ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel


Updated on July 5, 2018
John Lavernoich profile image

JOHN LAVERNOICH is the author of six published books, as well as a significant number of published short stories and articles.

A scene from the 1954 remake of A STAR IS BORN, starring Judy Garland.

In an issue of Time magazine from several years ago, there was an article focusing on ten hit films produced in almost the past half-century which might be candidates for being remade. But the question that we really should ask is: should those films be remade? In some cases, that's not an easy question to answer -- especially when you don't know if the remake will be as successful as the original.

Remakes have always been an essential part of the motion picture industry, going back to the silent era -- the idea was if the first film version was successful, the odds were that it would be worth remaking more than one for those new generations of audiences who were either too young or weren't born when the original version first debuted in move theaters (or, for that matter, the first few remakes). And yet, despite our high hopes for any new movies (and, to a certain degree, TV shows, stage plays and musicals, books, and music albums), we still don't know how successful they'll really be -- even in today's digital age.

Of course, when you do make a feature film -- there are certain expectations that are always present which remain essential to either its success or failure. Most film critics expect every movie to be of high quality (though it's not always possible) -- the corporate executives who run the major film studios (and not just in Hollywood) expect all movies to make a profit (and not just in movie theaters) -- and audiences expect all movies to be entertaining, otherwise they might discourage anyone else from actually seeing it for the first time, based on the lack of quality (and possibly logic) in most of them.

When you do remake a classic movie, infusing it with quality is important, including remaining true to the original source material (while updating it to give it a sense of both realism and relevance). The original 1937 film version of A Star Is Born inspired two remakes over the next forty years -- with the first remake, the 1954 version, being far and away the best of the two, given the talent that was involved in the making of that film, including stars Judy Garland and James Mason, and director George Cukor, a reminder that when it comes to movie remakes, Hollywood can get it right. (A third remake of A Star Is Born, starring Bradley Cooper [who also directed it] and Lady Gaga, is due in theaters in early-October 2018.) Even remakes of films that are now considered classics but weren't successful when first released (like 2005's Charlie & The Chocolate Factory, a remake of 1971's Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory) can be as good as the original -- and sometimes better -- again, with quality playing an essential role in their production, as well as how critics and audience will respond to them.

And the remakes of classic films that aren't as great as the original -- like say, 2002's Mr. Deeds, a remake of director Frank Capra's Mr. Deeds Goes To Town (1936)? There are those who say that many classic films shouldn't be remade -- not only because they were unique in terms of storytelling techniques, characterization, and the commentary of the times, but also because they were, and remain in the minds of generations, the definite version which should remain untouched, thus insuring their continued popularity, which is why I hope that there's never a feature film remake of a classic like Gone With The Wind; the original versions have already stood the test of time -- and should be seen and appreciated by all generations of audiences who definitely know quality when they see it (and who are smart enough to avoid a remake that was produced and released solely for profit's safe).

It's highly unlikely that Hollywood will stop producing remakes of past films anytime soon -- if only because motion pictures are and remains a multi-billion dollar industry. But at the same time, if filmmakers and producers -- both established and upcoming -- want to really stay ahead of the curve, you certainly can't go wrong with creating original and high-quality feature films that might become classics someday, alongside those that have long achieved (and deserved) that status.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)