ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

HOW THE MEDIA INFLUENCED THE CASE OF MENENDEZ BROTHER’S

Updated on October 5, 2013

Mr. and Mrs. Jose Menendez were Cuban immigrants who were lIving in USA. Apart from being handsome, Menendez was a successful businessman in Beverly Hills. They treated their two sons, Erick and Lyle well and gave them most of the things they desired. They attended good schools, lived in good houses, drove good cars, played tennis in private courts, and were members of the famous country clubs. Many people in the neighborhood admired this family set up. The boys were talented tennis players, and the parents accorded them the necessary assistance into becoming re-known national tennis players.

A sad instance for this family is that the boys were overly spoiled. They planned to execute their parents so that they could inherit the entire wealth, which they possessed. A clear sign of premeditation is when they travelled to a town called San Diego in order to buy shotguns, which were used for the execution. In establishing an alibi, they arranged to meet one of their friends in Santa Monica two days later. In that day which was August 20, 1989, they entered into the sitting room and met their parents who were watching television whom they short gunned to death (Soble, and Johnson, 1994).

Lyle Menendez and Erik Menendez who were aged 68 and 70 respectively had used guns to kill their parents Jose and “kitty” Mendez. The incidence occurred on august 20, 1989 at the family’s residence in Beverly Hills. The prosecutor’s assumption was that the brothers were influenced by a desire and greed for their inheritance of the family’s wealth. At this time, the wealth was estimated to be at $14 million. The defense side theorized that the brothers had murdered their parents out of fear for their lives after days of sexual, physical and psychological abuse by the parents.

The superior court at Los Angeles County charged the brothers with murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The prosecutor asked the court to issue a death sentence against the two brothers. The defense side found it hard to dispute the evidence after the brothers admitted committing the felony. The defense therefore, had to rely on another strategy whereby, they claimed that Eric and Lyle had lived in fear due to several counts of abuse.

The brothers claimed that the parents were psychologically and physically abusive in the entire period they had lived together. Lyle claimed that his father had molested him sexually for approximately two years from the time he was aged 6 to 8 years. Eric gave the same testimony about being sexually molested by the father. In his testimony, Eric claimed that his father had sexually molested him since the time he was six up to the time of his death (he was 18 at this time) Impact of the Media Coverage in the Menendez Brothers Case

Eric and Lyle were tried in Alos Angeles court in the year 1993. Proceedings of this case were aired life on television; many viewers who were present at the court proceeding described the on going as a soap opera or a movie. In the cross-examination, Eric and Lyle claimed that they bought the guns in the nearby store so that they could protect themselves from their abusive parents, but they were informed of the mandatory one-week waiting period. This prompted them to drive to San Diego where they could buy them without having to wait. In the process of cross-examination, the prosecutor put a focus on this testimony. He asked the boys to give an explanation on whether they had been interested on revolvers or automatic handguns and what criteria they had considered in selecting them. He then posted a question to Mr. Eric Menendez whether, he knew that the Big five store stopped selling such weapons since 1986.

Eric was confused since he was anticipating this type of question. After along pause, he admitted on his ignorance on the issue, and stressed that they had indeed visited the store in their endeavor of looking for the guns. This made many people who were watching to opine that the boys were indeed lying, and that the murder was a premeditated effort by Eric and Lyre to acquire their parent’s wealth. One journalist who was writing for the Vanity Fair Newspaper, Dunne Dominique expressed the following feelings in his coverage of the trial.

The television coverage of the Menendez brothers which is not supposed to portray the judges, the spectators or the media present in the courtroom did not relay the real situation in this trial. This is because when the prosecutor caught Eric Unaware, and which prompted him to lie, there were open mouth expressions and gasps on some juries’ face. Some relatives bowed their heads. This journalist describes the shock of that moment as electrifying. The prosecutor had caught the person openly lying.

The prosecutor had received the tip about the big five from a phone call by a viewer who was watching the court proceedings. Despite the drama, which this trail had caused, such as the prosecutor receiving death threats, the juries found it hard to conclude the charges and this led to a mistrial. The second trial in 1996 was not aired live, and the duo was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)