ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Trapped In a Film He Never Made

Updated on July 31, 2014

Aside from M. Night Shyamalan, has anyone in the film industry nuked their reputation as much as George Lucas has? Ever since the release of Return of the Jedi in 1983, the once acclaimed director has seen his reputation fall faster Hercules at the box office, with 1989’s Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade standing as the only bright spot for Lucas in that time period. The worst of Lucas’ failures in this time period; Howard the Duck, the 1986 film based off the Marvel Comics character of the same name. As bad as the Star Wars prequels may have been to some, this adaptation of Steve Gerber’s beloved character is by far Lucas’ magna opus of suck. As a film, Howard the Duck is a travesty; as an adaption of a comic book, it’s an abomination that the likes of Batman and Robin can only dream of.


Howard T. Duck (voiced by Chip Zien) begins the story living on his home planet Duckworld, only to immediately be pulled from his apartment and through outer space. He arrives on Earth (Cleveland to be exact), and immediately saves a woman named Beverly (Lea Thompson) from being mugged. The two begin a friendship, and Howard begins to adapt to life in Cleveland while also searching for a way home with the help of Beverly and her scientist friend Phil (Tim Robbins). As time goes on, Howard ends up getting a losing a job at a romantic spa, begins to manage Beverly’s band Cherry Bomb, and must defeat the Dark Overlord of the Universe (voiced by Brian Steele), an evil life form that arrives on Earth and possesses Phil’s colleague Walter Jennings (Jeffery Jones).


If nothing else, Lucas should get credit for this; he was/is a fan of the Howard the Duck comics from the 1970’s, and is said to have been saddened by the film’s failure. But just because you’re a fan of something doesn’t mean you understand it, and it’s quite clear that Lucas and his writing/directing team of Gloria Klatz and William Huyck (Huyck is the sole credited director) didn’t understand their material. One look at Gerber’s series shows that Howard the Duck was really a fish out of water story with heavy elements of surrealism, satire and existentialism (famously, Gerber commented that the main joke of Howard the Duck was that there was no joke). The movie features none of those three themes, instead trying (and failing spectacularly) to be a supernatural comedy in the same vain as Ghostbusters. In the end, the only thing audiences ended up laughing at was the horrible dialog, which consists mainly of duck puns.

Howard the Duck in comic form
Howard the Duck in comic form

Perhaps the most shocking failure of Howard the Duck however is its visuals. Despite all the criticism Lucas has faced over the years as a storyteller, you could at least always count on his films to look the part. Howard the Duck simply looks awful, and it seems pretty clear that the film would’ve worked much better as an animated film as opposed to live action (supposedly, the film was scheduled to be animated, but became live action due to a contract dispute between Lucas and the distributor). The most egregious example of the poor of effects occurs in the climactic battle, featuring the Dark Overlord in his true form. What should be an impressive visual effect is a silly one, with the Dark Overlord looking more like a melting pile of sewage than a creature that should strike fear. The rest of the film doesn’t fare much better, with the only memorable image (and not necessarily in a good way) likely being the site of a topless female duck back on Duckworld. You know you have problems when your best shot in a film is a naked duck.


As Beverly, Lea Thompson is the best of the cast, doing an okay job of essaying the thankless role of girlfriend/damsel in distress. In a better film, Thompson might’ve been able to effectively capture the essence of Beverly, the only other character from the comics to appear in this film. Besides her, the performances range from ugh to “Stop! Please stop!” As the villain, Jeffrey Jones isn’t given much to do but mime Brian Steele’s lines and look even more cartoony then he did as Ed Rooney in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, while Tim Robbins is so bad as Phil that it’s difficult to imagine he would go onto win an Academy Award two decades later. But the worst performance goes to Chip Zien, who voices Howard. Mostly known for his excellent stage career, Zien is nothing like that here, giving a performance that makes Howard come across as a flat, bored and creepy. Even if the rest of the film had worked better, it’s difficult to imagine it being good as long as Zien was sucking the life out of Howard every step of the way.

Howard and Beverly (Lea Thompson). Howard was played by numerous actors and stunt performers, including future Chucky star Ed Gale.
Howard and Beverly (Lea Thompson). Howard was played by numerous actors and stunt performers, including future Chucky star Ed Gale.

If there’s one positive distinction that can be made for Howard the Duck, it’s that it was the first Marvel property to be released as a theatrical film since the Captain America serials of the 1940’s. Besides that footnote though, the film is nothing more than a glorified embarrassment, with lazy writing, poor visuals and worse performances combining to suck the life out of a once great comic book character. In fact, the reputation for Howard the Duck has never recovered from this film; the Gerber comics have become difficult to find, and the character is largely treated as a joke by casual and even some hardcore comic fans. If there’s any film that can serve as evidence that the power of film can have just as negative an impact as a positive one, Howard the Duck is that film. As it stands, it’s both the worst comic book adaptation of all time and the first step George Lucas took towards tarnishing his name.

1 star for Howard the Duck

Is Howard the Duck the worst comic book film ever?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      hippoattack 

      4 years ago

      This movie sucked. #blows. They better not remake it.

    • FatFreddysCat profile image

      Keith Abt 

      4 years ago from The Garden State

      I actually saw "Howard" during its 1986 theatrical run... judging from its famously meager box office run I'd say I'm one of only a few dozen people who can make that claim. :D I was sixteen years old and it sparked a school boy crush on Lea Thompson that lingers to this day, nearly 30 years later.

      The "Howard" comic book was one of the best series Marvel ever produced. It's very sly, occasionally dark, extremely subversive social satire...too bad none of that ended up in the movie.

      Instead, Willard and Gloria Huyck turned it into a glitzy, neon-colored mess that encapsulates everything that was wrong about Hollywood in the '80s, all rolled up into one film.... that's why I love it!! Haha.

    • LailaK profile image

      LailaK 

      4 years ago from Atlanta, Georgia

      Very cool! I wish I could see it :) voted up!

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)