ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Wicker Man (1973) Funnily Enough It's Not as Good as the Remake

Updated on July 16, 2020
The Remake was hilarious, while the original was dumb and boring and definitely not funny or scary.
The Remake was hilarious, while the original was dumb and boring and definitely not funny or scary. | Source

Overrated Unscary Horror Film

Now this movie is boring and not scary and a little preachy like it's saying any religion that's not Judeo-Christian is fundamentally psychotic or evil or weird which seems very much prejudiced and bigoted to me.

If you can't stand that other people don't want to worship your bearded zombie with daddy issues that you cannibalize on Sundays by drinking his blood and eating his flesh and thereby becoming a zombie yourself, then too bad go cry to your local Catholic priest maybe he'll feel you up and make you feel good and tell you it's okay afterward.

Now the movie is boring and dull and the main character is a dumb dick with a stick up his butt who is afraid of naked women and anything that's not Christian. He goes to this island looking for a little girl he meets these people who tell him they know nothing about it, they reveal the little girl was a trick and they sacrifice him instead. Which seems stupid they report a kidnapping a police officer investigates they kill him and now everyone probably knows about their weird cult and they'll either have to go to prison or drink the Kool-aid because a cop will be noticed if he doesn't show up if they wanted to sacrifice someone why don't they get a vagrant or something, but no. After all, they're stupid they have to come up with this elaborate scheme to get a police officer instead, and now they'll probably be executed or put into an insane asylum like the Christ wacko who wrote this film.

Anyway, the remake is better because it has nick cages off the walls acting to counterbalance the stupid plot and then he punches a lady in the face, steals a bike, and then makes a hilarious monologue about bees it was a comedy that was masquerading as a b horror movie. This movie is just a really dull, boring movie that is masquerading as a horror movie it's not enjoyable there's no laughs or comedy like in the remake its not so bad it's good it's just bad.


Christoper Lee acts like a madman and hams it up as silly antogonist, should've kept playing Dracula. Luckily he redeemed himself as Saruman in Lord of The Rings.
Christoper Lee acts like a madman and hams it up as silly antogonist, should've kept playing Dracula. Luckily he redeemed himself as Saruman in Lord of The Rings. | Source
Wet blanket protagonist is afraid of naked women, other cultures, singing, dancing, and an overall loser.
Wet blanket protagonist is afraid of naked women, other cultures, singing, dancing, and an overall loser. | Source

The Original vs. The Remake

I'm befuddled on how anyone can like this movie. I'm even more confused about how anyone can see the original as being all that different from the remake. The only differences I can see are worse acting, worse cinematography, slower development, and far from necessary singing and nudity. A bit like the remake, the resolution had nothing to do with the story leading up thereto.

Now, the theme is dated and fits with the B movies that are supported by the bigoted trope of Christians good, pagans bad, and the entertainment and cheap shock derived from this clash of values. This kind of "spooky cult thriller" genre, and particularly this movie, are often interpreted multiple ways: We'll see it as a silly oversimplification of polytheist/nature worship religions, plus putting a "spooky" spin thereto, and considering that the 1970s was the golden age of cults we could take it as a poke at those kinds of cults. Additionally, its visiting is nearly just about pretty much as good ole' Christian rightwing pandering.

The film promotes the thought that we reside during the middle ages and each good people believes in Jesus and folks that do not are wicked pagans that commit human sacrifice. Again, to restate this film promotes religious bigotry, especially the foremost character. Sergeant Howie was irritating, so I was happy to watch him being burned within the wicker man.

It`s not often that I discuss what people have written in their reviews but it`s not often I see a movie as stupid because the Wicker Man gets praised to the high heavens. This film revolves around the plot set-up of someone from a Scottish island sending an anonymous letter to enforcement officials hoping that the policeman who reads it'll investigate the case of a missing child and is additionally a virgin. What are the chances of that? It also ignores other logical things like isn't it fair to assume the police will investigate the contents of such an anonymous letter? It also seems to ignore standard police procedure.

Other things annoyed me. If this may be an isolated Scottish island untouched by modern society then the inhabitants are Celts, but are their pagan based ideals truly Celtic? And doesn’t England’s mainland have maypoles? If so, then surely people from the countryside can`t have anything in common with these islanders who have a unique cultural background. The philosophy seen here is more new ageism than Celtic so is there any point of setting it on a faraway Scottish island? It should be obvious that this has been happening for years. Does that mean they’ve been writing to police stations on the mainland for years and are receiving other dullards who never had sex to sacrifice?

I don’t know if it`s the fault of the producers or if they used a nasty print but everything on screen seems very cheap and badly edited because the camera jumps around from scene to scene the sound editing is also extremely poor.

The Remake

As always Cage puts on a wonderful performance that holds the movie together. I was in hysterics after he punched crazy fat ethel, and then he punched even more crazy women while wearing a silly bear costume, it was way funnier than the original film which boring as heck. How did this masterpiece go overlooked it's such an exquisite movie. It's one altogether those movies for movie buffs really, but I'm sure even the broader mainstream audience will pick on its genius. that's what this is: sheer genius.

It might be unintentionally so, but what percentage of times do I see a Bear Suit within the last act of a movie being pulled out with such nonchalant bravado? the beginning might leave you slightly confused, but the moment you catch that horrible acting delivered by the police buddy you get barely of what's to come: many laugh-out-loud moments. Many lines of dialogue are memorable unlike the original, like "Phallic symbols, phallic symbols", "The bees are in my eyes", "How'd it get burned?", "Step removed from the bike" and much of others. Highly recommended to any film fan or anybody attempting to hunt out some laughs.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Aaron James Skull profile imageAUTHOR

      Aaron James Hills 

      5 months ago from Colorado

      Nothing but Christian propaganda, just like the Nazis saying all Jews are evil and must be exterminated for their religious beliefs.

    • profile image

      Moral Man 

      6 months ago

      Both the original 1973 The Wicker man (actually filmed in late 1972 in Scotland) and the 2006 remake are impressive and boils down to personal taste. The original 1973 version has superior music and almost runs like a musical. Punch the humpbacked fool, the teaser, and the hobby horse are notable characters in the original, and the costumes, music, rituals! and scenery are medeival.

      Watching this movie is like traveling back to the medeival period, a time when music, art, and literature were at their best. As today, the medeival period was turbulent and much of its history is unpleasant. The Wicker man 1973 and its 2006 remake are also full of unpleasant scenes, especially at the end when the police officer becomes sacrificed to pagan gods by bloodthirsty locals. The locals believe that sacrificing a human in the original movie would give them a bountiful harvest of apples, and in the remake, they believe the sacrifice would improve the abundance and quality of honey from honeybees. Are the pagans right in their beliefs and in what they do? Or is the Christian policeman who becomes the sacrificial victim right in his beliefs? The movie leaves it up to the viewer to decide.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)