ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Post Prometheus Depression

Updated on November 24, 2012


This past summer a disturbing and depressing event happened to me, one which it has taken me months to come to terms with. That event was an opening night theater viewing of the new Ridley Scott film, and Alien prequel, Prometheus. Hailed as Scott's triumphant return to science fiction, at the helm of a franchise he helped launch no less, the film had a great deal of potential. The trailer remains on the best I've ever seen, eerie, haunting, gripping and with audio and visual callbacks to the original Alien film.

The film itself however was an agonizing train-wreck, a perplexing mix of vivid and incredibly well done visual effects that, thanks to dull lifeless characters, are entirely void of purpose. Much like the Star Wars prequels there are very few technical faults to be found, and a whole lot to love on the visual level, but where the film stumbles in it's characters and story telling. So now, in spoiler-ific detail I will join my voice with the hundreds of other similar nerds who felt betrayed and let down by this film.

It will probably help to have seen the film but also bear in mind that I only saw the film once on opening night so my memory as to each and every detail may be a bit fuzzy (I'll do my best).

The Characters

When I first left the theater I felt let down, to be sure, but for the first few hours I attempted to rationalize away the questions I had by discussing the film with those I'd seen it with. When they couldn't present any good answers I turned to the internet, which was already abuzz with content about the film, much of it understandably negative. It took me until recently to truly see just how BAD of a movie this is and just why it feels that way.

One of the main flaws here is the characters. Not only are all the characters static, as in not a single one of them has any real arc, all of them are also, simultaneously, inconsistent. It really is sort of baffling just how a character can have no arc and yet feel like they change to a completely different sort of character from scene to scene.

Our two main characters, Holloway and Shaw, are scientists who've spent their careers tracking down clues which seem to point to alien visitation having taken place in Earth's past.

Part 1 - The Glyph

Their main piece of evidence for this is a recurring glyph that appears all over the world in very different cultures which shows a figure pointing to several stars. There are several issues here that others have pointed out, such as how the Prometheus team manage to find the LV planetary system based on the handful of stars in the glyph. There aren't exactly reference stars around them, no recognizable constellations to steer by.

My main complaint about the star-pointing alien is that it is said to occur in various cultures throughout human history. So then how did the aliens leave it? And why? This is similar to ACTUAL pseudoscientific claims made by ancient astronaut believers today, who believe that things like pyramids occur in so many cultures because they were all taught to build them by aliens. The problem with both of these ideas, the star-pointer and the pyramid builders is that not all cultures build pyramids at the same time. In the same way not all the cultures that supposedly drew these glyphs or paintings existed concurrently. The ancient Egyptian pyramids were built at least 2000 years before most of the pyramids in Mexico and in the same way the cultures that would have painted this glyph of an alien (or man) pointing to some stars would have reached their peak at VASTLY different times.

So how long did the Engineers spend on Earth? Did they selectively visit certain cultures at certain times to pass on certain knowledge? Did they even visit the Earth AT ALL? The only Engineer we ever even see on Earth dissolves in the opening sequence of the film, and his DNA seems to seed microbial life (not humans), on a planet which is never even ESTABLISHED as being Earth anyway.

On top of all that there is the question of why the Engineers wanted to leave maps to get to the LV system in the first place. As is explained later the moons in the LV system are used to store weaponized black-goo (by explained I mean explained badly). So why would the aliens want human beings in the future to find those facilities? Did human beings make these glyphs and NOT aliens, and if so than why did the humans of the ancient past know about the symbol at all?

They want us to come and find them

If found 10,000 years from now will our ancestors think this symbol represents an alien dumping things into a wormhole? Sounds about as logical as how the characters in this film think.
If found 10,000 years from now will our ancestors think this symbol represents an alien dumping things into a wormhole? Sounds about as logical as how the characters in this film think.

Part 2 - Shaw and Holloway

So based on no evidence whatsoever Shaw believes that the alien depicted in these glyphs had a hand in creating humans. When asked why she believes she simply replies that she chooses to believe things. This idea, that belief is a simple choice, betrays just how unscientific and stupid Shaw's character is. Reality be damned, she'll believe what she CHOOSES even if that means throwing out facts and wallowing in open self-deception.

