ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

9 Pokémon Types That Need To Be Introduced

Updated on September 28, 2019
akaRakxm profile image

I've been reading comics and watching cartoons for as long as I can remember. So yeah, I know a thing or two or three.

But...Why???

I know that it may seem odd to keep adding more and more types to the series, but since the original 15 types introduced in Generation I, we have only gotten 3 new types, despite having introduced over 600 new species.

Please keep in mind that these types are my own personal opinions, and they are in no particular order. Enjoy!

Bird

Of the 101 Flying-type Pokémon, 45 of them are birds. Of those 45 birds, 25 of them are Normal/Flying-types. Instead of having these Normal/Flying-types, why not just roll that combo into one simple type "Bird-type".

This new type would not only help to simplify a lot of Pokémon's typing, but also help differentiate in a way that is similar to the Bug and Dragon-typing. Additionally, it would help to mitigate some of the type weaknesses that Flying-types have that don't make sense for all Flying-types (i.e. Electric-type attacks).

Notable Examples:
Pidgey line - Bird
Fletchling line - Bird/Fire
Hawlucha - Bird/Fighting

Cyber

This type would have a bit more of an exclusive feel, similar to the Dragon-type, but would be almost guaranteed to be exclusively man-made Pokémon. Secondary typing would heavily influence the weaknesses, but the most likely overarching weakness would likely be Poison and Bug-types.

Like the Bird-type, Cyber-type could help to make some of those Electric/Steel-types fit into more type possibilities than they previously had.

Notable examples:
Porygon line: Cyber
Zygarde: Cyber/Dragon
Registeel: Cyber/Steel

Light

You can't have darkness without light, and for FAR too long, we have had Dark-type Pokémon, without the counterpart of Light-type. Even in the TCG, we were introduced to "Dark" Pokémon and "Light" Pokémon, which means that somebody at Game Freak knew what they were doing. While the Fairy-type could be argued to hold that Light role, I do feel that there should be a purely Light-Type.

An obvious issue that we run into immediately is the Dark vs Light-type and which overpowers the other. In my mind, the weakness of these two types would depend on if the Pokémon in question is attacking or being attacked. In the same way that darkness and light can affect the other in different ways, this would introduce a new game mechanic that would provide players with a more in-depth planning for the battle at hand.

Notable examples:
Mew: Light/Psychic
Mareep line: Electric/Light
Zeraora: Light/Electric

Cosmic

There are now quite a few Pokémon that have some sort of link to outer space, and depending on the source material (i.e. the anime, manga or games), the exact number of those Pokémon falls around 15 to 20, if we include the Ultra Beasts (which we will). With so many that could potentially fall into this new category of Pokémon, why not give them that typing to set them apart from the normies that we get back on Earth (or the Pokémon World?).

Cosmic-Types would have a clear advantage over Ground-Types, as they would have elements of both Psychic and Dark-Types, and would use this to keep themselves airborn (a la gravity control). Fire-Types would be a huge disadvantage, as the vacuum of space would extinguish any flames.

Notable examples:
Clefairy line: Fairy/Cosmic
Lunatone/Solrock: Rock/Cosmic
Elgyem line: Cosmic

Arcane

I don't mean arcane as in the mystical arts. I mean it like "mysterious or secret". You know, like the legendaries. Unlike most of the new Types I have introduced, this category (arguably) has the most potential candidates. With the now 71 known legendaries that are now in existance (and no, the Ultra Beasts don't technically fall into that category), that is more than the total number of Fire-Type Pokémon in existance! So, let's give them their own type, as they are so numerous. Hell, for the sake of this, we can even throw in the Pseudo-Legendaries like Dragonite, and some of the more mysterious Pokémon, like the Unown.

This type would have an overwhelming advantage over Normal-Types, as they are literally quite the opposite. The damage that Arcane-Types take from most basic elements would be far less than others, but they would meet a definitive disadvantage with other mythological Types (i.e. Dragon or Fairy-Types).

