ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why I Hate History Channel’s Ancient Aliens

Updated on September 28, 2019
Dean Traylor profile image

Dean Traylor is a freelance writer and teacher who writes about various subjects including education and creative writing.


I HATE Ancient Aliens. There’s no other way to put it. I hate its premise; I hate its direction; and I hate it with a passion. In fact, hate doesn’t come close to describe the revulsion I have for this show. I can waste my time coming up with a fancy introduction to this article to explain my point-of-view on the show, but why bother? It’s bad enough that I can’t change the channel fast enough to prevent the insidious garbage that spews from this show from flowing into my living room.

This insipid show is one of many questionable offerings served up by the History Channel. It’s been on the air for several seasons and has been a surprising success, considering how off the mark it gets.

The producers want the public to believe that this is a well researched show that “brings to light” a topic that needs to be discussed and debated. But, in reality, its entire premise and message boils down all the mysteries of science to one mantra: Space aliens did it!

And by “did it”, the show’s creators are referring to everything and anything remotely connected to human endeavors and accomplishments throughout history. We can break down a typical season with questions and answers to some of the most popular topics found in nearly every episode:

It’s not uncommon to see these experts labeled as “author and researcher” or “investigative journalist”.

  • Who built the pyramids of Giza? Aliens! Of course.
  • How did the Mayan and Aztec civilizations rise to power? With the help of space aliens who promised to return one day.
  • Who inspired some of history’s greatest artists, inventors, prophets, and scientists? Why none other than your friendly neighborhood aliens.

The show doesn’t stop there. It tries to tie other “mysteries” of the paranormal such as:

  • the Bermuda Triangle,
  • Bigfoot,
  • shifting magnetic poles, and
  • Numerous conspiracies that can be blamed on those pesky aliens.

Even Nostradamus and the so-called 2012 Mayan Calendar Apocalypse have been given the Ancient Alien treatment.

One of the regular members of the show's gallery of experts
One of the regular members of the show's gallery of experts

Gallery of Experts

The concept that “all roads lead to space aliens” is not the only annoyance on the program. The show’s other crowning achievement in futility is its gallery of “experts.” Some are guests others are regulars; yet, nearly all of them have dubious credentials in their respective fields.

It’s not uncommon to see these experts labeled as “author and researcher” or “investigative journalist”. Such titles make the unsuspecting viewers believe they are listening to well-learned and highly professional people proving that their astounding claims are valid. Never mind that many of these experts -- seemingly dressed like Indiana Jones (complete with a fedora hat) with aviation sunglasses -- often have little or no understanding how to investigate a claim or to do any form of scientific research.

Some of the guests appear to be genuine and have authored several books based on the subjects they claim to be experts in. However, if one will actually Google these experts’ names, one will discover that many of them are self-published and self-appointed researchers with little or no credentials (and if they do have credentials, it came from diploma mills).

There are groups that are conspicuously excluded from the series. Skeptics are rarely brought in to debate these claims. And if they are, they are often given a few minutes to rebut any claims before being drowned out by the ancient alien theorists. If the show believes in creating debate on the matter, it’s obvious that they’ve taken sides and have become the cheerleaders for these pseudo-scientists.


Mr. Ancient Astronaut Inspires (and Consults)

Two of the most visible experts on the show come to mind. Giorgio A. Tsoukalos and Erich von Däniken have made a name for themselves within the ancient alien theory circle. In fact, von Däniken is the person credited with starting the “theory” and for coining the term and its alternative, ancient astronaut. In some ancient alien theorist circles, Däniken is known as the granddaddy of the theory, and if he has a nickname, it wouldn’t be surprising that it’s Mr. Ancient Astronaut.

It has been reported that Däniken was a daydreaming bell-hop from Switzerland when he came up with the theory. Later, he wrote a bestselling book (Chariots of the Gods?) which became an international best-seller and spurn numerous copycat books about UFOS and the paranormal during the early to mid 1970s.

Proof for this has always been sketchy and often involved the misinterpretations of ancient artifacts or unverified observations made by Däniken

The ancient alien theory (and we’re taking liberty here calling it a theory) refers to the concept that extraterrestrial aliens came to Earth during ancient times and contributed to the growth of human civilization. Proof for this has always been sketchy and often involved the misinterpretations of ancient artifacts or unverified observations made by Däniken.

