age.

      as far as reading your hubs goes, I have read quite a few of them. However, I haven't gotten a chance to comment in them, since I've been kind of busy job hunting, working and going to school these past few months. plus, usually like to leave more than the typical, "good hub" response. Granted, I'm guilty of that in other hubs that I commented in the past about, but I try to be more detailed though. anyway, I apologize about that. However, I'll definitely be sure to try to leave comments in the future. Anyway, thanks for stopping by.

    • Glimmer515 profile image

      Glimmer515 

      8 years ago from Never Never Land

      The original Freddy is to much of an icon! Without him i dont feel like it can be any good anyways! And I am a huge horror fan ,as u might know if u have seen any of my hubs, so I totally agree with ur review!

    • Stevennix2001 profile imageAUTHOR

      Steven Escareno 

      8 years ago

      hmm...you may have a good point there. I never thought of it that way. i just figured it was because the overrated michael bay was behind this movie as a producer, and that they got a director in samuel bayer, who obviously lacks a lot of film experience directing, in charge of this film. however, you do make a good point there about platinum dunes though. I've never thought of that. thanks for the tip!

    • satomko profile image

      Seth Tomko 

      8 years ago from Macon, GA

      Does the lack of scares come from, you think, the paint-by-numbers slickness that seems to be the approach Platinum Dunes takes to all these horror film remakes?

    • Stevennix2001 profile imageAUTHOR

      Steven Escareno 

      8 years ago

      @paradise7

      yeah, i agree with you. personally, i don't see why hollywood even bothers making remake after remake of movies. besides, like the old saying goes, don't fix what isn't broken. however, i guess they'll do anything to make a few bucks these days. anyway, thanks again for stopping by.

      @cybersupe

      thanks cybersupe, and tell freddy i said thanks as well. yeah, i was hoping he'd like the hub too, as I wouldn't want to make him angry and become one of his next victims. lol. anyway, thanks for stopping by guys.

    • CYBERSUPE profile image

      CYBERSUPE 

      8 years ago from MALVERN, PENNSYLVANIA, U.S.A.

      Your Hub shows that you put a lot of work into it. Freddy Krueger approves ! awesone pictures. Good Job

    • Paradise7 profile image

      Paradise7 

      8 years ago from Upstate New York

      One of the best horror movies, ever. I don't think, no matter what they do, they can top the scare-thrill of the original one!

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)