Notable examples:
Mewtwo: Psychic/Arcane
Arcanine: Fire/Arcane
Unown: Arcane

Magic

While this type may not have a whole lot of candidates, I would still say that there are enough to warrent having it. Arguably, many of those that currently fall into the Ghost-Type could easily find a place in this new type. The Pokémon that should be slated to fill this new Type would be those that distort reality to their whim, such as when Mismagius created a Cynthia clone. The possibilities are pretty astounding.

When it comes to advantages, Magic-Types would obviously overtake Normal-Types and most forms of the elemental Types, but they would fall short with the Psychic, Dark and Fairy-Types, as these already have their own brands of magic.

Notable examples:
Misdreavus line: Ghost/Magic
Jirachi: Magic/Steel
Hoopa: Magic

Food

Oh-kay, this one is a bit more....out there when it comes to types, and also VERY unlikely to every become legit, but hear me out! While there may only be a handful of Pokémon that look like food (i.e. Vanillite family), the people in the Pokémon World still need to eat something, right? And there is some debate on whether normal animals exist on their world. So....that leaves Pokémon to be eaten. Which means that somewhere along the line, there would have had to be some kind of law passed on what classifies as food or not (like it's okay to eat fish, but not a dog).

I mean...I can think of a large number of weaknesses this type would have; Fire, Ground, Bird (oh god, the seagulls in the Pokémon World can shoot water!!). This type, unlike most, would have weakness based entirely on the Pokémon's place in the food chain. Prime example, if Magikarp were a Food-Type, it would be at a disadvantage against say...a Fearow, or another type of Bird Pokémon. For obvious reasons, all Food-Types would be at a disadvantage to Snorlax.

Notable examples:
Vanillite line: Food/Ice
Pidove line: Food/Bird
Swirlix line: Food/Fairy

Sound

Sound is somewhat of a novelty in the Pokémon World. There are several Pokémon whose entire schtick is making noise (looking at you, Whismur family). The thing about it is, when used correctly, sound can be an effective weapon, or provide a sheild with the shockwaves. Even back between Gen 1 & Gen 2, when Pokégods were like a huge deal, there was one called Audior that was just a dinosaur that made loud noises. There is a potential goldmine of concepts that could be applied to this particular type.

Because we can't have an OP type again (DRAGON-TYPES), Sound-Types would have an advantage over Steel-Type (the vibrations would cause issue for the Pokémon), Rock-Type (see the previous parantheses), and Psychic-Types (loud noises make it hard to concentrate on f*ckery). The weakness of the Sound-Type would be Ground-Type (to bury it away), Electric-Type (cut off the power, and no more sound), and Dark-Type (in the dark, nobody can figure out where you are).

Notable examples:
Whismur line: Sound
Togepi line: Fairy/Sound (for those of you that disagree, please watch the anime)
Chimecho line: Sound

Multi

There have been Multi-Type Pokémon since literally Generation 1, but they've never had their own classification. By Multi-Type, I don't mean they have more than one Type, I mean that there are more than one entities involved in a single Pokémon. Like, when you take three Magnemites and smoosh em together and get a Magnaton. That sort of thing.

The biggest threat to the Multi-Type is Steel-Type, as a scalpel could tear these lovelies apart, and thus end that Multi-Type union. Multi-Types would have an advantage over Normal-Types, as their numbers could overwhelm their opponent.

Notable examples:
Magneton: Electric/Multi
Zweilous/Hydreigon: Dragon/Multi
Zygarde: Multi/Dragon

Final Thoughts

Well, there ya go. 9 new types. Maybe they're good. Maybe they're bullshit. What are your thoughts?

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Banana boy 

      5 weeks ago

      I wish I had a 5 in 1 art box

    • NightTerrorsYT profile image

      Katie Gillispie 

      5 weeks ago from Ohio

      Id love to see the cosmic!

    • poppyr profile image

      Poppy 

      4 months ago from Tokyo, Japan

      Interesting ideas. I definitely agree we need Light types. Cyber makes sense, especially with the examples you gave. Cool idea for an article!

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)