ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Entertainment and Media»
  • Movies & Movie Reviews

Wolf’s Bane – A review of The Wolf of Wall Street

Updated on December 27, 2013
Margot Robbie is Naomi, the trophy wife of Jordan Belfort played by Leonardo DiCaprio in the Martin Scorsese film The Wolf of Wall Street
Margot Robbie is Naomi, the trophy wife of Jordan Belfort played by Leonardo DiCaprio in the Martin Scorsese film The Wolf of Wall Street

Title: The Wolf of Wall Street

Production Company: Paramount Pictures

Run Time: 138 minutes

Rated: R

Director: Martin Scorsese

Stars: Leonardo DiCaprio, Jonah Hill, Margot Robbie, Matthew McConaughey, Kyle Chandler, Rob Reiner, Jon Bernthal, Jon Favreau

2 stars for The Wolf of Wall Street

Summary: Was a film about Wall Street corruption and the unethical behavior of one of its biggest ne’er-do-wells really necessary? And what’s with all the full frontal nudity? Scorsese, we thought you were an artist.

It’s hard for me to not intentionally malign and abuse Leonardo DiCaprio’s name whenever I talk about his movies. Never has there been a more overrated and over appreciated name in the annals of Tinseltown.

Here is a perfect example of yet another DiCaprio film that will turn the heads of the Hollywood elite and force us to sit through yet another three hour glory fest of debasement, depravity and debauchery.

It amuses me to see that one bastion of poor behavior (Hollywood) chooses to take potshots at another cesspool (Wall Street). But then again, Hollywood has bitten the hand that feeds them more than once (Gordon Gekko ringing any bells here?)

I love it when Hollywood dishes out doses of morality in the form of movies like this that show the baser side of humanity and the greed and corruption prevalent in the lives of the rich and infamous. Of course no one ever bothers to shine the light on Hollywood types before they OD.

Here, DiCaprio plays Jordan Belfort in a story about the life and times of the Wall Street mogul who managed to bilk millions of investors out of their hard earned savings all while living the life of the brat playboy that one expects from monetary excess.

Belfort surrounded himself with others who wanted to share in that success. Men jumped at the chance to work with him, knowing well that they would reap the benefit of the trickle down effect that his wealth generating schemes would exploit.

The appeal of that life has limits, though. As outsiders, we can see the lack of morality in the goings on that include prostitutes, alcohol and a plethora of illegal substances that become a necessary stimulation to help these morons get through their days of picking the pockets of average citizenry.

Like any other profession, Wall Street does indeed have its pariahs, men who prey on the lives of others to expand their own financial portfolios. Men do not go to work on Wall Street to intentionally become paupers, but not all of them sell their souls to become slaves to the almighty dollar either. Belfort is just one example of the bad apples that just happen to get caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

The combination of DiCaprio and perennial uber-putz Jonah Hill were the ultimate distractions in credibility for this story. I couldn’t buy either of them in their respective roles in this supposed morality play. DiCaprio has also managed to hurt himself further in my opinion by continuing his rants against Wall Street depravity on the media circuit while promoting this movie.

Martin Scorsese is usually one of my favorite directors, but lately his obsession with using this younger passel of actors is waning thin for me. I would so much rather see him exposing and glorifying the mobsters that he has proven he can do so well in films like Goodfellas and Casino. His darker movies are so much more fun.

And what’s with the gratuitous use of full frontal female nudity that seems to pervade this movie? I realize that Scorcese’s intentionally trying for an R rating and that he’s exposing (pardon the pun) the utter depravity of the main character, but given some of the scenes, NC-17 (or X) might have been a more appropriate classification.

Was Belfort a cretin? Undoubtedly. Did he deserve his comeuppance? Absolutely. Did he deserve a Hollywood movie designed to extol the virtues (or lack thereof) of his lifestyle upon those who will never have the opportunity (thankfully) to be a part of his world where money smuggling and dwarf throwing are just part of the daily ritualistic fun?

Absolutely not. I give The Wolf of Wall Street 2 out of 5 stars.

What's your favorite DiCaprio/Scorsese collaboration?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • BernietheMovieGuy profile image

      Bernie Ment 3 years ago from Syracuse, NY

      How DiCrapio was even considered for an Oscar for this movie (and how this movie itself was even considered for an Oscar) just proves the vapidity of Hollywood to me.

    • BernietheMovieGuy profile image

      Bernie Ment 3 years ago from Syracuse, NY

      Interestingly enough, the use of colorful language wasn't the only thing that offended me, even though I personally found it unnecessary to tell the story. You're right, though, that other cultures would find similar language offensive and Scorsese and DiCrapio would probably be on some hitlist right now if they defamed Allah that way.

      I'm disappointed that Scorses felt the need to make this piece of cheese. He's usually a good director and spot on in his projects - even though most of the time, his characters swear more than they need to. You just expect that, though, from his mob characters yet even they use less colorfol language than DiCrapio did here. Thanks for the comment!

    • tsadjatko profile image

      TSAD 3 years ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

      As usual Bernie your review is right on, but I must qualify my comment with the fact that I have not seen the movie. Why? Because I heard from a reliable source that in this movie they broke the world record for its liberal use of expletives!

      The F word is used an average of every 21 seconds, 506 times, the S word 70 times, God's name was blasphemed 28 times .

      Do you think Muslims would allow Hollywood to use their prophet's name as a cuss word? They respect their prophet and they expect people to.

      So I'm going to pay Hollywood to blaspheme the name of Jesus? Not in my lifetime, not since I've come to know The Lord.

      Hollywood is nothing but a glorified pimp who provides for American clientele, actors who will take their cloths off and prostitute themselves for money.

    • BernietheMovieGuy profile image

      Bernie Ment 4 years ago from Syracuse, NY

      That was, bar none, their best collaborative effort, but I think the reason lies with who I feel was the true star of that movie - Daniel Day Lewis, who is just incredible in ANYTHING he touches. Thanks for the read!

    • Georgie Lowery profile image

      Georgianna Lowery 4 years ago from Lubbock, TX

      I probably won't see this. I didn't have much of a desire to before I read your review. I really don't now! I don't dislike Leo, but I could live without him. He's not one of my favorites. I chose Gangs of New York in your poll because I really did love that movie.