This fact, that Shaw will believe whatever she wants regardless of what the facts are, is probably the most consistent thing about a character in the film. She stubbornly holds onto a cross she wears even after learning that the Engineers have DNA essentially identical to that of humans, thus disproving any version of Christianity that anyone could come up with beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Giorgio's logic is about on par with that of Shaw. In fact in one statement Ridley actually mentioned that Jesus MIGHT HAVE BEEN AN ENGINEER and maybe that was the bad thing we did that pissed them off (crucifixion).
Giorgio's logic is about on par with that of Shaw. In fact in one statement Ridley actually mentioned that Jesus MIGHT HAVE BEEN AN ENGINEER and maybe that was the bad thing we did that pissed them off (crucifixion).

Now on to Holloway, who is a worthless character that is pointless to the script. He's presumably spent his career studying these glyphs with Shaw and building their case (as flimsy as it is) for an expedition to the vaguely defined stellar coordinates depicted therein. So naturally he's excited, after all not everyone get's to meet their maker. However keep in mind that Holloway is USED to studying ancient cultures and learning about people who are already dead, and most of the depictions of the symbol are indeed ancient. There is NO reason for him to ASSUME that the aliens are still alive and well or that, if they are alive, they even remember visiting our backwater planet to seed life/civilization here in the first place.

When they do arrive on the planet (sorry, moon) and discover the aliens are indeed dead Holloway reacts like a petulant man-child and begins sulking. He's just made the definitive discovery in all of human history. Not only are we not alone in the Universe but we were in fact visited and created by aliens. Holy shit! That overturns centuries of science which suggested that we evolved naturally without outside intelligent influence. We're talking easy Nobel Prize, maybe even having a brand new kind of prize named after you which will go on to judge scientists of the future for centuries.

Nope. He's sad because he doesn't get to talk to his gods, they're all dead. Except that, just as before, he has no reason to ASSUME that they are all dead. Sure the ones they find are pretty much fossilized and ancient but that doesn't mean the species died out. Obviously this base they find themselves in, on this dangerous moon they've landed on, is not the main residence of this species. It's safe to say that if this civilization visited Earth in the ancient past they could be spread out across the stars on hundreds of planets and thousands of moons.

I guess I can understand some disappointment on his part but the way he acts, sulking and drinking. His character later dies (is lit on fire) in what feels like a rushed attempt to add some tension or action to the film (there are numerous times when it feels like the screen-writer said to himself “we haven't had anything action-packed or scary in a while, better throw in some of that”).

Part 3 - David

David is one of the better things about the film primarily because Fassbender is a damn good actor and gives a great performance. The issue is that while his performance is great his character's motivations are confusing. On the one hand he seems to be there to help save Weylan, his “Father” but on the other he seems to know a whole lot more about the aliens than he ever lets on (including how to set them off into a murderous rage).

Very little about him is explained, such as his fascination with Laurence of Arabia, his reasoning behind poisoning Holloway with the goo, and where he gained all the knowledge of the alien, well, the alien everything. Also his motivations are all at once contradictory. He quips at one point in the film that “all children want their parents dead” or something to that effect.

Part 4 - Fifield and the Biologist

Fifield is a geologist who loves rocks. He has two spherical orbs which create an in-depth map of the area around him and are great for mapping caves. Despite his expertise and his high-tech helpers he manages to get lost on his way back to the ship. Later on, because the script needed an action scene, the black goo, which earlier got Holloway sick and made him suicidal, turns Fifield into a contorted zombie with a giant head.

The biologist. The only reason an expedition in space needs a biologist is if aliens are going to be involved. So naturally you'd want to hire a guy who's prepared to see some crazy alien shit, especially if you were expecting, as Shaw and Holloway were, to find intelligent life. Now I understand they didn't brief them before leaving but finding someone with the right psychological profile to, you know, NOT shit themselves when they see an alien, might be helpful.

Also the biologist is afraid of a fossilized alien body but later on tries to make-out with a deadly space-penis.

In space no one can hear you fall in love with a space phallus

Part 5 - Vickers and other minor characters

Vickers is a worthless character. There is meant to be some meaningful interplay between her, as Weylan's real child and David as Weylan's android-child. There does seem to be some jealousy between the two though it is in the background, barely brought up in passing and then dropped upon Vickers hilarious gut-busting-laugh inducing death at the hand of her own stupidity.

