ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Kid Breakdancers Future Funk America's Got Talent Predictions

Updated on August 19, 2010

Will the Mini Duo Win AGT

Future Funk is a duo of five and ten-year-old breakdancers who are contestants on the fifth season of America's Got Talent. This is one of those classic "cute kid" acts that arguably get a lot of votes for just that -- being cute. Future Funk got picked by the judges over another young act -- the female Hip Hop dancing group RNG--as the last act to advance during their quarterfinals round. These kids have shown considerable talent for their ages. However, for the reasons stated below, Future Funk will likely fail to win America's Got Talent.

First, Future Funk shouldn't even be in the semifinals. When the last spot left in their quarterfinals went to them, they were up against RNG. While RNG has its own limitations, that group did a decent job of pulling off choreography more difficult than what the act was used to executing. RNG showed the ability to follow complex choreography. Future Funk, on the other hand, did not have any semblance of complex choreography, and, while the 10-year-old kid pulled off some decent breaking, the 5-year-old made a pretty big mess of the performance and really did nothing special but arm movements.

Future Funk really has one solid breaker, at least for his age, in the older boy. But the 5-year-old really only brings the cute factor and is not an accomplished breaker or performer. This is not a well-oiled machine that deserves to be on the same stage as RNG, much less the better acts in the competition. Someone obviously provides their choreography, and the person who provides it knows that it has to remain super simple to avoid being a complete disaster. Just look at how simple the choreography is. There is no way this act has the talent to be in the semifinals.

However, some argue that Future Funk is "entertaining." Huh? I understand and agree that entertainment value is a relevant component to judging talent. After all, putting together an act that is entertaining is, in itself, a type of talent. However, Future Funk, while entertaining, does not deserve the credit for its entertainment value. Someone else is putting together their show, telling them what to say in the interviews, etc. That is patently obvious.

Additionally, being cute, even if considered a form of entertainment, is not unique enough to prevail in a talent contest unless the judges are way off base on judging talent. Just look at it this way--if the members of an act could be easily substituted with other cute kids that could pull off the same low-difficulty-level performance, then that act should not be given credit for talent over another act that possesses actual skills apart from simply being cute.

It simply couldn't be more obvious to anyone who knows anything about dance that even RNG is a far more accomplished group than Future Funk in the category of dancing. Let's not even mention Haspop, who actually deserves to make the semifinals on actual talent. Future Funk got their shot for being good for their age and being cute. There is nothing wrong with that. But then the judges bailed them out when they couldn't make the Top 3 even with the obvious voting for their being cute. It should have ended there, but the producers of America's Got Talent obviously wanted to see them one more time for some reason.

Well, Future Funk's time should be over now. During the semifinals, they face stiff competition from the following acts:

Michael Grimm

Taylor Mathews

Kristina Young

Antonio Restivo

Christina and Ali

ArcAttack

Prince Poppycock

Dan Sperry

AscenDance

Anna and Patryck

Connor Doran

Most, if not all, of these other America's Got Talent acts in Future Funk's semifinals round are a more polished and arguably more talented act. I won't even mention the overall favorites like Michael Grimm or Prince Poppycock. Let's just look at AscenDance and Anna and Patryck. AscenDance has a unique act that is very graceful and capable of being expanded into a more diverse show without adding more talented performers. Future Funk would need talented performers to join them, as it is patently clear that they can't do the more difficult tricks. This is not even debatable. And Anna and Patryck, who are only 12 themselves, are an extremely diverse dance duo that do ballroom and other dances. Their skill level is extremely high and at least comparable to what you can see from So You Think You Can Dance adult dance contestants. Future Funk doesn't even measure up in the dance category without even considering the other non-dance acts.

Considering that Future Funk has nowhere else to go in terms of talent and needed to be saved by the judges last time, the act will likely fail to advance to the finals of America's Got Talent. Simply put, it is high time for the cute kids to go home. They don't measure up to Haspop and the other truly talented peformers in the fifth season of AGT.


Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)