ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

A Response to the Film: The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez

Updated on April 13, 2020
wpcooper profile image

Fin lives in the Central Valley, where he is a student at CSUB. He writes in his free time and is interested in social issues and travel.

Note:

This is just an interpretation of the film as it relates to the public opinion of the social services workers who were referred to in the documentary. I am a social work student (currently) and although I understand public outrage, am hoping that this can present some understanding as to other perspectives.

Looking pleased and perhaps pleasantly smug
Looking pleased and perhaps pleasantly smug

An Overview

The murder of Gabriel Fernandez, an 8-year-old boy, was an event that happened in the city of Palmdale and involved four of Los Angeles County’s Department of Family and Children’s Services (DFCS), social workers. The case itself was one that centered around terrible forms of abuse and resulted in the conviction of the mother and her boyfriend. The mother received life in prison while the father was given the death penalty.

One of the major concerns that came out of this case was the fact that many in the public – as well as the LA County District Attorney – felt there were people in the social services department who were responsible for the young boy’s death. Four of these – two supervisory social workers and two social work employees – were tried on child abuse and falsifying public records in the death of young Fernandez. While there are many in the arena of public opinion who believe that the DFCS should be held liable in this situation, there are numerous other factors that the general public doesn’t understand that must be taken into consideration.

The Killers

The mother and her boyfriend
The mother and her boyfriend

The Department of Family and Children's Services (DFCS)

According to their website, the mission of the DFCS is “The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services promotes child safety and well-being by partnering with communities to strengthen families, keeping children at home whenever possible, and connecting them with stable, loving homes in times of need.” (DFCS, 2020). A couple of the key terms to be taken from that statement are “to strengthen families” and “keeping children home whenever possible”. The county’s goal is to preserve the family unit and to maintain the connection between the children and their birth parents. This is a philosophy that seems compatible with maintaining a healthy society since many social problems can be associated with a broken family.

During the documentary film, The Murder of Gabriel Fernandez, interviews are done with those who are associated with DFCS and the point that the goal of the department is to “keep families together” is clearly made. Even in situations where there is turmoil or conflict within the family unit, social work professionals recognize the value of working towards homeostasis and that the removal of children from the household can cause trauma to the child, perhaps even greater harm than the original forms of neglect or abuse.

Most of the actions or enforcements practiced by social workers are guided by policy and law. Differential responses (DR) are permitted to an extent, by California state policies within child welfare practices. DR are designed to allow a reasonable degree of flexibility and permit the worker to use their own judgment and discretion while handling a case. According to the department of social services:

Differential response, also called alternative response, encourages community agencies to participate in supporting families who are

considered low risk, allowing child protection services to focus on

the more serious cases in which abuse and neglect have been confirmed.

This approach recognizes that variations in families' needs and

strengths require different approaches. Assessments are done to help

agencies develop strategies for identifying child and family needs and

concerns and tail

— DFCS

Do you beleive the mother in this case should have received the Death Penalty?

See results
A happy little boy
A happy little boy

Even in situations where there is turmoil or conflict within the family unit, social work professionals recognize the value of working towards homeostasis and that the removal of children from the household can cause trauma to the child, perhaps even greater harm than the original forms of neglect or abuse.

Social Workers charged

In the trial, highlighted in the film, four social workers: Kevin Bom, Stefanie Rodriguez, Gregory Merritt, and Patricia Clement, had charges filed against them by the District Attorney, J. Lacey. According to court documents, “The People charged petitioners with felony child abuse (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a)) and falsifying public records (Gov. Code, § 6200). At a preliminary hearing, the magistrate held them to answer the charges.” (People v. Bom, et al., 2020). Originally, in the Superior Court, they were found guilty of the charges against them, but the appeals court reversed those claims. The claim of “felony child abuse” seems to be the most substantial count against the four and implies direct responsibility for the actions of Fernandez’s mother and boyfriend.

For one who isn’t familiar with the duties, obligations and practices of those who work in the social work field, the case might seem cut and dry and that the responsibility is with the DCFS. Popular culture portrays social workers as people who charge into people’s homes and remove children. In reality, that is one of the last things a social worker wishes to do. There are other options which are held higher that include maintaining the family unit and trying to work towards family reunification when possible.