The Captain is a pointless character, just there because, you know, these ships need a captain. He follows the scientific side of things very loosely but somehow knows the intimate details of the plot, including that this moon is a weapons facility.

The two pilots, who up until this point have been null characters, decide to sacrifice their lives beside the captain, for a mission that neither of them knew anything about when they left Earth (and neither of them REALLY know anything for sure about even as they kill themselves).

Oh and Weylan is in the movie, for some reason, and dies.

Big Ideas, Shitty Movie

I think one of the biggest issues with this film is that rather than trying to tell a good science-fiction or horror story (the way the original Alien did) it attempts to be just another vehicle for some of Ridley's favorite themes and ideas. The film shares a common theme with Blade Runner, a theme about finding your maker and getting answers from them.

The sad thing is that Prometheus neglects to tell a good story because the big glaring and obvious ideas keep being driven home with forced dialogue and constant reinforcement. At one point Shaw's character simply blurts out that “she can't create life” and then begins crying because it turns out she's unable to have children.

At that point in the film it hasn't even been established that Holloway and Shaw are even DATING. The only hint we've had that the two characters have any romantic involvement is that they held hands when they found the last cave painting. Suddenly Shaw is sad she can't have a baby and for some reason that makes her want to have sex with Holloway in a forced and pointless sex scene that does nothing to give the characters depth or emotional connection to the audience but does further the plot by (inexplicably) impregnating Shaw with a mutant squid.

The black goo has had three different effects on three different characters. It makes Shaw pregnant with a face-hugger, it makes Holloway get sick and want to be burned alive and it turns Fifield into a zombie. Almost seems like it does whatever the hell they wanted it to and has no rules or logic attached to it. It's the Alien Universe equivalent of the Infinite Improbability Drive.

The film's theme of Creation and Destruction of life, the struggle of the old generation against their offspring and vice versa, is an interesting one to be sure. The question of why the Engineers want to destroy us is on everyone's minds, even after Shaw is horribly injured during an impromptu alien abortion her first desire is to find answers to why the Engineers hate us, not to return to Earth for further medical attention or some reinforcements.

David is our creation, much like we are the Engineers creation and he seems to resent human beings, especially his own Father. Weylan, for whatever reason, is aboard the ship and believes aliens have the secret to eternal life (again for whatever reason). Weylan asserts that David doesn't have a soul but that human beings do have souls and yet Weylan seems unwilling to just die of old age the way he should. If he has a soul that will presumably live on after death than why is he so afraid to die? Or is he just saying that line of dialogue (as a hologram mind you) to be a dick to David?

As I said the themes in the film are interesting, the film wants to be about something bigger, about creation, destruction, about our fears and hatred of the younger generation that will inevitably replace us and about our contradictory desire to both commune with and kill our own parents. It's very Freudian in a sense and also reminded me heavily of the story of Cronus, who devoured his own children because one of them was meant to go on to betray him and kill him.

Rather than use its underlying themes to service the plot Prometheus throws plot out the window to shove Shaw's cross in your face and keep reminding us, without ever explaining anything, that the Engineers both created us and now have repented of making mankind and seek to destroy us.

the alien queen is shown clearly depicted on a wall, yet the film doesn't give us any actual xenomorphs, just half-assed answers to a bazillion questions that it didn't need to raise.
the alien queen is shown clearly depicted on a wall, yet the film doesn't give us any actual xenomorphs, just half-assed answers to a bazillion questions that it didn't need to raise.


The true beauty of the original Alien film is clear to me now. It's a simple story, one about a group of blue collar workers in space being picked off by an alien monster aboard their spaceship. It's straight-forward and it doesn't shove the plot into the background in order to shove it's own pretentious feeling of self-worth and meaning onto the viewer. Prometheus wants to be ABOUT something but in doing so it forgets to be ABOUT something that HAPPENS.

You can write down the events that happen in the film Alien and they all make sense. Sure there are some stands you could tug on that might unravel (such as how quickly the alien grows to adulthood) but everything that transpires in the film is, more or less, explained. Any questions raised are outside the story (such as “who laid all the eggs?” and “what is the space-jockey?”).

