ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Entertainment and Media»
  • Movies & Movie Reviews»
  • Science Fiction & Fantasy Films

Film Review: Ready Player One: Why Is It So Different From The Book?

Updated on April 10, 2018
RachaelLefler profile image

Rachael has an intense passion for movies, and believes that the role of the film critic is to help movies improve.

Intro and Summary

If you've read the book, you know nothing about what happens in this film.

They start out similarly. It's the future, and everything sucks. Wade Watts lives in the stacks (a housing project made from trailers stacked on top of each other), but goes off to a secret base in a junkyard to play in the OASIS, a virtual reality world everyone is hooked on. When the creator of the OASIS died, he left behind clues to an "Easter egg" hidden in the OASIS, and the person who found his Easter egg would become his heir and inherit total control over the OASIS. Wade and a few friends search for the egg, racing against an army of faceless corporate drones from a company called IOI. That's basically what's the same as in the book.

Key differences from the book:

  • The challenges are all different. No movie-reciting challenges. The keys work differently. Instead of each key leading to a gate (that has to be found based on a riddle given when you win the key), and each gate containing its own unique new challenge, each key simply comes with a clue for finding the next key. So the challenge as a whole was way simplified.
  • Many of the fictional references changed or were omitted. Sadly, this includes leaving out a lot of anime, Ultraman, and a lot of arcade games are either omitted or only mentioned in passing.
  • More action is added, with no showing of the things that required a lot of time and patience, like Wade putting up with school demands.
  • The "High Five" gang meet in the real world under different circumstances and much faster than in the book.
  • Art3mis is described as having an avatar that deliberately bucks the "generic beauty" of the standard avatar in the OASIS. I pictured this as an avatar modified to more closely resemble herself, warts and all, minus the birthmark. They interpreted this in the film as "has the same edgy teen girl hair as every other edgy teen girl". And is otherwise totally beautiful.
  • Perzival looks like a Square Enix style white-haired pretty boy. I don't know if that goes against his original description per se, but it wasn't exactly what I pictured.
  • Aech looks... unflattering. Less cool than expected. But the character's real-world player was almost exactly how I pictured her.
  • There is more emphasis on romance, and more of a "you need the real world too, guys" preaching. But it comes off as weird preaching for a movie that just spent two hours or so telling us how awesome the virtual worlds are.
  • Art3mis is now a damsel in distress at IOI in the third act, whereas before, it was Wade who had gotten himself indebted to IOI as a way to hack into their computer system. Art3mis also now has a personal reason for hating IOI.
  • IOI's evilness is played up. It was a shock that they would go as far as to try to murder Perzival in the book. In the movie, they kind of oozed "movie/comic villain" stereotypes, especially Sorrento. In the book, IOI didn't appear at first to be that different from any major tech company. It pissed off the main character that they were trying to game Halliday's contest, but at first at least, it didn't seem like they were so obviously evil.

Whether you like these changes or not is going to have a lot to do with your individual subjective opinions and beliefs. But I think generally the book was better.


Review:

I had a stronger emotional connection with the book, but a friend of mine had a stronger emotional response from the movie. Maybe it's just that different media have greater or less emotional impact for different people. I don't think the movie is bad, but some elements of it feel too "Hollywood", ie, conventional and stereotyped. For example, they added a car chase at the end. I knew they would have to cut out some pop culture references for the sake of copyright, but some feel conspicuously and sadly absent, especially D & D references and Monty Python and the Holy Grail, which were thematically tied to the idea of the quest for the Easter egg in a way that The Shining just was not.

And bringing up The Shining brings up a problem, the same problem I had with Big Bang Theory in another article, and a problem I see recurring in any mainstream media about "nerdy" guys. The problem is, these bits of media tend to see nerdy guys as hopeless, unable to fuck girls like a "real man" does. The fictional plot is then designed to solve this problem. It's much like how "nerdy" girls are "fixed" with blind dates or unnecessary makeovers or attempts at popularity coaching (spoofed amazingly well by the song 'Popular' in the musical Wicked), "nerdy" guys have to go out and get some vag. If they don't or can't, something is desperately wrong with and broken about them.

Halliday's maverick genius status, in this movie, is overshadowed by this whole "tragically sexless poor sexless nerd needs sex sex sex will solve everything and not having sex is the biggest mistake of your life" stereotype. That's how they manage to fit The Shining, a movie that doesn't fit in with any of Halliday's more family-friendly 80's gaming and fantasy adventure obsessions from the book, into this movie. See, it means he was afraid and/or suffered from terrible regret for a girl he dated once, did not bang, who then ended up married to his best friend. It doesn't fit, at all. Leave it up to Hollywood to make everything about getting laid.

The real genius of the book was talking about why certain pop culture references in a pop culture reference storm matter to nerds. Specific references (arcade games, D & D campaigns, specific movies) were chosen because they reflected nostalgia for the era of dawn of video games. New references were just willy-nilly. They didn't have the same connection to Halliday's life story, as described in the book. You can't just take anything from "the 80's" and insert it in place of those references. I know why they had to do things that way, but it's still a little disappointing.

Was the movie all bad though? No. It was genuine, heartwarming, emotionally moving. And also fast-paced and exciting. So my verdict? Go see it if you loved the book, but don't expect it to be the same or even similar. So much was changed.

Rating for 'Ready Player One' (Film) - 7/10

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)