Since the 1970s, when the theory took root, professional archeologists have debunked the claims made by von Däniken and his cohort. They’ve even gone as far as calling the ancient alien theorists frauds and hucksters. Some have labeled the concept racist (more on that later).

Still, these theorists have crafted their claims and have found a niche market to spew their garbage. This includes the History Channel and this show (in which Däniken is listed as a consultant, producer and the inspiration).


“That is Impossible. Can This Be…Aliens?”

While Däniken is the inspiration for Ancient Alien, his protégé is the star. Tsoukalos is also a consulting producer for the show. As the publisher of Legendary Times and director of the Erich von Däniken Center for Ancient Alien Research (yes, there is such a place), he seemingly has the right credentials for the show. However, he has something else that the alleged egomaniac Däniken doesn’t: A presence on the screen (and this probably drives the former Swiss bellhop mad!).

But, if one believes that Tsoukalos adds some credibility to this hopelessly incredulous show, then think again. He’s a giddy, bearded man with freakish hair that flashes seriously drug-addled grimaces as he gushes on and on about the aliens. His mere presence may have caused some viewers to snicker as they wonder “what is he on?”

He even has his own mind-numbing mantra: “That is impossible, so you have to ask yourself how this can be?” And, of course, he states, in an overly excited tone, that it’s the “the aliens.”

Däniken’s theory focused on non-European ancient civilizations

A Racist Concept

To its credit, the show has expressed the belief that ancient aliens were the inspiration for every society on Earth. However, the ancient alien theory and its proponents have been accused of being racist in the past. This is something the show can’t exactly escape, despite its attempt at inclusion.

Originally, Däniken’s theory focused on non-European ancient civilizations. His original book leveled its “research” artifacts from the Mayans, Aztecs, Middle Eastern, African, and Asian societies. He found it bizarre that these civilization created intricate architecture or had complex social and religious systems.

Thus, it comes as no surprise that he looked for anything to prove that monumental feats such as the Pyramids of Giza or the cities of the indigenous American cultures were created with the help of an alien race. Possibly, he had a hard time believing that non-European societies were as advanced as the ancient Europeans were (and possibly more).


It Just Gets Weird

As mentioned, the show has veered away from the hidden racism that the theory entails. But that’s not an improvement. The show has taken a turn for the weird. Possibly it’s an attempt legitimize the theory or simply to stretch out the concept to make it a unifying theory for all things bizarre (and to keep viewers watching it).

What can be gleaned from these “weird” episodes (or shall we say what did the aliens create or inspire)? Here are a few tidbits:

  • All religions are inspired by space aliens
  • Natural formations are created by aliens.
  • Natural disasters? Not quite! Aliens are suspects.
  • Evolution, physics, DNA? Yep, it’s those aliens again.

By now, it appears that all things human and all things mother Earth are the result of aliens. What more can one asks about these aliens?

If an episode that first aired in 2015 is any indication, there’s a cosmic war between aliens that once happened, or is currently going on. And Earth and its inhabitants are in the cross-hair. How do we know? We’ll just take it that the experts on Ancient Alien have the answer.

It’s hard to believe this show has lasted a decade. If it’s not the ridiculous ploy of aliens infiltrating all aspects of life it’s Tsoukalos rambling in glee while scoffing at scientists and making all things aliens.

By now -- as the old saying goes – Ancient Aliens has jumped the shark several times over and has managed to keep going. Unfortunately, Tsoukalos, Däniken, and the rest of the ancient alien theorists will credit alien involvement with that.

All you need to know about the show
All you need to know about the show

© 2017 Dean Traylor


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image


      5 weeks ago

      I agree wholeheartedly. My son and I used to watch as sort of a platform for parody. It IS entertaining, though. But in all seriousness the show angers me because it never gives credit to the wondrous accomplishments of ancient cultures. Their argument is always that ancients couldn’t possibly have the intelligence to produce these things. Well maybe they could because they had the time to gaze upon an unobstructed night sky and observe its glory, instead of having their faces perpetually fixed to a smartphone or television set and not coming up with logical explanations to the universe around them...

    • Dean Traylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Dean Traylor 

      5 weeks ago from Southern California/Spokane, Washington (long story)

      The article is about the show not the naval films supposedly showing a ufo. At this point. That particular navy film is a mystery and theres no evidence to verify whether the object is real or not, or merely something natural or misidentified.