These options were at best, hinted at in the film and the social workers, other than a brief interview with Merritt and some philosophical talk by administrators, did not speak. What was said by the workers who did talk, was that they were doing their jobs and performing their duties within the scope of the profession.

The Social Workers Stand in Front of a Judge  From L to R: P.atricia Clement, Stefanie Rodriguez, Greg Merritt, Kevin Bom
The Social Workers Stand in Front of a Judge From L to R: P.atricia Clement, Stefanie Rodriguez, Greg Merritt, Kevin Bom

Things Seen and Heard

One of the obvious questions that come to mind, is how sound was the judgment used by those workers who were associated with Fernandez. HIPPA policies prohibit any patient details and are designed to protect the client as well as the social worker. DR offers the option of personal judgment – in this case, it seems that the desire to maintain the family unit, superseded other pressing concerns – and professional guidance. What seems more disconcerting, is if the phrase “supporting families who are considered low risk, allowing child protection services to focus on the more serious cases” which is taken directly from the DFCS page leads to two troubling speculations: 1) The social workers were not aware as to the extent of Fernandez’s situation; 2) There were more serious cases than the Fernandez one which were the focus of the social worker's attention. The only other option, which is available, is that the social work professionals were indifferent to Fernandez and basically, did not care.

Other considerations to keep in mind are the fact that Gabriel’s teacher contacted the DFCS numerous times, notifying them of the abuse. A security guard in a county office contacted the authorities to warn them of things he had seen in Gabriel that he (the guard) found disturbing. There were other persons – family members even – who made efforts to intervene on Gabriel’s behalf. These facts contribute to the idea that Gabriel was obviously in danger and that his situation was brought before the county authorities. What exactly was made known to the social workers in question, isn’t completely revealed in the film.

Should the social services employees be held liable for the death of clients?

See results

Some Witnesses

Click thumbnail to view full-size
Arturo Martinez was a security guard who tried to interveneGregory Merritt was one of the social workers charged
Arturo Martinez was a security guard who tried to intervene
Arturo Martinez was a security guard who tried to intervene
Gregory Merritt was one of the social workers charged
Gregory Merritt was one of the social workers charged

Some Final Thoughts

These facts, along with the details of the Fernandez situation, make this a difficult case to analyze. An observer – as well as the LA County – district attorney obviously felt someone should have intervened in the situation. The social workers were the fall guys. Another perspective suggests the need to maintain the family unit. Families after all, are the backbones of a healthy society. Children, it is believed, are better off with the people who brought them into the world.

Clearly, there is no simple answer. Just a sad case – one of many: two adults displaced because of a mistake made, a little boy gone, four social workers whose lives were influenced, and countless other family members who have been traumatized.

talking to the lawyers
talking to the lawyers
in her prison blues
in her prison blues
the victim  (RIP)
the victim (RIP)

References

The Department of Family and Children’s Services. (2016). Family maintenance services for court and voluntary cases. Los Angeles: Department of Family and Children’s Services.

Herman, J. (producer), Knappenberger, B. (director). (2020). The trials of Gabriel Fernandez [motion picture]. United States: Netflix.

Kevin Bom, et al. v Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BA445260, (2020).

Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services. (2020).

People v. Kevin Bom, et al. Los Angeles Superior Court, No. BA445260 (2016).

United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Differential response in child protective services. Washington, D.C. :Administration for Children and Families.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • wpcooper profile imageAUTHOR

      Finn 

      5 weeks ago from Cheyenne

      Yves: I appreciate the feedback. I agree with you on most points and I am not too sure what the social workers new though...

      thank you for your comments.

    • savvydating profile image

      Yves 

      5 weeks ago

      I watched the Netflix documentary on Gabriel Fernandez. I was heartbroken for the little boy. There is no forgiveness in my heart for parents who abuse their children, even causing their deaths. I do believe that some of the social workers were culpable, particularly the older blond woman.

      While maintaining the family unit is generally best for society, in Gabriel's case, it would have been far better had he been able to leave, obviously. He might have had the chance for a happy life. It is too bad he was unable to stay with his gay uncle, who loved Gabriel dearly.

      Well written.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)