If you sat down and wrote out a journal entry on what had happened to the crew of the Nostromo you could likely explain the whole thing fairly easily. The plot is simple and any psychosexual themes regarding the lead female character and the phallic design of Giger's alien and the fact that the first one impregnated is a man are all in the background. Any deeper meaning read into Alien takes a back seat to a very well-executed and fairly simple horror film.

If you wrote down the events that happened the crew of the Prometheus it would look like an awful jumbled mess. The way the pieces fit together is so messy as to defy explanation.

Prometheus gets busted like a myth


Prometheus forgets that the best way to execute deeper themes and get them across to the audience is to TELL A GOOD STORY. The movie has so much potential. It has themes of the creation and destruction of life, it has elements of ancient alien origins similar to 2001 and an undercurrent of Lovecraftian horror, it has the promise of alien monstrosities attacking characters, and it has the framework of the entire Alien franchise to help set up a satisfying backstory.

Prometheus somehow squanders all of that. And thus from one of Hollywood's best directors, from a science-fiction visionary, we get a bad movie made all the worse by the fact that it had so much promise. I may never quite get over being fooled by Prometheus and I know that any future sequel-prequels will have a mountain of expectations to overcome.

If trailers were honest


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • artblack01 profile image


      5 years ago from New Mexico

      They're going to connect it in the Sequel, yes, they are making a part two to this travesty known as Prometheus.

    • profile image


      5 years ago

      I didn't like this movie either and saw no connection to the Alien storyline.

    • artblack01 profile image


      5 years ago from New Mexico

      Oh the farce that is the idea that human origin and ancient constructs are the product of alien intervention. I just watched a program the other day that debunked the idea of ancient aliens. It showed how the pyramids and other ancient buildings were constructed by humans and not by aliens, as well as the evidence that shows how people made mistakes while in the process and how the process was a pains taking human endeavor.

      I will probably watch the sequel to this prequel just to see where it's going but i will only watch it once and i will not pay.

    • Titen-Sxull profile imageAUTHOR


      5 years ago from back in the lab again

      Thanks for the comment artblack01 and don't worry about hijacking the hub, if you want to vent about any parts of the alien franchise feel free. I agree about the AVP films, they were pretty terrible, particularly Requiem which attempted to bring back the grit and gore and heavy R rated feel of both franchises but failed to give us good characters or a plausible ending (they nuke a whole city and let the survivors who know the truth live?)

      Prometheus at least is visually stunning to look at, but under that facade it doesn't have a heart. It has a brain though and keeps shoving it's "big ideas" in our faces. If Scott wanted to lecture on life, gender, creation and destruction, and the plausibility of ancient aliens or gods why didn't he just do that? I guess that wouldn't have made him as much money though...

    • artblack01 profile image


      5 years ago from New Mexico

      When I first heard the film was coming out I was so excited but the more information I learned about the film the less and less I became enthusiastic about seeing it. I am usually pretty good about predicting whether or not a movie is going to be good based on the trailers, so the more trailers I watched the more clues that this movie would not meet any of my expectation. I was expecting too much but what I would find is clearly explained in your hub... except the whole expectation before the trailers that the "engineers" would be alien themselves, looking more like what their space suits looked like, which don't look like space suits.

      Now being an Alien fan myself, I saw the movie when it came out when I was 6 years old, now at 39, still loving the movie as much as I did then the only disappointment is all the shitty movies that came out after as sequels/prequels/explanations... this movie is probably the worst considering it was made by one of my favorite directors but that it was as one of the worst films I have ever seen and was on par with the Aliens vs Predator movies which were horribly made and written.

      I could go on and on with this but I will stop hijacking your hub.

      Thanks for a great hub. It was made so much better than the movie it describes.

    • Titen-Sxull profile imageAUTHOR


      5 years ago from back in the lab again

      Sorry if I spoiled the movie Disappearinghead and thanks for the comment. This film remains one of the most promising, and thus most disappointing, films I've ever seen, really a shame considering how good it could have turned out.

    • Disappearinghead profile image


      5 years ago from Wales, UK

      Excellent well written hub. I'm torn. I wanted to see what on the surface looks like a good film, but I suspected I'd be disappointed, and now I know.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)