    • profile image


      5 weeks ago

      One question, what do you suppose the U.S.Navy photographed and followed that was released by our government? Looked like a flying visible means of contrail...stops instantly and accelerates to a few thousand knots instantaneously, which would crush any living thing if it were not isolated from G-Forces.

      Wake up...yes the show makes some foolish claims, but for the most part, they may be onto something very real.

    • profile image


      2 months ago

      Everything in this review is right on. The show is rubbish. BUT .... it is entertaining and better than a comedy show - I laugh so much at the bizarre theories and claims. These guys KNOW they are spouting rubbish - and they are abke to do it with a straight face - that’s impressive!

    • Dean Traylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Dean Traylor 

      2 months ago from Southern California/Spokane, Washington (long story)

      I don't, but it's bit hard to miss when they show it nearly every night for three addition, have it on Netflix. Also, it's a review. It's bit hard to hate something if you don't watch it.

    • profile image


      2 months ago

      don't watch it then if you hate it so much

    • Dean Traylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Dean Traylor 

      2 months ago from Southern California/Spokane, Washington (long story)

      Its a tv review Tony.

    • profile image


      2 months ago

      From everything i've read here; you have not done your research! I sugest you go to google search and search these words: how many Sumerian cuneiform tablets have been found to date.

      2nd search: where are Sumerian cuneiform tablets located.

      3rd search: what information has been translated from Sumerian cuneiform tablets.

      4th search: where did Sumerian cuneiform tablets come from.

      5th search: who is Zacaria Sitchin and what edjucation does he have.

      6th search: what collages have studied Sumerian cuneiform.

      Then see what you think

    • Dean Traylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Dean Traylor 

      7 months ago from Southern California/Spokane, Washington (long story)

      It sounds plausible, until you do some research and discover that much of the theory came from a handful of people with sketchy pasts and dubious "research" methods. At this point most who believe them, simply want to believe them. Ancient Aliens simply exploits this form of confirmation bias.

    • profile image

      Robert K Tompsett 

      7 months ago

      I agree with Poppy's quote , "I find the ancient alien theory to be more believable than many of the religions on this earth."

    • newbizmau profile image

      Maurice Glaude 

      20 months ago from Mobile, AL

      I agree it is hard to watch some of those shows, but if you do some of the research on your own you get way more out of it. There are lots of ancient text that have many AH HA moments, like the topic of Angels or "Fallen Angels." Were they spiritual entities or visitors from other planets?

    • Dean Traylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Dean Traylor 

      21 months ago from Southern California/Spokane, Washington (long story)

      As a reminder to readers: If you are going to comment on this article, please refrain from name-calling and using derogatory words. If you don't like it, then express it in a way that will not get your comments banned (and not just from me either). Also, be warned, if you disagree and claim something to the contrary, make sure to have something to support your argument. As it stands, I believe the show does more harm than good. And, in an age when it seems charlatans are succeeding in every aspect of public life, there's no doubt that the BS they are pushing will have long-lasting damages to the social well-being of society.

    • Dean Traylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Dean Traylor 

      21 months ago from Southern California/Spokane, Washington (long story)

      Hey Lennie clowns don't need to comment on clowns.

    • poppyr profile image


      2 years ago from Tokyo, Japan

      I find the ancient alien theory to be more believable than many of the religions on this earth.

      Also, you mentioned that it was racist, but Erich von Däniken also talked about Stonehenge, which is in England.

    • ValKaras profile image

      Vladimir Karas 

      2 years ago from Canada

      Dean---Please, don't take my comments wrong, I don't mind one bit if you are opting for judging the book by its cover---or by judging a theory by its presenters. I can't impose my views on anybody.

      Einstein would be a perfect dude to see this sort of a mismatch between a presenter and his theory. His psychological evaluation would be so defeating that his theory "should" be seen as a crazy mumbling of a village idiot. Read his bio from his childhood on.

      Likewise, at least to me, it doesn't matter what Google has to say about those proponents of the ancient aliens theory. What matters to me is the physical evidence which I saw with my own eyes, while they were at those sites and simply pointing at them.

      For example, those smooth stone surfaces in Puma Punku---according to some real experts in stone shaping---and according to my own eyes---just had to be machined by a sophisticated technology. You don't have to listen to their stories if you don't want to---just look and think, how could those huge blocks be formed with such a precision thousands of years back in the past, at times when the textbooks are talking about savage tribes roaming around and using primitive tools.

      Again, when Einstein came to the US, he couldn't speak any English, he was even stuttering in German, but for some "mysterious reasons" no one is calling the funny looking dude "stupid".

      Also, let us not judge what people say by their "credentials" either, because nowadays highly educated physicists don't have Tesla's brain.

      And I have personally talked to some psychotherapists who were short of taking notes while I was casually describing my methods of self-evolution. Science doesn't belong exclusively to scientists these days (anymore).

      All in all, you don't have to like that bunch of "charlatans" if that's what you choose to call them---but use your own eyes, and the next time a "regular archaeologist" tells you that the Great pyramid was done with soft bronze chisels--- be my guest and believe him---because "he has all valid credentials" to support it.

      I didn't mean to make a discussion out of this, so don't mind this additional comment.

    • MizBejabbers profile image

      Doris James MizBejabbers 

      2 years ago from Beautiful South

      So, you hate the program. Change the channel. I hate sitcoms, so I change the channel, but I don't go off on them because I know that other people like them. Most people who rant about new discoveries, and some of these new discoveries are documented, are doing it for religious reasons. But somewhere in the Bible it says that new knowledge will be revealed in the endtimes. What the Bible doesn't say is that people will believe it.

    • Dean Traylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Dean Traylor 

      2 years ago from Southern California/Spokane, Washington (long story)

      Val, you do know that the two people I mentioned are known hucksters? Do you realize that these guys have built empires based on stuff they can never prove? The running joke of the story is that all they do is place alien as an answer for every mystery of the universe. Also, I've mentioned that all you have to do is Google these people's names to find out who they really are. If I'm being mean to them, then that's another topic. Personally, I feel they are spreading dangerous stuff and I'm not the only one saying that. The part about this thing having a underlying racist theme has not gone unnoticed. You may not like the idea of me attacking them, but in the age of disinformation, these people need to be called out.

    • ValKaras profile image

      Vladimir Karas 

      2 years ago from Canada

      Dean---It's perfectly all right if your intellectual preferences make you dislike the program in question---as long as you don't expect that your subjectivity says anything about it's objective value or the lack of it.

      You start your article by saying in so many words how much you "hate" the program, and it would be nice if you stayed at that, not trying to make of it a sufficient argument to knock it down as ridiculous.

      Namely, I hope you are aware that you can't debunk a theory by mocking its presenters.

      Your ridiculing Georgio Tsoukalos's hair sounds like someone who would make fun of Albert Einstein's similar hair style and by doing that believe that he has made a big dent in the theory of relativity.

      I also hope that you are aware that theories by their definition are not claiming to be a final word, and even the "mainstream" archaeology is just a bunch of theories. There was a time when it was a "mainstream" conviction that the Earth was flat. The "mainstream" medicine keeps correcting itself, the "mainstream" Newtonian physics is getting questioned by quantum physics, and so on.

      I am sure you know that what we "know" about electricity is still only a theory, and the same goes for the force of gravity, among so many, many other things in our textbooks.

      At this point maybe it would be good to remember that in order to debunk a theory, we would have to first be experts in that field. You may call presenters of that show all the degrading names you want--- but you are saying much more about your own credibility than about theirs.

      Your profile says that you are a journalist by profession. I thought that journalist's job was to provide concrete facts, not to come up with his "hate" as a debunking argument.

      For example, you would have to provide proofs that builders of the Great pyramid actually had more sophisticated tools than bronze chisels---which, so far is the only fact we have about the ways they could have shaped those heavy stones before putting them in place, by a method that is still giving headaches to the mainstream archaeologists.

      So, what's really wrong if some people who are deeply into this field--- not like you or myself---have an alternative theory about things of the distant past?

      Of course, much of religious beliefs are threatened by those theories, and it is "my theory" that someone will never allow anything else but the word from the holy books to provide the facts about the ancient history. Politics is everywhere, my friend.

      I am not defending the alien theory, but the logic about debunking it. Personally, I am freakishly in love with everything mysterious, and guess what---the truth about so much of what we think we "know" is still up for grabs. So, let's be fair about those folks who are not happy with what is "known".


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)